Skip to main content

Radiation-induced lung toxicity – cellular and molecular mechanisms of pathogenesis, management, and literature review


Lung, breast, and esophageal cancer represent three common malignancies with high incidence and mortality worldwide. The management of these tumors critically relies on radiotherapy as a major part of multi-modality care, and treatment-related toxicities, such as radiation-induced pneumonitis and/or lung fibrosis, are important dose limiting factors with direct impact on patient outcomes and quality of life. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of radiation-induced pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis, present predictive factors as well as recent diagnostic and therapeutic advances. Novel candidates for molecularly targeted approaches to prevent and/or treat radiation-induced pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis are discussed.


Lung, breast, and esophageal cancer are common thoracic malignancies with high cancer-associated mortality [1]. In the majority of cases thoracic radiotherapy represents a central part of multi-modal treatment concepts [2]. Several diagnostic and therapeutic advances, such as PET-imaging [3, 4], improved radiation delivery techniques [5,6,7,8,9], implementation of immunotherapy [10,11,12,13,14,15,16], and molecularly targeted therapy [17,18,19], have led to improved outcome in terms of overall survival, local and distant control as well as quality of life. However, between 10 and 30% of all patients with lung or breast cancer receiving thoracic radiotherapy develop radiation-induced pneumonitis (RIP) as a subacute treatment-associated toxicity, and they are at high risk of developing radiation-induced lung fibrosis (RILF) as late toxicity, although treatment-related death is uncommon [5, 20,21,22,23,24].

Accordingly, lung toxicity remains a crucial dose limiting factor, and dose escalation trials with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy have been limited by severe lung toxicity [25,26,27]. Due to the development of novel radiotherapy techniques, including intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) [5, 6] and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) [20], and radiation qualities, such as and proton therapy [28], radiation exposure of normal lung tissue can be significantly reduced. Consequently, the occurrence of RIP grade ≥ 2 in the treatment of lung cancer has gradually decreased from 30 to 47% using 2D-radiotherapy [29], to 30–35% with 3D-radiotherapy [30, 31], 29–32% with IMRT [31, 32], 24–29% with VMAT [32, 33], and < 5% with proton therapy [28, 34]. The radiation delivery technique is also of importance for the development of RIP and RILF. Different fractionation regimens, such as classically fractionated radiotherapy with 2 Gy per fraction for the treatment of rather large tumor volumes, and high precision radiation delivery techniques for the treatment of smaller volumes, such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), are associated with different risk profiles of RIP/RILF arising from differences in the delivered doses and target volumes. In addition, single- versus multi-fraction course SBRT/SABR regimens and the localization of the tumor (central versus peripheral) impact radiation-induced lung toxicity [35,36,37]. Central tumors treated with SBRT often receive more conservative dose fractionation regimens (e.g. SBRT with 3–8 fractions) compared to peripheral tumors resulting in less treatment-related toxicity but comparable outcome [37,38,39]. High dose single-fraction lung SBRT (e.g. ≥ 30 Gy) may be associated with increased toxicity [40, 41]. However, several studies reported low rates of ≥ grade III side effects in selected patient cohorts [35, 42].

This review summarizes the current understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of RIP and RILF. We present predictive factors and the current standards of diagnostic and therapeutic management. Finally, we discuss novel candidates for molecularly targeted approaches to prevent and/or treat RIP and RILF.

Diagnosis of RIP and RILF

The diagnosis of RIP and RILF is based on clinical presentation and may be supported by associated imaging findings. Various grading scales are used (see Tables 1 and 2). In clinical practice, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria and the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) are the ones most widely used [43, 44]. However, the majority of all patients will not show any clinical symptoms. Upon conventional thoracic radiotherapy, RIP occurs 1 and 6 months after treatment, typically within 3 months following completion of irradiation. Clinical symptoms include persistent, dry and non-productive coughing, dyspnea (on physical exertion or at rest), low-grade fever, pleuritic pain, and chest discomfort [45]. To date, no standard laboratory test can unequivocally identify RIP. Most patients exhibit normal levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and diagnostic differentiation from bacterial pneumonia remains challenging [46]. Nevertheless the performance of bronchial lavage sampling with subsequent cytology and immunomonitoring analyses for differential diagnosis of RIP from infectious lung disease is currently under investigation [47].

Table 1 Overview about grading scales for radiation-induced pneumonitis
Table 2 Overview about grading scales for radiation-induced lung fibrosis

The benefit of lung function tests for determining the grade of RIP, such as spirometry with lung diffusion capacity test, remains unclear. Several studies investigated changes in lung function after thoracic radiotherapy, and the extent of change in diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) upon radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients was reported to be associated with the RIP grade [48, 49]. However, no national or international consensus has yet been established.

Imaging of RIP upon conventional radiotherapy may present with non-specific chest X-ray changes which typically are confined to the irradiated field, with airspace opacities being most common [50]. Pleural effusions or atelectasis may be associated as well. The preferred imaging modality to detect RIP is chest computed tomography (CT), preferably high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Chest CTs provide more detailed information about parenchymal changes and often reveal alterations that are localized to the irradiated field, rendering the diagnosis of RIP for clinicians rather obvious [51]. The radiological characteristics of RIP change over time. In the initial phase they include ground-glass opacities and/or airspace consolidation [52]. In some cases, a small ipsilateral pleural effusion may occur in the first 6 months after thoracic irradiation and may persist for several months. In the later phase of RIP after conventional radiotherapy, septal wall thickening may occur with the alveolar opacities producing a “crazy paving” pattern [53]. Upon SABR, radiographic changes will occur in most of the patients within 6 months and can be described as diffuse consolidation (> 20%), patchy consolidation (> 20%), and diffuse or patchy ground glass opacities (> 5%) (see Table 3) [54, 55]. In contrast to conventional radiotherapy, these changes do usually not occur before 2–3 months after completion of treatment – presumably due to the relevantly shorter treatment course. [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-2-D-glucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) does not contribute to confirming a RIP diagnosis [56]. Inflammatory processes usually demonstrate an increased metabolic activity and are common after thoracic radiotherapy, causing significant confusion when PET/CT is used in the first 6 months after irradiation. However, only the minority of these patients develop clinical RIP.

Table 3 Overview of radiographic changes after completion of conventionally fractionated radiotherapy compared to stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) of the thorax

RILF is typically observed between 6 and 12 months after thoracic radiotherapy and can continuously progress for several years. Several grading scales have been established to categorize RILF (see Table 2). Nearly all patients show (radiographic) signs of RILF following thoracic irradiation [50]. However, the majority of patients with RILF remain asymptomatic, and clinical manifestations are mostly linked to established comorbidities, such as pre-existing lung or heart disorders. Symptoms include dyspnea (upon physical exertion or at rest), persistent and dry coughing, fatigue, and weight loss [45]. Radiographic pulmonary changes are usually observed in the irradiated field but can occur in the rest of the lung as well [57].

Chest X-ray imaging can show volume loss and architectural distortion [56]. In some cases, a mediastinal shift and traction bronchiectasis can be found. Compared to previous chest X-ray scans, progression from RIP increasingly becoming more reticular or linear is typical for RILF. Again, HRCT imaging can better delineate parenchymal changes as compared to chest X-ray imaging, including volume loss, linear scarring, and traction bronchiectasis [58]. Chronic consolidation is often found together with air-bronchograms usually exhibiting a non-anatomical distribution. Upon SABR the most frequent late radiographic changes are characterized by consolidation, volume loss, and bronchiectasis in a so called “modified conventional pattern”. Previously, straight lines or edges were typically reported as pulmonary changes following conventional 2D- or 3D-radiotherapy. Yet, with current delivery techniques, such as IMRT, VMAT, or SABR, these changes have become rather uncommon, and/or may be more difficult to appreciate without information on the beam configurations used.

A special and very rare form of lung toxicity upon RT for breast cancer is radiation-induced bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia (BOOP, < 2% of cases) which may develop several months after RT, commonly with longer latency time compared to RIP [59]. Clinical presentation and radiographic changes are similar to RIP. In contrast to RIP which largely remains limited to the irradiated fields, BOOP is frequently found also in the non-irradiated lung with diffuse patterns and may show patchy alveolar infiltrations ± air bronchograms and consolidations [60].

The severity of RILF can be radiologically measured with the help of semi-quantitative grading (1–5 points) using radiographic features (see Table 3). “Scar-like” patterns as characterized by streaky opacities in the tumor region are usually associated with less severe RILF due to the mild loss of volume [56]. Conversely, “mass-like” patterns as depicted by focal consolidation and/or ground glass opacification in the tumor region typically with air bronchograms and/or traction bronchiectasis represent rather severe forms of RILF [56]. Upon SABR, “mass-like” fibrosis has been observed more frequently (in up to 14% of cases) and challenges the diagnosis of local recurrence [54]. In contrast to the equivocal value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT for RIP diagnosis, it can be helpful in differentiating pulmonary fibrosis of radiation-induced origin from recurrent malignancy [56].

Cellular and molecular mechanisms and pathogenesis of RIP and RILF

The alveolar tissue of the lung is relatively sensitive to ionizing radiation [61, 62]. Therefore, RIP and RILF are major dose limiting adverse effects interfering with the radiotherapeutic success in the treatment course of thoracic malignancies [63,64,65,66]. The pathogenesis of RIP and RILF is a complex multi-step process involving several resident cells of the lung as well as recruited immune cells and is initiated and perpetuated via pleiotropic inter- and intracellular communication and signaling events [67,68,69]. According to the current understanding, an overwhelming cascade of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), pro-inflammatory cytokines, and chemokines released by dying and/or senescent epithelial cells, endothelial cells, and activated immune cells essentially contribute to the development of RIP and RILF (see Figs. 1 and 2) [66, 70].

Fig. 1

Overview about radiation-induced acute and subacute alveolar changes. AT I cell: alveolar type I cell; AT II cell: alveolar type II cell; DAMP: damage-associated molecular pattern; TGF-β: transforming growth factor β

Fig. 2

Overview about radiation-induced late alveolar changes. AT I cell: alveolar type I cell; AT II cell: alveolar type II cell; ECM: extracellular matrix; TGF-β: transforming growth factor β

Radiation-induced lung toxicity can be divided into three phases: Acute, subacute, and late radiation toxicity. In the acute phase, occurring minutes to days after irradiation, repair of radiation-induced DNA damage takes place in the lung tissue. This includes base modifications, single and double strand breaks of varying complexity, DNA crosslinks, and bulky lesions which arise from direct ionization events or are indirectly mediated by free reactive oxygen species (ROS), respectively [71]. Acute radiation-induced toxicity appears to primarily involve alveolar type I (AT I) and II (AT II) epithelial cells, and endothelial cells [62]. Whereas most tumor cells preferentially undergo necrotic forms of cell death upon radiation at clinically relevant doses, normal tissue epithelial cells and endothelial cells predominantly show phenotypes of cellular senescence [66, 72]. Intriguingly, radiation-induced senescence is accompanied by an altered gene expression profile and the release of several pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, constituting the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) [73]. Major representatives of SASP cytokines include transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), interleukins (IL) -1, − 6, and − 8 as well as ligands of the CXCR1/2 and CCR2/5 chemokine receptors. These mediators enforce cellular senescence in parenchymal cells, stimulate endothelial cell activation, and contribute to the recruitment and activation of immune cells [68]. Moreover, DNA damage-induced senescence and death of AT I and AT II cells result in a loss of barrier function and reduced surfactant production, decreased surface tension, and possible atelectasis due to the lack of surfactant eventually leading to interstitial edema, exudation of proteins into the alveolar space, and further reduction of the alveolar septa [74,75,76,77]. The microvascular system of the lung tissue and particularly endothelial cells are also affected by radiotherapy, both directly via DNA damage-induced senescence and indirectly via released DAMPs and SASP cytokines giving rise to increased vascular permeability and decreased vascular integrity further amplifying the damage of AT I and AT II cells (see Fig. 1) [76]. Ultimately, the affected lung tissue will develop sterile alveolitis with further infiltration of immune cells.

The subacute phase, which can last for several months, is defined by the recruitment of several effector cells of the innate and adaptive immune system (neutrophils, monocytes, macrophages, and lymphocytes) and the concomitant release of pro-inflammatory cytokines which trigger extensive tissue remodeling of the lung. Immune cell infiltration into the injured lung is facilitated by increased vascular permeability, augmented expression of adhesion molecules (e.g. intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) and platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (PECAM-1) on activated endothelial cells, and release and deposition of chemokines [78]. The initial recruitment of neutrophils is followed by monocytes, macrophages, and lymphocytes (see Fig. 1) [79, 80], and immune-cell derived cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF), TGF-β, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-6, IL-7, and IL-8, enforce the activation and proliferation of fibroblasts [81,82,83,84]. For a more detailed assessment of the contribution of distinct immune cell subsets, the interested reader is referred to Wirsdörfer et al. [85], Kainthola et al. [86] and McKelvey et al. [87].

Apart from the described immune-mediated tissue remodeling events, hypoxia has been reported to contribute to the onset and the perpetuation of RIP and RILF [76]. Radiation-induced hypoxia occurs several days after thoracic radiotherapy and has been reported to increase over time in different animal models [76, 88]. Importantly, hypoxia-induced downstream signaling leads to upregulation of TGF-β, enhanced collagen synthesis, and changes in the lung architecture (see Fig. 2). In summary, all these events contribute to the development and establishment of RIP which represents the acute, but reversible scenario of radiation-induced lung toxicity. Of note, elevated serum levels of TGF-β are associated with increased risk of RIP [89].

The late phase of radiation-induced lung injury can be defined by the irreversible rearrangement of lung architecture which occurs several months following thoracic radiotherapy [58]. Again, TGF-β produced by activated immune cells as well as by AT I/II cells and fibroblasts, appears to be a key player due to its profibrotic functions (see Fig. 2) [89, 90]. TGF-β acts by binding to two serine/threonine kinase receptors, namely TGF-β type I and type II receptors, resulting in the activation of multiple signaling cascades, including the small mother against decapentaplegic (SMAD) 2/3, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK) signaling pathways [77, 91,92,93]. Activated Smad2/3 forms complexes with Smad4, subsequently translocating to the nucleus and regulating the expression of genes associated with fibroblast proliferation, migration, and collagen synthesis in the lung tissue [77, 91]. TGF-β stimulates the expression of fibrillar collagens (type I, III and type V) and fibronectin by fibroblasts in the interstitial space resulting in stiffening of the alveolar area and reduction of gas exchange [94,95,96]. Additionally, overexpression of TGF-β in experimental models of fibrosis was observed to be accompanied by upregulation of protease inhibitors, such as tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), along with an excessive accumulation of matrix proteins and collagens [97, 98]. TGF-β stimulates the differentiation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts which comes along with induction of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and increased contractility [99]. Thus, lung architecture remodeling culminates in increasing stiffness and thickening of the lung parenchyma due to the overproduction of extracellular matrix proteins, and the alveolar space is severely reduced [100]. These architectural changes in the lung and the expansion of irreversibly fibrotic regions during the late phase after thoracic radiotherapy are apparent in chest CTs as pulmonary fibrosis.

Predictors of RIP

RIP occurs in the subacute phase after radiotherapy and is mainly characterized by increased infiltration of immune effector cells, such as neutrophils, monocytes, and macrophages, and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. In order to prevent the development of RIP and RILF in the radiotherapeutic routine, several risk factors have been identified. The predictors of RIP can be patient-, disease-, and/or treatment-related.

Patient-related risk factors of RIP

Several patient-related characteristics, such as age, sex, performance status, smoking status, and comorbidities, have been suggested as risk factors for RIP. In a meta-analysis of 31 independent studies with patients of different thoracic malignancies (lung, breast, and esophageal cancer), older age (odds ratio (OR) = 1.7, p < 0.0001) and pre-existing comorbidities (OR = 2.3, p = 0.007) were identified as potential risk factors for the development of RIP [101]. In contrast, a subsequent study with 576 patients identified no significant differences in the incidence of grade ≥ 3 RIP between patients ≤60 and > 60 years (p = 0.943) [102], and other studies also failed to find significant associations between increasing age and the occurrence of RIP [102,103,104]. In summary, age should be considered as a relevant risk factor for RIP, but lung comorbidities and radiotherapy features may be more important risk factors compared to chronological age alone.

The role of the patients’ sex remains controversial. In average, women appear to have smaller tumor volumes and have more often a non-smoking history compared to men [105]. Therefore, their pre-radiotherapy lung capacity (FEV1, DLCO) is usually better than the one of male patients.

Pre-existing lung disease, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or interstitial lung disease (ILD), can confound the diagnosis of RIP and occurs quite frequently in lung cancer patients. The predictive role of COPD appears controversial. While patients with extensive emphysema experience RIP in more than 50%, and several studies suggest an increased risk of RIP in patients with underlying COPD [106, 107], other reports do not confirm these observations [102, 108]. Patients with pre-existing ILD seem to be more susceptible to RIP and are at markedly increased risk of radiation-induced toxicity [109, 110]. A retrospective analysis of 504 patients undergoing thoracic SABR reported grade ≥ 3 RIP in 32% and grade 5 pneumonitis in 21% of all ILD patients compared to a general risk of less than 10% of grade ≥ III RIP after SBRT [111,112,113]. Further studies observed an SABR-related mortality rate of 16%, and it was recommended to reduce the radiation dose for patients with pre-existing ILD in order to prevent radiation-induced lung toxicity [114]. Accordingly, stricter than normal dose constraints may need to be applied in these cases [110, 115], and careful weighing of the risks and benefits for each individual patient is critical in this population at high risk for severe toxicity. Informed consent should include a clear description of the risks. Alternative treatment options, including close observation, should be explored and considered [109]. Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) are defined as precursor stages of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and show similar, but less severe radiological changes compared to ILD [116]. Although ILAs mostly remain asymptomatic or subclinical, they are frequently observed in lung cancer screening trials and need particular attention [117]. The ILA classifying radiographic changes include non-fibrotic (ground glass opacification, areas of consolidation, mosaic attenuation) as well as fibrotic features (ground glass opacification with reticulation, honeycombing). Importantly, patients with ILAs show lower exercise tolerance, a restrictive pattern in lung function tests, higher risk of developing clinically significant ILD, and an increased overall mortality [118]. Along these lines, patients with pre-existing ILAs also seem to be more susceptible to radiation-induced toxicity [109, 110]. Therefore, physicians should perform a comprehensive risk assessment, including clinical (prior symptoms, diagnosis, lung function with DLCO) and image-based evaluation, and the radiotherapeutic treatment of patients with ILA should be carefully discussed – preferentially in a process of shared decision-making. Ongoing trials, such as ASPIRE-ILD phase II study (NCT03485378), are currently prospectively investigating the safety and efficacy of SBRT in patients with inoperable early stage NSCLC with pre-existing ILD and ILA [119].

Disease-related risk factors of RIP

Disease-related factors of RIP include the tumor location and the tumor volume. The location of the tumor was reported to be associated with the risk of RIP in several studies and meta-analyses identifying patients with tumors in the middle or lower lobes to be at higher risk [101, 103, 120]. A significantly elevated risk of RIP was described for patients with tumors in the inferior part of the lung [103]. The increased risk of RIP may reflect differences in radiosensitivity between different regions of the lung. The caudal part of the lung contains more lung volume and shows stronger movements compared to the cranial part – especially in patients with emphysema.

In addition, increasing tumor volumes seem to be associated with higher probabilities to develop RIP [121,122,123,124]. Accordingly, treatment volume planning, motion management, and delivery verification strategies are critical. Nevertheless, there is currently no consensus in the literature on the reporting of cut-offs as well as on the used radiation delivery techniques. Moreover, tumor volumes can be described by different measures which are inconsistently used, including gross tumor volume (GTV), clinical target volume (CTV), planning target volume (PTV) ± involved lymph node volume, and lung volume minus GTV, CTV, or PTV, respectively. Interestingly, the irradiated lung volume was not significantly associated with radiation-induced BOOP after radiotherapy for breast cancer [60].

Apart from the tumor volume and its location, its proximity to the heart and – in consequence – the radiation dose delivered to the heart impacts the risk of RIP and RILF [125,126,127]. Importantly, the dosimetric values of the heart are not simply surrogate markers for dosimetric lung parameters [127]. The underlying mechanisms have not been understood yet, but dose constraints to the heart need to be critically considered to prevent RIP and RILF.

In contrast, the tumor stage has not been confirmed as a risk factor for RIP [46, 102, 128]. Hence, tumor volume rather than tumor stage should be considered as a relevant risk factor for RIP, but clear cut-off values remain to be defined for both conventional and SABR populations.

Treatment-related risk factors of RIP

Treatment of thoracic malignancies involves radiotherapy, surgery, and various systemic therapies. As a result, different treatment modalities are accompanied by different risks for the development of RIP. Several studies reported that previous surgery leads to a higher risk of RIP [126, 129]. However, in a meta-analysis including 6 studies with 800 patients, surgery was not confirmed as a risk factor for RIP [101]. The extent of resection and differences in postoperative treatments may represent confounding factors and thus should be analyzed in greater detail.

Systemic treatment options include several different agents, combinations, and that affect radiation-induced lung toxicity [130]. Compared to other anticancer drugs, paclitaxel-based chemotherapy has been described to be associated with higher risks of RIP [124, 131,132,133]. Additionally, a meta-analysis found that sequential rather than concurrent chemotherapy (OR = 1.6, p = 0.01) seems to increase the RIP risk. Yet, treatment intensity and patient selection may confound these findings and thus need to be considered [101]. Conflicting results were reported in a different meta-analysis including 1205 patients from seven randomized clinical trials which showed no significant differences between concomitant and sequential chemotherapy for grade ≥ 3 acute pulmonary toxicity (relative risk (RR): 0.69; 95% CI: 0.42 to 1.12; p = 0.13) [134].

Parameters extracted from dose-volume histograms may offer the most resilient predictors of radiation-induced toxicity. In the literature, the mean lung dose (MLD) and the lung volume receiving 20 Gy (V20) are the most frequently and robustly reported risk factors [124, 135]. It is recommended to limit V20 to ≤30–35%, and MLD to ≤20–23 Gy in normofractionated radiotherapy to limit the risk of RIP to ≤20% in patients with NSCLC [124]. Hypofractionated radiotherapy with single doses of ≥2.5 Gy is associated with higher rates of RIP [124, 136]. For SBRT, V20 > 10% and MLD > 6 Gy were associated with higher risk of grade 2–4 RIP [137,138,139]. Apart from these established dose constraints, the concept of the “critical volume” has been increasingly used [140]. According to this concept, a minimum of approximately one-third of the total native lung volume (with connection to the body via a functional hilum) needs to be spared from the threshold dose in order to maintain the basic organ function. Several protocols defining the critical lung volume have been published, ranging from 1000 to 1500 cm3 [140,141,142]. Future studies are needed to provide additional guidance for physicians and to assess the performance of the critical volume concept with regards to preventing radiation-induced toxicity.

With the clinical implementation of immunotherapeutic protocols, the impact of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) on the development of RIP needs to be examined and is currently under investigation [143, 144]. Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/ Programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibition alone can cause immune-mediated pneumonitis in less than 5% [145]. Furthermore, radiation recalls several months after thoracic radiotherapy while ICI is still being administered have been described in some cases [144, 146]. The first systematic retro- and prospective studies have shown acceptable toxicity of sequential and concurrent radio-immunotherapy [147,148,149,150]. However, the risk of RIP and immune-mediated pneumonitis may still be underestimated [144, 151]. Unfortunately, predictive biomarkers and/or patient- or disease-related characteristics that can identify patients with elevated risk of RIP with ICI treatment are currently not available [152], but several ongoing studies are investigating these multi-modal treatment approaches and aim at establishing such biomarkers (NCT03519971 (PACIFIC-2), NCT04245514 (SAKK 16/18), NCT03801902 (NRG-LU004), NCT03217071). For the time being, careful monitoring of radiation and/or immune-mediated pneumonitis and appropriate treatment management strategies with the aim of reducing risk and/or enabling early symptom detection are needed [153].

Prevention of radiation-induced lung injury

Although distinct improvements in radiation treatment planning and delivery techniques (IMRT, VMAT) allow sparing the healthy tissue while escalating the dose administered to the tumor, RIP and RILF remain dose limiting factors of thoracic radiotherapy which strongly affect the therapeutic outcome and quality of life. In order to improve outcome in patients with locally advanced stages of thoracic cancer, multi-modal treatments combining radio-, chemo- and/or immunotherapy are increasingly being employed and often represent the standard of care [13, 14, 154]. Besides technical advances to reduce radiation-induced toxicity, such as the implementation of IMRT and VMAT, no evidence-based pharmacological intervention has been found so far. Several agents are currently under investigation to prevent and/or treat RIP and RILF, namely protectors, modifiers, and mitigators of radiation-induced lung toxicity. Diverse mechanisms of action have been suggested. As such, radiation protectors would be given before radiotherapy, mitigators would be administered during or immediately after irradiation but before the occurrence of radiation-induced toxicity, and modifiers of radiation-induced lung toxicity would be employed after the appearance of RIP or RILF in order to attenuate progression or to reverse the damage. However, the best strategy seems to be investigating novel radiation delivery techniques (image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy) and radiation qualities (proton, particle therapy) combined with promising pharmacological intervention in order to obtain optimal results.

ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitors and angiotensin-II receptor subtype 1 (AT-1) antagonists have been shown to be helpful in mitigating radiation-induced damage by targeting inflammatory and fibrogenic pathways in preclinical model systems [90, 155, 156]. Angiotensin-II stimulates TGF-β expression via upregulation of toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) [157] and α-SMA via mechanisms involving serum response factor (SRF) [158]. Accordingly, AT-1 receptor antagonists may counteract these effects. The ACE inhibitor enalaprilat as the active metabolite of enalapril has been reported to attenuate levels of TGF-β, vascular remodeling, and subsequent lung fibrosis [156]. Similarly, the application of captopril was associated with a reduction in pulmonary complication-associated mortality after total body irradiation in a randomized controlled trial [159]. Despite of the strong preclinical evidence, ACE inhibitors and AT-1 receptor antagonists need to be investigated further in prospective trials.

Amifostine is traditionally used to attenuate accumulating renal toxicity and/or xerostomia during anti-cancer chemo (radio)therapy. Several clinical trials incorporating amifostine reported a particularly low rate of clinically apparent pneumonitis upon thoracic chemoradiotherapy for lung cancer patients [160,161,162,163,164,165]. However, major methodological limitations, including lacking predefinition of time, type of evaluation, lacking inclusion of established risk factors (radiotherapy doses and volumes), and missing control groups limit the informative value of these studies. In the so far largest clinical trial on amifostine only “late lung toxicity” was evaluated [166], and none of the mentioned studies found a reduced rate of clinically and/or radiologically detectable subacute or late lung toxicity upon administration of amifostine [167]. In contrast to radioprotective effects on normal tissues, tumor-protective effects of amifostine can be largely ruled out [167, 168]. However, amifostine can cause adverse effects ranging from nausea and hypotension to myocardial infarction and a poor tolerability (especially when administered intravenously), thus limiting its clinical use.

Prophylactic use of inhalative corticosteroids has been suggested to prevent radiation-induced lung toxicity. However, despite encouraging preclinical results, clinical trials failed to show efficacy of inhalative corticosteroids in the prevention of RIP and RILF [169, 170]. Symptomatic RIP grade 2 patients were successfully treated with inhaled steroids, such as beclomethason [170]. Nevertheless, not all patients may respond to inhaled treatment, and treatment intensification could be necessary with close clinical observation. In contrast to the oral application with a high first pass effect, inhaled application of corticosteroids is accompanied by lower risks of systemic side effects, such as weight gain, hyperglycemia, and sleep disturbances, and thus should be investigated in larger trials.

Pentoxifylline is a phosphodiesterase inhibitor which downregulates the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, particularly TNF. In preclinical studies, administration of pentoxifylline prior to whole thorax irradiation has been reported to reduce TNF mRNA and protein levels [171]. Furthermore, pentoxifylline-mediated phosphodiesterase inhibition results in reduced leukocyte adherence to endothelial cells, less platelet aggregation, and dilatation of capillaries. In a small placebo-controlled phase II study, pentoxifylline reduced the occurrence of high grade pneumonitis and decreased lung function loss after 3 and 6 months [172] confirming earlier results [173, 174]. However, the small number of included patients, heterogeneous treatment and follow-up monitoring as well as the different primary endpoints of the studies need to be considered, and further randomized controlled trials are warranted.

Mechanistically, TGF-β is a central player in the development of both RIP and RILF. Thus, inhibition of TGF-β and/or its downstream signaling cascades represents an attractive strategy to prevent radiation-induced lung toxicity. Several in vivo studies described reduced inflammation and lung fibrosis upon TGF-β receptor inhibition with LY2109761, a TGF-β receptor I/II kinase inhibitor which interferes with SMAD1/2 phosphorylation, attenuates TGF-β signaling, and suppresses production of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-7R, and IL-8 [175, 176]. LY2157299 (galunisertib) more specifically inhibits TGF-β receptor I and has already convinced in phase II clinical trials for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) with manageable toxicity [177]. Its relevance for the prevention of RILF remains to be evaluated. Pirfenidone is an anti-fibrotic agent with approval for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) that also counteracts TGF-β signaling by downregulating pro-fibrotic cytokines, attenuating lung fibroblast proliferation, and decreasing extracellular matrix deposition [178,179,180,181]. Several ongoing or unpublished trials currently investigate pirfenidone for its prophylactic performance in radiation-induced lung toxicity (NCT02296281, NCT00020631).

Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) is another cytokine involved in the development of RILF via its engagement in downstream signaling of fibrotic cytokines, such as TGF-β, IL-1, and TNF [176]. Along these lines, the preventive potential of several PDGF receptor inhibitors has been investigated in the context of radiation-induced lung toxicity in vitro and in vivo [182, 183]. Collectively, the findings suggest that the development of lung fibrosis can be inhibited by perturbing fibrotic signaling events and that this strategy is more promising than interfering with inflammation [183]. However, in clinical trials for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), PDGF inhibitors, such as imatinib, failed to prolong survival and/or improve lung function [184] – in contrast to nintedanib which appears safe and slowed down IPF progression considerably [185, 186]. Clinical performance of PDGF inhibitors for the prevention of radiation-induced lung toxicity is currently being trialed (NCT02496585, NCT02452463).

Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) is a further potential target for the prevention of RILF that was adopted from trials on IPF. It is a matricellular protein involved in tissue remodeling, myofibroblast differentiation, adhesion, and angiogenesis. In vivo experiments demonstrated that CTGF inhibition can attenuate the development of radiation-induced lung fibrosis and even to revert the fibrotic processes in a therapeutic setting [187]. Moreover, FG-3019 (pamrevlumab), a neutralizing antibody designed against CTGF, appears to be more potent than pirfenidone or nintedanib (PDGFR/VEGFR/FGFR inhibitor) in a mouse model of radiation-induced lung fibrosis [188]. Nevertheless, despite successfully completed phase II clinical trials of pamrevlumab in IPF [189], its potential to prevent radiation-induced lung toxicity needs further evaluation.

Apart from cytokines, extracellular adenosine contributes to the development of RILF. It is released by irradiated cells or generated from extracellular adenine nucleotides by the interplay of the ectoenzymes ectoapyrase (CD39) and 5’ectonucleotidase (CD73), respectively [190]. Targeting the CD39/CD73/adenosine axis via administration of PEGylated adenosine deaminase or CD73 antibodies resulted in significantly attenuated RILF in preclinical settings [191] and thus represents a promising pharmacological strategy for future clinical trials.

Several transient receptor potential cation channels (TRPs) are expressed in the lung and have been found to mediate inflammatory and fibrotic processes, such as interstitial edema and lung fibrosis. TRPM2 is involved in acute and late radiation-induced toxicity, and its PARP1-dependent activation upon exposure to ionizing irradiation has been described to contribute to the development of xerostomia in a mouse model [192]. Furthermore, TRPM2-deficient mice exhibit less inflammation and dermatofibrosis in response to radiotherapy as compared to wild type mice [193]. Thus, the role of TRP channels as potential therapeutic target in the prevention of RIP and RILF needs further investigation [194].

Finally, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been shown to exhibit strong regenerative capacity for several forms of tissue damage [195]. MSCs can successfully migrate towards the injured site in the lung upon irradiation and differentiate into distinct lung cell types, including AT I/II cells and endothelial cells. Preclinical studies reported that lung fibrosis can be modulated by administration of MSCs [195, 196]. In these settings, adoptive transfer of MSCs did limit radiation-induced endothelial cell loss in the early phase after irradiation and promoted tissue repair through the secretion of superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) [197] and the anti-fibrotic factors hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) [198]. Initial phase I trials on IPF confirmed safety of MSC application and reported promising outcomes [199, 200].

Treatment of RIP and RILF

National and international guidelines recommend treating RIP only if symptomatic with corticosteroids according to clinical severity based on consensus guidelines due to limited clinical data. The treatment should be carried out over at least several weeks and subsequently should be slowly tapered (see Table 4) [201]. Abrupt discontinuation should be avoided in order to prevent early relapse of RIP (rebound phenomenon) with increased severity and higher risk of RILF development. For asymptomatic or subclinical patients, clinical observation without further treatment is recommended. Patients with radiation-induced BOOP usually show fast and effective responses to steroid treatment [202]. Prophylactic administration of antibiotics in RIP can be considered for patients at high risk of bacterial infection, for instance with cancer-associated bronchial stenosis, or for immunocompromised patients. If symptoms persist under treatment with steroids and/or antibiotics, antifungal treatment may be subscribed. Steroid doses can be reduced in combination with azathioprine or cyclosporine A. For individual cases, these agents can be used if corticosteroid treatment fails. Respiratory gymnastics and inhalation of β-sympathomimetics have been reported to be supportive. In severe cases of RIP (CTCAE ≥III), administering oxygen, assisted ventilation and prophylaxis of right heart failure are needed. A successful treatment option for RILF has yet not been established.

Table 4 Treatment with corticosteroids in responsive patients with moderate RIP (CTCAE I-II)


RIP and RILF remain dose limiting forms of radiation-induced lung toxicity with relevant impact on the success of thoracic radiotherapy. Several patient-, disease- and treatment-related factors, namely age, pre-existing lung disease, tumor location, radiation dose, and irradiated volume, need to be considered when trying to predict their risk of occurrence. This is of particular importance in complex settings of multi-modal radio-chemo-immunotherapy with or without prior surgery. Refined radiation delivery techniques, including motion management and treatment verification strategies, can reduce the irradiated lung volume and should be considered for patients with high risk of RIP. The current repertoire of preventive and/or therapeutic intervention by administration of radiation protectors, modifiers, and/or mitigators remains rather limited. But with growing knowledge of the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms of radiation-induced lung toxicity, promising targets and pathways have been and will be identified to serve as future therapeutic options – preferentially in combination with novel radiation delivery techniques.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.







[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-2-D-glucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography


Angiotensin-converting enzyme


Alveolar type I


Alveolar type II


Bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia


Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease


C-reactive protein


Computed tomography


Common terminology criteria for adverse events


Connective tissue growth factor


Clinical target volume


Damage-associated molecular pattern


Diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide


Deoxyribonucleic acid


Extracellular signal–regulated kinase


Forced expiratory volume in one second


Gross tumor volume


Hepatocyte growth factor


High-resolution computed tomography


Intercellular adhesion molecule 1


Immune checkpoint inhibition


Image-guided radiotherapy




Interstitial lung abnormality


Interstitial lung disease


Intensity modulated radiotherapy


Mitogen-activated protein kinase


Mean lung dose


Magnetic resonance


Mesenchymal stem cell


Non-small cell lung cancer


Odds ratio


Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1


Poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase 1


Programmed cell death 1


Platelet-derived growth factor


Programmed cell death 1 ligand 1


Platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1


Prostaglandin E2


Planning target volume


Radiation-induced lung fibrosis


Radiation-induced pneumonitis


Reactive oxygen species


Radiation Therapy Oncology Group


Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy


Senescence-associated secretory phenotype


Stereotactic body radiotherapy


Small mother against decapentaplegic


Superoxide dismutase 1


Serum response factor


Transforming growth factor-β


Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases


Toll-like receptor 4


Tumor necrosis factor


Transient receptor potential cation channel


Transient receptor potential cation channel member 2


Lung volume receiving 20 Gy


Volumetric modulated arc therapy


α-smooth muscle actin


  1. 1.

    Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:7–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Delaney G, Barton M, Jacob S, Jalaludin B. A model for decision making for the use of radiotherapy in lung cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2003;4:120–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Nestle U, Schimek-Jasch T, Kremp S, Schaefer-Schuler A, Mix M, Küsters A, Tosch M, Hehr T, Eschmann SM, Bultel YP, Hass P. Imagingbased target volume reduction in chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (PET-Plan): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2020;21(4):581–92.

  4. 4.

    Unterrainer M, Eze C, Ilhan H, Marschner S, Roengvoraphoj O, Schmidt-Hegemann N, Walter F, Kunz W, Af Rosenschöld PM, Jeraj R. Recent advances of PET imaging in clinical radiation oncology. Radiat Oncol. 2020;15:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Chun S, Hu C, Choy H, Komaki R, Timmerman R, Schild S, Bogart J, Dobelbower M, Bosch W, Galvin J. Comparison of 3-D conformal and intensity modulated radiation therapy outcomes for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer in NRG oncology/RTOG 0617. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;93:S1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ling DC, Hess CB, Chen AM, Daly ME. Comparison of toxicity between intensity-modulated radiotherapy and 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2016;17:18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Finazzi T, Haasbeek CJ, Spoelstra FO, Palacios MA, Admiraal MA, Bruynzeel AM, Slotman BJ, Lagerwaard FJ, Senan S. Clinical outcomes of stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy for high-risk lung tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020;107(2):270–78.

  8. 8.

    De Ruysscher D, Niedermann G, Burnet NG, Siva S, Lee AW, Hegi-Johnson F. Radiotherapy toxicity. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5:1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kurz C, Buizza G, Landry G, Kamp F, Rabe M, Paganelli C, Baroni G, Reiner M, Keall PJ, van den Berg CA. Medical physics challenges in clinical MR-guided radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol. 2020;15:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Borghaei H, Langer CJ, Gadgeel S, Papadimitrakopoulou VA, Patnaik A, Powell SF, Gentzler RD, Martins RG, Stevenson JP, Jalal SI. 24-month overall survival from KEYNOTE-021 cohort G: Pemetrexed and carboplatin with or without Pembrolizumab as first-line therapy for advanced nonsquamous non–small cell lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2019;14:124–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Reck M, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, et al. LBA8_PR - KEYNOTE-024: Pembrolizumab (pembro) vs platinum-based chemotherapy (chemo) as first-line therapy for advanced NSCLC with a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50%. Abstract presented at ESMO 2016 Congress, October 7 - 11, 2016, Copenhagen, Denmark. Available online: Accessed 27 Aug 2020.

  12. 12.

    Paz-Ares L, Luft A, Vicente D, Tafreshi A, Gümüş M, Mazières J, Hermes B, Çay Şenler F, Csőszi T, Fülöp A. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for squamous non–small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:2040–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Gandhi L, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Gadgeel S, Esteban E, Felip E, De Angelis F, Domine M, Clingan P, Hochmair MJ, Powell SF. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2078–92.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Antonia SJ, Villegas A, Daniel D, Vicente D, Murakami S, Hui R, Kurata T, Chiappori A, Lee KH, de Wit M. Overall survival with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:2342–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Käsmann L, Eze C, Dantes M, Roengvoraphoj O, Niyazi M, Belka C, Manapov F. State of clinical research of radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy combinations in solid tumours—a German radiation oncology survey. Eur J Cancer. 2019;108:50–4.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Käsmann L, Eze C, Manapov F. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) combined with immune check-point inhibition (ICI) in advanced lung cancer: which metastatic site should be irradiated to induce immunogenic cell death?. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020;108(1):225–6.

  17. 17.

    Mok TS, Wu Y-L, Thongprasert S, Yang C-H, Chu D-T, Saijo N, Sunpaweravong P, Han B, Margono B, Ichinose Y. Gefitinib or carboplatin–paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:947–57.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Rosell R, Carcereny E, Gervais R, Vergnenegre A, Massuti B, Felip E, Palmero R, Garcia-Gomez R, Pallares C, Sanchez JM. Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:239–46.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Shaw AT, Kim D-W, Nakagawa K, Seto T, Crinó L, Ahn M-J, De Pas T, Besse B, Solomon BJ, Blackhall F. Crizotinib versus chemotherapy in advanced ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2385–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wijsman R, Dankers F, Troost EG, Hoffmann AL, van der Heijden EH, de Geus-Oei L-F, Bussink J. Comparison of toxicity and outcome in advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated (chemo-) radiotherapy using IMRT or VMAT. Radiother Oncol. 2017;122:295–9.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Chao P-J, Lee H-F, Lan J-H, Guo S-S, Ting H-M, Huang Y-J, Chen H-C, Lee T-F. Propensity-score-matched evaluation of the incidence of radiation pneumonitis and secondary cancer risk for breast cancer patients treated with IMRT/VMAT. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Wennberg B, Gagliardi G, Sundbom L, Svane G, Lind P. Early response of lung in breast cancer irradiation: radiologic density changes measured by CT and symptomatic radiation pneumonitis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;52:1196–206.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Nishioka A, Ogawa Y, Hamada N, Terashima M, Inomata T, Yoshida S. Analysis of radiation pneumonitis and radiation-induced lung fibrosis in breast cancer patients after breast conservation treatment. Oncol Rep. 1999;6:513–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Keffer S, Guy CL, Weiss E. Fatal radiation pneumonitis: literature review and case series. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020 Mar. 5(2):238–49.

  25. 25.

    Sun L-M, Leung SW, Wang C-J, Chen H-C, Fang F-M, Huang E-Y, Hsu H-C, Yeh S-A, Hsiung C-Y, Huang DT. Concomitant boost radiation therapy for inoperable non–small-cell lung cancer: preliminary report of a prospective randomized study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;47:413–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Cannon DM, Mehta MP, Adkison JB, Khuntia D, Traynor AM, Tomé WA, Chappell RJ, Tolakanahalli R, Mohindra P, Bentzen SM. Dose-limiting toxicity after Hypofractionated dose-escalated radiotherapy in non–small-cell lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:4343.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Wurstbauer K, Zehentmayr F, Deutschmann H, Dagn K, Exeli A-K, Kopp P, Porsch P, Maurer B, Studnicka M, Sedlmayer F. DART-bid for loco-regionally advanced NSCLC. Strahlenther Onkol. 2017;193:315–23.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Nguyen Q-N, Ly NB, Komaki R, Levy LB, Gomez DR, Chang JY, Allen PK, Mehran RJ, Lu C, Gillin M. Long-term outcomes after proton therapy, with concurrent chemotherapy, for stage II–III inoperable non-small cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2015;115:367–72.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Onishi H, Kuriyama K, Yamaguchi M, Komiyama T, Tanaka S, Araki T, Nishikawa K, Ishihara H. Concurrent two-dimensional radiotherapy and weekly docetaxel in the treatment of stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a good local response but no good survival due to radiation pneumonitis. Lung Cancer Amst Neth. 2003;40:79–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Sejpal S, Komaki R, Tsao A, Chang JY, Liao Z, Wei X, Allen PK, Lu C, Gillin M, Cox JD. Early findings on toxicity of proton beam therapy with concurrent chemotherapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer. 2011;117:3004–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Rehman S, Speirs C, Molotievschi A, Mullen D, Fergus S, DeWees T, Velez M, Bradley J, Robinson C. Evaluating a nomogram for the development of radiation pneumonitis in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with 3d and intensity modulated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;90:S161–2.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Zhang T, Zhou Z, Bi N, Wang J, Wang L, Deng L, Feng Q, Liang J, Xiao Z, Chen D. VMAT for Unresectable locally advanced NSCLC does not increase the risk of radiation pneumonitis compared with IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019;105:E543.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Wu K, Xu X, Li X, Wang J, Zhu L, Chen X, Wang B, Zhang M, Xia B, Ma S. Radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10:6531.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Chang JY, Verma V, Li M, Zhang W, Komaki R, Lu C, Allen PK, Liao Z, Welsh J, Lin SH. Proton beam radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy for unresectable stage III non–small cell lung cancer: final results of a phase 2 study. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:e172032.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Osti M, Agolli L, Valeriani M, Reverberi C, Bracci S, Marinelli L, De Sanctis V, Cortesi E, Martelli M, De Dominicis C. 30 Gy single dose stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT): report on outcome in a large series of patients with lung oligometastatic disease. Lung Cancer. 2018;122:165–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Nicosia L, Reverberi C, Agolli L, Marinelli L, De Sanctis V, Valeriani M, Osti MF. Long term results of single high dose stereotactic body radiotherapy in the treatment of primary lung tumors. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Bertolaccini L, Terzi A, Ricchetti F, Alongi F. Surgery or stereotactic ablative radiation therapy: how will be treated operable patients with early stage not small cell lung cancer in the next future? Ann Transl Med. 2015;3(2):25.

  38. 38.

    Park HS, Harder EM, Mancini BR, Decker RH. Central versus peripheral tumor location: influence on survival, local control, and toxicity following stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary non–small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10:832–7.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Zhao Y, Khawandanh E, Thomas S, Zhang S, Dunne EM, Liu M, Schellenberg D. Outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy 60 Gy in 8 fractions when prioritizing organs at risk for central and ultracentral lung tumors. Radiat Oncol. 2020;15:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Guckenberger M, Baier K, Polat B, Richter A, Krieger T, Wilbert J, Mueller G, Flentje M. Dose–response relationship for radiation-induced pneumonitis after pulmonary stereotactic body radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2010;97:65–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    de Jong EE, Guckenberger M, Andratschke N, Dieckmann K, Hoogeman MS, Milder M, Møller DS, Nyeng TB, Tanadini-Lang S, Lartigau E. Variation in current prescription practice of stereotactic body radiotherapy for peripherally located early stage non-small cell lung cancer: recommendations for prescribing and recording according to the ACROP guideline and ICRU report 91. Radiother Oncol. 2020;142:217–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Kalinauskaite GG, Tinhofer II, Kufeld MM, Kluge AA, Grün AA, Budach VV, Senger CC, Stromberger CC. Radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with lung oligometastases. BMC Cancer. 2020;20:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Cox JD, Stetz J, Pajak TF. Toxicity criteria of the radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) and the European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31:1341–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    National Cancer Institute (US). Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (2017) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events:(CTCAE). v5. Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Wannenmacher M, Debus J, Wenz F. Strahlentherapie. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2007.

  46. 46.

    Wang Z, Huo B, Wu Q, Dong L, Fu H, Wang S, Zhang J. The role of procalcitonin in differential diagnosis between acute radiation pneumonitis and bacterial pneumonia in lung cancer patients receiving thoracic radiotherapy. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Toma CL, Serbescu A, Alexe M, Cervis L, Ionita D, Bogdan MA. The bronchoalveolar lavage pattern in radiation pneumonitis secondary to radiotherapy for breast cancer. Maedica. 2010;5(4):250–7.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Schröder C, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Vorwerk H, Schmidt M, Huhnt W, Blank E, Sidow D, Buchali A. Changes in pulmonary function and influencing factors after high-dose intrathoracic radio (chemo) therapy. Strahlenther Onkol. 2017;193:125–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Guerra JLL, Gomez D, Zhuang Y, Levy LB, Eapen G, Liu H, Mohan R, Komaki R, Cox JD, Liao Z. Change in diffusing capacity after radiation as an objective measure for grading radiation pneumonitis in patients treated for non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83:1573–9.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Davis SD, Yankelevitz DF, Henschke CI. Radiation effects on the lung: clinical features, pathology, and imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;159:1157–64.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Thomas R, Chen YH, Hatabu H, Mak RH, Nishino M. Radiographic patterns of symptomatic radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer patients: Imaging predictors for clinical severity and outcome. Lung Cancer. 2020;145:132–9.

  52. 52.

    Ikezoe J, Takashima S, Morimoto S, Kadowaki K, Takeuchi N, Yamamoto T, Nakanishi K, Isaza M, Arisawa J, Ikeda H. CT appearance of acute radiation-induced injury in the lung. Am J Roentgenol. 1988;150:765–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    De Wever W, Meersschaert J, Coolen J, Verbeken E, Verschakelen JA. The crazy-paving pattern: a radiological-pathological correlation. Insights Imaging. 2011;2:117–32.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Ronden MI, Palma D, Slotman BJ, Senan S. Brief report on radiological changes following stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for early-stage lung tumors: a pictorial essay. J Thorac Oncol. 2018;13:855–62.

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Dahele M, Palma D, Lagerwaard F, Slotman B, Senan S. Radiological changes after stereotactic radiotherapy for stage I lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6:1221–8.

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Benveniste MF, Gomez D, Carter BW, Betancourt Cuellar SL, Shroff GS, Benveniste APA, Odisio EG, Marom EM. Recognizing radiation therapy–related complications in the chest. Radiographics. 2019;39:344–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Epler GR, Kelly EM. Systematic review of postradiotherapy bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia in women with breast cancer. Oncologist. 2014;19:1216.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Choi YW, Munden RF, Erasmus JJ, Joo Park K, Chung WK, Jeon SC, Park C-K. Effects of radiation therapy on the lung: radiologic appearances and differential diagnosis. Radiographics. 2004;24:985–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Cornelissen R, Senan S, Antonisse IE, Liem H, Tan YK, Rudolphus A, Aerts JG. Bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia (BOOP) after thoracic radiotherapy for breast carcinoma. Radiat Oncol. 2007;2:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Murofushi KN, Oguchi M, Gosho M, Kozuka T, Sakurai H. Radiation-induced bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia (BOOP) syndrome in breast cancer patients is associated with age. Radiat Oncol. 2015;10:103.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Dileto CL, Travis EL. Fibroblast radiosensitivity in vitro and lung fibrosis in vivo: comparison between a fibrosis-prone and fibrosis-resistant mouse strain. Radiat Res. 1996;146:61–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Iwata H, Murai T, Shibamoto Y. Radiation response of the normal lung tissue and lung tumors. In: Advances in radiation oncology in lung Cancer. Berlin: Springer; 2011. p. 119–28.

  63. 63.

    Tsoutsou PG, Koukourakis MI. Radiation pneumonitis and fibrosis: mechanisms underlying its pathogenesis and implications for future research. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66:1281–93.

    Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Wirsdörfer F, Jendrossek V. Modeling DNA damage-induced pneumopathy in mice: insight from danger signaling cascades. Radiat Oncol. 2017;12:142.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    de Leve S, Wirsdörfer F, Cappuccini F, Schütze A, Meyer AV, Röck K, Thompson LF, Fischer JW, Stuschke M, Jendrossek V. Loss of CD73 prevents accumulation of alternatively activated macrophages and the formation of prefibrotic macrophage clusters in irradiated lungs. FASEB J. 2017;31:2869–80.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Hansel C, Jendrossek V, Klein D. Cellular senescence in the lung: the central role of senescent epithelial cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:3279.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Robbins ME, Diz DI. Pathogenic role of the renin–angiotensin system in modulating radiation-induced late effects. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64:6–12.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Fleckenstein K, Gauter-Fleckenstein B, Jackson IL, Rabbani Z, Anscher M, Vujaskovic Z. Using biological markers to predict risk of radiation injury. Seminars in radiation oncology. 2007;(2):89–98.

  69. 69.

    Chiang C-S, Liu W-C, Jung S-M, Chen F-H, Wu C-R, McBride WH, Lee C-C, Hong J-H. Compartmental responses after thoracic irradiation of mice: strain differences. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62:862–71.

    Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Citrin DE, Shankavaram U, Horton JA, Shield W III, Zhao S, Asano H, White A, Sowers A, Thetford A, Chung EJ. Role of type II pneumocyte senescence in radiation-induced lung fibrosis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:1474–84.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Hall EJ, Giaccia AJ. Radiobiology for the Radiologist, 8th Ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2018.

  72. 72.

    Lauber K, Ernst A, Orth M, Herrmann M, Belka C. Dying cell clearance and its impact on the outcome of tumor radiotherapy. Front Oncol. 2012;2:116.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Coppé J-P, Desprez P-Y, Krtolica A, Campisi J. The senescence-associated secretory phenotype: the dark side of tumor suppression. Annu Rev Pathol Mech Dis. 2010;5:99–118.

    Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Desai TJ, Brownfield DG, Krasnow MA. Alveolar progenitor and stem cells in lung development, renewal and cancer. Nature. 2014;507:190–4.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Trott KR, Herrmann T, Kasper M. Target cells in radiation pneumopathy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;58:463–9.

    Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Fleckenstein K, Zgonjanin L, Chen L, Rabbani Z, Jackson IL, Thrasher B, Kirkpatrick J, Foster WM, Vujaskovic Z. Temporal onset of hypoxia and oxidative stress after pulmonary irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68:196–204.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Ding N-H, Jian Li J, Sun L-Q. Molecular mechanisms and treatment of radiation-induced lung fibrosis. Curr Drug Targets. 2013;14:1347–56.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Giuranno L, Ient J, De Ruysscher D, Vooijs MA. Radiation-induced lung injury (RILI). Front Oncol. 2019;9:877.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Zhang B, Wang Y, Pang X, Su Y, Ai G, Wang T. ER stress induced by ionising radiation in IEC-6 cells. Int J Radiat Biol. 2010;86:429–35.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Ryter SW, Kim HP, Hoetzel A, Park JW, Nakahira K, Wang X, Choi AM. Mechanisms of cell death in oxidative stress. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2007;9:49–89.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Jack CI, Bottier B, Jackson MJ, Cassapi L, Fraser WD, Hind CR. Indicators of free radical activity in patients developing radiation pneumonitis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;34:149–54.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Arpin D, Perol D, Blay J-Y, Falchero L, Claude L, Vuillermoz-Blas S, Martel-Lafay I, Ginestet C, Alberti L, Nosov D. Early variations of circulating interleukin-6 and interleukin-10 levels during thoracic radiotherapy are predictive for radiation pneumonitis. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8748–56.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Chen Y, Williams J, Ding I, Hernady E, Liu W, Smudzin T, Finkelstein JN, Rubin P, Okunieff P. Radiation pneumonitis and early circulatory cytokine markers. Seminars in radiation oncology. 2002;12(1):26–33.

  84. 84.

    Kühlmann UC, Chwieralski CE, Reinhold D, Welte T, Bühling F. Radiation-induced matrix production of lung fibroblasts is regulated by interleukin-8. Int J Radiat Biol. 2009;85:138–43.

    Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Wirsdörfer F, Jendrossek V. The role of lymphocytes in radiotherapy-induced adverse late effects in the lung. Front Immunol. 2016;7:591.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Kainthola A, Haritwal T, Tiwari M, Gupta N, Parvez S, Tiwari M, Prakash H, Agrawala PK. Immunological aspect of radiation-induced pneumonitis, current treatment strategies, and future prospects. Front Immunol. 2017;8:506.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    McKelvey KJ, Hudson AL, Back M, Eade T, Diakos CI. Radiation, inflammation and the immune response in cancer. Mamm Genome. 2018;29:843–65.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Vujaskovic Z, Anscher MS, Feng Q-F, Rabbani ZN, Amin K, Samulski TS, Dewhirst MW, Haroon ZA. Radiation-induced hypoxia may perpetuate late normal tissue injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;50:851–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Liu Y, Xia T, Zhang W, Zhong Y, Zhang L, Wang X, Yu H. Variations of circulating endothelial progenitor cells and transforming growth factor-beta-1 (TGF-β1) during thoracic radiotherapy are predictive for radiation pneumonitis. Radiat Oncol. 2013;8:189.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Molteni A, Wolfe LF, Ward WF, Hsin Ts’ao C, Brizio Molteni L, Veno P, Fish BL, Taylor JM, Quintanilla N, Herndon B. Effect of an angiotensin II receptor blocker and two angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors on transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and α-Actomyosin (α SMA), important mediators of radiation-induced pneumopathy and lung fibrosis. Curr Pharm Des. 2007;13:1307–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Hata A, Chen Y-G. TGF-β signaling from receptors to Smads. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2016;8:a022061.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Dewen LYSLW, Yabin P, Junjie JMM. Studies on the expression of Smad3, Smad4 and Smad7 in rats with radiation pulmonary fibrosis [J]. J Radiat Res Radiat Process. 2004;3. Available online: Accessed 27 Aug 2020.

  93. 93.

    Ryu S-Y, Do S-H, Chung J-Y, Kim T-H, Kim S-H, Choi C-Y, Jeong K-S, Park S-J. Activation of MAP kinases during progression of radiation-induced pneumonitis in rats. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2011;30:876–83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Raghu G, Masta S, Meyers D, Narayanan AS. Growth factor-J31-3. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989;140:95–100.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Ignotz RA, Massague J. Transforming growth factor-beta stimulates the expression of fibronectin and collagen and their incorporation into the extracellular matrix. J Biol Chem. 1986;261:4337–45.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Luo Y, Xu W, Chen H, Warburton D, Dong R, Qian B, Selman M, Gauldie J, Kolb M, Shi W. A novel profibrotic mechanism mediated by TGFβ-stimulated collagen prolyl hydroxylase expression in fibrotic lung mesenchymal cells. J Pathol. 2015;236:384–94.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Rubin P, Johnston CJ, Williams JP, McDonald S, Finkelstein JN. A perpetual cascade of cytokines postirradiation leads to pulmonary fibrosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;33:99–109.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Barcellos-Hoff M, Dix TA. Redox-mediated activation of latent transforming growth factor-beta 1. Mol Endocrinol. 1996;10:1077–83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Tomasek JJ, Gabbiani G, Hinz B, Chaponnier C, Brown RA. Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002;3:349–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Kendall RT, Feghali-Bostwick CA. Fibroblasts in fibrosis: novel roles and mediators. Front Pharmacol. 2014;5:123.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Vogelius IR, Bentzen SM. A literature-based meta-analysis of clinical risk factors for development of radiation induced pneumonitis. Acta Oncol. 2012;51:975–83.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Jin H, Tucker SL, Liu HH, Wei X, Yom SS, Wang S, Komaki R, Chen Y, Martel MK, Mohan R. Dose–volume thresholds and smoking status for the risk of treatment-related pneumonitis in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2009;91:427–32.

    Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Bradley JD, Hope A, El Naqa I, Apte A, Lindsay PE, Bosch W, Matthews J, Sause W, Graham MV, Deasy JO. A nomogram to predict radiation pneumonitis, derived from a combined analysis of RTOG 9311 and institutional data. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:985–92.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Wen J, Liu H, Wang Q, Liu Z, Li Y, Xiong H, Xu T, Li P, Wang L-E, Gomez DR. Genetic variants of the LIN28B gene predict severe radiation pneumonitis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with definitive radiation therapy. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50:1706–16.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Ball DL, Fisher RJ, Burmeister BH, Poulsen MG, Graham PH, Penniment MG, Vinod SK, Krawitz HE, Joseph DJ, Wheeler GC. The complex relationship between lung tumor volume and survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated by definitive radiotherapy: a prospective, observational prognostic factor study of the trans-Tasman radiation oncology group (TROG 99.05). Radiother Oncol. 2013;106:305–11.

    Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Rancati T, Ceresoli GL, Gagliardi G, Schipani S, Cattaneo GM. Factors predicting radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer patients: a retrospective study. Radiother Oncol. 2003;67:275–83.

    Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Kimura T, Togami T, Takashima H, Nishiyama Y, Ohkawa M, Nagata Y. Radiation pneumonitis in patients with lung and mediastinal tumours: a retrospective study of risk factors focused on pulmonary emphysema. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:135–41.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Takeda A, Kunieda E, Ohashi T, Aoki Y, Oku Y, Enomoto T, Nomura K, Sugiura M. Severe COPD is correlated with mild radiation pneumonitis following stereotactic body radiotherapy. Chest. 2012;141:858–66.

    Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Finazzi T, Ronden-Kianoush MI, Spoelstra FO, Nossent EJ, Nijman SF, Bahce I, Dickhoff C, Senan S. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer and co-existing interstitial lung disease. Acta Oncol. 2020;59:569–73.

    Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Goodman CD, Nijman SF, Senan S, Nossent EJ, Ryerson CJ, Dhaliwal I, Qu M, Laba J, Rodrigues G, Palma DA. A Primer on Interstitial Lung Disease and Thoracic Radiation. J Thorac Oncol. 2020;15(6):902–13.

  111. 111.

    Bahig H, Filion E, Vu T, Chalaoui J, Lambert L, Roberge D, Gagnon M, Fortin B, Béliveau-Nadeau D, Mathieu D. Severe radiation pneumonitis after lung stereotactic ablative radiation therapy in patients with interstitial lung disease. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2016;6:367–74.

    Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Takeda A, Ohashi T, Kunieda E, Enomoto T, Sanuki N, Takeda T, Shigematsu N. Early graphical appearance of radiation pneumonitis correlates with the severity of radiation pneumonitis after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with lung tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;77:685–90.

    Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Ueki N, Matsuo Y, Togashi Y, Kubo T, Shibuya K, Iizuka Y, Mizowaki T, Togashi K, Mishima M, Hiraoka M. Impact of pretreatment interstitial lung disease on radiation pneumonitis and survival after stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10:116–25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Chen H, Senan S, Nossent EJ, Boldt RG, Warner A, Palma DA, Louie AV. Treatment-related toxicity in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer and coexisting interstitial lung disease: a systematic review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;98:622–31.

    Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    De Ruysscher D, Faivre-Finn C, Moeller D, Nestle U, Hurkmans CW, Le Péchoux C, Belderbos J, Guckenberger M, Senan S, Group L. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) recommendations for planning and delivery of high-dose, high precision radiotherapy for lung cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2017;124:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Washko GR, Hunninghake GM, Fernandez IE, Nishino M, Okajima Y, Yamashiro T, Ross JC, Estépar RSJ, Lynch DA, Brehm JM. Lung volumes and emphysema in smokers with interstitial lung abnormalities. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:897–906.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Brown S-AW, Padilla M, Mhango G, Powell C, Salvatore M, Henschke C, Yankelevitz D, Sigel K, De-Torres JP, Wisnivesky J. Interstitial lung abnormalities and lung cancer risk in the National Lung Screening Trial. Chest. 2019;156:1195–203.

    Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Putman RK, Hatabu H, Araki T, Gudmundsson G, Gao W, Nishino M, Okajima Y, Dupuis J, Latourelle JC, Cho MH. Association between interstitial lung abnormalities and all-cause mortality. Jama. 2016;315:672–81.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Palma DA, Chen H, Bahig H, Gaede S, Harrow S, Laba JM, Qu XM, Rodrigues GB, Yaremko BP, Yu E. Assessment of precision irradiation in early non-small cell lung cancer and interstitial lung disease (ASPIRE-ILD): study protocol for a phase II trial. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:1206.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Nakamura T, Fuwa N, Kodaira T, Tachibana H, Tomoda T, Nakahara R, Inokuchi H. Clinical outcome of stage III non-small-cell lung cancer patients after definitive radiotherapy. Lung. 2008;186:91–6.

    Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Parker SM, Siochi RA, Wen S, Mattes MD. Impact of tumor size on local control and pneumonitis after stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung tumors. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019;9:e90–7.

    Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Meng Y, Yang H, Wang W, Tang X, Jiang C, Shen Y, Luo W. Excluding PTV from lung volume may better predict radiation pneumonitis for intensity modulated radiation therapy in lung cancer patients. Radiat Oncol. 2019;14:7.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    De Petris L, Lax I, Sirzén F, Friesland S. Role of gross tumor volume on outcome and of dose parameters on toxicity of patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Med Oncol. 2005;22:375–81.

    Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Palma DA, Senan S, Tsujino K, Barriger RB, Rengan R, Moreno M, Bradley JD, Kim TH, Ramella S, Marks LB. Predicting radiation pneumonitis after chemoradiation therapy for lung cancer: an international individual patient data meta-analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;85:444–50.

    Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Yorke ED, Jackson A, Kuo LC, Ojo A, Panchoo K, Adusumilli P, Zauderer MG, Rusch VW, Shepherd A, Rimner A. Heart dosimetry is correlated with risk of radiation pneumonitis after lung-sparing hemithoracic pleural intensity modulated radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;99:61–9.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Dang J, Li G, Zang S, Zhang S, Yao L. Comparison of risk and predictors for early radiation pneumonitis in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with radiotherapy with or without surgery. Lung Cancer. 2014;86:329–33.

    Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Huang EX, Hope AJ, Lindsay PE, Trovo M, El Naqa I, Deasy JO, Bradley JD. Heart irradiation as a risk factor for radiation pneumonitis. Acta Oncol. 2011;50:51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Dang J, Li G, Zang S, Zhang S, Yao L. Risk and predictors for early radiation pneumonitis in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated with concurrent or sequential chemoradiotherapy. Radiat Oncol. 2014;9:172.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Bledsoe TJ, Nath SK, Decker RH. Radiation pneumonitis. Clin Chest Med. 2017;38:201–8.

    Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Jeremić B, Miličić B, Milisavljevic S. Toxicity of concurrent hyperfractionated radiation therapy and chemotherapy in locally advanced (stage III) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): single institution experience in 600 patients. Clin Transl Oncol. 2012;14:613–8.

    Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Fujimori K, Yokoyama A, Kurita Y, Uno K, Saijo N. Paclitaxel-induced cell-mediated hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Oncology. 1998;55:340–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Taghian AG, Assaad SI, Niemierko A, Kuter I, Younger J, Schoenthaler R, Roche M, Powell SN. Risk of pneumonitis in breast cancer patients treated with radiation therapy and combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1806–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Bielopolski D, Evron E, Moreh-Rahav O, Landes M, Stemmer SM, Salamon F. Paclitaxel-induced pneumonitis in patients with breast cancer: case series and review of the literature. J Chemother. 2017;29:113–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Aupérin A, Le Péchoux C, Rolland E, Curran WJ, Furuse K, Fournel P, Belderbos J, Clamon G, Ulutin HC, Paulus R. Meta-analysis of concomitant versus sequential radiochemotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. In: Database of abstracts of reviews of effects (DARE): quality assessed reviews [internet]. York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; 2010.

  135. 135.

    Zhang X-J, Sun J-G, Sun J, Ming H, Wang X-X, Wu L, Chen Z-T. Prediction of radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer patients: a systematic review. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2012;138:2103–16.

    Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Thor M, Deasy J, Iyer A, Bendau E, Fontanella A, Apte A, Yorke E, Rimner A, Jackson A. Toward personalized dose-prescription in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: validation of published normal tissue complication probability models. Radiother Oncol. 2019;138:45–51.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Yamashita H, Takahashi W, Haga A, Nakagawa K. Radiation pneumonitis after stereotactic radiation therapy for lung cancer. World J Radiol. 2014;6:708.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Kong F, Zhang H, Liu Y, Yao H, Cerra-Franco A, Shiue K, Vile D, Wang W, Langer M, Watson G. Radiation to the immune system may be an important risk factor for long-term survival after SBRT in early stage non-small cell lung Cancer: a role of RT plan optimization. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;102:e689–90.

    Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Zhao J, Yorke ED, Li L, Kavanagh BD, Li XA, Das S, Miften M, Rimner A, Campbell J, Xue J. Simple factors associated with radiation-induced lung toxicity after stereotactic body radiation therapy of the thorax: a pooled analysis of 88 studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;95:1357–66.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Ritter TA, Matuszak M, Chetty IJ, Mayo CS, Wu J, Iyengar P, Weldon M, Robinson C, Xiao Y, Timmerman RD. Application of critical volume-dose constraints for stereotactic body radiation therapy in NRG radiation therapy trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;98:34–6.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Videtic G, Singh A, Chang J, Le Q, Parker W, Olivier K. A randomized phase II study comparing 2 stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) schedules for medically inoperable patients with stage I peripheral non-small cell lung cancer. Radiation therapy oncology group 0915. Philadelphie: Radiat Ther Oncol Group; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Bezjak A, Bradley J, Gaspar L, Robert D, Papiez L, Gore E. Seamless phase I/II study of stereotactic lung radiotherapy (SBRT) for early stage, centrally located, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in medically inoperable patients. RTOG. 2012;813:1–75.

    Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Wirsdörfer F, De Leve S, Jendrossek V. Combining radiotherapy and immunotherapy in lung cancer: can we expect limitations due to altered normal tissue toxicity? Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:24.

    Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Manapov F, Roengvoraphoj O, Dantes M, Marschner S, Li M, Eze C. Pneumonitis in irradiated lungs after nivolumab: a brief communication and review of the literature. J Immunother. 2018;41:96–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Tian S, Switchenko JM, Buchwald ZS, Patel PR, Shelton JW, Kahn SE, Pillai RN, Steuer CE, Owonikoko TK, Behera M, Curran WJ. Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Concurrent Immunotherapy: A Multicenter Safety and Toxicity Analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020;108(1):304–13.

  146. 146.

    McGovern K, Ghaly M, Esposito M, Barnaby K, Seetharamu N. Radiation recall pneumonitis in the setting of immunotherapy and radiation: a focused review. Future Sci OA. 2019;5:FSO378.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    von Reibnitz D, Chaft JE, Wu AJ, Samstein R, Hellmann MD, Plodkowski AJ, Zhang Z, Shi W, Dick-Godfrey R, Panchoo KH. Safety of combining thoracic radiation therapy with concurrent versus sequential immune checkpoint inhibition. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2018;3:391–8.

    Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Bang A, Wilhite TJ, Pike LR, Cagney DN, Aizer AA, Taylor A, Spektor A, Krishnan M, Ott PA, Balboni TA. Multicenter evaluation of the tolerability of combined treatment with PD-1 and CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibitors and palliative radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;98:344–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Levy A, Massard C, Soria J-C, Deutsch E. Concurrent irradiation with the anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 immune checkpoint blocker durvalumab: single Centre subset analysis from a phase 1/2 trial. Eur J Cancer. 2016;68:156–62.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  150. 150.

    Jabbour SK, Berman AT, Decker RH, Lin Y, Feigenberg SJ, Gettinger SN, Aggarwal C, Langer CJ, Simone CB, Bradley JD, Aisner J. Phase 1 Trial of Pembrolizumab Administered Concurrently With Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JAMA oncology. 2020;6(6):848–55.

  151. 151.

    Shaverdian N, Thor M, Shepherd AF, Offin MD, Jackson A, Wu AJ, Gelblum DY, Yorke ED, Simone CB, Chaft JE, Hellmann MD. Radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer patients treated with chemoradiation plus durvalumab. Cancer Med. 2020;9(13):4622–31. .

  152. 152.

    Naidoo J, Page D, Li B, Connell L, Schindler K, Lacouture M, Postow M, Wolchok J. Toxicities of the anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint antibodies. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:2375–91.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. 153.

    Käsmann L, Eze C, Taugner J, Roengvoraphoj O, Belka C, Manapov F. Implementation of durvalumab maintenance treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)—a German radiation oncology survey. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2020;9:288.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. 154.

    Theelen WSME, Peulen HMU, Lalezari F, van der Noort V, de Vries JF, JGJV A, Dumoulin DW, Bahce I, Niemeijer A-LN, de Langen AJ, Monkhorst K, Baas P. Effect of Pembrolizumab after stereotactic body radiotherapy vs Pembrolizumab alone on tumor response in patients with advanced non–small cell lung Cancer: results of the PEMBRO-RT phase 2 randomized clinical TrialPembrolizumab alone vs after stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLCPembrolizumab alone vs after stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. JAMA Oncol. 2019.

  155. 155.

    Gao F, Fish BL, Moulder JE, Jacobs ER, Medhora M. Enalapril mitigates radiation-induced pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis if started 35 days after whole-thorax irradiation. Radiat Res. 2013;180:546–52.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. 156.

    Medhora M, Gao F, Jacobs ER, Moulder JE. Radiation damage to the lung: mitigation by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Respirology. 2012;17:66–71.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. 157.

    Li YS, Ni SY, Meng Y, Shi XL, Zhao XW, Luo HH, Li X. Angiotensin II facilitates fibrogenic effect of TGF-β1 through enhancing the down-regulation of BAMBI caused by LPS: a new pro-fibrotic mechanism of angiotensin II. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e76289.

  158. 158.

    Hautmann MB, Thompson MM, Swartz EA, Olson EN, Owens GK. Angiotensin II–induced stimulation of smooth muscle α-actin expression by serum response factor and the homeodomain transcription factor MHox. Circ Res. 1997;81:600–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. 159.

    Cohen EP, Bedi M, Irving AA, Jacobs E, Tomic R, Klein J, Lawton CA, Moulder JE. Mitigation of late renal and pulmonary injury after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83:292–6.

    Google Scholar 

  160. 160.

    Antonadou D, Petridis A, Synodinou M, Throuvalas N, Bolanos N, Veslemes M, Sagriotis A. Amifostine reduces radiochemotherapy-induced toxicities in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Seminars in oncology. 2003;(18):2–9.

  161. 161.

    Mell LK, Malik R, Komaki R, Movsas B, Swann RS, Langer C, Antonadou D, Koukourakis M, Mundt AJ. Effect of amifostine on response rates in locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer patients treated on randomized controlled trials: a meta-analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68:111–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  162. 162.

    Antonadou D, Throuvalas N, Petridis A, Bolanos N, Sagriotis A, Synodinou M. Effect of amifostine on toxicities associated with radiochemotherapy in patients with locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57:402–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  163. 163.

    Komaki R, Lee JS, Milas L, Lee HK, Fossella FV, Herbst RS, Allen PK, Liao Z, Stevens CW, Lu C. Effects of amifostine on acute toxicity from concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for inoperable non–small-cell lung cancer: report of a randomized comparative trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;58:1369–77.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  164. 164.

    Devine A, Marignol L. Potential of amifostine for chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy-associated toxicity reduction in advanced NSCLC: a meta-analysis. Anticancer Res. 2016;36:5–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. 165.

    Antonadou D, Coliarakis N, Synodinou M, Athanassiou H, Kouveli A, Verigos C, Georgakopoulos G, Panoussaki K, Karageorgis P, Throuvalas N. Randomized phase III trial of radiation treatment±amifostine in patients with advanced-stage lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;51:915–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. 166.

    Movsas B, Scott C, Langer C, Werner-Wasik M, Nicolaou N, Komaki R, Machtay M, Smith C, Axelrod R, Sarna L. Randomized trial of amifostine in locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and hyperfractionated radiation: radiation therapy oncology group trial 98-01. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2145–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  167. 167.

    King M, Joseph S, Albert A, Thomas TV, Nittala MR, Woods WC, Vijayakumar S, Packianathan S. Use of Amifostine for Cytoprotection during radiation therapy: a review. Oncology. 2020;98:61–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. 168.

    Sasse AD, de Oliveira Clark LG, Sasse EC, Clark OAC. Amifostine reduces side effects and improves complete response rate during radiotherapy: results of a meta-analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64:784–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  169. 169.

    Pagel J, Mohorn M, Kloetzer K, Fleck M, Wendt T. Inhalative versus systemische Pneumonitisprophylaxe bei Thoraxbestrahlungen. Strahlenther Onkol. 1998;174:25–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  170. 170.

    Henkenberens C, Janssen S, Lavae-Mokhtari M, Leni K, Meyer A, Christiansen H, Bremer M, Dickgreber N. Inhalative steroids as an individual treatment in symptomatic lung cancer patients with radiation pneumonitis grade II after radiotherapy–a single-Centre experience. Radiat Oncol. 2016;11:12.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  171. 171.

    Rube C (2002) Wilfert F, Uthe D, Schmid KW, Knoop R, Willich N, Schuck A, Rube C. Modul Radiat-Induc tumour necrosis factor alpha TNF-alpha expr lung tissue Pentoxifylline Radiother Oncol 64:177–187.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  172. 172.

    Ozturk B, Egehan I, Atavci S, Kitapci M. Pentoxifylline in prevention of radiation-induced lung toxicity in patients with breast and lung cancer: a double-blind randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;58:213–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. 173.

    Kwon H-C, Kim S-K, Chung W-K, Cho M-J, Kim J-S, Kim J-S, Moon S-R, Park W-Y, Ahn S-J, Oh Y-K. Effect of pentoxifylline on radiation response of non-small cell lung cancer: a phase III randomized multicenter trial. Radiother Oncol. 2000;56:175–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  174. 174.

    Misirlioglu CH, Demirkasimoglu T, Kucukplakci B, Sanri E, Altundag K. Pentoxifylline and alpha-tocopherol in prevention of radiation-induced lung toxicity in patients with lung cancer. Med Oncol. 2007;24:308–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  175. 175.

    Flechsig P, Dadrich M, Bickelhaupt S, Jenne J, Hauser K, Timke C, Peschke P, Hahn EW, Gröne H-J, Yingling J. LY2109761 attenuates radiation-induced pulmonary murine fibrosis via reversal of TGF-β and BMP-associated proinflammatory and proangiogenic signals. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:3616–27.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  176. 176.

    Dadrich M, Nicolay NH, Flechsig P, Bickelhaupt S, Hoeltgen L, Roeder F, Hauser K, Tietz A, Jenne J, Lopez R. Combined inhibition of TGFβ and PDGF signaling attenuates radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Oncoimmunology. 2016;5:e1123366.

    Google Scholar 

  177. 177.

    Kelley RK, Gane E, Assenat E, Siebler J, Galle PR, Merle P, Hourmand IO, Cleverly A, Zhao Y, Gueorguieva I, Lahn M. A phase 2 study of galunisertib (TGF-β1 receptor type I inhibitor) and sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Clinical and translational gastroenterology. 2019;10(7):e00056.

  178. 178.

    Knüppel L, Ishikawa Y, Aichler M, Heinzelmann K, Hatz R, Behr J, Walch A, Bächinger HP, Eickelberg O, Staab-Weijnitz CA. A novel antifibrotic mechanism of nintedanib and pirfenidone. Inhibition of collagen fibril assembly. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2017;57:77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  179. 179.

    Kwapiszewska G, Gungl A, Wilhelm J, Marsh LM, Puthenparampil HT, Sinn K, Didiasova M, Klepetko W, Kosanovic D, Schermuly RT, Wujak L. Transcriptome profiling reveals the complexity of pirfenidone effects in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J. 2018;52(5):1800564.

  180. 180.

    Jin J, Togo S, Kadoya K, Tulafu M, Namba Y, Iwai M, Watanabe J, Nagahama K, Okabe T, Hidayat M. Pirfenidone attenuates lung fibrotic fibroblast responses to transforming growth factor-β1. Respir Res. 2019;20:119.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  181. 181.

    King TE Jr, Bradford WZ, Castro-Bernardini S, Fagan EA, Glaspole I, Glassberg MK, Gorina E, Hopkins PM, Kardatzke D, Lancaster L. A phase 3 trial of pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2083–92.

    Google Scholar 

  182. 182.

    Li M, Ping G, Plathow C, Trinh T, Lipson KE, Hauser K, Krempien R, Debus J, Abdollahi A, Huber PE. Small molecule receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor of platelet-derived growth factor signaling (SU9518) modifies radiation response in fibroblasts and endothelial cells. BMC Cancer. 2006;6:79.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  183. 183.

    Abdollahi A, Li M, Ping G, Plathow C, Domhan S, Kiessling F, Lee LB, McMahon G, Gröne H-J, Lipson KE. Inhibition of platelet-derived growth factor signaling attenuates pulmonary fibrosis. J Exp Med. 2005;201:925–35.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  184. 184.

    Daniels CE, Lasky JA, Limper AH, Mieras K, Gabor E, Schroeder DR. Imatinib treatment for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: randomized placebo-controlled trial results. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181:604–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  185. 185.

    Richeldi L, Du Bois RM, Raghu G, Azuma A, Brown KK, Costabel U, Cottin V, Flaherty KR, Hansell DM, Inoue Y. Efficacy and safety of nintedanib in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2071–82.

    Google Scholar 

  186. 186.

    Kolb M, Raghu G, Wells AU, Behr J, Richeldi L, Schinzel B, Quaresma M, Stowasser S, Martinez FJ. Nintedanib plus sildenafil in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1722–31.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  187. 187.

    Bickelhaupt S, Erbel C, Timke C, Wirkner U, Dadrich M, Flechsig P, Tietz A, Pföhler J, Gross W, Peschke P. Effects of CTGF blockade on attenuation and reversal of radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109:djw339.

    Google Scholar 

  188. 188.

    Lipson K, Moustafa M, Akbarpour M, Fouse S, Kriegsmann M, Zhou C, Liu K, Lasitschka F, Weichert W, Seeley T. Therapeutic pamrevlumab (FG-3019) is more effective than pirfenidone or nintedanib in a mouse radiation-induced lung fibrosis model; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  189. 189.

    Richeldi L, Pérez ERF, Costabel U, Albera C, Lederer DJ, Flaherty KR, Ettinger N, Perez R, Scholand MB, Goldin J. Pamrevlumab, an anti-connective tissue growth factor therapy, for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (PRAISE): a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:25–33.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  190. 190.

    de Leve S, Wirsdörfer F, Jendrossek V. The CD73/ado system—a new player in RT induced adverse late effects. Cancers. 2019;11:1578.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  191. 191.

    Wirsdörfer F, de Leve S, Cappuccini F, Eldh T, Meyer AV, Gau E, Thompson LF, Chen N-Y, Karmouty-Quintana H, Fischer U. Extracellular adenosine production by ecto-5′-nucleotidase (CD73) enhances radiation-induced lung fibrosis. Cancer Res. 2016;76:3045–56.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  192. 192.

    Liu X, Cotrim A, Teos L, Zheng C, Swaim W, Mitchell J, Mori Y, Ambudkar I. Loss of TRPM2 function protects against irradiation-induced salivary gland dysfunction. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  193. 193.

    Perraud A-L, Rao DM, Kosmacek EA, Dagunts A, Oberley-Deegan RE, Gally F. The ion channel, TRPM2, contributes to the pathogenesis of radiodermatitis. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2019;58:89–98.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  194. 194.

    Dietrich A. Modulators of transient receptor potential (TRP) channels as therapeutic options in lung disease. Pharmaceuticals. 2019;12:23.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  195. 195.

    Nicolay NH, Perez RL, Debus J, Huber PE. Mesenchymal stem cells–a new hope for radiotherapy-induced tissue damage? Cancer Lett. 2015;366:133–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  196. 196.

    Zanoni M, Cortesi M, Zamagni A, Tesei A. The role of mesenchymal stem cells in radiation-induced lung fibrosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:3876.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  197. 197.

    Klein D, Steens J, Wiesemann A, Schulz F, Kaschani F, Röck K, Yamaguchi M, Wirsdörfer F, Kaiser M, Fischer JW. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy protects lungs from radiation-induced endothelial cell loss by restoring superoxide dismutase 1 expression. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2017;26:563–82.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  198. 198.

    Dong L-H, Jiang Y-Y, Liu Y-J, Cui S, Xia C-C, Qu C, Jiang X, Qu Y-Q, Chang P-Y, Liu F. The anti-fibrotic effects of mesenchymal stem cells on irradiated lungs via stimulating endogenous secretion of HGF and PGE2. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8713.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  199. 199.

    Averyanov A, Koroleva I, Konoplyannikov M, Revkova V, Lesnyak V, Kalsin V, Danilevskaya O, Nikitin A, Sotnikova A, Kotova S. First-in-human high-cumulative-dose stem cell therapy in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with rapid lung function decline. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2020;9:6–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  200. 200.

    Chambers DC, Enever D, Ilic N, Sparks L, Whitelaw K, Ayres J, Yerkovich ST, Khalil D, Atkinson KM, Hopkins PM. A phase 1b study of placenta-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respirology. 2014;19:1013–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  201. 201.

    Hanania AN, Mainwaring W, Ghebre YT, Hanania NA, Ludwig M. Radiation-induced lung injury: assessment and management. Chest. 2019;156(1):150–62.

  202. 202.

    Sara A-G, Hamdan A-J, Hanaa B, Nawaz KA. Bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia: pathogenesis, clinical features, imaging and therapy review. Ann Thorac Med. 2008;3:67.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


This manuscript has not been previously published and is not under consideration elsewhere. The persons listed as authors have given their approval for the submission.


This study was supported by the Munich Excellence Training Initiative for Physician Scientists (Metiphys, to LK), the CPC-M translational funds (German Center for Lung Research (DZL) to AD, CASW, and CB), and the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK to CB). Research in the authors’ laboratories is supported by the DFG (GRK 2338 “Targets in Toxicology” to AD and CASW) and the BMBF (“ZiSStrans” 02NUK047C to KL).

This research was funded in part through the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748.

Author information




LK, AD, KL and CB wrote the manuscript. All authors read and commented on the manuscript and approved submission of the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lukas Käsmann.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that competing interests do not exist.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Käsmann, L., Dietrich, A., Staab-Weijnitz, C.A. et al. Radiation-induced lung toxicity – cellular and molecular mechanisms of pathogenesis, management, and literature review. Radiat Oncol 15, 214 (2020).

Download citation