Open Access

Hypofractionated irradiation of infra-supraclavicular lymph nodes after axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer post-conservative surgery: impact on late toxicity

  • Marina Guenzi1,
  • Gladys Blandino1Email author,
  • Maria Giuseppina Vidili3,
  • Deborah Aloi1,
  • Elena Configliacco1,
  • Elisa Verzanini1,
  • Elena Tornari1,
  • Francesca Cavagnetto2 and
  • Renzo Corvò1
Radiation Oncology201510:177

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0480-y

Received: 17 March 2015

Accepted: 7 August 2015

Published: 20 August 2015

Abstract

Background

The aim of the present work was to analyse the impact of mild hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) of infra-supraclavicular lymph nodes after axillary dissection on late toxicity.

Methods

From 2007 to 2012, 100 females affected by breast cancer (pT1- T4, pN1-3, pMx) were treated with conservative surgery, Axillary Node Dissection (AND) and loco-regional radiotherapy (whole breast plus infra-supraclavicular fossa). Axillary lymph nodes metastases were confirmed in all women. The median age at diagnosis was 60 years (range 34–83). Tumors were classified according to molecular characteristics: luminal-A 59 pts (59 %), luminal-B 24 pts (24 %), basal-like 10 pts (10 %), Her-2 like 7 pts (7 %). 82 pts (82 %) received hormonal therapy, 9 pts (9 %) neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, 81pts (81 %) adjuvant chemotherapy. All patients received a mild hypofractionated RT: 46 Gy in 20 fractions 4 times a week to whole breast and infra-supraclavicular fossa plus an additional weekly dose of 1,2 Gy to the lumpectomy area. The disease control and treatment related toxicity were analysed in follow-up visits. The extent of lymphedema was analysed by experts in Oncological Rehabilitation.

Results

Within a median follow-up of 50 months (range 19–82), 6 (6 %) pts died, 1 pt (1 %) had local progression disease, 2 pts (2 %) developed distant metastasis and 1 subject (1 %) presented both. In all patients the acute toxicity was mainly represented by erythema and patchy moist desquamation. At the end of radiotherapy 27 pts (27 %) presented lymphedema, but only 10 cases (10 %) seemed to be correlated to radiotherapy. None of the patients showed a severe damage to the brachial plexus, and the described cases of paresthesias could not definitely be attributed to RT. We did not observe symptomatic pneumonitis.

Conclusions

Irradiation of infra-supraclavicular nodes with a mild hypofractionated schedule can be a safe and effective treatment without evidence of a significant increase of lymphedema appearance radiotherapy related.

Keywords

Breast cancerHypofractionationRegional Nodal IrradiationToxicity

Background

In high-risk node-positive women with breast cancer, national and international guidelines (AIRO/NCCN/DEGRO) recommended to extend radiotherapy to lymph nodal area (apex axilla - III level and/or supraclavicular regions) after axillary dissection to improve loco-regional control and survival, especially in the presence of additional clinical and biological risk factors [14]. The standard given dose post conservative surgery remains 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks and it is recommended a boost to the tumor bed to further improve the local control [5]. Several randomized trials proved that in selected low-risk patients, shorter treatment regimens (3 to 4 weeks) with a hypofractionated schedule may be safe and effective with comparable medical outcome and cosmesis [6, 7]. A task force group endorsed by the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) asserted that data are now sufficient to support the use of hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HF-WBI) for selected patients with early-stage breast cancer [8] and recently the same association has recommended the administration of such therapeutic schedule [9]. Published data supportive of hypo-fractionated schedules are limited to breast irradiation and only few clinical trials are available on regional lymph node irradiation with short schemes [10]. The hypo-fractionated loco-regional radiotherapy scheme used in our Institute is not particularly compressed in time but provides a smaller number of fractions (20 versus 25), during which the boost to the tumor bed is simultaneously administered once-a-week, reducing the patient accesses [11]. This is a retrospective study about one hundred consecutive patients treated with mild hypofractionated locoregional radiotherapy. The aim of the present work was to analyse the impact on late toxicity of this hypofractionated scheme in order to assess safety and efficacy in infrasupraclavicular area.

Methods

From 2007 to 2012, one hundred patients affected by breast cancer were treated with conservative surgery, axillary node dissection (AND) and loco-regional (whole breast plus infra-supraclavicular fossa) hypofractionated RT. The median age at diagnosis was 60 years (range 34–83). Histology was ductal carcinoma in 76 patients (76 %). Characteristics of patients are shown in Table 1. Tumors were classified according to molecular characteristic as shown in Table 2. Axillary lymph nodes metastasis were confirmed in all women (81 patients post conservative surgery and 9 patients at diagnosis, before neo-adjuvant chemotherapy). Patients received systemic therapy: hormonal in 82 patients (82 %), neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in 9 patients (9 %), adjuvant chemotherapy in 81 patients (81 %). All the administered chemotherapy schedules contained anthracycline derivatives and taxanes. In agreement with several randomized phase III trials which have shown to improve local control with mild side effects and acceptable cosmetic outcome [5] in our center all the patients receive a boost dose. The selected group of patients examined in this analysis received hypofractionated RT with concomitant boost as described in detail in a previous published experience [11], Our treatment schedule was 46 Gy in 20 fractions 4 times a week to whole breast and infra-supraclavicular fossa (from Monday to Friday with a day off on Wednesday) with concomitant additional weekly dose of 1,2 Gy (preferibly delivered on Monday) to the lumpectomy area (total boost dose of 6 Gy in 5 fractions once a week). As reported by our previous paper, using the Linear-Quadratic cell survival model we assumed that 46Gy in 2.3 Gy fractions is equivalent to 50Gy in 2.0 Gy fractions as shown in Table 3 [11]. The four fractions per week schedule is commonly used in our Department in order to optimize the clinical and dosimetric activities, by also allowing an easier integration of palliative treatments [1113]. Most treatments (81 %) were delivered by linear accelerator Varian Clinac 2100CD (RX, 6–15 MV), and the remaining 19 % by Tomotherapy Hi-Art® System (Accuray®, RX 6MV) when it was necessary to improve coverage of the target or minimize dose to normal tissue in selected patients in which a steep dose gradient was required. A planning computed tomography (CT GE Lightspeed Ultra) scan was made for each patient, positioned on a wing-board with both arms raised above the head. Patients were scanned from the level of the larynx to the level of the upper abdomen, including both lungs, with a scan thickness and index of 5 mm [11]. Four tattoos were made on the thoracic skin to allow the repositioning of the patient during treatment sessions. The whole breast clinical target volume (WB-CTV) included the glandular breast tissue of the ipsilateral breast. The WB-CTV did not extend into the pectoralis major, nor the ribs, and did not include the skin [11]. The three-dimensional tissue volumes containing the supraclavicular (SCV) infraclavicular (IFV) and III level lymph nodes were defined on CT scans by using readily identifiable anatomic landmarks on the guide of two published papers (Table 4) [14]. In patients treated by linear accelerator (81 %), whole breast radiation was delivered by opposed tangential beams and infra-supraclavicular fossa by two or more opposing fields (main beam energy: 6 MV and, when it is necessary to improve target coverage, 15 MV). The gantry angles, the use of multileaf collimator, wedges and additional subfields were employed to achieve optimal dose distribution and maximal organ at risk avoidance (heart, left anterior descending coronary artery, ipsilateral lung, esophagus, thyroid and spinal cord). Constraints for the organs at risk are shown in Table 5, overdosages were limited within 5 %, this means that global Dmax is mantained lower than 105 % and this is possible using sub fields with MLC closed on overdosage regions. Tomotherapy Hi-Art® treatments were delivered using a 0.403 pitch, Modulator Factor (MF) ranging between 1.5–4, field dimension 2.5 cm. It was impossible to exclude the brachial plexus from the radiation fields due to its proximity to the lymph nodes region. Treatment Planning was performed in order to give 95 % of the prescribed dose to PTV; in three-dimensional (3D) conformal Radiotherapy an Eclipse v.7.3.10 Varian Treatment Planning System was used while Helical tomotherapy planning was performed with the HI-Art® Tomotherapy inverse planning system (Madison, WI, USA). Portal films were taken at least once during the first treatment day and compared to digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) and simulator images to ensure accurate set up. In Tomotherapy a pre-treatment daily image guidance with megavoltage (MV) CT scan was performed. After matching with the kilovoltage planning CT, corrections for translations and rotation around longitudinal axis (roll) were done. The disease control and treatment-related toxicity were analysed in follow-up visits, performed at 6, 12 months after therapy and, subsequently, annually. Particular attention was paid to late side effects correlated to radiation of infra-supraclavicular fossa. The extent of lymphedema was analysed at the department of Oncological Rehabilitation of our Institute, by measuring upper limbs circumference at two different locations obtained 10 cm above and below the antecubital fossa in both upper extremities and comparing the values with those of the contralateral arm, as suggested by other authors [15]. Mild, moderate and severe arm lymphedema were defined as a difference of 0.5–2 cm, 2.1–3 cm and >3 cm respectively, in the circumference at one or more measurement sites between the treated and untreated sides [15]. Patients were followed by Oncological Rehabilitation Unit to appearance of lymphedema according to its severity.
Table 1

Patients’ characteristics

Characteristic

N

%

Age

  

 <50

24

24 %

 50-59

23

23 %

 >60

53

53 %

Histology

  

 DCI

75

75 %

 LCI

15

15 %

 Others

10

10 %

Pathological tumor stage

  

 pTis

2

2 %

 pT1

51

51 %

 pT2

38

38 %

 pT3

2

2 %

 pT4

2

2 %

 Not evaluable

5

5 %

Pathological nodal stage

  

 pN0

9

9 %

 pN1

25

25 %

 pN2

43

43 %

 pN3

23

23 %

Grading

  

 G1

4

4 %

 G2

54

54 %

 G3

38

38 %

Not evaluable

4

4 %

 Ki67

  

 ≤14 %

27

27 %

 >14 %

71

71 %

Not evaluated

2

2 %

DCI ductal carcinoma invasive, LCI lobular carcinoma invasive

Table 2

Molecular characteristics of patients

Molecular subtype

N

%

Luminal A

59

59 %

Luminal B

24

24 %

C-erb +++

7

7 %

Basal like

10

10 %

Table 3

BED comparison between standard and explored RT schedule [11]

RT schedule

BED tumor control α/β 4

BED acute effects α/β 10

BED fibrosis α/β 1.7

BED vascular damage α/β 2.5

W.B. = whole breast

W.B.

B.S

W.B.

B.S

W.B.

B.S

W.B.

B.S

B.S. = tumor bed side

60 Gy/30 F/6 W

75

90

60

72

109

131

90

108

(50 Gy + 10 Gy seq.boost)

52 Gy/20/F/5 W (46 Gy + 6 Gy cc.boost)

72

87

57

66

108

135

88

108

UK START TRIAL A

75

75

55

55

120

120

95

95

41.6 Gy/13 F/5 W

UK START TRIAL A

68

68

51

51

108

108

86

86

39 Gy/13 F/5 W

boost concomitant boost, seq.boost sequential boost, F fractions, W weeks

Table 4

Regional Nodal Contours: anatomical boundaries [14]

 

Anteriorly

Posteriorly

Superiorly

Inferiorly

Medially

Laterally

SCV

bounded by the deep surface of the sternocleidomastoid and the deep cervical fascia

Lat: the anterior and medial borders of the anterior scalene muscle.

 

the posterior border was defined by the subclavian artery

lateral edge of the trachea excluding the thyroid gland and thyroid cartilage superiorly

 

Med: medially to the carotid artery and internal jugular vein

IFV

the deep surface of the pectoralis major muscle

subclavian-axillary artery

the most superior aspect of the pectoralis minor muscle

level of the insertion of the clavicle into the manubrium

lateral edge of the clavicle

medial border of the pectoralis minor muscle

SCV supraclavicular fossa, IFV infraclavicular fossa

Table 5

Constraints for organs at risk in adjuvant radiotherapy of early breast cancer

Organ at risk

Normofractionation 2 Gy per fraction\5fr\week

Hypofractionated schedule 2,3 Gy per fraction\4 fr\week

LADCA

V20Gy = 0 %

V19Gy = 0 %

Heart

V20Gy = 10 % V40Gy =5 %

V19Gy = 0 %

Ipsilateral Lung

V20Gy = 25 % (exclusive periclavicular LN)

V19Gy = 25 % (exclusive periclavicular LN)

 

V20Gy = 35 % (inclusive periclavicular LN)

V19Gy = 35 % (inclusive periclavicular LN)

Spinal cord

Max 45 Gy

Max 42 Gy

LADCA left anterior descending coronary artery, LN lymph nodes

Results

Within a median follow-up of 50 months (range 19–82), 6 patients (6 %) died, one patient (1 %) had local progression disease, 2 patients (2 %) developed distant metastasis and 1 (1 %) subject presented both. In all patients the acute toxicity, according to the RTOG/EORTC classification [16], was mainly represented by erythema and patchy moist desquamation. In 27 patients (27 %) a lymphedema was recorded during the visit at the Department of Oncological Rehabilitation of our institute: 15 cases (15 %) as a likely consequence of chemotherapy and surgery because they appeared before radiotherapy. In only three cases, a preexisting lymphedema was worsened by radiotherapy. In 12 patients (12 %) it appeared after the end of radiotherapy: in 2 patients as a result of disease progression to the lymph nodes, in the remaining 10 patients appears to be related to radiotherapy. The time of onset of lymphedema in the latter 10 cases was very variable (from 1 to 48 months from the end of radiotherapy). The cases of radio induced lymphedema were classified as follows: 4 mild, 2 moderate and 4 severe. These patients were treated with manual lymph drainage and compression therapy. Post-RT, three patients showed paresthesias of upper limbs, two bilaterally, already present before starting radiation treatment, the last one ipsilateral, which resolved spontaneously in few months. All patients received chemotherapy regimens containing taxanes, of which paresthesias are one of the side effects. Treatment was generally well tolerated: a limited number of severe lymphedema (4 %), none of the patients showed a severe damage to the brachial plexus, the described cases of paresthesias could not definitely be attributed to RT and we did not observed symptomatic pneumonitis.

Discussion

The aim of the present work is to investigate the outcomes of a mild HF-WBI for the treatment of breast cancer when delivered to women who need irradiation to the infra-supraclavicular lymph nodal region. Our results seem to suggest that this hypofractionated schedule to the breast and the regional nodes is as effective as a standard RT regimen in the absence a significant increase of side effects. This evidence is of note since many concerns emerge when an altered fractionated regimen is proposed for the irradiation of locoregional node areas. As reported in the literature, the irradiation of the lymph node area may increase the risk of side effects such as radiation pneumonitis, lymphedema and brachial plexopathy. Since acute and late side effects are correlated to the volume of irradiated parenchyma, regional nodal radiotherapy can increase the pneumonitis rates (1.3 % vs 0.2 %) [17]. In order to reduce the risk of radio-induced pneumonitis, internationally approved protocols should be strictly applied [18]. Lymphedema may represent a standard complication after any axillary surgery. Its incidence can be difficult to define, as no standardized definition of lymphedema exists. The onset of lymphedema is related different causes including the extension of axillary dissection (5–15 % after dissection, 1–3 % after sentinel node biopsy), obesity, the association with chemotherapy and RT delivery [1923]. Shah et al., provides the incidence of lymphedema according to the extent of RT after dissection, reporting a rate from 2–35 % after breast irradiation and an increased incidence to 9–65 % in the case of loco-regional irradiation [20]. The different findings of lymphedema may be related not only to individual clinical situations and radiation techniques applied (extension of treatment volumes, type of planning, others) but also to the different methods of evaluation and classification used. Inter-limb circumferential discrepancy has been the most widely used outcome measure. Moreover, brachial plexopathy is a major concern with loco-regional RT: the induced damage may be related to dose per fraction, total dose, and volume irradiated. Using standard fractionation schedule (50Gy/25fr) the rates of brachial plexopathy are less than 5 % [10]. In recent years several schemes of hypofractionated WBI were developed and tested in randomized trials. The results with long-term follow-up demonstrated that the adoption of a shorter schedule may be safe and effective with comparable medical outcome and cosmesis to the standard irradiation: no statically significant differences both in local control and aesthetic result emerged in women who received the standard or the hypofractionated breast radiation [6, 7].

However, few data are still available as regards the late effects of hypofractionated radiotherapy when extended to the regional lymph nodes. A recent update of START A and START B evaluated the loco-regional RT in a limited group of patients and neither the 5 week nor the 3 week treatment developed significantly worse normal tissue impacts: the assessments of arm and shoulder effects showed no evidence of a detrimental effect for the hypofractionated schedules [7]. In 2011 Yarnolds et al. already showed no radio-induced brachial plexus toxicity after hypofractionated irradiation of the axilla and/or supraclavicular fossa. Those Authors stated that the START B regimen (40 Gy in 15 fractions/3 weeks) is equivalent to 47 Gy in 2.0-Gy fractions if the α/β value for brachial plexus is 2.0 Gy or to 49 Gy in 2.0-Gy fractions, if α/β = 1.0 Gy [24]. Haffty and Buchholz commented on the absence of side effects in the small group of patients (116pts of 2215, 7 %) enrolled in the START B trial and receiving regional hypofractionated RT: they confirmed that these results are consistent with modelling of normal tissue effects, which predicts that 40 Gy in 15 fractions should be as safe as the standard scheme for all normal tissues [25]. The results of several randomized studies demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of the hypofractionated WBI. Although limited, other data collected during hypofractionated regional nodes irradiation did not reveal increased toxicity as compared to standard fractionation RNI [10]. Badiyan N. et al. reviewed prospective and randomized data to analyse the efficacy and toxicity of hypofractionated radiation schedules in breast cancer with RNI to the axilla and supraclavicular regions. They noted that RNI with standard fractionation is associated with increased toxicity compared to WBI alone but current data do not support an increased rate of toxicity with hypofractionated RNI compared with standard fractionation RNI [10]. The outcomes of our investigation seem to confirm what emerges from the literature: patients treated with hypofractionated RT (46Gy in 20 fractions with 4 times a week) to the whole breast and infra-supraclavicular fossa (plus once weekly concomitant boost dose of 1,2 Gy to the lumpectomy area) did not show a higher rate of side effects, in 10 patients the lymphedema was radio induced, which only 4 severe. We observed no symptomatic pneumonitis, no radiation-related damage to the brachial plexus and only 11 % of lymphedema. The favorable results obtained with this fractionation can be the basis for investigating new radiation schemes with a smaller number of fractions administered in reduced times.

Conclusions

Mild hypofractionated WBI delivered in 20 fractions represents a safe and effective treatment for the infrasupraclavicular node areas. ASTRO board reported that shorter treatment schedules can significantly benefit patients in terms of convenience, acceptance of therapy, and cost. They suggest to do not initiate whole-breast radiation therapy as a part of breast conservation therapy in women age ≥50 with early-stage invasive breast cancer without considering shorter treatment schedule [9]. The limited experience available on hypofractionated scheme extended to lymph nodes do not seem to show an increased toxicity. In our department the adoption of this mild hypofractionated loco-regional radiation schedule in the context of a policy of gradual reduction of the numbers of the fractions has shown to be safe when delivered on locoregional nodal areas. This preliminary evidence should be further investigated and confirmed by large-scale prospective studies.

Declarations

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Radiotherapy – IRCCS A.O.U. San Martino – IST
(2)
Department of Medical Physics – IRCCS A.O.U. San Martino – IST
(3)
Department of Oncological Rehabilitation – IRCCS A.O.U. San Martino – IST

References

  1. EBCTCG (Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group), McGale P, Taylor C, et al. Effect of radiotherapy after mastectomy and axillary surgery on 10-year recurrence and 20-year breast cancer mortality: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 8135 women in 22 randomised trials. Lancet. 2014;384(9957):1848.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. AIRO 2013: Radiotherapy breast cancer: Indications and guidelines http://www.radioterapiaitalia.it/allegato__1222_796.phtml.
  3. NCCN. Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology™. Breast Cancer. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp#breast. 2015;Version 1.
  4. Sautter-Bihl ML, Sedlmayer F, Budach W, et al. DEGRO practical guidelines: radiotherapy of breast cancer III--radiotherapy of the lymphatic pathways. Strahlenther Onkol. 2014;190(4):342–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartelink H, Maingon P, Poortmans P, et al. Whole-breast irradiation with or without a boost for patients treated with breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer: 20-year follow-up of a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(1):47–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Whelan TJ, Pignol JP, Levine MN, et al. Long-term results of hypofractionated radiation therapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:513–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Haviland JS, Owen JR, Dewar JA, et al. The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) trials of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: 10-year follow-up results of two randomised controlled trials. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:1086–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Smith BD, Bentzen SM, Correa CR, et al. Fractionation for whole breast irradiation: an American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) evidence-based guideline. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81(1):59–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hahn C, Kavanagh B, Bhatnagar A, et al. Choosing Wisely: The American Society for Radiation Oncology’s Top 5 list. Practical Radiation Oncology. 2014;4:349–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Badiyan SN, Shah C, Arthur D, et al. Hypofractionated regional nodal irradiation for breast cancer: examining the data and potential for future studies. Radiother Oncol. 2014;110:39–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Corvò R, Ricchetti F, Doino D, et al. Adjuvant hypofractionated radiotherapy with weekly concomitant boost for women with early breast cancer: the clinical experience at Genoa university. Anticancer Res. 2010;30:4749–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Guenzi M, Vagge S, Azinwi NC, et al. A biologically competitive 21 days hypofractionation scheme with weekly concomitant boost in breast cancer radiotherapy feasibility acute sub-acute and short term late effects. Radiat Oncol. 2010;5:111.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Guenzi M, Bosetti D, Lamanna G, et al. Novel 10-fraction breast irradiation in prone and supine position: technical, dosimetric and clinical evaluation. Tumori. 2015;101(2):154–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Madu CN, Quint DJ, Normolle DP, Marsh RB, Wang EY, Pierce LJ. Definition of the supraclavicular and infraclavicular nodes: implications for three-dimensional CT-based conformal radiation therapy. Radiology. 2001;221:333–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bar Ad V, Cheville A, Solin LJ, Dutta P, Both S, Harris EER. Time course of mild arm lympedema after breast conservation treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phy. 2010;76:85–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group: Acute Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria. [https://www.rtog.org/researchassociates/adverseeventreporting/acuteradiationmorbidityscoringcriteria.aspx].
  17. Whelan TJ, Olivotto I, Ackerman I, et al. NCIC-CTG MA.20: an intergroup trial of regional nodal irradiation in early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:LBA1003.Google Scholar
  18. Nielsen MH, Berg M, Pedersen AN, et al. Delineation of target volumes and organs at risk in adjuvant radiotherapy of early breast cancer: National guidelines and contouring atlas by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. Acta Oncol. 2013;52:703–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. McLaughlin SA, Wright MJ, Morris KT, et al. Prevalence of lymphedema in women with breast cancer 5 years after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary dissection: patient perceptions and precautionary behaviors. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5220–6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Shah C, Wilkinson JB, Baschnagel A, et al. Factors associated with the development of breast cancer-related lymphedema after whole-breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83(4):1095–100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ugur S, Arıcı C, Yaprak M, et al. Risk Factors of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema. Lymphat Res Biol. 2013;11(2):72–5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Jung SY, Shin KH, Kim M, et al. Treatment factors affecting breast cancer-related lymphedema after systemic chemotherapy and radiotherapy in stage II/III breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;148:91–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Chandra RA, Miller CL, Skolny MN, et al. Radiation Therapy Risk Factors for Development of Lymphedema in Patients Treated with Regional Lymph Node Irradiation for Breast Cancer. Int J radiation Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;91:760–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Yarnold J, Bentzen SM, Coles C, et al. Hypofractionated whole-breast radiotherapy for women with early breast cancer: myths and realities. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;79(1):1–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Haffty BG, Buchholz TA. Hypofractionated breast radiation: preferred standard of care? Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:1032–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Guenzi et al. 2015

Advertisement