Skip to main content
Download PDF
/v1/supplement/title

Missed radiation therapy sessions in first three weeks predict distant metastasis and less favorable outcomes in surgically treated patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

Radiation Oncology volume 15, Article number: 194 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

We sought to investigate the prognostic impact of missed RT sessions in patients who had undergone surgery for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC).

Methods

The study sample consisted of 905 patients with surgically treated OCSCC who fulfilled criteria of RT course ≤8 weeks. The study participants were divided into three groups based on the characteristics of missed RT, as follows: 1) early missed RT, 2) late missed RT, and 3) RT as scheduled.

Results

The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates in the early missed RT, late missed RT, and RT as scheduled groups were 53.0, 58.1, and 64.5%, respectively (p = 0.046). In multivariate analysis, early missed RT was independently associated with both OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.486; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.122–1.966; p = 0.006) and the occurrence of distant metastasis (HR = 1.644; 95% CI: 1.047–2.583; p = 0.031).

Conclusion

Early missed RT was independently associated with a higher occurrence of distant metastasis and less favorable OS in patients who had undergone surgery for OCSCC.

Background

Malignancies of the oral cavity represent a major public health concern, with over 350,000 new yearly cases being diagnosed worldwide [1]. In Taiwan, oral cavity cancer accounts for approximately 70% of all newly diagnosed head and neck tumors [2] – with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) being the most common histological type. Radical surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for OCSCC. Patients carrying unfavorable pathological risk factors are also candidate to receive adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) – either with or without chemotherapy – in an effort to improve local and systemic control rates [3,4,5,6]. Adherence to the initially prescribed RT regimen is paramount to ensure optimal treatment outcomes, and deviations from the initial schedule may have adverse prognostic implications. In this context, published studies have shown that several variables related to the RT schedule – including length of radiation time, premature discontinuation of RT, and time to initiation of postoperative RT – predict prognosis in patients with head and neck malignancies [7,8,9,10,11,12].

The question as to whether missed RT sessions could be associated with clinical outcomes has received less attention [7], even in studies that focused on RT as definitive treatment in patients who did not undergo radical surgery [13,14,15]. We therefore designed the current retrospective study to specifically investigate this issue in a large series of patients with OCSCC who had previously undergone surgery. Missed sessions were analyzed in relation to their temporal occurrence during the RT course and examined with respect to overall survival (OS) and other outcomes of interest – including locoregional control (LRC) and freedom from distant metastasis (FFDM) rates.

Methods

Study patients

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 1058 adult patients with histology-proven OCSCC who received radical surgery and RT – either alone or in combination with chemotherapy – at the Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (Taoyuan City, Taiwan) between January 2005 and December 2012. All participants were restaged according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging Manual, Eighth Edition by an experienced radiation oncologist after reviewing medical records. The institutional tumor board performed central review of each new case. Before the routine use of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging (2009), staging was performed with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging along with abdominal ultrasound and bone scan. Currently, both MR and PET can be performed for staging purposes. As of 2009, tumor board routinely suggested a second PET scan (post-operative/pre-RT PET) prior to adjuvant treatment for high-risk patients (e.g., those presenting with extranodal spread) to detect early recurrences. Only patients who underwent surgery with curative intent (including neck dissection) and who received a radiation dose of 2 Gy per fraction were deemed eligible. Exclusion criteria were as follows: 1) history of second primary malignancies; 2) local, regional, or distant failure occurring during the course of RT; 3) total RT dose < 60 Gy or > 72 Gy; and 4) presence of distant recurrences identified on the second PET scan. Owing to the retrospective nature of the study, the need for informed consent was waived.

Treatment approach

Primary tumors were excised with ≥1 cm margins (both peripheral and deep margins). Patients with clinically positive nodal disease underwent level I–V neck dissections, whereas level I–III neck dissections were performed in presence of clinically negative nodes. The procedures for collection and classification of pathologic risk factors and the indications for adjuvant treatment have been previously described in detail [16, 17]. Patients received homogeneous treatment according to our institutional guidelines (Supplementary Table 1). All patients underwent postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) consisting of a conventional fractionated daily dose of 2 Gy per fraction, 5 days per week. A 6-MV photon beam was used to achieve a target total dose between 60 and 66 Gy. Suspicious FDG-avid lesions detected on PET imaging before the beginning of RT received a simultaneous integrated boost at a dose of 70–72 Gy [18]. The initial treatment volume comprised the primary tumor bed and the regional cervical nodes. PORT was performed using different techniques – including conventional two-dimensional RT, three-dimensional conformal RT, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). A conventional field arrangement generally included a bilateral opposing field and a low anterior portal – with the spinal cord being shielded upon delivering of a dose of 46 Gy or more. The dose delivered to the brain stem and spinal cord was limited to 54 Gy. Upon administration of 46–50 Gy, the irradiation area was reduced to include the tumor bed and metastatic nodes only. Concurrent chemotherapy was offered to patients harboring adverse prognostic factors [17]. Cisplatin – generally administered as a single dose of 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks or at a weekly dose of 40 mg/m2 – was the most commonly used chemotherapy agent [19, 20].

Definition of variables

The performance status was calculated with the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale. Cigarette smoking was dichotomized as yes (subjects who smoked ≥100 cigarettes in their lifetime) versus no (subjects who smoked < 100 cigarettes in their lifetime and who were not currently smoking) [21]. Alcohol consumption (current or former drinkers versus nondrinkers) and betel quid chewing (current or former chewers versus non-chewers) were also considered as dichotomous variables. Chemotherapy was dichotomized as yes (concurrent chemotherapy or chemotherapy administered in the 2 weeks preceding the start of RT) versus no. The Charlson Comorbidity Index [22] was used to categorize the presence of comorbidities as yes (score ≥ 1) versus no. Preoperative PET imaging was dichotomized as yes versus no.

Radiotherapy-related variables

Because a prolonged RT course is known to be associated with a less favorable OS [23], we solely focused on patients with a radiation treatment time (RTT) – defined as the time from the beginning to the end of RT – of less than 8 weeks. The treatment package time (TPT) was calculated from the date of surgery to the last RT session. The interval between surgery and RT was calculated from the date of surgery to the first RT session. For the purpose of analysis, the study participants were divided into three groups based on the characteristics of missed RT, as follows: 1) early missed RT (defined as having received < 14 fractions in the first 3 weeks), 2) late missed RT (defined as having received ≥14 fractions in the first 3 weeks but less than 29 fractions in the first 6 weeks), and 3) RT as scheduled (defined as having received ≥14 fractions in the first 3 weeks and ≥ 29 fractions in the first 6 weeks).

Definition of outcomes

OS – calculated as the time elapsed (in years) from the start of RT to the date of death – was the main outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included LRC and FFDM rates. LRC was defined as the time from the start of RT to the date of local or regional recurrence, whereas FFDM was the time elapsed from the start of RT to the date of diagnosis of distant metastases.

Data analysis

Intergroup differences in terms of continuous variables were assessed with the Student’s t-test, whereas the chi-square test was used for categorical data. Survival curves were plotted with the Kaplan-Meier method (log-rank test). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of OS, LRC, and FFDM rates. The following covariates were entered into the multivariate model: age, sex, pT, pN, tumor differentiation, TPT, pattern of missed RT sessions (early missed RT, late missed RT, RT as scheduled), cigarette smoking, betel quid chewing, alcohol consumption, presence of comorbidities, concurrent chemotherapy, and PET imaging. The results are expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In all analyses, two-tailed p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient characteristics

The median age of the 905 study participants was 50.8 years (range, 25.1–89.4 years) (Table 1). There were 37 (3.1%) patients who had pathological stage I − II disease, whereas 868 (95.9%) had stage III − IV disease. Pathological nodal metastases were identified in 409 patients (63.3%). PET/CT imaging was performed during the preoperative staging work-up in 442 (48.8%) study participants. Concurrent chemoradiation was administered to 505 (55.8%) patients. A total of 642 (70.9%) patients began PORT within 6 weeks of radical surgery, with 436 (48.2%) having a TPT ≤85 days. The median RTT was 47 days (range, 39–56 days). A total of 556 (61.4%) and 905 (100%) patients completed RT within 7 and 8 weeks of surgery, respectively.

Table 1 General characteristics of the study patients
Full size table

Missed radiation therapy sessions

There were 116, 341, and 448 patients in the early missed RT, late missed RT, and RT as scheduled groups, respectively. The reasons for early missed RT were as follows: operational causes (machine breakdown, public holidays; n = 69), treatment plan modifications because of physician’s decision (including re-simulation and re-optimization of the treatment plan due to modifications of the facial profile, physician’s discretion, missing of fixation cast or oral bite block; n = 13), patients taking leaves (unknown reasons; n = 34), frailty (hospital admissions, weight loss; n = 18), and mixed reasons (operational causes and other reasons; n = 32).

Survival outcomes

The median duration of follow-up was 6.1 years (range, 0.2–13.9 years), during which 451 (49.8%) patients died. The 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates in the entire study cohort were 71.1, 67.6, and 60.6%, respectively. The 5-year OS rates according to pathologic stage (AJCC Eight Edition Staging Manual) are shown in Fig. 1a. Kaplan-Meier survival plots of OS, FFDM, and LRCR according to the patterns of missed RT sessions (early missed RT, late missed RT, RT as scheduled) are depicted in Fig. 1b−d. The 5-year OS rates in patients with early missed RT, late missed RT, and RT as scheduled were 53.0, 58.1, and 64.5%, respectively. The 5-year OS rate of patients with early missed RT was significantly lower than of patients with RT as schedule (p = 0.021). The 5-year FFDM rates in patients with early missed RT, late missed RT, and RT as scheduled were 76.1, 84.3, and 82.2%, respectively. Patients with early missed RT had a significantly higher rate of distant metastasis when compared with patients with late missed RT (p = 0.048). Finally, the 5-year LRC rates in patients with early missed RT, late missed RT, and RT as scheduled were 70.1, 69.1, and 77.8%, respectively. Patients with late missed RT had a significantly lower local-regional control rate when compared with patients with RT as scheduled (p = 0.011).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Panel a: Kaplan-Meier plot of 5-year overall survival according to pathologic stage (AJCC Eight Edition Staging Manual; n = 905); panel b: Kaplan-Meier plot of overall survival in patients stratified into three groups based on the characteristics of missed radiation therapy; panel c: Kaplan-Meier plot of local-regional control in the study patients stratified into three groups based on the characteristics of missed radiation therapy; panel d: Kaplan-Meier plot of freedom from distant metastases in the study patients stratified into three groups based on the characteristics of missed radiation therapy

Full size image

Predictors of survival outcomes

Table 2 summarizes the results of univariate analysis of variables associated with 5-year OS, FFDM, and LRCR rates. In addition to other variables, early missed RT (versus RT as scheduled) was identified as a significant adverse predictor of OS. Moreover, early missed RT (versus late missed RT) was significantly associated with a less favorable FFDM. After allowance for potential confounders in multivariate analysis (Table 3), early missed RT (versus RT as scheduled) retained its independent adverse prognostic significance for OS (HR = 1.201; 95% CI: 0.978–1.474; p = 0.008). Notably, early missed RT (versus RT as scheduled) was also independently associated with a less favorable FFDM (HR = 1.644; 95% CI: 1.047–2.583; p = 0.031).

Table 2 Univariate analyses of freedom from distant metastases, locoregional control, and overall survival rates
Full size table
Table 3 Multivariate analyses of freedom from distant metastases, locoregional control, and overall survival rates
Full size table

Discussion

The present retrospective study demonstrates that early missed RT (versus RT as scheduled) was an independent adverse predictor of OS in a large cohort of patients with OCSCC enrolled in an endemic betel quid chewing area. Moreover, early missed RT was independently associated with a higher occurrence of distant metastasis. Notably, late missed RT was an independent adverse predictor of local-regional control but not of OS. Taken together, our results indicate that the prognostic significance of missed sessions varies in relation to the course of RT – with early missing being independently associated with a less favorable OS.

The clinical outcomes of our patients who completed RT as scheduled were in line with those reported in previous studies [24, 25]. Conversely, growing evidence indicates that deviations from originally scheduled RT plans predict poor outcomes in patients with solid malignancies [26, 27]. A prolonged TPT has been previously associated with less favorable survival figures in head and neck malignancies [25]. A TPT > 85 days and an interval from surgery to RT initiation > 6 weeks have been related to an increased likelihood of locoregional recurrences [25, 28]. An RTT > 8 weeks was found to predict poor OS rates and a higher risk of local and distant recurrences [29] in different solid neoplasms [7, 12, 30]. Another report identified a prolonged TPT as an adverse predictor of cancer-specific survival and FFDM in patients with locally advanced laryngeal cancer [31].

Based on the available literature, it remains difficult to identify the most useful parameter for RT treatment gaps in relation to clinical outcomes. By taking advantage of a large clinical cohort of OCSCC patients treated in a homogenous manner, we deliberately used a different approach to this problem. Specifically, we investigated the prognostic impact of missed sessions according to their temporal occurrence during the course of RT. Notably, all of our patients did not have a total package time > 85 days and the time interval between surgery and RT initiation was well-balanced in the three study groups. Our findings indicate that early missed – but not late missed – RT sessions have an adverse impact on OS. Late missed RT sessions were associated with a less favorable local-regional control. While early missed sessions may exert a significant detrimental effect on survival possibly through an increased risk of distant metastases, only a trend was observed for late missed sessions. The association between early missed RT sessions and an increased occurrence of distant metastasis may be explained by the precocious effects elicited by radiation on target tissues – including alterations in immune response, cytokine signaling, and gene expression levels [32,33,34]. An escape of the tumor from such early effects may favor disease progression, which could account for the unfavorable prognostic significance attributable to early missed RT both in terms of OS and distant metastases. The RT-induced tissue effects elicited by initial sessions seem therefore to have a paramount prognostic significance, although the molecular underpinnings underlying this phenomenon deserve further scrutiny.

The reasons for missing RT sessions can depend on the patient (e.g., avoidance of adverse events, lack of adherence) or other factors (e.g., national holidays, machine breakdown). In general, early missed RT sessions are unlikely to be caused by treatment toxicity – whose onset generally occurs following at least 3 weeks of treatment [35]. Our current data highlight the importance of compensatory strategies when unexpected deviations from the original RT plan occur. Strategies to achieve this goal include 1) the delivery of compensatory RT sessions on weekends aimed at preserving the originally planned treatment duration, total dose, and dose per fraction, 2) an increased number of daily fractions (e.g., deliver of two fractions on Fridays with an interval of 6 h between fractions) and 3) an increased dose per fraction [36].

Our findings need to be interpreted in the context of some limitations. First, the retrospective nature of our investigation is inherently subjected to selection biases and recall biases. Second, we cannot rule out residual confounding effects due to unmeasured variables. Additionally, this is a single-institution study that may have limited external validity because it was conducted in betel quid chewing endemic area. Findings from single-center investigations are not necessarily generalizable to all patients with OCSCC because of different institutional practices and disparate patient populations. Independent confirmation of our findings is necessary before drawing more definitive conclusions.

These caveats notwithstanding, our current data indicate that early missed RT was independently associated with less favorable outcomes in patients with OCSCC who had previously undergone surgery. Efforts to maximize early adherence to RT can ultimately improve prognosis in this patient group.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset on which the study is based are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

OCSCC:

oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

OS:

overall survival

LRC:

locoregional control

FFDM:

freedom from distant metastasis

PORT:

postoperative radiotherapy

3DCRT:

three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy

IMRT:

intensity-modulated radiation therapy

VMAT:

volumetric-modulated arc therapy

RTT:

radiation treatment time

TPT:

treatment package time

HR:

hazard ratio

CI:

confidence interval

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bureau of Health Promotion DoH, the Executive Yuan. Taiwan Cancer registry annual report, 2015, Taiwan. https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/List.aspx?nodeid=269.

  3. Yao M, Chang K, Funk GF, Lu H, Tan H, Wacha J, et al. The failure patterns of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiotherapy-the university of Iowa experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67(5):1332–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blanchard P, Baujat B, Holostenco V, Bourredjem A, Baey C, Bourhis J, et al. Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): a comprehensive analysis by tumour site. Radiotherapy Oncol. 2011;100(1):33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ooishi M, Motegi A, Kawashima M, Arahira S, Zenda S, Nakamura N, et al. Patterns of failure after postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced and recurrent head and neck cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016;46(10):919–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Daly ME, Le QT, Kozak MM, Maxim PG, Murphy JD, Hsu A, et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: patterns of failure and predictors of local control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;80(5):1412–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Suwinski R, Sowa A, Rutkowski T, Wydmanski J, Tarnawski R, Maciejewski B. Time factor in postoperative radiotherapy: a multivariate locoregional control analysis in 868 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;56(2):399–412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Su NW, Liu CJ, Leu YS, Lee JC, Chen YJ, Chang YF. Prolonged radiation time and low nadir hemoglobin during postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy are both poor prognostic factors with synergistic effect on locally advanced head and neck cancer patients. OncoTargets Therapy. 2015;8:251–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lazarev S, Gupta V, Ghiassi-Nejad Z, Miles B, Scarborough B, Misiukiewicz KJ, et al. Premature discontinuation of curative radiation therapy: insights from head and neck irradiation. Advances Radiation Oncol. 2018;3(1):62–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Harris JP, Chen MM, Orosco RK, Sirjani D, Divi V, Hara W. Association of Survival with Shorter Time to radiation therapy after surgery for US patients with head and neck Cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol-- Head Neck Surg. 2018;144(4):349–59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Graboyes EM, Garrett-Mayer E, Ellis MA, Sharma AK, Wahlquist AE, Lentsch EJ, et al. Effect of time to initiation of postoperative radiation therapy on survival in surgically managed head and neck cancer. Cancer. 2017;123(24):4841–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheng YJ, Tsai MH, Chiang CJ, Tsai ST, Liu TW, Lou PJ, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy after curative surgery for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma and treatment effect of timing and duration on outcome-A Taiwan Cancer Registry national database analysis [published online ahead of print, 2018 Jun 14]. Cancer Med. 2018;7(7):3073–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1611.

  13. Robertson AG, Robertson C, Perone C, Clarke K, Dewar J, Elia MH, et al. Effect of gap length and position on results of treatment of cancer of the larynx in Scotland by radiotherapy: a linear quadratic analysis. Radiotherapy Oncol. 1998;48(2):165–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Skladowski K, Law MG, Maciejewski B, Steel GG. Planned and unplanned gaps in radiotherapy: the importance of gap position and gap duration. Radiotherapy Oncol. 1994;30(2):109–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tarnawski R, Fowler J, Skladowski K, Świerniak A, Suwiński R, Maciejewski B, et al. How fast is repopulation of tumor cells during the treatment gap? International journal of radiation oncology, biology. Physics. 2002;54(1):229–36.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liao C-T, Lin C-Y, Fan K-H, Wang H-M. The optimal treatment modality for Taiwan Oral cavity Cancer patients-experience of a medical center. J Cancer Res Practice. 2015;2(2):103–16 https://doi.org/10.6323/JCRP.2015.2.2.01.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liao C-T, Lee L-Y, Hsueh C, Lin C-Y, Fan K-H, Wang H-M, et al. Pathological risk factors stratification in pN3b oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: focus on the number of positive nodes and extranodal extension. Oral Oncol. 2018;86:188–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kang CJ, Lin CY, Yang LY, Ho TY, Lee LY, Fan KH, et al. Positive clinical impact of an additional PET/CT scan before adjuvant radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. J Nuclear Med. 2015;56(1):22–30 https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.145300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tsan D-L, Lin C-Y, Kang C-J, Huang S-F, Fan K-H, Liao C-T, et al. The comparison between weekly and three-weekly cisplatin delivered concurrently with radiotherapy for patients with postoperative high-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Radiat Oncol. 2012;7(1):215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang HM, Liao CT, Chang TC, Chen JS, Liaw CC, Chen IH, et al. Biweekly paclitaxel, cisplatin, tegafur, and leucovorin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer. 2004;101(8):1818–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nguyen KH, Marshall L, Brown S, Neff L. State-specific prevalence of current cigarette smoking and smokeless tobacco use among adults - United States, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(39):1045–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Graboyes EM, Kompelli AR, Neskey DM, Brennan E, Nguyen S, Sterba KR, et al. Association of Treatment Delays with Survival for patients with head and neck Cancer: a systematic review. JAMA Otolaryngol-- Head Neck Surg. 2019;145(2):166–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Cooper JS, Zhang Q, Pajak TF, Forastiere AA, Jacobs J, Saxman SB, et al. Long-term follow-up of the RTOG 9501/intergroup phase III trial: postoperative concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy in high-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;84(5):1198–205.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Rosenthal DI, Mohamed ASR, Garden AS, Morrison WH, El-Naggar AK, Kamal M, et al. Final report of a prospective randomized trial to evaluate the dose-response relationship for postoperative radiation therapy and pathologic risk groups in patients with head and neck Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;98(5):1002–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Yao JJ, Zhang F, Gao TS, et al. Survival impact of radiotherapy interruption in nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era: a big-data intelligence platform-based analysis. Radiother Oncol. 2019;132:178–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gonzalez Ferreira JA, Jaen Olasolo J, Azinovic I, Jeremic B. Effect of radiotherapy delay in overall treatment time on local control and survival in head and neck cancer: review of the literature. Reports Practical Oncol Radiotherapy. 2015;20(5):328–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ang KK, Trotti A, Brown BW, Garden AS, Foote RL, Morrison WH, et al. Randomized trial addressing risk features and time factors of surgery plus radiotherapy in advanced head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;51(3):571–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Soyfer V, Geva R, Michelson M, Inbar M, Shacham-Shmueli E, Corn BW. The impact of overall radiotherapy treatment time and delay in initiation of radiotherapy on local control and distant metastases in gastric cancer. Radiation Oncol (London, England). 2014;9:81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shaikh T, Handorf EA, Murphy CT, Mehra R, Ridge JA, Galloway TJ. The impact of radiation treatment time on survival in patients with head and neck Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;96(5):967–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Suzuki H, Terada H, Hanai N, Nishikawa D, Koide Y, Beppu S, et al. Treatment package time predicts cancer-specific survival and distant metastasis in laryngeal cancer. Oncol Lett. 2019;17(1):1384–90 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9664.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sundahl N, Duprez F, Ost P, De Neve W, Mareel M. Effects of radiation on the metastatic process. Mol Med. 2018;24(1):16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Hosseini H, Obradović MMS, Hoffmann M, Harper KL, Sosa MS, Werner-Klein M, et al. Early dissemination seeds metastasis in breast cancer. Nature. 2016;540(1476-4687 (Electronic)):552–8.

  34. Castano Z, San Juan BP, Spiegel A, Pant A, DeCristo MJ, Laszewski T, et al. IL-1beta inflammatory response driven by primary breast cancer prevents metastasis-initiating cell colonization. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20(9):1084–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. van der Laan HP, Bijl HP, Steenbakkers RJ, van der Schaaf A, Chouvalova O, Vemer-van den Hoek JG, et al. Acute symptoms during the course of head and neck radiotherapy or chemoradiation are strong predictors of late dysphagia. Radiotherapy Oncol 2015;115(1):56–62.

  36. Bese NS, Hendry J, Jeremic B. Effects of prolongation of overall treatment time due to unplanned interruptions during radiotherapy of different tumor sites and practical methods for compensation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68(3):654–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank all members of the Cancer Center (Chang Gung Memorial Hospital) for their invaluable support.

Funding

This study was financially supported by grants (BMRP 238, CMRPG3H1221, and CMRPG3H1851) from the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton and Radiation Therapy Center, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan

    Yin-Yin Chiang, Yung-Chih Chou, Yao-Yu Wu, Wing-Keen Yap, Ping-Ching Pai, Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang, Chien-Yu Lin, Kang-Hsing Fan, Bing-Shen Huang, Tsung-Min Hung & Ngan-Ming Tsang

  2. Department of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan

    Kai-Ping Chang & Chun-Ta Liao

  3. College of Medicine Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

    Kai-Ping Chang & Chun-Ta Liao

  4. Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

    Kai-Ping Chang & Chun-Ta Liao

  5. School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

    Ngan-Ming Tsang

  6. Department of Radiation Oncology, Fangliao General Hospital, No. 139, Zhongshan Rd., Fangliao Township, Pingtung County, 940, Taiwan

    Ngan-Ming Tsang

  7. Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Lin-Kou, School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chang Gung University, No. 5 Fu-Hsing Street, Kwei-Shan, Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan

    Ngan-Ming Tsang

Authors
  1. Yin-Yin Chiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yung-Chih Chou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kai-Ping Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chun-Ta Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yao-Yu Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wing-Keen Yap
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ping-Ching Pai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Chien-Yu Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Kang-Hsing Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Bing-Shen Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Tsung-Min Hung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Ngan-Ming Tsang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CYY: data collection and interpretation, manuscript drafting; TNM: study concept, design, and supervision; CKP and LCT: critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; CYC: data analysis and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; WYY and YWK: statistical calculations and data interpretation; PPC, CJTC, LCY, FKH, HBS, and HTM: data collection and interpretation. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ngan-Ming Tsang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was granted ethical approval (No. 201601077B0) by the Institutional Review Board of the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Lin-Kou.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Guidelines for postoperative treatment of oral cavity cancer in our institution.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chiang, YY., Chou, YC., Chang, KP. et al. Missed radiation therapy sessions in first three weeks predict distant metastasis and less favorable outcomes in surgically treated patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Radiat Oncol 15, 194 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01632-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01632-1

Keywords