Skip to main content

Aptamers: a novel targeted theranostic platform for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma


Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an extremely challenging disease with a high mortality rate and a short overall survival time. The poor prognosis can be explained by aggressive tumor growth, late diagnosis, and therapy resistance. Consistent efforts have been made focusing on early tumor detection and novel drug development. Various strategies aim at increasing target specificity or local enrichment of chemotherapeutics as well as imaging agents in tumor tissue. Aptamers have the potential to provide early detection and permit anti-cancer therapy with significantly reduced side effects. These molecules are in-vitro selected single-stranded oligonucleotides that form stable three-dimensional structures. They are capable of binding to a variety of molecular targets with high affinity and specificity. Several properties such as high binding affinity, the in vitro chemical process of selection, a variety of chemical modifications of molecular platforms for diverse function, non-immunoreactivity, modification of bioavailability, and manipulation of pharmacokinetics make aptamers attractive targets compared to conventional cell-specific ligands. To explore the potential of aptamers for early diagnosis and targeted therapy of PDAC - as single agents and in combination with radiotherapy - we summarize the generation process of aptamers and their application as biosensors, biomarker detection tools, targeted imaging tracers, and drug-delivery carriers. We are furthermore discussing the current implementation aptamers in clinical trials, their limitations and possible future utilization.


Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most fatal cancers burdened with a five-year overall survival below 9% [1]. In 2018, 2.5% of the newly diagnosed cancer cases and 4.5% of all cancer-related deaths worldwide were attributed to PDAC [2]. A diagnosis at late disease stages, the lack of biomarkers for screening, early metastatic dissemination, and ultimately the resistance to systemic therapies account for the dismal prognosis of PDAC [3]. Only 20% of patients harbor resectable cancer at the time of diagnosis [4]. For 80% of patients with metastatic PDAC, the current treatment options are modified (m) FOLFIRINOX (folic acid, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) or a combination of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with good performance status and gemcitabine with or without a second agent for those with a poor performance status [5]. Even for the fittest patients, who tolerate the most effective evidence-based treatment regimen FOLFIRINOX, the median overall survival time is only 11 months [6]. Furthermore, targeted therapies in advanced pancreatic cancer do not show significant improvement in survival [7]. Therefore, it is crucial to uncover novel and reliable biomarkers/probes for early diagnosis and surveillance. In addition, there is an urgent need to develop targeted imaging agents and drug delivery systems to improve PDAC prognosis.

Aptamers have the potential to overcome difficulties of clinical diagnosis and treatment in PDAC. These molecules are small oligonucleotide sequences that serve as ligands to target molecules such as proteins, bacteria, viruses, or cells. Due to their advantages of higher tissue penetration, rapid production, low synthesis cost, less immunogenicity, thermal stability, and ease of labeling [8], aptamers are gaining popularity as target vehicles in cancer-theranostics. Modified aptamers tagged with labeling agents function as sensitive biosensors or targeted imaging tracers. As the selection and generation can be accomplished without structural knowledge of the target molecule, aptamers can also serve as a tool to discover novel biomarkers [9]. Although they were initially conceived and designed as inhibitors, a rising number of studies reports functionally targeted agent delivery systems employing aptamers [10]. Thus, aptamers emerge as promising tools for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.

Since 1990, Systematic Evolution of Ligands by EXponential enrichment (SELEX) became the method of choice for generating aptamers [11]. In order to optimize that process and synthesize aptamers more reliably and efficiently, several improvements regarding binding conditions, library design, type of target, selection platform, and immobilization matrix were introduced [12]. Nowadays, with the rapid development of computer technology, the aptamer-target interactions can be predicted without affinity experiments. This allows more time- and cost-efficient selection and characterization of candidate oligonucleotides [13]. In addition to the SELEX technology, dimerization/conjugation of some aptamers increases the binding affinity and fine-tunes the target specificity, which maximizes the possibilities of various aptamer applications in the future [14].

Aptamers as aptasensors in PDAC

Aptamers have been used as ligands for the detection step of noninvasive diagnostic assessments, such as ELISA and other immunoassays, which are usually applied for analyzing biomarkers in blood samples. These new aptamer-based assays, termed “aptasensors” can be designed to integrate readout methods, such as chemiluminescence (CL), electro-chemoluminescence (ECL), fluorescence, surface plasmon resonance (SPR), surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), etc. [15,16,17], to improve detection of existing biomarkers. Compared to traditional techniques, the unique features of aptamers, including ease of synthesis, quick turn-over time, low cost, high sensitivity, and stability under different conditions, render aptasensors a very promising alternative so that they may soon replace antibody-based assays.

Carbohydrate antigen 19–9 (CA 19–9), the only routinely used serum marker of PDAC, can specifically be bound by an aptamer, which has been identified using a trypsin-enhanced SELEX method. Although the dissociation constant (Kd) value of 20.05 ± 3.02 nM showes that this aptasensor has a high affinity to CA 19–9, it has not been prospectively validated as aptasensor in biological fluids [18]. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), another clinically established biomarker that improves the accuracy of PDAC diagnostics significantly [19], can be traced by different kinds of aptasensors [20]. Xiang and colleagues reported aptamer-based biosensors for CEA detection [21]. The performance of this aptasensor was greatly optimized and improved through the combination with nanocarriers, such as graphene, metal nanoparticles, quantum dots, etc. [20, 22]. Aptamer-based biosensors were tested for CEA measurement and showed a good selectivity, excellent stability, biocompatibility and affinity [23]. Interleukin-6 (IL-6), a major mediator of inflammation, is reported to be a diagnostic biomarker or a prognostic indicator of survival in patients with pancreatic cancer [24]. Zhuang and coworkers presented an IL-6 aptamer-based nanosensor for rapid (< 10 min), highly sensitive and specific detection of IL-6 with enhanced stability [25]. Mihaela and colleagues reported an IL-6-targeted electrochemical aptasensor based on pyrrole and gold nanoparticles, which showed high specificity and sensitivity [26]. Metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9), another potential biomarker for diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of pancreatic cancer [27], is involved in several important processes of carcinogenesis, including invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis [28]. Scarano and coworkers developed a piezoelectric biosensor with implementation of two different aptamers in a sandwich-like approach for real-time measurement of MMP-9 [29].

Most of the other potential protein-based biomarkers for early PDAC detection, including cell migration-inducing hyaluronan binding protein (CEMIP), C4b-binding protein α-chain (C4BPA), insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 2 (IGFBP2), insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 (IGFBP3), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-8 (IL-8), interleukin-10 (IL-10), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 (MIC-1) [30], could theoretically be targeted by aptamers, too. Due to a lack of large prospective clinical trials, aptamer-based biosensors directed against potential tumor biomarkers are currently only established for VEGF, a key player of angiogenesis and metastasis formation in various cancer entities [31]. VEGF aptasensors show equivalent sensing properties to VEGF antibodies and represent promising future tools of clinical diagnostics [32]. Serum tested aptasensors for the detection of established and potential PDAC biomarkers are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 PDAC related aptasensors for biomarkers detection

Aptamers for the detection of circulating cancer cells (CTCs) and novel PDAC biomarkers

The identification of promising predictive PDAC biomarkers remains challenging. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are single or clustered cells that loose connection to the tumor bulk and can be detected in the bloodstream. They are important biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of early and metastatic cancer [36]. Thus, sensitive techniques for CTC detection would be crucial for early diagnosis, prognosis prediction, and for monitoring treatment response via noninvasive liquid biopsies. Utilizing blind cell SELEX methods, aptamers targeting cancer cell surface structures can be enriched efficiently even without knowledge of the protein expression profile of CTCs. After several rounds of positive and negative selection, aptamers are amplified, sequenced and subjected to protein mass spectrometry to identify the detailed target structure [9]. On one hand this strategy promotes the generation of specific aptamers for detection and therapeutic targeting of cancer cells, on the other hand it facilitates the discovery of novel CTC-based biomarkers.

To date, several aptamer-based biosensors have been designed to identify and quantify various CTCs with detection limits as low as one single cell [37]. In PDAC, Dua and colleagues established an RNA aptamer (SQ-2) that recognizes pancreatic cancer cells with very high specificity. In the SELEX process they used Panc-1 and Capan-1 cells for positive selection and normal human pancreatic ductal epithelial (HPDE) cells for negative selection. After sequencing the winning aptamer, they identified alkaline phosphatase placental-like 2 (ALPPL-2), an oncofetal protein, as the target of SQ-2 [38]. Mechanistic exploration of ALPPL-2 revealed its involvement in pancreatic cancer cell growth and invasion. Based on the expression of ALPPL-2 on the cell surface and as a soluble factor in the circulation, the authors also developed a sandwich-aptamer-linked immobilized sorbent assay (ALISAs) targeting ALPPL-2-positive extracellular vehicles (EVs) with high sensitivity and specificity. In conclusion, SQ-2 is a possible targeted probe for serum- and cell-based diagnostics, and ALPPL-2 appears to be a promising future biomarker for PDAC [39].

Wu and co-workers used SELEX to generate a DNA-aptamer called XQ-2d and successfully identified CD71 (transferring receptor 1) as the molecular target for cell-specific aptamer binding [40]. Other groups developed novel PDAC-cell-targeted aptamers, such as PL8, aptamer 1, and aptamer 146 [41, 42]. Even though the exact targets of those aptamers have not been identified yet, these molecules have the potential to detect CTCs. Remarkably, Kim and colleagues performed SELEX while targeting stemness-enriched PDAC cancer cells. As a result, the novel aptamer 1 and aptamer 146 were generated, which might be future candidates for the detection of cancer stem cells (CSCs) [43].

Apart from intact PDAC cells the secretomes of PDAC cells as well as PDAC tissues, were used for the SELEX process. White et al. described an in-vitro positive/negative selection strategy to identify a cyclophilin B RNA-aptamer (M9–5) that detects structural differences between the secretome of pancreatic cancer and non-cancerous cells. M9–5 has the ability to discriminate sera from PDAC-patients and healthy volunteers with high specificity and sensitivity [44, 45]. Another aptamer (BC-15), which was selected against human PDAC tissue, but not adjacent normal tissue showed a high affinity for CTCs isolated from pancreatic cancer patients. Compared to the well-established anti-cytokeratin antibody-based method, the BC-15 aptamer-based method showed similar efficacy for the identification of CTCs. Interestingly, the BC-15 aptamer exemplifies the potential to generate a particular patient-specific aptamer using individual tumor tissue as target [46]. Future applications of these personalized aptamers include precise molecular targeting or surveillance of therapeutic response.

Aptamer-based targeted imaging of PDAC

Aptamer-based targeted imaging is one of the most promising molecular imaging technologies for PDAC diagnosis, accurate staging, and the monitoring of treatment response. Compared to conventional imaging protocols, aptamer-based targeted imaging employs tumor-specific, labeled aptamers to explore biological targets in living subjects. This method harbors the following advantages: i) early detection is much easier to achieve due to amplified imaging via aptamers targeting PDAC markers; ii) aptamers that specifically target PDAC biomarkers have the potential to differentiate between malignant and benign diseases; iii) more accurate imaging helps to evaluate precise staging of PDAC and improves surgical guidance for complete tumor resection and lymph node clearance; iv) aptamers support the detection of biological characteristics of PDAC patients for clinical decision making and prognostic prediction, which can be evaluated without biopsies [47].

A few aptamer-based, PDAC-targeted imaging approaches have been evaluated in-vitro and in-vivo (Table 2, Fig. 1). Wang and co-workers generated a DNA-aptamer (Ap52) against the shared tumor-specific MAGE-A3111–125 peptide antigen. Signals of the Cy3-conjugated aptamer were specifically localized on the surface of cancer cells from seven different entities, including pancreatic cancer. These in-vitro results suggest that Ap52 may have potential for future molecular imaging [49]. In a xenograft mouse model the fluorescein-labeled aptamer XQ-2d targeting CD71 and the aptamer AP1153 targeting G-protein-coupled cholecystokinin B receptor (CCKBR) accumulated particularly in PDAC tumors [40]. Therefore, these Cy-3-labeled aptamers are promising candidates for PDAC diagnostics.

Table 2 PDAC related diagnostic aptamers
Fig. 1

Application areas of aptamers in PDAC. Aptamers, can specifically bind target molecules and owing to their combinatorial properties for the incorporation of therapeutics and diagnostics agents, can be used as targeted theranostic (therapeutics plus diagnostics) in PDAC. a By specifically binding to the extracellular domain of the receptor, aptamers can work as competitive inhibitors and block cancer-related signaling in target cells. b Instead of nucleosides, nucleoside analogs, including gemcitabine and 5-FU, can be incorporated into aptamers. These nucleoside analog coupled aptamers can be specifically internalized and act as anti-proliferative agents. c Different kinds of oligonucleotides, including anti-miRNAs, ASOs, miRNAs, and siRNAs, can be incorporated into aptamers. These oligonucleotides coupled aptamers can function in targeted gene therapy in PDAC. d Aptamers can be incorporated into several multimodal drug delivery systems as carriers for targeted therapy and targeted imaging. e By integrating different readout methods, aptamers can be used as biosensors to detect defined biomarkers, CTCs and CSCs using aptamer-based ELISA methods. f Aptamers can be incorporated with different contrast agents to increase the sensitivity and precision of cancer detection by targeted molecular imaging. (Abbreviations: Anti-miRNAs: microRNAs inhibitors; ASOs, antisense oligonucleotides; miRNA: microRNAs; siRNA: short interfering RNAs; CTCs: cancer stem cells; CSCs: circulating tumor cells; ELISA: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay)

Although there are no fluorophore-labeled aptamers available for clinical applications, human tumor tissue sections have been used to determine the performance of aptamer-based imaging in PDAC patient samples. Targeting PDAC cells with Cy-3-coupled P19/P1 aptamers was employed as a diagnostic tool on archival human pancreatic duodenectomy tissue sections. Scoring patterns from 72 patients revealed a positive correlation between high fluorescence signal intensity and significantly increased mortality [55]. Thus, aptamer-based, PDAC-targeted imaging seems to allow prognostic prediction.

Besides fluorescence imaging, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is another option for PDAC-targeted molecular imaging utilizing metal-oxide-labeled aptamers. Recently, a novel matrix metalloproteinase 14 (MMP14)-targeted aptamer (M17) conjugated with polyethylene glycol-Fe3O4 was synthesized. This molecule can specifically bind to pancreatic cancer cells in vitro and hereby reduce MRI T2-weighted imaging signal intensity [51]. As a result, this novel molecular-targeted MRI approach bears potential for PDAC diagnostics.

Aptamer-based, molecular-targeted therapy of PDAC

In the past two decades several antibody-based, molecular-targeted therapies were implemented for the treatment of different hematologic and solid malignancies. Unfortunately, no antibody-based targeted therapy has yet been successful in improving the prognosis of PDAC patients [7]. Similar to antibodies, aptamers recognize and bind targets of interest, but they provide numerous advantages. Aptamers are small and they can be easily modified and linked to diverse nanoparticle systems for multi-functionalization. Other intrinsic features include their short production time, fully chemical synthesis, lower costs of manufacturing, no batch-to-batch variability, and better thermal stability.

Several aptamers were identified for possible treatment strategies in PDAC (Table 3). Kim and colleagues generated a 2′-fluoropyrimidine-modified RNA-aptamer (P12FR2) directed against pancreatic adenocarcinoma up-regulated factor (PAUF), a novel secretory protein overexpressed in pancreatic cancer. P12FR2 aptamers inhibited PAUF-induced migration of PANC-1 cells in vitro and decreased tumor growth by 60% in a PDAC xenograft mouse model without causing relevant weight loss in treated mice [50]. Another aptamer (P15) selected by blind PDAC cell SELEX showed significant inhibition of metastasis formation in an in-vitro assay. P15 achieves this effect by targeting the intermediate filament vimentin, an intracellular epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) tumor cell marker, which is highly expressed as a mislocalized protein on the surface of pancreatic cancer cells [53]. Moreover, chemically modified aptamers against two immune checkpoint proteins, Programmed Death 1 (PD-1) and Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) have been generated. These PD-1- and PD-L1-aptamers could mimic antibody functions in different in-vitro assays [52]. Hence, aptamers have the potential to function as antagonists or inhibitors of crucial oncogenic pathways due to their convincing therapeutic performance in preclinical PDAC models.

Table 3 PDAC related therapeutic aptamers and aptamers-based drug delivery systems

Oligonucleotides, such as microRNAs (miRNAs), miRNA inhibitors (anti-miRs), antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), and short interfering RNAs (siRNAs), have been shown to potently silence the expression of their target genes. However, one of the most significant obstacles for oligonucleotide-based therapeutic strategies is the lack of specific delivery to the tumor [10]. Aptamers can recognize distinct molecules or structures on cancer cells and get endocytosed quickly upon binding. These intrinsic properties of aptamers provide a chemically modifiable option of targeted oligonucleotide delivery in the form of novel aptamer-oligonucleotide conjugates. In order to explore the performance of aptamer-oligonucleotide conjugates in PDAC therapy, small activating RNA against CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-a (C/EBPa-saRNA) was conjugated to PDAC cell-targeted aptamers. These novel agents inhibited cell proliferation in vitro and significantly reduced tumor growth in an advanced PDAC mouse model [54, 55]. Thus, aptamer-based targeted delivery of oligonucleotides has potential therapeutic effects in advanced PDAC.

Nucleoside analogs are a class of drugs that are of special interest for aptamer-based targeted treatment. Due to the similar structure of nucleoside analogs and natural nucleosides, they can be incorporated into aptamers rather easily. Partha Ray et al. utilized a nuclease resistant RNA-aptamer that binds EGFR on pancreatic cancer cells and is subsequently internalized in order to deliver gemcitabine-containing polymers into EGFR-expressing cells, which inhibited cell proliferation in vitro [56]. Dua et al. produced an alkaline phosphatase placental-like 2 (ALPPL2) targeted RNA aptamer (SQ2) and coupled five repeats of 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine (5FdU) to the 3′-end. Hence, one aptamer can deliver five monomer units of the drug, while the phosphorothioate backbone ensures that the drug is not cleaved extracellularly by the action of serum nucleases [65]. Yoon and co-workers developed a PDAC targeted RNA-aptamer (P19), which was enriched with gemcitabine or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). They used gemcitabine triphosphate (dFdCTP) or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) triphosphate (5FdUTP) to replace cytidine triphosphate (CTP) or uridine triphosphate (UTP) during RNA-aptamer synthesis. These aptamer-drug conjugates (ApDCs) did not only significantly inhibit cell proliferation in PANC-1 cells, but also inhibited cell proliferation in the gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer cell line AsPC-1 [66]. Coincidentally, Park and colleagues created an aptamer called APTA-12 by single substitution of a guanine residue with a gemcitabine phosphoramidite at position 14 of the AS1411. APTA-12 notably inhibited the growth of pancreatic cancer models in vitro and in vivo [63]. Thus, the gemcitabine- or 5-FU-incorporated aptamers represent attractive tools for cancer cell-specific chemotherapeutic drug delivery in PDAC.

The original AS1411 aptamer mentioned above is a 26-nucleotide guanosine-rich DNA-aptamer with high affinity and specificity to nucleolin, a cell-surface receptor overexpressed in cancer cells. Because AS1411 has not only proven anti-cancer effects in models of various cancer entities, but is also an enhancer of cellular uptake, it is frequently used for the generation of aptamer-based drug delivery systems [57]. According to expectations, it was reported that an increased loading density of AS1411 on gold nanostars (AuNS) rises the quantity of AS1411 delivered into pancreatic cancer cells, which finally results in substantial pancreatic cancer cell death [61]. Lale et al. developed a dual-targeted, pH-sensitive, biocompatible polymeric nano-system conjugated with doxorubicin. This dual approach with folate and the AS1411 aptamer successfully increased the cancer-targeting efficiency of the nanoparticles resulting in a higher payload of doxorubicin in PDAC cell lines [64]. Also, the herb-derived compound triptolide (TP) can also increase anti-tumor activity in vitro and in vivo when coupled to an AS1411-linked polymeric nanocarrier [69]. These studies open new perspectives for overcoming drug resistance of pancreatic cancer.

CD71 (transferrin receptor) and EGFR are also commonly used targets in aptamer-guided therapy of PDAC. Several groups loaded doxorubicin, monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), or monomethyl auristatin F (MMAF) to CD71- or EGFR-targeted aptamers, respectively [58, 70]. Their ability to dampen the proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells makes these aptamers attractive options for delivery of toxic substances specifically into PDAC cells.

Aptamers in clinical trials

Since pegaptanib, an RNA-aptamer directed against VEGF165, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an anti-angiogenic treatment for neovascular (wet), age-related, macular degeneration (AMD) in 2004, an increasing number of aptamers have successfully entered clinical trials. Until now, three aptamers have entered phase III. The protagonists are Pegnivacogin (RB006), a direct factor IXa inhibitor; E10030, an anti-platelet-derived growth factor (anti-PDGF-B) aptamer; and Zimura, a complement factor C5-inhibitor [59].

So far, NOX-A12 is the only aptamer undergoing a clinical trial for pancreatic cancer [8]. NOX-A12 is an RNA-aptamer that targets CXCL12 (C-X-C Chemokine Ligand 12), a key chemokine protein involved in tumor cell proliferation, the formation of new blood vessels and metastasis. As a novel CXCL12 inhibitor, NOX-A12 was found to be safe and well-tolerated by 28 patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in a phase 2a study (NCT01521533) [62]. Twenty patients with metastatic microsatellite-stable (MSS) colorectal or pancreatic cancer were recruited in the Opera study (NCT03168139) to evaluate the efficacy of NOX-A12 plus pembrolizumab (PD-1 antibody) treatment. The results demonstrated that 25% of patients achieved stable disease and 35% of patients showed a prolonged survial time on treatment in comparison to the prior line of therapy. The safety profile of the combination therapy was consistent with that of pembrolizumab alone in advanced cancer patients. Therefore, NOX-A12 displayed both safety and therapeutic potential in combination with pembrolizumab. More clinical trials are needed to explore the efficacy of several more aptamers in PDAC treatment [67].

Aptamers in combination with radiation therapy

In order to improve the therapeutic outcome of clinical PDAC treatment, it seems inevitable to design novel strategies that combine different treatment modalities aiming at achieving synergism [60]. However, the improved efficacy of combined systemic therapies often comes at the costs of severe side effects. Accordingly, local therapies move into the focus of combined modality settings. Radiotherapy is a longstanding and essential component of multimodal cancer treatment [60]. For many solid tumor entities, combination regimens of chemo- and radiotherapy represent the standard of care (e.g., locally advanced head and neck cancers or glioblastoma) [71]. However, for the treatment of PDAC, radiotherapy is rather infrequently applied, because the majority of patients present in disseminated disease stages, and PDAC is well known for its high degree of radioresistance [72]. Aptamers represent versatile tools to bypass this radioresistance due to their high target specificity, straightforward synthesis, stability in different conditions and body fluids and the abundant spectrum of possible modifications as described in the previous sections.

Three strategies for the combination of aptamers and ionizing radiation can be found in the literature. The first strategy uses aptamers, which exhibit radiosensitizing properties per se without any further conjugation since binding to their designated targets interferes with radioresistance signaling (Fig. 2a). This was successfully shown in a glioblastoma (GBM) cell model, where the EGFRvIII-specific DNA-aptamer increased the radiosensitivity of EGFRvIII-expressing U87 cells, besides inhibition of proliferation, migration, and invasion [73]. The authors speculated that increased radiosensitivity with U2 treatment in GBM cells might occur through decreasing the ATP supply and inhibiting the signaling molecules in the common pathways induced by EGFRvIII and MET and thus inhibition of the DNA damage response.

Fig. 2

Different strategies of aptamer-based combined modality approach with radiotherapy. Aptamers specifically bind to the target structures (e.g. EGFR, PSMA, MUC-1, nucleolin, etc.), endocytosed and released in the cytoplasm following lysosomal degradation (a) Aptamer-binding to designated target interferes with radio-resistance signaling and sensitize radiotherapy. b Several radiosensitizers, such as metal formulations, siRNAs and nucleoside analogs can be coupled with aptamers for targeted delivery into cancer cells to sensitize radiotherapy. c Therapeutic radionuclides can be incorporated into aptamers for targeted radiotherapy. d These aptamers (re-)activate systemic anti-tumor immune responses by targeting immune checkpoint activation related receptors, enable antitumoral immunity and possible abscopal effects

The second radiosensitizing strategy utilizes aptamers as vehicles for radiosensitizing compounds (Fig. 2b). This group of aptamers can be subdivided according to the nature of their modification into aptamers which (i) deliver metal (nano-)formulations, (ii) incorporate molecules targeting the DNA damage response (DDR), and (iii) transport chemotherapeutics.

Aptamers with metal (nano-)formulations

Aptamers of this group enforce the biological effects of radiation by physical dose enhancement via photoelectrons, Auger electrons, and secondary electrons that are generated from irradiated metal particles [74] (Fig. 2b left panel). This, in turn, leads to an increase in the levels of free radicals in tumor cells and enforced DNA damage. One example of aptamers in this group is the already mentioned AS1411 aptamer against cell surface nucleolin. A gold nanocluster conjugate of the AS1411 aptamer enhanced the efficacy of radiation therapy in breast tumor-bearing mice. Importantly, the authors reported a specific enrichment of the radiosensitizing gold nanoclusters in the breast tumors and a significant increase in the mean survival times of the animals [75]. Analogously, the combination of silver nanoparticles with polyethylene glycol (PEG)-functionalized AS1411 aptamer improved the outcome of radiation therapy in preclinical glioma models. Significantly prolonged median survival times were shown in animals undergoing the combined aptamer radiotherapy protocol vs. aptamer treatment alone [76]. Apart from metal formulations, the anti-MUC1 aptamer was conjugated to the radiosensitizer 1,10 phenanthroline for in-vitro radiosensitization of breast cancer cells, although the actual radiosensitizing potential of this complex has not yet been fully proven [77]. None of those mentioned above approaches used a preclinical PDAC model. Nevertheless, since the AS1411 aptamer has been shown to potently bind to PDAC cells in other studies, and since MUC1 is expressed in PDAC cells as well [78], metal (nano) formulations of both the AS1411- and the anti-MUC1- aptamer could potentially be used as radiosensitizers for pancreatic cancer.

Aptamers with molecules targeting components of the DDR

Aptamers in this category enhance the biological effectiveness of radiotherapy by their conjugation to substances that interfere with the DNA damage response (e.g., siRNAs targeting crucial DDR regulators, Fig. 2b middle panel). This treatment strategy was successfully reported in an approach with targeted administration of DNA-PK silencing siRNA by aptamer-siRNA chimeras against prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in experimental models of prostate cancer. Upon aptamer treatment, an increase in radiation-induced cytotoxicity (based on specific DNA-PK knockdown) was achieved in vitro in a PSMA-positive prostate cancer cell line. The subsequent in-vivo evaluation with xenotransplants showed a PSMA-specific, significant delay in tumor growth upon the combination of aptamer treatment and radiotherapy with 6 Gy, which was not observed without irradiation or in non-PSMA expressing tumors, respectively [79, 80]. These data further strengthen the PSMA- and therefore tumor-specific nature of aptamer-mediated radiosensitization and underline the attractiveness of this approach in combination with local radiotherapy. Since PSMA expression has also been shown in PDAC [81], PSMA targeting aptamers in combination with radiotherapy may represent an exciting option for PDAC treatment and should be investigated in more detail.

An example of combining several of the mentioned aptamer strategies in one molecule is the AuNP-NUAP-STAT3d aptamer, which is targeted against nucleolin and is conjugated with gold nanoparticles and a STAT3 antagonizing decoy payload, again emphasizing the easy-to-modify nature of aptamers. The AuNP-NUAP-STAT3d aptamer was described to potently radiosensitize head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cells by combining tumor-specific radical-amplifying gold nanoclusters and tumor-specific inhibition of STAT3 signaling [82].

Targeted delivery of chemotherapeutics

As a third approach of aptamer-based radiosensitization, target-specific radiochemotherapy regimens that combine aptamers with chemotherapeutic agents are currently being investigated (Fig. 2b right panel). As already described, pyrimidine analogs, such as 5-FU and gemcitabine, can directly be integrated into the molecular structure of aptamers thereby optimizing therapeutic drug delivery. Analogously, aptamers were also modified for the delivery of therapeutic radionuclides (Fig. 2c). However, the latter approach is currently explored mainly for diagnostic, but not for therapeutic purposes [83]. The only therapeutic approach that has been reported so far is the combination of PEGylated liposomes loaded with the α-particle emitter 225Ac and with anti-PSMA aptamer A10 for the experimental treatment of prostate cancer models [84]. Apart from anti-PSMA aptamer A10 labeled α-particle emitter 225Ac loaded PEGylated liposomes, anti-PSMA antibody labeled ones were also generated for evaluation of their selectivity, internalization potential and killing efficacy. The results showed that the antibody was more efficient than the aptamer in terms of cytotoxicity and lethal dose values [84]. However, the comparison between antibodies and aptamers does not consider the distinction between affinity and avidity. Moreover, this difference could be explained by the double number of antibodies on the surface of the liposome compared to the number of aptamers. Each antibody has two binding sites, whereas one aptamer only has one binding site. Based on the calculation from de Almeida and colleagues for this case, antibody labeled liposomes owned 4 times higher binding capacity, but showed 1.5–1.7 times lower lethal dose values compared to aptamer labeled liposomes [83]. Thus, aptamer could be equal or better than the antibody as a delivery agent.

The third strategy is a very complex approach which made use of aptamers that were modified to (re-)activate anti-tumor immune responses (Fig. 2d). In a breast cancer mouse model, irradiation-induced upregulation of VEGF was instrumentalized to enable tumor-specific enrichment of a dual-modified aptamer against VEGF and costimulatory 4-1BB T cell antigen. The aptamer showed similar efficacy with regards to tumor control as compared to conventional, stimulatory 4-1BB antibodies, but – due to its tumor-specific delivery – relevantly less toxicity. Notably, systemic immune responses were (re-)activated, resulting in the control of distant metastatic tumor lesions outside the irradiation field. These findings underline the potential of tumor stroma-targeted aptamers to modulate anti-tumor immune mechanisms in combination with radiation [85, 86].

Although aptamers in combination with radiation therapy are rarely explored in pancreatic cancer, the strategies we summarized above provide us promising approaches to sensitize radiotherapy in several cancers. Considering the high degree of radioresistance in PDAC, these aptamer-based radiosensitizing treatments supply us with novel ideas to decrease its radioresistance and maybe improve the prognosis in the future, especially regarding the emerging new technical possibilities of image-guided irradiation (e.g. MR-Linac).

Conclusion and perspectives

As described in this review, aptamers are very useful tools and have several applications in the diagnosis and therapy of pancreatic cancer. Unique features including ease of synthesis, high sensitivity and specificity and stability in different conditions, render aptasensors an interesting choice for the detection of biomarkers, CTCs, and CSCs. Additionally, aptamer-based biosensors represent ideal noninvasive devices for PDAC diagnosis even in early tumor stages. With help of the blind SELEX method, aptamers are able to identify novel biomarkers from cancer cells, secretomes, membranes or tissues, which can stimulate novel ideas for screening attempts and new hypotheses for mechanistic studies. Aptamer-based in-vivo imaging is an excellent way to obtain comprehensive images and molecular information without invasive biopsies. Data from aptamer-enhanced technologies will support clinical decision making and enhance the quality of precise prognostic prediction. Importantly, as aptamers can exert several ways of action, they are attractive tools for targeted therapy of PDAC, alone or in combination with standard approaches, such as radiotherapy. Aptamers can work as inhibitors and drug carriers. Their excellent performance in targeted inhibition renders them competitive alternatives to antibodies. Diverse aptamer-based drug delivery systems with incorporated nucleoside analogs, oligonucleotides, and other drugs allow aptamers to guide targeted chemotherapy or RNA interference into PDAC cells.

However, the application of aptamers has some limitations. Significant problems include degradation in blood and high renal excretion [87], although the molecules can be modified to increase plasma half-life. For RNA-aptamers, which are usually degraded by nucleases in biological media, modifications of 3′- and 5′-ends provide resistance to exonucleases, and modifications on 2′-position protect against endonucleases [88]. In order to prolong aptamer circulation in the bloodstream, conjugation with polyethylene glycol (PEG) is a commonly used strategy that increases the half-life of PEG-conjugated aptamers up to several days [89].

With the development and advancement of aptamers, these molecules are becoming an attractive platform for translational applications. To make the best use of aptamers, future directions should focus on aptamer-based biosensors and aptamer-based, targeted drug-delivery systems – particularly systems for nucleoside analogue and oligonucleotide delivery for combined modality treatment approaches.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.





5-Fluorouracil triphosphate




Silver nanoclusters


Aptamer-linked immobilized sorbent assay


Alkaline phosphatase placental-like 2


Age-related macular degeneration


miRNA inhibitors


Aptamer-drug conjugates


Antisense oligonucleotides


Gold nanoparticles


Gold nanostars


CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-a


C4b-binding protein α -chain

CA 19–9:

Carbohydrate antigen 19–9


G-protein-coupled cholecystokinin B receptor


Cadmium sulfide-graphene


Carcinoembryonic antigen


Cell migration-inducing hyaluronan binding protein




Cancer stem cells


Circulating tumor cells


Cytidine triphosphate


C-X-C chemokine ligand 12


DNA-damage response


Gemcitabine triphosphate


Electro chemiluminescence


Epidermal growth factor receptor


Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay


Epithelial-mesenchymal transition


Extracellular vehicles


Food and drug administration


Folic acid, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin




Graphene field effect transistor


Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma


Heat shock protein 70


Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein




Linear dynamic range


Limit of detection


Macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1




Monomethyl auristatin E


Monomethyl auristatin F


Matrix metalloproteinase


Magnetic resonance imaging




Pancreatic adenocarcinoma up-regulated factor


Polymerase chain reaction


Programmed death 1


Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma


Programmed death ligand 1


Polyethylene glycol


Prostate-specific membrane antigen


Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment


Surface-enhanced raman spectroscopy


Short interfering RNAs


Surface plasmon resonance


STAT3 antagonizing decoy oligonucleotide




Uridine triphosphate


Vascular endothelial growth factor


  1. 1.

    Rawla P, Sunkara T, Gaduputi V. Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer: global trends, etiology and risk factors. World J Oncol. 2019;10:10–27.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kamisawa T, Wood LD, Itoi T, et al. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2016;388:73–85.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Du T, Bill KA, Ford J, et al. The diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer: A comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography with pancreas protocol. Am J Surg. 2018;215:472–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Singh RR, EMJD O’R. New treatment strategies for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Drugs. 2020;80:647–69.

  6. 6.

    Uson Junior PLS, Rother ET, Maluf FC, et al. Meta-analysis of modified folfirinox regimens for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018;17:187–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ottaiano A, Capozzi M, De Divitiis C, et al. Gemcitabine mono-therapy versus gemcitabine plus targeted therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized phase iii trials. Acta Oncol. 2017;56:377–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kaur H, Bruno JG, Kumar A, et al. Aptamers in the therapeutics and diagnostics pipelines. Theranostics. 2018;8:4016–32.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Xiong H, Yan J, Cai S, et al. Cancer protein biomarker discovery based on nucleic acid aptamers. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;132:190–202.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Nuzzo S, Roscigno G, Affinito A, et al. Potential and challenges of aptamers as specific carriers of therapeutic oligonucleotides for precision medicine in cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11.

  11. 11.

    Tuerk C, LJs G. Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment: Rna ligands to bacteriophage t4 DNA polymerase. Science. 1990;249:505–10.

  12. 12.

    Komarova N, Kuznetsov A. Inside the black box: what makes selex better? Molecules. 2019;24.

  13. 13.

    Gong S, Wang Y, Wang Z, et al. Computational methods for modeling aptamers and designing riboswitches. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18.

  14. 14.

    Maimaitiyiming Y, Hong F, Yang C, et al. Novel insights into the role of aptamers in the fight against cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019;145:797–810.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Munzar JD, Ng A, Juncker D. Duplexed aptamers: history, design, theory, and application to biosensing. Chem Soc Rev. 2019;48:1390–419.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ghorbani F, Abbaszadeh H, Dolatabadi JEN, et al. Application of various optical and electrochemical aptasensors for detection of human prostate specific antigen: A review. Biosens Bioelectron. 2019;142:111484.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Yousefi M, Dehghani S, Nosrati R, et al. Aptasensors as a new sensing technology developed for the detection of muc1 mucin: A review. Biosens Bioelectron. 2019;130:1–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Gu L, Yan W, Liu S, et al. Trypsin enhances aptamer screening: A novel method for targeting proteins. Anal Biochem. 2018;561–562:89–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Meng Q, Shi S, Liang C, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen in pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther. 2017;10:4591–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Khanmohammadi A, Aghaie A, Vahedi E, et al. Electrochemical biosensors for the detection of lung cancer biomarkers: A review. Talanta. 2020;206:120251.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Xiang W, Lv Q, Shi H, et al. Aptamer-based biosensor for detecting carcinoembryonic antigen. Talanta. 2020;214:120716.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Tang Z, ZJMA M. Ultrasensitive amperometric immunoassay for carcinoembryonic antigens by using a glassy carbon electrode coated with a polydopamine-pb (ii) redox system and a chitosan-gold nanocomposite. Microchim Acta. 2017;184:1135–42.

  23. 23.

    Huang JY, Zhao L, Lei W, et al. A high-sensitivity electrochemical aptasensor of carcinoembryonic antigen based on graphene quantum dots-ionic liquid-nafion nanomatrix and dnazyme-assisted signal amplification strategy. Biosens Bioelectron. 2018;99:28–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Vainer N, Dehlendorff C, JSJO J. Systematic literature review of il-6 as a biomarker or treatment target in patients with gastric, bile duct, pancreatic and colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2018;9:29820.

  25. 25.

    Hao Z, Pan Y, Huang C, et al. Sensitive detection of lung cancer biomarkers using an aptameric graphene-based nanosensor with enhanced stability. Biomed Microdevices. 2019;21:65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Tertiş M, Ciui B, Suciu M, et al. Label-free electrochemical aptasensor based on gold and polypyrrole nanoparticles for interleukin 6 detection. Electrochim Acta. 2017;258:1208–18.

  27. 27.

    Mroczko B, Lukaszewicz-Zajac M, Wereszczynska-Siemiatkowska U, et al. Clinical significance of the measurements of serum matrix metalloproteinase-9 and its inhibitor (tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1) in patients with pancreatic cancer: Metalloproteinase-9 as an independent prognostic factor. Pancreas. 2009;38:613–8.

  28. 28.

    Mondal S, Adhikari N, Banerjee S, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (mmp-9) and its inhibitors in cancer: A minireview. Eur J Med Chem. 2020;194:112260.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Scarano S, Dausse E, Crispo F, et al. Design of a dual aptamer-based recognition strategy for human matrix metalloproteinase 9 protein by piezoelectric biosensors. Anal Chim Acta. 2015;897:1–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kunovsky L, Tesarikova P, Kala Z, et al. The use of biomarkers in early diagnostics of pancreatic cancer. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;2018:5389820.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ferrara N, Gerber H-P, JJNm LC. The biology of vegf and its receptors. Nat Med. 2003;9:669–76.

  32. 32.

    Dehghani S, Nosrati R, Yousefi M, et al. Aptamer-based biosensors and nanosensors for the detection of vascular endothelial growth factor (vegf): A review. Biosens Bioelectron. 2018;110:23–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Khosravi F, Loeian SM, Panchapakesan B. Ultrasensitive label-free sensing of il-6 based on pase functionalized carbon nanotube micro-arrays with rna-aptamers as molecular recognition elements. Biosensors (Basel). 2017;7.

  34. 34.

    Freeman R, Girsh J, Jou AF, et al. Optical aptasensors for the analysis of the vascular endothelial growth factor (vegf). Anal Chem. 2012;84:6192–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Zhao S, Yang W, RYJB L, et al. A folding-based electrochemical aptasensor for detection of vascular endothelial growth factor in human whole blood. Biosens Bioelectron. 2011;26:2442–7.

  36. 36.

    Sundling KE, ACJAiap L. Circulating tumor cells: Overview and opportunities in cytology. Adv Anat Pathol. 2019;26:56–63.

  37. 37.

    Safarpour H, Dehghani S, Nosrati R, et al. Optical and electrochemical-based nano-aptasensing approaches for the detection of circulating tumor cells (ctcs). Biosens Bioelectron. 2020;148:111833.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Dua P, Kang HS, Hong SM, et al. Alkaline phosphatase alppl-2 is a novel pancreatic carcinoma-associated protein. Cancer Res. 2013;73:1934–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Shin HS, Jung SB, Park S, et al. Alppl2 is a potential diagnostic biomarker for pancreatic cancer-derived extracellular vesicles. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2019;15:204–10.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Wu X, Zhao Z, Bai H, et al. DNA aptamer selected against pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma for in vivo imaging and clinical tissue recognition. Theranostics. 2015;5:985–94.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Champanhac C, Teng IT, Cansiz S, et al. Development of a panel of DNA aptamers with high affinity for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Sci Rep. 2015;5:16788.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Kim YJ, Lee HS, Jung DE, et al. The DNA aptamer binds stemness-enriched cancer cells in pancreatic cancer. J Mol Recognit. 2017;30.

  43. 43.

    Mitra A, Mishra L, Li SJO. Emt, ctcs and cscs in tumor relapse and drug-resistance. Oncotarget. 2015;6:10697.

  44. 44.

    Ray P, Sullenger BA, White RR. Further characterization of the target of a potential aptamer biomarker for pancreatic cancer: Cyclophilin b and its posttranslational modifications. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2013;23:435–42.

  45. 45.

    Ray P, Rialon-Guevara KL, Veras E, et al. Comparing human pancreatic cell secretomes by in vitro aptamer selection identifies cyclophilin b as a candidate pancreatic cancer biomarker. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:1734–41.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Zhang J, Li S, Liu F, et al. Selex aptamer used as a probe to detect circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood of pancreatic cancer patients. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0121920.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Tummers WS, Willmann JK, Bonsing BA, et al. Advances in diagnostic and intraoperative molecular imaging of pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 2018;47:675–89.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Amouzadeh Tabrizi M, Shamsipur M, Farzin L. A high sensitive electrochemical aptasensor for the determination of vegf(165) in serum of lung cancer patient. Biosens Bioelectron. 2015;74:764–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Wang CY, Lin BL, Chen CH. An aptamer targeting shared tumor-specific peptide antigen of mage-a3 in multiple cancers. Int J Cancer. 2016;138:918–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kim YH, Sung HJ, Kim S, et al. An rna aptamer that specifically binds pancreatic adenocarcinoma up-regulated factor inhibits migration and growth of pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2011;313:76–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Huang X, Zhong J, Ren J, et al. A DNA aptamer recognizing mmp14 for in vivo and in vitro imaging identified by cell-selex. Oncol Lett. 2019;18:265–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Wang H, Lam CH, Li X, et al. Selection of pd1/pd-l1 x-aptamers. Biochimie. 2018;145:125–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Yoon S, Armstrong B, Habib N, et al. Blind selex approach identifies rna aptamers that regulate emt and inhibit metastasis. Mol Cancer Res. 2017;15:811–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Yoon S, Huang KW, Andrikakou P, et al. Targeted delivery of c/ebpalpha-sarna by rna aptamers shows anti-tumor effects in a mouse model of advanced pdac. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2019;18:142–54.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Yoon S, Huang KW, Reebye V, et al. Targeted delivery of c/ebpalpha -sarna by pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma-specific rna aptamers inhibits tumor growth in vivo. Mol Ther. 2016;24:1106–16.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Ray P, Cheek MA, Sharaf ML, et al. Aptamer-mediated delivery of chemotherapy to pancreatic cancer cells. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2012;22:295–305.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Yazdian-Robati R, Bayat P, Oroojalian F, et al. Therapeutic applications of as1411 aptamer, an update review. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;155:1420-31.

  58. 58.

    Porciani D, Tedeschi L, Marchetti L, et al. Aptamer-mediated codelivery of doxorubicin and nf-kappab decoy enhances chemosensitivity of pancreatic tumor cells. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2015;4:e235.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Catuogno S, Esposito CL. Aptamer cell-based selection: overview and advances. Biomedicines. 2017;5.

  60. 60.

    Vokes EE. Combined modality therapy of solid tumours. Lancet. 1997;349(Suppl 2):Sii4–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Dam DH, Lee RC, Odom TW. Improved in vitro efficacy of gold nanoconstructs by increased loading of g-quadruplex aptamer. Nano Lett. 2014;14:2843–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Ludwig H, Weisel K, Petrucci MT, et al. Olaptesed pegol, an anti-cxcl12/sdf-1 spiegelmer, alone and with bortezomib-dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: A phase iia study. Leukemia. 2017;31:997–1000.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Park JY, Cho YL, Chae JR, et al. Gemcitabine-incorporated g-quadruplex aptamer for targeted drug delivery into pancreas cancer. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2018;12:543–53.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Lale SV, GA R, Aravind A, et al. As1411 aptamer and folic acid functionalized ph-responsive atrp fabricated ppegma-pcl-ppegma polymeric nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery in cancer therapy. Biomacromolecules. 2014;15:1737–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Dua P, Kim S, et al. Alppl2 aptamer-mediated targeted delivery of 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine to pancreatic cancer. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2015;25:180–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Yoon S, Huang KW, Reebye V, et al. Aptamer-drug conjugates of active metabolites of nucleoside analogs and cytotoxic agents inhibit pancreatic tumor cell growth. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2017;6:80–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Halama N, Prüfer U, Froemming A, et al. Phase i/ii study with cxcl12 inhibitor nox-a12 and pembrolizumab in patients with microsatellite-stable, metastatic colorectal or pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 2019;30.

  68. 68.

    Wu J, Wang C, Li X, et al. Identification, characterization and application of a g-quadruplex structured DNA aptamer against cancer biomarker protein anterior gradient homolog 2. PLoS One. 2012;7:e46393.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Wang C, Liu B, Xu X, et al. Toward targeted therapy in chemotherapy-resistant pancreatic cancer with a smart triptolide nanomedicine. Oncotarget. 2016;7:8360.

  70. 70.

    Kratschmer C, Levy M. Targeted delivery of auristatin-modified toxins to pancreatic cancer using aptamers. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2018;10:227–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Hennequin C, Guillerm S, Quero L. Combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy: A thirty years evolution. Cancer Radiother. 2019;23:662–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Orth M, Metzger P, Gerum S, et al. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: biological hallmarks, current status, and future perspectives of combined modality treatment approaches. Radiat Oncol. 2019;14:141.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Zhang X, Peng L, Liang Z, et al. Effects of aptamer to u87-egfrviii cells on the proliferation, radiosensitivity, and radiotherapy of glioblastoma cells. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2018;10:438–49.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Liu Y, Zhang P, Li F, et al. Metal-based nanoenhancers for future radiotherapy: Radiosensitizing and synergistic effects on tumor cells. Theranostics. 2018;8:1824–49.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Ghahremani F, Kefayat A, Shahbazi-Gahrouei D, et al. As1411 aptamer-targeted gold nanoclusters effect on the enhancement of radiation therapy efficacy in breast tumor-bearing mice. Nanomedicine. 2018;13:2563–78.

  76. 76.

    Zhao J, Liu P, Ma J, et al. Enhancement of radiosensitization by silver nanoparticles functionalized with polyethylene glycol and aptamer as1411 for glioma irradiation therapy. Int J Nanomedicine. 2019;14:9483–96.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Alves LN, Missailidis S, Lage CAS, et al. Anti-muc1 aptamer as carrier tool of the potential radiosensitizer 1,10 phenanthroline in mcf-7 breast cancer cells. Anticancer Res. 2019;39:1859–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Burdick MD, Harris A, Reid CJ, et al. Oligosaccharides expressed on muc1 produced by pancreatic and colon tumor cell lines. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:24198–202.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Ni X, Zhang Y, Ribas J, et al. Prostate-targeted radiosensitization via aptamer-shrna chimeras in human tumor xenografts. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:2383–90.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Ni X, Zhang Y, Zennami K, et al. Systemic administration and targeted radiosensitization via chemically synthetic aptamer-sirna chimeras in human tumor xenografts. Mol Cancer Ther. 2015;14:2797–804.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Ren H, Zhang H, Wang X, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen as a marker of pancreatic cancer cells. Med Oncol. 2014;31:857.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Zhang S, Gupta S, Fitzgerald TJ, et al. Dual radiosensitization and anti-stat3 anti-proliferative strategy based on delivery of gold nanoparticle - oligonucleotide nanoconstructs to head and neck cancer cells. Nanotheranostics. 2018;2:1–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    de Almeida CEB, Alves LN, Rocha HF, et al. Aptamer delivery of sirna, radiopharmaceutics and chemotherapy agents in cancer. Int J Pharm. 2017;525:334–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Bandekar A, Zhu C, Jindal R, et al. Anti-prostate-specific membrane antigen liposomes loaded with 225ac for potential targeted antivascular alpha-particle therapy of cancer. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:107–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Schrand B, Verma B, Levay A, et al. Radiation-induced enhancement of antitumor t-cell immunity by vegf-targeted 4-1bb costimulation. Cancer Res. 2017;77:1310–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Benaduce AP, Brenneman R, Schrand B, et al. 4-1bb aptamer-based immunomodulation enhances the therapeutic index of radiation therapy in murine tumor models. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;96:458–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Lakhin A, Tarantul V, LJAN G. Aptamers: Problems, solutions and prospects. Acta Naturae. 2013;5:34-43.

  88. 88.

    Ni S, Yao H, Wang L, et al. Chemical modifications of nucleic acid aptamers for therapeutic purposes. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18.

  89. 89.

    Chandola C, Neerathilingam M. Aptamers for targeted delivery: current challenges and future opportunities role of novel drug delivery vehicles in nanobiomedicine: IntechOpen; 2019;126:67-75.

  90. 90.

    Guo C, Su F, Song Y, et al. Aptamer-templated silver nanoclusters embedded in zirconium metal-organic framework for bifunctional electrochemical and spr aptasensors toward carcinoembryonic antigen. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:41188–99.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Wang D, Li Y, Lin Z, et al. Surface-enhanced electrochemiluminescence of ru@sio2 for ultrasensitive detection of carcinoembryonic antigen. Anal Chem. 2015;87:5966–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Shi GF, Cao JT, Zhang JJ, et al. Aptasensor based on tripetalous cadmium sulfide-graphene electrochemiluminescence for the detection of carcinoembryonic antigen. Analyst. 2014;139:5827–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Wu X, Liu H, Han D, et al. Elucidation and structural modeling of cd71 as a molecular target for cell-specific aptamer binding. J Am Chem Soc. 2019;141:10760–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Clawson GA, Abraham T, Pan W, et al. A cholecystokinin b receptor-specific DNA aptamer for targeting pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2017;27:23–35.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    He X, Chen X, Liu L, et al. Sequentially triggered nanoparticles with tumor penetration and intelligent drug release for pancreatic cancer therapy. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2018;5:1701070.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.

Authors' information (Optional)

Not applicable.


This work was supported by the PePPP center of excellence MV ESF/14-BM-A55–0045/16; ESF MV-630-S-150-2012/132/133); DFG SFB-1321 (Project P14, 329628492), Förderprogramm für Forschung unf Lehre (FöFoLe, Reg. Nr. 1028) and Friedrich-Baur-Stiftung (Reg. Nr. 42/17).

Author information




All authors contributed to the conception and drafting of the manuscript and have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to J. Mayerle or U. M. Mahajan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors disclose no conflicts.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Q., Maier, S.H., Li, P. et al. Aptamers: a novel targeted theranostic platform for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Radiat Oncol 15, 189 (2020).

Download citation


  • Pancreatic adenocarcinoma
  • Aptamers
  • Theranostics
  • Targeted imaging
  • Targeted therapy
  • Radiation therapy