Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Linkage disequilibrium pattern of the ATM gene in breast cancer patients and controls; association of SNPs and haplotypes to radio-sensitivity and post-lumpectomy local recurrence

  • 1, 3Email author,
  • 4,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 5,
  • 2, 3,
  • 1, 3 and
  • 1, 3
Radiation Oncology20072:25

https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-2-25

©  Edvardsen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

  • Received: 16 March 2007
  • Accepted: 10 July 2007
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

The ATM protein is activated as a result of ionizing radiation, and genetic variants of the ATM gene may therefore affect the level of radiation-induced damage. Individuals heterozygous for ATM mutations have been reported to have an increased risk of malignancy, especially breast cancer.

Materials and methods

Norwegian breast cancer patients (272) treated with radiation (252 of which were evaluated for radiation-induced adverse side effects), 95 Norwegian women with no known history of cancer and 95 American breast cancer patients treated with radiation (44 of which developed ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence, IBTR) were screened for sequence variations in all exons of the ATM gene as well as known intronic variants by denaturating high performance liquid chromatography (dHPLC) followed by sequencing to determine the nature of the variant.

Results and Conclusion

A total of 56 variants were identified in the three materials combined. A borderline significant association with breast cancer risk was found for the 1229 T>C (Val>Ala) substitution in exon 11 (P-value 0.055) between the Norwegian controls and breast cancer patients as well as a borderline significant difference in haplotype distribution (P-value 0.06). Adverse side effects, such as: development of costal fractures and telangiectasias, subcutaneous and lung fibrosis, pleural thickening and atrophy were evaluated in the Norwegian patients. Significant associations were found for several of the identified variants such as rs1800058 (Leu > Phe) where a decrease in minor allele frequency was found with increasing level of adverse side effects for the clinical end-points pleural thickening and lung fibrosis, thus giving a protective effect. Overall our results indicate a role for variation in the ATM gene both for risk of developing breast cancer, and in radiation induced adverse side effects. No association could be found between risk of developing ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence and any of the sequence variants found in the American patient material.

Keywords

  • Breast Cancer
  • Breast Cancer Patient
  • Lung Fibrosis
  • Adverse Side Effect
  • Ataxia Telangiectasia

Background

The ATM gene was localized to the chromosomal sub-band 11q22-q23 by genetic linkage analysis in families with members affected by ataxia telangiectasia (AT) in 1988. AT is an inherited recessive disorder associated with neurological dysfunction, growth abnormalities, extreme radio-sensitivity, immunological deficiency and increased risk of malignancy [1–3]. The majority of AT- patients are compound heterozygous with different mutations in each allele of the gene, a large proportion of which are reported to be truncating, giving rise to shorter versions of the protein where the C-terminal domain of the protein often is deleted [4]. Individuals who are AT- heterozygous have been reported to have intermediate radio-sensitivity and an increased risk of malignancy, especially breast cancer [3, 5–10], possibly associated with genetic variance affecting binding domains of the protein [11]. Estimates of carrier frequencies indicate that 0.5–1% of the population are AT-carriers [8, 12]. Studies in mice have shown that ATM haploinsufficiency is followed by an increased sensitivity to low doses of radiation, carcinogens and an increased incidence of mammary tumours but not increased radiation mutagenesis [13–15].

The ATM gene codes for a protein with 3056 amino acids and a molecular weight of ~350 kDa which have been found to exist both in monomeric (active) and dimeric (inactive) state [16]. The protein contains several important domains such as 1) the C-terminal protein kinase domain (PI3K-domain), 2) the substrate binding domain in the N-terminal of the protein necessary for activation of p53 in response to DNA damage, 3)the FAT domain – common for the PI3K-like family members F RAP, A TM and T RAPP, 4) a proline rich region shown to bind c-Abl and 5) an incomplete leucine zipper. For more detailed description of the domains see the review by [17]. The protein is primarily located in the nucleus but has also been found in cytoplasmic vesicles called endosomes and peroxisomes. In the peroxisomes ATM co-localized with catalase which is involved in the detoxification of reactive oxygen species [18, 19].

The ATM protein is involved in the cell cycle control and is a member of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase family, implicated in the early response to DNA damaging agents, such as ionizing radiation causing double strand breaks (DSB) [16, 20]. ATM possesses kinase activity and phosphorylates serine and threonine amino acids in several important downstream cell cycle proteins such as p53, BRCA1/2, CHK1/2 and c-Abl [18, 20, 21]. ATM deficient cells are extremely sensitive to ionizing radiation (IR). It has been shown that IR induces the instantaneous phosphorylation of the ATM protein at Ser-1981 leading to catalytic activation by dimer dissociation rendering the kinase domain accessible [22]. This activation continues throughout the cell cycle although the protein level remains constant [23]. Recent studies have identified two additional serine residues, Ser-367 and Ser-1893 which are phosphorylated as a response to DNA damage in vitro and shown that site specific mutations of either one of the three serine residues (367, 1893 and 1981) give rise to proteins defective in ATM signalling in vivo [24]. Studies of linkage disequilibrium (LD) patterns of the ATM gene have revealed low recombination and extensive LD spanning the whole gene, in particular in the 3'- end of the gene, with few haplotypes representing the majority of chromosomes [25–27]. Studies of the associations of haplotypes with breast cancer risk have revealed contradictory results, some showing an increased risk associated with particular haplotypes [27, 28] while other found no such association [29, 30].

The aim of this study was to investigate the difference in type and frequencies of ATM variants and haplotypes in association with risk of breast cancer, as well as subcutaneous and cutaneous radiation induced adverse side effects, development of costal fractures and pleural thickening. In addition, we wanted to investigate whether an association between genetic variation of the ATM gene and the risk of developing local recurrence after radiation treatment could be found.

Materials and methods

Norwegian controls

The control group for the Norwegian breast cancer cases consisted of 95 post-menopausal women participating in the National Mammography screening program, with no history of breast cancer after two negative mammograms [31]; age range at the time of blood collection was 55 – 72 years.

Norwegian breast cancer cases

The breast cancer cases used in this study has previously been investigated for variations in the glutathione-S-transferase genes GSTP1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 and are also described in detail in [32] as well as here: From 1975 to 1986 a total of 1496 patients diagnosed with breast cancer and referred to the Norwegian Radium Hospital (NRH), received their loco-regional radiation treatment with a fractionation pattern of 4.3 Gray (Gy) x10 (2 treatments per week for 5 weeks; total dose 43 Gy; treatment A). This fractionation schedule was applied both as an adjuvant, post-operative treatment and administered to women who had RT after a loco-regional recurrence following breast cancer surgery some years prior to referral to the NRH. This RT schedule was expected to be more effective and at the same time less resource-consuming than the conventional fractionation pattern (2 Gy x25, 5 treatments per week; total dose 50 Gy). The typical post-mastectomy target fields covered the ipsilateral lymph node regions in the axilla, the fossa supraclavicularis and along the arteria mammaria interna. Depending on the extent of the operation and/or the expected risk of local recurrence, the thoracic wall was also irradiated [33]. Late adverse effects are therefore expected in these anatomical regions, manifested as telangiectasias of the skin, subcutaneous fibrosis and atrophy, costal fractures, pleural thickening and lung fibrosis. During the late 80's and early 90's evidence accumulated for unjustifiably severe adverse side effects following this type of RT. In 1996 it was decided that all patients still alive (n = 289) should be systematically evaluated for radiation induced adverse effects within the target field as a basis to estimate the level of monetary compensation. A total of 245 patients took part in this evaluation.

In parallel with treatment A, an alternative treatment regimen was used (2.5 Gy x20, 4 treatments per week for 5 weeks; treatment B). This schedule still met the requirements related to limited RT capacity but was more in line with the conventional fractionation pattern of 5 weekly treatments of 2 Gy for 5 weeks. Treatment B was to be applied mainly in patients with primarily inoperable breast cancer, who could potentially be rendered operable by RT. From 1975 to 1991, 617 women received treatment B against the chest wall, with or without radiation to the regional lymph nodes. Of these 617 women, 155 were still alive in 1997. One-hundred-and-nineteen of these patients agreed to be included in the evaluation study and the same assessments of damage were performed as for the treatment A group.

During the survey, the clinical examinations and overall pain evaluation were performed by three dedicated oncologists. A physiotherapist assessed shoulder mobility and arm oedema by comparison with the contra lateral arm and also assessed the cutaneous and sub-cutaneous adverse effects. A radiologist recorded pleural and lung densities as seen on chest X-ray, in addition to the presence of costal fractures. Photographs of the irradiated areas were taken and kept in the patient's medical record. These photographs, together with the patient journals and the original evaluation, were the source of this study's scoring of cutaneous adverse effects, as assessed in 2004. All adverse effects were scored as "none", "little", "some" and "substantial", in part based on the CTC and Somalent scoring system and in part on an ad hoc defined scoring system based on the individual health professional's experience.

In the analysis of radiation-induced side effects we excluded patients who, after their primary RT, had repeated irradiations for loco-regional recurrence. As a result there were a total of 253 patients included with 156 having received 4.3 Gy x10 (A) and 97 having received 2.5 Gy x20 (B). Of these, 5 women (1 given treatment A and 4 given treatment B) had inoperable tumours and received the RT to shrink the tumour in order that they could receive surgery. The remaining 248 women (155 receiving treatment A and 93 treatment B) received post-operative RT [32].

American breast cancer cases

The patients included in this study were part of a larger patient cohort containing a total of 1546 early stage breast cancer patients treated at Yale New Haven Hospital between 1973 and 1994 with lumpectomy followed by radiotherapy (LRT). A total of 112 patients developed ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR), 52 of whom consented to participate in this study (group 1). As a control group, 52 women with breast cancer treated with LRT in the same period but not developing IBTR were collected (group 2). The two groups were matched by age (± 5 years), year of treatment (± 5 years) and stage of the disease [34]. Leukocyte DNA was available for all 104 samples but mutation screening of the ATM gene was only performed for 44 of the patients experiencing IBCT and 51 of the matched controls. This was done to fit into a 96 well format analyses scheme, excluding the samples with the poorest DNA quality and lowest DNA concentration.

Consent form and ethical committee

All samples were collected after proper informed consent was obtained and the project was approved by the regional ethical committee.

DNA isolation

Blood samples were collected in EDTA tubes and frozen until time of leukocyte DNA isolation using chloroform/phenol extraction followed by ethanol precipitation using the Applied Biosystems 340A Nucleic Acid Extractor and according to standard procedures.

Genotyping Method

All individual exons of the ATM gene and some flanking intronic regions with known variants were screened for variants by denaturating high performance liquid chromatography (dHPLC). A thorough description of the method can be found in [35]. Briefly, individual exons and the included intronic regions were amplified by PCR and screened for variations performing heteroduplex analysis and separation on the Transgenomic® Wave System. Heteroduplexes were identified by abnormal band pattern appearing on the chromatograms and samples with possible variations were subjected to direct sequencing of a newly amplified PCR fragment to determine the nature of the variant. Samples with a dHPLC band pattern deviating from the reference sequence, but without evidence for a heteroduplex were also submitted to direct sequencing in order to capture any homozygote variant. Both Wave and sequence output were read independently by two investigators. Sequence information on all PCR primers as well as the PCR and dHPLC conditions can be found in [35].

Statistical Methods

To test the statistical significance of the difference in genotype distribution between two groups Chi-square tests were performed using SPSS 13.0. All p-values of single marker associations are two sided and not corrected for multiple testing. The haplotypes were estimated using Phase v.2.1.1 and the significance of the difference in haplotype distribution between two or more groups were obtained using the case-control permutation analysis implemented in Phase that tests whether the estimated haplotypes in the case and control groups are a random sample from a single set of haplotype frequencies or if cases are more similar to other cases than to controls [36, 37].

In silico protein analysis

The online protein prediction tool PolyPhen [38] was utilized to assess the possible functional effect of a sequence variation in the coding regions of the ATM gene resulting in an amino-acid substitution in the protein sequence. The online tool scores the effect of a non-synonymous variation as benign, possibly damaging or probably damaging.

Results

Screening of the exonic regions of the ATM gene, as well as known intronic variants, in three materials: Norwegian controls (material 1), Norwegian breast cancer cases (material 2) and American breast cancer cases, with or without ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (material 3), identified a total of 56 variations; 55,4 % transitions (n = 31), 32,1 % transversions (n = 18) and 12,5 % insertions/deletions (n = 7), [see Additional file 1]. Of these, 10 were intronic and 36 exonic, the latter sub-grouped into: 3 truncating, 10 synonymous and 23 non-synonymous. Estimations of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were performed for the variants detected in the Norwegian controls, none of the variants deviated from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (data not shown). Nine of the 56 identified variants were found in all three materials, an additional 7 were common for the Norwegian materials (material 1 and material 2) and three for the breast cancer materials (material 2 and material 3). The variations were distributed throughout the gene, with the highest number of variants found in close proximity to or within exon 39 (5 variants), exon 31 (4 variants) and exon 8,15,32,52 and 60 (3 variants identified in each). The location of the identified variants along the gene as well as the exons relative to the domains of the protein described by [17], such as the PI3K domain, substrate binding domains and ATP-binding domains, is illustrated in Figure 1.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Schematic illustration of the ATM gene. The distribution of the variations detected in the studied materials along the gene is shown in the upper panel with exonic variants indicated on top of the gene and intronic below the gene, illustrated by colored triangles (pink for Norwegian controls, blue for Norwegian breast cancer patients and green for American breast cancer patients, numbers above/below is consistent with numbering used in Additional file 1). Below is given an illustration of the protein with important areas such as substrate binding domains, Leucine zipper, ATP-binding domains, FAT domain and PI3K domain [17] together with exonic information. (The size of the exons and the distance between them are not indicative of the sizes/distances in the gene/protein).

Single marker associations

Risk for developing breast cancer

The association between any variant in the ATM gene and risk of breast cancer was computed by comparing the 95 cancer free women and the 272 breast cancer patients from Norway. A total of 43 variants were identified in the two materials combined [see Additional file 1]. The variant in exon 11 (variant nr. 10, Additional file 1), where a T to C substitution causes an amino-acid change from valine to alanine in the Leucine zipper domain, was found borderline significantly associated with risk of development of breast cancer (P = 0.055), with a lower frequency of the minor allele in breast cancer patients, suggesting a protective effect for of this variant (Table 1).

Table 1

Exon/Variant

Genotype

Cases

Controls

P-value

Exon 11

    

1229 T>C

TT

270

92

0.055

Val > Ala

TC

1

3

 

Variant associated at the single marker level with development of breast cancer in the Norwegian breast cancer patients

Association of variance in ATM with adverse side effects of radiotherapy

The impact of variation in the ATM gene on the level of radiation induced side effects: costal fractures, subcutaneous and lung fibrosis, pleural thickening, development of telangiectasias and atrophy, was studied in the Norwegian breast cancer patients. Twenty individuals were excluded from this analysis as a consequence of receiving multiple radiotherapy treatments to the same area, thus making it difficult to evaluate radiation induced damage from one specific treatment. The remaining 252 patients were first analyzed in combination (Table 2, a) and then divided according to treatment regimen and analyzed separately (Table 2b and 2c). A total of 154 and 94 patients received treatment A (4.3 Gy *10) and B (2.5 Gy *20) respectively. Several of the detected ATM variants were rare [see Additional file 1] and association analyses with level of radiation induced side effects were performed only for those with minor allele frequency > 1%. Even at this low frequency, several of the SNPs were found associated to one or more of the studied end-points: costal fractures, pleural thickening, subcutaneous and lung fibrosis, development of telangiectasias and atrophy both when all cases were analyzed in combination and when the cases were divided into two groups according to received treatment regimen (Table 2a,b and 2c). The change of a G with an A in exon 39 (rs1801516) was found significantly associated with the development of telangiectasias when all cases were analyzed combined (P-value 0.042), and the association became even more significant when only the patients receiving treatment A were analyzed (P-value 0.027). The association is caused by a decreasing frequency of the minor allele with increasing level of radiation induced side effects indicating a protective effect for the A allele. The C to T transition in exon 31 (rs1800058) altering the aminoacid in position 4258 from Leu to Phe was found associated with pleural thickening and lung fibrosis in all cases combined (P-value > 0.001 for both clinical end-points) as well as only in the patients receiving treatment B (P-value 0.001 and 0.002 respectively). Also in this patient group a borderline significant association was observed between this variant and development of costal fractures (P-value 0.055). The impact of this association and other listed in Table 2 have to be interpreted with caution since the number of identified variant alleles is very low and the number of cases limited.

Table 2

Exon/Variant

Genotype

Level of adverse effects

P-value

  

0

1

2

3

 

a)

      

Pleural thickening

Exon 20

GG

136

82

23

1

0.001

IVS20+28delG

GA

4

2

0

1

 

Exon 31, rs1800058

CC

135

82

23

1

> 0.001

4258 C>T

CT

5

1

0

1

 

Leu > Phe

      

Exon 41, rs3092910

      

5793 T>C

TT

136

82

23

1

0.001

Ala > Ala

TC

4

2

0

1

 

Lung fibrosis

Exon 31, rs1800058

CC

66

156

18

1

> 0.001

4258 C>T

CT

3

3

0

1

 

Leu > Phe

      

Development of telangiectasias

Exon 39, rs1801516

GG

35

33

41

70

0.042

5557 G>A

GA

11

14

10

20

 

Asp > Asn

AA

4

1

0

0

 

Atrophy

Exon 31, rs1800058

      

4258 C>T

CC

35

57

74

65

0.02

Leu > Phe

CT

4

1

0

2

 

b)

      

Pleural thickening

Exon 20

GG

69

61

19

0

> 0.001

IVS20+28delG

GA

2

2

0

1

 

Exon 41, rs3092910

TT

69

61

19

0

> 0.001

5793 T>C

TC

2

2

0

1

 

Ala > Ala

      

Lung fibrosis

Exon 32, rs1800889

CC

11

111

13

0

0.009

4578 C>T

CT

4

11

2

1

 

Pro > Pro

      

Development of telangiectasias

Exon 39, rs1801516

GG

14

21

28

47

0.027

5557 G>A

GA

4

9

9

15

 

Asp > Asn

AA

3

1

0

0

 

c)

      

Costal fractures

Exon 9, rs3218674

CC

75

12

1

0

0.043

735 C>T

CT

6

0

1

0

 

Val > Val

      

Pleural thickening

Exon 31, rs1800058

CC

64

20

4

0

0.001

4258 C>T

CT

5

0

0

1

 

Leu > Phe

      

Lung fibrosis

Exon 31, rs1800058

CC

51

35

2

0

0.002

4258 C>T

CT

3

2

0

1

 

Leu > Phe

      

Subcutaneous fibrosis

Exon 32, rs1800889

CC

32

25

16

5

0.022

4578 C>T

CT

6

1

0

3

 

Pro > Pro

      

Associations of genetic variance in the ATM gene with radiation induced side effects in the Norwegian breast cancer patients: for all patients combined (a), treatment A (4.3 Gy *10, b) and treatment B (2.5 Gy *25, c) (organized by adverse effect, level of adverse effect is divided into four groups: none (0), little (1), some (2) and substantial (3)). (The P-values are not adjusted for multiple testing)

Risk for ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence

None of the variants identified in the American breast cancer patients were found associated with risk of developing ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR) at the single marker level although some differences in minor allele frequencies were seen (data not shown).

Association of heterozygosity of the ATM gene with adverse side effects of radiotherapy and risk for ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR)

To assess the influence of variation in the ATM gene focusing on variants 1) affecting a splice site, 2) leading to a truncated version of the protein or 3) scored as probably or possibly damaging in PolyPhen, all patients with presence of one or more such sequence variation in the ATM gene where combined into one group. The level of adverse side effects in the Norwegian breast cancer patients or risk of IBTR in the American breast cancer cases were then compared between the group of patients with and the group of patients without any detected variation in the ATM gene fulfilling these criteria. No significant association could be found between the presence of such sequence variations in the ATM gene for any of the assessed end-points in the Norwegian breast cancer patients or the American breast cancer patients (data not shown).

Haplotype associations

Risk for developing breast cancer

A trend for difference in frequency distribution of the haplotypes of the ATM gene was found between cases and controls when including all identified variants, (P-value 0.06) but it did not reach statistical significance. Phased estimations based on both cases and controls gave 51 haplotypes of which 12 were found in both cases and controls, 9 only in the controls and 30 only in the cases [see Additional file 2]. In addition, one haplotype was only found when analyzing the controls and another three only when analyzing the cases separately. The ten most frequent haplotypes were in common for both materials, and the top three accounted for 73.6%, 79.9% and 71.3% of the total number of represented chromosomes when analyzing cases and controls combined, only controls and only cases respectively. Calculating the difference in frequency distribution of the phased haplotypes, including only the variants with a minor allele frequency ≥ 1% in cases or controls, gave a P-value = 0.23. The low frequent variants tend to reside on different haplotypes.

Association with adverse side effects of radiotherapy

No significant association was found between haplotype distribution and the radiation induced adverse side effects studied here, whether the analyses were performed for all cases combined or split by treatment regimen (data not shown).

Risk for ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence

No significant difference in haplotype distribution was found in the American breast cancer cases with relation to risk of developing ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence. In both groups the three most frequent estimated haplotypes accounted for more than 78% of the analyzed chromosomes (data not shown).

Discussion and conclusion

It has been reported that the coding regions of the ATM gene has a reduced nucleotide diversity in human and chimpanzee as compared to other genes such as ABCB1, BRCA1/2, PTGS2 and XRCC1, in particular the last 2650 bp of gene containing among other the PI3K domain [26]. Our results clearly illustrated this by the fact that only 11% of the total variation is found within this area. In addition, we see no variation in exon 6, which contains the substrate binding domain necessary for p53 activation. In a recent study of French AT-families [11] no difference in risk of breast cancer was detected between heterozygous truncating mutations and missense/in-frame deletions. Three high risk groups of truncating mutations were identified each of which were associated to a known binding domain of the ATM protein. Studying the association between sequence variations in the ATM gene and risk of breast cancer in seven family branches [39] found no association with mutations that truncate the ATM protein in these domains. This is in line with our results where the variant in exon 11 found associated with breast cancer risk is also not located in any of these domains. In a recently reported in vitro study the rs1800056 (Phe > Leu) and the rs1800057 (Pro > Arg) variants were found to modify chromosomal radiosensitivity in lymphoblastoid cell lines from AT-patients, AT-heterozygous and normal individuals [40]. These two variants were not associated with radiation induced adverse side effects in our study, but the rs1800058 (Leu > Phe), not found associated by [40] was linked to several of the clinical end-points analyzed here. [28] identified an association between the variant rs1801516 with radiosensistivity in French breast cancer patients caused by an overrepresentation of the A allele in the breast cancer cases who where adverse radiotherapy responders. This result is supported by the study of [41] where a trend towards increased radiosensitivity of human fibroblast where found with the presence of the variant genotype. This is in contrast with our results indicating a protective effect of the A allele. The contradictory between our study and that of [28] may be a consequence of the different ethnicity of the populations or possibly a result of the limited study population in the French study with only 70 radiosensitivity breast cancer cases included.

In accordance with recent studies we found that a small number of haplotypes represents the majority of the analyzed chromosomes [25, 26], both in cases and controls. From a study of Korean breast cancer patients [42] reported a significantly different frequency distribution of the estimated haplotypes between cases and controls when analyzing five ATM SNPs with a minor allele frequency of more than 10%. None of the same variants were detected in our study as a consequence of both experimental design and the different populations studied but a trend indicating the same was found when analyzing our results although it did not reach statistical significance. Our data suggest that the low frequent variants are in part causing this difference.

Overall our results indicate a role for variation in the ATM gene both for risk of developing breast cancer, and in radiation induced adverse side effects, although the findings need to be confirmed in larger studies.

Abbreviations

AT: 

Ataxia telangiectasia

ATM: 

Ataxia telangiectasia mutated

BRCA1/2: 

Breast cancer 1/2 early onset

CHK1/2: 

checkpoint homolog (S. pombe) 1/2

DSB: 

Double strand breaks

FRAP: 

FK506 binding protein 12-rapamycin associated protein (mTOR)

GST: 

Glutathione-S-transferase

Gy: 

Gray

IBTR: 

Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence

IR: 

Ionizing radiation

kDa: 

Kilo Dalton

LD: 

Linkage disequilibrium

LRT: 

lumpectomy followed by radiotherapy

p53: 

Tumor protein 53

PI3K: 

Phosphoinositide-3 kinase

Rs: 

Reference sequence

SNP: 

Single Nucleotide polymorphism

TRAPP: 

Transformation/transcription domain-associated protein

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude towards the women who have agreed to participate in this research project. This work has been supported by grants from the Norwegian Cancer Society (grant no D99061, the Norwegian Research Council (grant no.155218/300), SalusAnsvar Medical Prize (2002) and the Swiss Bridge Award. Hege Edvardsen is a fellow of the Norwegian Cancer Society. The authors acknowledge Bjørn Erikstein for collecting the material from the Norwegian breast cancer patients.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet Medical Centre, Oslo, Norway
(2)
Department of Clinical Cancer Research, Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet Medical Centre, Oslo, Norway
(3)
Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
(4)
Biomedical Laboratory Sciences Program, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo University College, Oslo, Norway
(5)
Department of Radiation Oncology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Associate, Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Jersey, USA

References

  1. Gatti RA, Berkel I, Boder E, Braedt G, Charmley P, Concannon P, Ersoy F, Foroud T, Jaspers NG, Lange K, .: Localization of an ataxia-telangiectasia gene to chromosome 11q22-23. Nature 1988, 336: 577-580. 10.1038/336577a0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Boder E, Sedgwick RP: Ataxia-telangiectasia. (Clinical and immunological aspects). Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol Beih 1970, 13-14:8-16.: 8-16.Google Scholar
  3. Olsen JH, Hahnemann JM, Borresen-Dale AL, Tretli S, Kleinerman R, Sankila R, Hammarstrom L, Robsahm TE, Kaariainen H, Bregard A, Brondum-Nielsen K, Yuen J, Tucker M: Breast and other cancers in 1445 blood relatives of 75 Nordic patients with ataxia telangiectasia. Br J Cancer 2005, 93: 260-265. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602658PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gilad S, Khosravi R, Shkedy D, Uziel T, Ziv Y, Savitsky K, Rotman G, Smith S, Chessa L, Jorgensen TJ, Harnik R, Frydman M, Sanal O, Portnoi S, Goldwicz Z, Jaspers NG, Gatti RA, Lenoir G, Lavin MF, Tatsumi K, Wegner RD, Shiloh Y, Bar-Shira A: Predominance of null mutations in ataxia-telangiectasia. Hum Mol Genet 1996, 5: 433-439. 10.1093/hmg/5.4.433View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Olsen JH, Hahnemann JM, Borresen-Dale AL, Brondum-Nielsen K, Hammarstrom L, Kleinerman R, Kaariainen H, Lonnqvist T, Sankila R, Seersholm N, Tretli S, Yuen J, Boice JD Jr., Tucker M: Cancer in patients with ataxia-telangiectasia and in their relatives in the nordic countries. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001, 93: 121-127. 10.1093/jnci/93.2.121View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Paterson MC, Anderson AK, Smith BP, Smith PJ: Enhanced radiosensitivity of cultured fibroblasts from ataxia telangiectasia heterozygotes manifested by defective colony-forming ability and reduced DNA repair replication after hypoxic gamma-irradiation. Cancer Res 1979, 39: 3725-3734.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Shiloh Y, Parshad R, Frydman M, Sanford KK, Portnoi S, Ziv Y, Jones GM: G2 chromosomal radiosensitivity in families with ataxia-telangiectasia. Hum Genet 1989, 84: 15-18. 10.1007/BF00210663View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Swift M, Morrell D, Cromartie E, Chamberlin AR, Skolnick MH, Bishop DT: The incidence and gene frequency of ataxia-telangiectasia in the United States. Am J Hum Genet 1986, 39: 573-583.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Borresen AL, Andersen TI, Tretli S, Heiberg A, Moller P: Breast cancer and other cancers in Norwegian families with ataxia-telangiectasia. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1990, 2: 339-340. 10.1002/gcc.2870020412View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Renwick A, Thompson D, Seal S, Kelly P, Chagtai T, Ahmed M, North B, Jayatilake H, Barfoot R, Spanova K, McGuffog L, Evans DG, Eccles D, Easton DF, Stratton MR, Rahman N: ATM mutations that cause ataxia-telangiectasia are breast cancer susceptibility alleles. Nat Genet 2006, 38: 873-875. 10.1038/ng1837View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cavaciuti E, Lauge A, Janin N, Ossian K, Hall J, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Andrieu N: Cancer risk according to type and location of ATM mutation in ataxia-telangiectasia families. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2005, 42: 1-9. 10.1002/gcc.20101View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gatti RA, Tward A, Concannon P: Cancer risk in ATM heterozygotes: a model of phenotypic and mechanistic differences between missense and truncating mutations. Mol Genet Metab 1999, 68: 419-423. 10.1006/mgme.1999.2942View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Connolly L, Lasarev M, Jordan R, Schwartz JL, Turker MS: Atm haploinsufficiency does not affect ionizing radiation mutagenesis in solid mouse tissues. Radiat Res 2006, 166: 39-46. 10.1667/RR3578.1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Barlow C, Eckhaus MA, Schaffer AA, Wynshaw-Boris A: Atm haploinsufficiency results in increased sensitivity to sublethal doses of ionizing radiation in mice. Nat Genet 1999, 21: 359-360. 10.1038/7684View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Umesako S, Fujisawa K, Iiga S, Mori N, Takahashi M, Hong DP, Song CW, Haga S, Imai S, Niwa O, Okumoto M: Atm heterozygous deficiency enhances development of mammary carcinomas in p53 heterozygous knockout mice. Breast Cancer Res 2005, 7: R164-R170. 10.1186/bcr968PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Savitsky K, Bar-Shira A, Gilad S, Rotman G, Ziv Y, Vanagaite L, Tagle DA, Smith S, Uziel T, Sfez S, .: A single ataxia telangiectasia gene with a product similar to PI-3 kinase. Science 1995, 268: 1749-1753. 10.1126/science.7792600View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lavin MF, Scott S, Gueven N, Kozlov S, Peng C, Chen P: Functional consequences of sequence alterations in the ATM gene. DNA Repair (Amst) 2004, 3: 1197-1205. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.03.011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Watters D, Khanna KK, Beamish H, Birrell G, Spring K, Kedar P, Gatei M, Stenzel D, Hobson K, Kozlov S, Zhang N, Farrell A, Ramsay J, Gatti R, Lavin M: Cellular localisation of the ataxia-telangiectasia (ATM) gene product and discrimination between mutated and normal forms. Oncogene 1997, 14: 1911-1921. 10.1038/sj.onc.1201037View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Watters D, Kedar P, Spring K, Bjorkman J, Chen P, Gatei M, Birrell G, Garrone B, Srinivasa P, Crane DI, Lavin MF: Localization of a portion of extranuclear ATM to peroxisomes. J Biol Chem 1999, 274: 34277-34282. 10.1074/jbc.274.48.34277View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Cortez D, Wang Y, Qin J, Elledge SJ: Requirement of ATM-dependent phosphorylation of brca1 in the DNA damage response to double-strand breaks. Science 1999, 286: 1162-1166. 10.1126/science.286.5442.1162View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim ST, Lim DS, Canman CE, Kastan MB: Substrate specificities and identification of putative substrates of ATM kinase family members. J Biol Chem 1999, 274: 37538-37543. 10.1074/jbc.274.53.37538View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Bakkenist CJ, Kastan MB: DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation. Nature 2003, 421: 499-506. 10.1038/nature01368View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pandita TK, Lieberman HB, Lim DS, Dhar S, Zheng W, Taya Y, Kastan MB: Ionizing radiation activates the ATM kinase throughout the cell cycle. Oncogene 2000, 19: 1386-1391. 10.1038/sj.onc.1203444View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kozlov SV, Graham ME, Peng C, Chen P, Robinson PJ, Lavin MF: Involvement of novel autophosphorylation sites in ATM activation. EMBO J 2006, 25: 3504-3514. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601231PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Bonnen PE, Story MD, Ashorn CL, Buchholz TA, Weil MM, Nelson DL: Haplotypes at ATM identify coding-sequence variation and indicate a region of extensive linkage disequilibrium. Am J Hum Genet 2000, 67: 1437-1451. 10.1086/316908PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Thorstenson YR, Shen P, Tusher VG, Wayne TL, Davis RW, Chu G, Oefner PJ: Global analysis of ATM polymorphism reveals significant functional constraint. Am J Hum Genet 2001, 69: 396-412. 10.1086/321296PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Koren M, Kimmel G, Ben-Asher E, Gal I, Papa MZ, Beckmann JS, Lancet D, Shamir R, Friedman E: ATM haplotypes and breast cancer risk in Jewish high-risk women. Br J Cancer 2006, 94: 1537-1543. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603062PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Angele S, Romestaing P, Moullan N, Vuillaume M, Chapot B, Friesen M, Jongmans W, Cox DG, Pisani P, Gerard JP, Hall J: ATM haplotypes and cellular response to DNA damage: association with breast cancer risk and clinical radiosensitivity. Cancer Res 2003, 63: 8717-8725.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Tamimi RM, Hankinson SE, Spiegelman D, Kraft P, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ: Common ataxia telangiectasia mutated haplotypes and risk of breast cancer: a nested case-control study. Breast Cancer Res 2004, 6: R416-R422. 10.1186/bcr809PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Tommiska J, Jansen L, Kilpivaara O, Edvardsen H, Kristensen V, Tamminen A, Aittomaki K, Blomqvist C, Borresen-Dale AL, Nevanlinna H: ATM variants and cancer risk in breast cancer patients from Southern Finland. BMC Cancer 2006, 6:209.: 209. 10.1186/1471-2407-6-209View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Helle SI, Ekse D, Holly JM, Lonning PE: The IGF-system in healthy pre- and postmenopausal women: relations to demographic variables and sex-steroids. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2002, 81: 95-102. 10.1016/S0960-0760(02)00052-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Edvardsen H, Kristensen VN, Grenaker Alnaes GI, Bohn M, Erikstein B, Helland A, Borresen-Dale AL, Fossa SD: Germline glutathione S-transferase variants in breast cancer: Relation to diagnosis and cutaneous long-term adverse effects after two fractionation patterns of radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007, 67: 1163-1171.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Host H, Brennhovd IO, Loeb M: Postoperative radiotherapy in breast cancer--long-term results from the Oslo study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1986, 12: 727-732.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Turner BC, Harrold E, Matloff E, Smith T, Gumbs AA, Beinfield M, Ward B, Skolnick M, Glazer PM, Thomas A, Haffty BG: BRCA1/BRCA2 germline mutations in locally recurrent breast cancer patients after lumpectomy and radiation therapy: implications for breast-conserving management in patients with BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations. J Clin Oncol 1999, 17: 3017-3024.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Bernstein JL, Teraoka S, Haile RW, Borresen-Dale AL, Rosenstein BS, Gatti RA, Diep AT, Jansen L, Atencio DP, Olsen JH, Bernstein L, Teitelbaum SL, Thompson WD, Concannon P: Designing and implementing quality control for multi-center screening of mutations in the ATM gene among women with breast cancer. Hum Mutat 2003, 21: 542-550. 10.1002/humu.10206View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Stephens M, Smith NJ, Donnelly P: A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am J Hum Genet 2001, 68: 978-989. 10.1086/319501PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Stephens M, Donnelly P: A comparison of bayesian methods for haplotype reconstruction from population genotype data. Am J Hum Genet 2003, 73: 1162-1169. 10.1086/379378PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Polyphen2007. [http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph/]
  39. Thompson D, Duedal S, Kirner J, McGuffog L, Last J, Reiman A, Byrd P, Taylor M, Easton DF: Cancer risks and mortality in heterozygous ATM mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005, 97: 813-822.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Gutierrez-Enriquez S, Fernet M, Dork T, Bremer M, Lauge A, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Moullan N, Angele S, Hall J: Functional consequences of ATM sequence variants for chromosomal radiosensitivity. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2004, 40: 109-119. 10.1002/gcc.20025View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Alsbeih G, El-Sebaie M, Al-Harbi N, Al-Buhairi M, Al-Hadyan K, Al-Rajhi N: Radiosensitivity of Human Fibroblasts is Associated With Amino Acid Substitution Variants in Susceptible Genes And Correlates With The Number of Risk Alleles. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007, 68: 229-235.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Lee KM, Choi JY, Park SK, Chung HW, Ahn B, Yoo KY, Han W, Noh DY, Ahn SH, Kim H, Wei Q, Kang D: Genetic polymorphisms of ataxia telangiectasia mutated and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005, 14: 821-825. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0330View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Edvardsen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement

Radiation Oncology

ISSN: 1748-717X

Contact us