Skip to main content

Advertisement

Predictive model of the first failure pattern in patients receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy for inoperable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC)

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze patterns of failure in patients with LA-NSCLC who received definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and to build a nomogram for predicting the failure patterns in this population of patients.

Materials and methods

Clinicopathological data of patients with LA-NSCLC who received definitive chemoradiotherapy and follow-up between 2013 and 2016 in our hospital were collected. The endpoint was the first failure after definitive chemoradiotherapy. With using elastic net regression and 5-fold nested cross-validation, the optimal model with better generalization ability was selected. Based on the selected model and corresponding features, a nomogram prediction model was built. This model was also validated by ROC curves, calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

With a median follow-up of 28 months, 100 patients experienced failure. There were 46 and 54 patients who experience local failure and distant failure, respectively. Predictive model including 9 factors (smoking, pathology, location, EGFR mutation, age, tumor diameter, clinical N stage, consolidation chemotherapy and radiation dose) was finally built with the best performance. The average area under the ROC curve (AUC) with 5-fold nested cross-validation was 0.719, which was better than any factors alone. The calibration curve revealed a satisfactory consistency between the predicted distant failure rates and the actual observations. DCA showed most of the threshold probabilities in this model were with good net benefits.

Conclusion

Clinicopathological factors could collaboratively predict failure patterns in patients with LA-NSCLC who are receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy. A nomogram was built and validated based on these factors, showing a potential predictive value in clinical practice.

Introduction

According to the latest NCCN guidelines, definitive chemoradiotherapy is the main recommended treatment for unresectable LA-NSCLC [1]. Due to the excellent result of the PACIFIC trial [2], an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) was recommended for subsequent maintenance therapy. Patients with this disease staging were heterogeneous, and the 5-year survival rates ranged from 6 to 30% [3]. A previous study showed that radiation technology (intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) vs three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT)) may be the predictive factor of recurrence patterns [4]. However, nearly all patients receiving definitive radiotherapy in our institution were treated by IMRT, and the failure patterns of these patients were different from those previously described.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) improved the survival of patients with LA-NSCLC compared with sequential chemoradiotherapy (SCRT), indicating that local control is important for patient outcome [5]. Obtaining good locoregional control is the main goal in LA-NSCLC. Studies have shown that improving radiation doses or performing large segmentation may improve local control, but doses to the surrounding organs at risk were also increased [6,7,8]. Therefore, clearly classifying the failure patterns among these patients is the basis for precise radiation treatment. Currently, no satisfactory predictive model has been built to assess the failure patterns for LA-NSCLC.

Here, we present the results of a retrospective study analyzing the failure patterns in 100 patients with LA-NSCLC who received definitive CRT. The purpose of this study was to investigate the first failure pattern of LA-NSCLC and build a nomogram to predict the failure pattern for these patients.

Materials and methods

Patients

Between 2013 and 2016, consecutive patients underwent definitive CRT for LA-NSCLC and were followed-up in our hospital. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients initially diagnosed with locally advanced lung cancer; (2) patients with pathologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer; (3) patients who received IMRT to unresectable LA-NSCLC; (4) patients with a total radiation dose ≥50 Gy and who had completed the radiotherapy plan; (5) patients with data on the determination of EGFR mutation status; (6) patients who received regular follow-up imaging examinations (thoracic CT, brain MRI, abdominal and superficial lymph node ultrasound, whole-body bone scan or PET-CT) in our hospital. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with a second primary cancer; (2) patients who died during the course of radiotherapy; (3) patients with an unknown EGFR status; (4) patients who were treated with maintenance chemotherapy or targeted therapy after definitive CRT; (5) patients who received targeted therapy before the first failure; and (6) patients with unavailable clinicopathological materials. Finally, 100 patients were included in this study.

Definition of clinicopathological factors and recurrence/metastasis

Data on clinicopathological factors, including age, gender, family history, chronic medical diseases, smoking status, pathological diagnosis, chemotherapy, EGFR mutation status, TNM stage (according to the TNM classification in the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) 8th ed. [9]), the radiotherapy and chemotherapy regimens delivered, and radiotherapy planning margins were retrieved. Imaging examination findings, including those from thoracic CT, brain MRI, abdominal and superficial lymph node ultrasound, whole-body bone scan or PET-CT before and after treatments, were reviewed to evaluate the clinical stage and failure patterns. Disease recurrence at the in-field (centroid originating within the original planning target volume) of radiation or local-regional lymph node was considered local failure, and all other sites of recurrence or metastases were defined as distant failure. Failure patterns were evaluated by imaging examinations, and the first sites of recurrence were recorded.

Statistical analysis

Baseline characteristics are shown as numbers. Univariate analysis with Chi-square test and Wilcoxon test were conducted to explore individual significant factors with false discovery rate (FDR) correction. The model building process were divided into two steps. First, based on all the 16 clinical factors, multivariate logistic regression with elastic net regularization was used to generate models including different features. In this stage, model training and parameter tuning were based on the whole dataset. Second, 5-fold nested cross-validation was conducted to assess the generalization ability of those models incorporating different features. Finally, the selected optimal model and the corresponding features were used to build a nomogram. The AUC of the ROC curve, calibration curve and DCA were also assessed to validate the performance of the predictive model. The dataset and scripts were attached as supplement material.

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, version 22.0, R software, version 3.4.5 and python version 3.7. All tests were two-sided, and p < 0.05 was defined as a statistically significant result.

Results

Patient characteristics

The baseline characteristics of the included LA-NSCLC patients are shown in Table 1. Of the 100 patients, the median age was 59 (22–83) years old. Eighty patients were males, and 20 were females. There were 38, 56 and 6 patients diagnosed with clinical stages of IIIA, IIIB and IIIC, respectively. The tumor location was peripheral in 59 patients, and the other 41 patients’ lesions were located centrally. Forty-nine patients were pathologically diagnosed with adenocarcinoma, 39 with squamous cell carcinoma and 12 with non-small cell carcinoma. Among the 100 patients, EGFR mutations were detected in 24. All patients were treated with IMRT technology, 79% received a radiation dose of 60 Gy/30 Fx, and the median radiation dose was 60 Gy (50–66 Gy). Forty-three patients who were treated with 2–4 cycles of consolidation chemotherapy after radiation. Only 40 patients were given CCRT, and 60 patients were treated with SCRT.

Table 1 Patient characteristics

With a median follow-up of 28 months, among the 100 patients who exhibited failure, 46 and 54 experienced local failure and distant failure, respectively (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

The distribution of first failure patterns among patients with inoperable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer who received definitive chemoradiotherapy

Univariate analysis

Univariate analysis with Chi-square test (categorical predictors) and Wilcoxon test (continuous predictors) showed that sex (p = 0.035), smoking status (p = 0.027), pathological tumor type (p = 0.031), age (p = 0.026), tumor location (p = 0.012) and EGFR mutation status (p = 0.018) were statistically associated with the different failure patterns. However, considering the multiple comparison, FDR correction was conducted and the adjusted q values were shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Univariate analysis of clinical factors in predicting failure pattern

Due to the limitation of small sample size, we included all 16 factors which may affect the failure patterns, into the multivariate analysis of elastic net regression.

Development and validation of the failure pattern prediction model

The tuned hyperparameter and the generated five models with different number of features in the first stage are shown in Table 3. Assessment results of the five models using 5-fold nested cross-validation is shown in Table 4. Results shown that the optimal model incorporated nine features including smoking, pathology, location, EGFR mutation status, age, tumor diameter, clinical N stage, consolidation chemotherapy and radiation dose. The detailed coefficients and corresponding hyperparameter information of the optimal model can be found in Additional file 1: Table S1.

Table 3 Models and corresponding features generated by elastic net regression
Table 4 Model assessment by 5-fold nested cross-validation

Based on the selected nine features, a failure pattern predictive model is visually presented as a nomogram (Fig. 2). Example of the hyperparameter tuning details can be seen from Fig. 3. In Fig. 4a, we show the average ROC curve of the predictive model with 5-fold nested cross-validation and the average AUC was 0.719 (95% CI: 0.474–0.963). The ROC curves of smoking, pathology, location, EGFR mutation status, age, tumor diameter, clinical N stage, consolidation chemotherapy, radiation dose and the nomogram indicated that the nomogram predicting model was excellent and better than each factor alone (age: AUC = 0.630, 95% CI = 0.520–0.734; tumor location: AUC = 0.624, 95% CI = 0.528–0.719; EGFR mutation status: AUC = 0.601, 95% CI = 0.521–0.682; Pathology: AUC = 0.638, 95% CI = 0.540–0.737; Smoking: AUC = 0.609, 95% CI = 0.515–0.703; Tumor diameter: AUC = 0.531, 95% CI = 0.423–0.640; clinical N stage: AUC = 0.566, 95% CI = 0.466–0.667; Consolidation chemotherapy: AUC = 0.585, 95% CI = 0.488–0.682; Radiation dose: AUC = 0.529, 95% CI = 0.461–0.597) to predict distant failure (Additional file 2: Figure S1). The results showed that for a single factor, age was the most suitable for predicting local failure (AUC =0.630, 95% CI = 0.520–0.734), while tumor location and pathology were better at predicting distant failure than at predicting local failure. The nomogram showed good predictive efficiency (specificity 81.8%, sensitivity 69.4%). The validation results of the calibration curve showed satisfactory consistency between the predicted distant failure and actual observation (Fig. 4b). DCA showed that the majority of the threshold probabilities in this model had good net benefits (Fig. 4c).

Fig. 2
figure2

Nomogram predicting the first failure patterns. For each individual patient, nine lines are drawn upward to determine the points received from the nine variables in the nomogram. The sum of these points is located on the “Total Points” axis, and a line is drawn downward to determine the likelihood that this patient to occur distant failure

Fig. 3
figure3

Parameter tuning of the elastic net logistic regression. a Selection of the tuning parameter lambda in the elastic net model via 5-fold cross validation based on minimum criteria. The x-axis represents the different log(lambda). The y-axis represents the binomial deviance. Numbers along the upper x-axis represent the average number of predictors. Red dots represent the average binomial deviance values of each model with a given lambda. The vertical bars represent the upper and lower value of the deviances. The vertical black lines represent the optimal lambda which fits the data best. b Elastic net regression coefficient of the nine factors with different lambda values. The x-axis and y-axis represent the log(lambda) and coefficient. Different color lines were representing different factors

Fig. 4
figure4

The validation of nomogram. a Average ROC curve of the prediction model with 5-fold nested cross-validation. The average AUC of the 5-fold validation was 0.719. b Calibration curve of the nomogram model to predict distant failure. The x-axis and y-axis represent the predicted and actual probabilities of occurring distant failure, respectively. The blue diagonal 45 line correspond to the perfect prediction, and the orange dotted line represent the predictive performance of the nomogram. The closer the dotted line fitted to the diagonal line, the better the prediction performance was. c Decision curve of the nomogram to predict distant failure in the whole dataset. The x-axis and y-axis measure the threshold probabilities and net benefit, respectively. The latter is calculated by adding the true positives and subtracting the false positives. The horizontal line along the x-axis assumes that no patient will occur distant failure, the solid gray line assumes that all patients will occur distant failure at a specific threshold probability. The solid blue line means the net benefit with using the nomogram

Discussion

For stage III NSCLC, which is a heterogeneous disease, a uniform standardized treatment is inadequate, and an individualized precise treatment is needed. Before precise treatment can be provided, a clear classification of patients with this stage is fundamental. This study was conducted to build a nomogram for predicting the failure pattern in LA-NSCLC patients. Studies have shown that the most common type of recurrence is distant [10,11,12], which is consistent with our cohort (distant failure vs. local failure = 54% vs. 46%). Previous reports have suggested that the presence of EGFR mutation is a favorable factor for local control, and patients with EGFR mutation were at a high risk of distant relapse [13,14,15,16,17]. Considering the significant role of EGFR mutation status in predicting failure pattern, we only included LA-NSCLC patients who detected the EGFR mutation status in this study.

Previous studies have indicated that the prevalence of EGFR mutations in stage III NSCLC patients ranges from 17 to 30%, which was similar to that in our cohort (24%) [14, 16, 17]. Consistent with the results in previous studies, our study also showed that EGFR mutant patients of LA-NSCLC who are receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy have a higher distant failure rate than a local failure rate. However, the predictive efficacy of only one factor was not satisfactory, and we need a combined and high-efficacy predictive model. Hence, in this study, we included 16 clinicopathological factors that were considered to be related to the recurrence or patient prognosis to build a nomogram model [18,19,20,21]. In the univariate analysis, we observed 6 factors that may be related to the failure patterns. The 6 factors were sex, smoking status, pathological type, age, tumor location and EGFR mutation status. Considering the multiple comparison of univariate analysis, we corrected it with FDR. After the FDR correction, above 6 factors still showed the predictive trend for failure pattern.

However, since univariate analysis does not consider interactions among features, we directly utilized a multivariate elastic net regression of these 16 clinical features without filtering features using univariate analysis. Elastic net is a hybrid of Lasso and Ridge regression techniques by using L1 and L2 norms as priori regularization during training. The hyperparameter alpha was used to control the convex combination of L1 and L2 regularization. Consequently, this combination enables the elastic net select features intrinsically. Here, the elastic net (with 5-fold nested cross-validation) finally selected nine features including smoking, pathology, location, EGFR mutation status, age, tumor diameter, clinical N stage, consolidation chemotherapy and radiation dose to build prediction model. The statistical results indicated that LA-NSCLC patients receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy with the characteristics of non-smoker, non-squamous cell carcinoma, younger age, peripheral LA-NSCLC, EGFR mutations, long tumor diameter, advanced N stage, non-consolidation chemotherapy and low radiation dose were more likely to experience distant failure. To date, few studies have compared the failure pattern between peripheral and central LA-NSCLC.

In previous study, Brian et al. [22] reported that only TNM stage and surgery but not primary tumor or lymph node volume were associated with distant failure. In our study, we also did not observe a relationship between tumor volume or lymph nodal volumes with distant failure. In our cohort, the predictive role of clinical N stage for failure pattern was confirmed. In a poster report shown at the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) annual meeting 2016, Yoon et al. [4] showed that the use of IMRT decrease the risks of locoregional failure and adjuvant chemotherapy correlated with a decrease in distant failure. In our study, all patients were treated with IMRT. All patients received chemotherapy and radiotherapy, 40 patients were given CCRT, and 60 patients were treated with SCRT. Among the 100 patients, 43 patients were treated with 2–4 cycles of consolidation chemotherapy after radiation. Study result also showed that whether conducted consolidation chemotherapy was related to the failure pattern. Otherwise, in a study of early NSCLC, Masaki et al. [23] reported that patients with early-stage peripheral NSCLC were more likely to have distant failure. In a study by Melisa et al. [24], their data indicated that the recurrence rate of distant sites was higher than that at local sites in younger patients with NSCLC and peripheral NSCLC. Although the populations were different between our cohort and the above two studies, we obtained similar predictors for the first failure pattern for NSCLC patients. Furthermore, we found that the driver gene mutation status of NSCLC was associated with distant failure. A recent study also indicated that compared to patients with wild-type EGFR stage III NSCLC, those with EGFR-mutant unresectable stage III NSCLC tend to have a higher rate of out-of-field failure than in-field failure [25]. However, in the majority of the previous studies mentioned above, no predictive model was developed for a single impact factor. Hence, we built a nomogram to improve the predictive power of failure patterns for these stage III patients.

Different rates of local recurrence and distant failure according to the predictive model provide significant insights into the therapeutic strategies for LA-NSCLC. To improve the local control rate in patients with unresectable LA-NSCLC, several dose-escalation studies were conducted [6, 26, 27]. The classic study of RTOG 0617 showed that high dose (74 Gy) radiation did not result in a better outcome than the outcome of the conventional dose (60 Gy). The main reason for the poor outcome in the high-dose group may be that the treatment-related adverse event rate was higher in the high-dose group than in the conventional-dose group. In patients who tended to experience distant failure of the first recurrence, high-dose radiation only increased the radiation-related side effects rather than increasing the benefit of local control. Therefore, fitting populations are significant and necessary for a rigorous study, and accurate classification of the population is fundamental to providing precise treatment. The data also indicated that the outcomes between local failure and distant failure were different [16, 25, 26]. Hence, to design a better treatment strategy, we should make a good prediction of failure patterns before beginning treatment.

Certainly, the limitations of our study should be addressed here. The sample size of this study (n = 100) is relatively small. This is a retrospective analysis, and large sample sizes and rigorous prospective studies are needed to validate this predictive model. Moreover, the sensitivity of this model to predict distant failure was poor, but the specificity was excellent. Although sensitivity and specificity were both important, for this study, the sensitivity may not be as important as the specificity, because the whole precision of the model is compromised. Furthermore, the calibration curve revealed a good consistency between the predicted distant failure and actual observation. Certainly, an external validation was needed, which will make the predictive model more convincing. In addition, the dimension of our data was low, more features including clinicopathological factors, imaging features, biological features and so on, were needed to make a standardized predictive model. Even so, all of these cases were from the real world and this predictive model can still provide good assistance in clinical practice.

Conclusion

This study discovered collaborating clinicopathological factors could predict the first failure pattern in patients with LA-NSCLC who are receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy. The predictive model of nomogram built by these factors (smoking, pathology, location, EGFR mutation status, age, tumor diameter, clinical N stage, consolidation chemotherapy and radiation dose) shows a potential predictive value in clinical practice.

Availability of data and materials

Please contact author for data requests.

Abbreviations

3D-CRT:

Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy

ASTRO:

American Society for Radiation Oncology

AUC:

Area under the ROC curve

CCRT:

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy

CRT:

Chemoradiotherapy

DCA:

Decision curve analysis

EGFR:

Epidermal growth factor receptor

FDR:

False discovery rate

ICI:

Immune checkpoint inhibitor

IMRT:

Intensity modulated radiation therapy

LA-NSCLC:

Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

SCRT:

Sequential chemoradiotherapy

References

  1. 1.

    National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology, non-small cell lung cancer, version 3. 2019. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/nscl.pdf, 2019, Jan 18 2019.

  2. 2.

    Antonia SJ, Villegas A, Daniel D, Vicente D, Murakami S, Hui R, Kurata T, Chiappori A, Lee KH, de Wit M, et al. Overall survival with Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(24):2342–50.

  3. 3.

    Auperin A, Le Pechoux C, Rolland E, Curran WJ, Furuse K, Fournel P, Belderbos J, Clamon G, Ulutin HC, Paulus R, et al. Meta-analysis of concomitant versus sequential radiochemotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(13):2181–90.

  4. 4.

    Yoon S, Shaikh T, Ross EA, Bauman J, Borghaei H, Mehra R, Meyer J, Hallman M. Patterns and predictors of failure following definitive chemoradiation for locally advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;96:E477–8.

  5. 5.

    Eberhardt WE, De Ruysscher D, Weder W, Le Pechoux C, De Leyn P, Hoffmann H, Westeel V, Stahel R, Felip E, Peters S. 2nd ESMO consensus conference in lung cancer: locally advanced stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(8):1573–88.

  6. 6.

    Bradley JD, Paulus R, Komaki R, Masters G, Blumenschein G, Schild S, Bogart J, Hu C, Forster K, Magliocco A, et al. Standard-dose versus high-dose conformal radiotherapy with concurrent and consolidation carboplatin plus paclitaxel with or without cetuximab for patients with stage IIIA or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (RTOG 0617): a randomised, two-by-two factorial phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(2):187–99.

  7. 7.

    Zhu Z, Liu W, Gillin M, Gomez DR, Komaki R, Cox JD, Mohan R, Chang JY. Assessing the robustness of passive scattering proton therapy with regard to local recurrence in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a secondary analysis of a phase II trial. Radiat Oncol. 2014;9:108–8.

  8. 8.

    Guckenberger M, Wilbert J, Richter A, Baier K, Flentje M. Potential of adaptive radiotherapy to escalate the radiation dose in combined radiochemotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;79(3):901–8.

  9. 9.

    Wang L, Anraku M, Sato M, Nitadori J-I, Nagayama K, Kitano K, Nakajima J. Impact of the 8th edition of the UICC-TNM classification on clinical stage 0-IA lung adenocarcinoma: does the new classification predict postoperative prognosis more precisely than the previous one? Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;24(5):223–9.

  10. 10.

    Caglar HB, Baldini EH, Othus M, Rabin MS, Bueno R, Sugarbaker DJ, Mentzer SJ, Jänne PA, Johnson BE, Allen AM. Outcomes of patients with stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy and radiation with and without surgery. Cancer. 2009;115(18):4156–66.

  11. 11.

    Lara P, Chanski K, Gaspar L, Albain K, Crowley J, Gandara D. PD-075 Consolidation docetaxel (D) following concurrentchemoradiotherapy (chemoRT) in stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): updated five-year survival results from Southwest Oncology Group trial S9504. Lung Cancer. 2005;49(Suppl2):S88–9.

  12. 12.

    Vokes EE, Herndon JE 2nd, Kelley MJ, Cicchetti MG, Ramnath N, Neill H, Atkins JN, Watson DM, Akerley W, Green MR. Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy compared with chemoradiotherapy alone for regionally advanced unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: cancer and leukemia group B. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(13):1698–704.

  13. 13.

    Johung KL, Yao X, Li F, Yu JB, Gettinger SN, Goldberg S, Decker RH, Hess JA, Chiang VL, Contessa JN. A clinical model for identifying radiosensitive tumor genotypes in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(19):5523–32.

  14. 14.

    Akamatsu H, Kaira K, Murakami H, Serizawa M, Koh Y, Ono A, Shukuya T, Tsuya A, Nakamura Y, Kenmotsu H, et al. The impact of clinical outcomes according to EGFR mutation status in patients with locally advanced lung adenocarcinoma who recieved concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Am J Clin Oncol. 2014;37(2):144–7.

  15. 15.

    Tanaka K, Hida T, Oya Y, Oguri T, Yoshida T, Shimizu J, Horio Y, Hata A, Kaji R, Fujita S, et al. EGFR mutation impact on definitive concurrent Chemoradiation therapy for inoperable stage III adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10(12):1720–5.

  16. 16.

    Yagishita S, Horinouchi H, Katsui Taniyama T, Nakamichi S, Kitazono S, Mizugaki H, Kanda S, Fujiwara Y, Nokihara H, Yamamoto N, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation is associated with longer local control after definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage III nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;91(1):140–8.

  17. 17.

    Lim YJ, Chang JH, Kim HJ, Keam B, Kim TM, Kim DW, Paeng JC, Kang KW, Chung JK, Jeon YK, et al. Superior treatment response and in-field tumor control in epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant genotype of stage III nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer undergoing definitive concurrent Chemoradiotherapy. Clin Lung Cancer. 2017;18(3):e169–78.

  18. 18.

    Gandhi S, Nantavithya C, Chang JY, Lin SH, Liao Z, Mohamed AS, Fuller CD, Li H, Gomez DR. A method for analyzing and reporting patterns of in-field recurrence after definitive concurrent chemoradiation in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;102(3, Supplement):e698–9.

  19. 19.

    Varlotto JM, Yao AN, DeCamp MM, Ramakrishna S, Recht A, Flickinger J, Andrei A, Reed MF, Toth JW, Fizgerald TJ, et al. Nodal stage of surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer and its effect on recurrence patterns and overall survival. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;91(4):765–73.

  20. 20.

    Yang P, Xu T, Gomez DR, Deng W, Wei X, Elhalawani H, Jin H, Guan F, Mirkovic D, Xu Y, et al. Patterns of local-regional failure after intensity modulated radiation therapy or passive scattering proton therapy with concurrent chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019;103(1):123–31.

  21. 21.

    Yoon S, Shaikh T, Ross EA, Bauman J, Borghaei H, Mehra R, Meyer JE, Hallman MA. Patterns and predictors of failure following definitive chemoradiation for locally advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;96(2, Supplement):E477–8.

  22. 22.

    Alexander BM, Othus M, Caglar HB, Allen AM. Tumor volume is a prognostic factor in non–small-cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;79(5):1381–7.

  23. 23.

    Nakamura M, Nishikawa R, Mayahara H, Uezono H, Harada A, Hashimoto N, Nishimura H. Pattern of recurrence after CyberKnife stereotactic body radiotherapy for peripheral early non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(1):214–21.

  24. 24.

    Wong ML, McMurry TL, Stukenborg GJ, Francescatti AB, Amato-Martz C, Schumacher JR, Chang GJ, Greenberg CC, Winchester DP, McKellar DP, et al. Impact of age and comorbidity on treatment of non-small cell lung cancer recurrence following complete resection: A nationally representative cohort study. Lung Cancer. 2016;102:108–17.

  25. 25.

    Nakamura M, Kageyama SI, Niho S, Okumura M, Hojo H, Motegi A, Nakamura N, Zenda S, Yoh K, Goto K, et al. Impact of EGFR mutation and ALK translocation on recurrence pattern after definitive chemoradiotherapy for inoperable stage III non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2019;20:e256–64.

  26. 26.

    Harada H, Nishio M, Murakami H, Ohyanagi F, Kozuka T, Ishikura S, Naito T, Kaira K, Takahashi T, Horiike A, et al. Dose-escalation study of three-dimensional conformal thoracic radiotherapy with concurrent S-1 and cisplatin for inoperable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2013;14(4):440–5.

  27. 27.

    Brower JV, Amini A, Chen S, Hullett CR, Kimple RJ, Wojcieszynski AP, Bassetti M, Witek ME, Yu M, Harari PM, et al. Improved survival with dose-escalated radiotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: analysis of the National Cancer Database. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(10):1887–94.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Innovation Fund for PhD Students from Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (CBXJ201814) & National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0905500) & Project of multi-center clinical research, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (DLY201619) & Shanghai Chest Hospital Project of Collaborative Innovation (YJXT20190101).

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

XF and XZ designed this study; XZ, RH and XL carried out analysis and wrote the manuscript; RH was also mainly responsible for the statistical analysis and revised the main manuscript content. CJ and WX were responsible for data collection. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Xiaolong Fu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, X., Hou, R., Li, X. et al. Predictive model of the first failure pattern in patients receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy for inoperable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). Radiat Oncol 15, 43 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-1467-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer
  • Failure
  • Recurrence
  • Predictor

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.