Skip to main content
Download PDF

Current status and perspectives of interventional clinical trials for brain metastases: analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov

Radiation Oncology volume 18, Article number: 62 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The management of brain metastases (BM), the major cause of cancer morbidity and mortality, is becoming an emerging area of interest. Surgery, whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), have historically been the main focal treatments for BM. However, the introduction of innovative targeted- and immune-based therapies is progressively changing the paradigm of BM treatment, resulting in an increase in clinical trials investigating new therapeutic strategies.

Methods

Using ClinicalTrials.gov, the largest clinical trial registry with over 400,000 registered trials, we performed an analysis of phase II and phase III ongoing trials evaluating different systemic therapies, radiotherapy (RT), and surgery given alone or in combination in patients with BM.

Results

One hundred sixty-eight trials, 133 phase II and 35 phase III; the largest part having primarily the curative treatment of patients with BM from lung cancer, breast cancer and melanoma, were selected. One hundred sixty-three trials used systemic therapies. One hundred thirteen used tyrosine kinase inhibitors, more frequently Osimertinib, Icotinib and Pyrotinib, 50 used monoclonal antibodies, more frequently Trastuzumab, Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab, 20 used conventional chemotherapies whilst no oncological active drugs were used in 6 trials. Ninety-six trials include RT; 54 as exclusive treatment and 42 in combination with systemic therapies.

Conclusion

Systemic targeted- and/or immune-based therapies, combined or not with RT, are increasingly used in the routine of BM treatment. SRS is progressively replacing WBRT. All these trials intend to address multiple questions on the management of patients with BMs, including the recommended upfront treatment for different cancer histologies and the optimal timing between systemic therapies and radiation regarding brain control and neurocognitive outcome and quality of life.

Introduction

Brain metastases (BM) are tenfold more common than primary malignant brain tumors and represent the most devastating neurologic complications of cancer. Up to 30–40% of cancer patients develop BM with lung, breast, and melanoma cancers resulting the leading cause of BM formation, causing 67–88% of all clinical cases of BM [1,2,3]. Traditionally BM have been treated with surgical resection, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) [4]. However, the development of targeted- and immuno-based therapies is revolutionizing the management of BM [5,6,7,8].

Targeted—[9,10,11] and immune-based therapies [12,13,14] are largely used to treat several cancers, including lung, breast and melanoma cancers. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase Inhibitor (TKI) (gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, icotinib, and osimertinib, dacomitinib) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors (crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib) are used for treating EGFR-mutated or ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC) patients, respectively [11]. Epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) inhibitors, including pertuzumab, trastuzumab, trastuzumab-emtansine, trastuzumab deruxtecan, lapatinib, tucatinib, and neratinib are used for treating HER2-positive breast cancer [10], whilst inhibitors of BRAF (dabrafenib, vemurafenib) are given together with MEK inhibitors (trametinib, cometinib) in BRAF-mutated melanoma [9]. At the same manner, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) anti PD-1/PDL-1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab) and anti-CTLA-4 inhibitors (Ipilimumab, tremelimumab) are increasingly used for treating patients with advanced disease [12,13,14], whilst combining targeted- and immune-based therapies is being evaluated in a variety of solid tumors [15]. Notably, according to the ability of these drug to penetrate the blood–brain barriers, targeted- and immune-based therapies, alone or in combination, have shown a therapeutic efficiency in treating BM [5,6,7,8], whilst increasing evidence suggest their use in combination with radiotherapy (RT) [16,17,18,19,20].

ClinicalTrials.gov is the largest clinical trial registry with over 400,000 registered trials and a weekly growth rate of new entries. The registration process and its potential for an analysis of the clinical trials landscape is well described in the literature [21, 22]. A detailed description of registered protocol elements can be found at the ClinicalTrials.gov website [23, 24]. Due to the nature of ClinicalTrials.gov trial submission process, detailed information on past and present clinical trials can be obtained using the ClinicalTrials.gov registry. We focused the current analysis to phase II and III clinical trials for BM, reported in ClinicalTrials.gov in the last decade. The incidence of BM is expected to increase as advancements in modern management of malignant extra-cranial disease have prolonged survival of patients, consequently, the demand for a better management of intracranial disease is increasing. The aim of the current study was to investigate the setup of current clinical trials aimed to improve outcomes in patients with BM through novel therapeutics, improved surveillance, and prevention.

Material and methods

Data acquisition

The records of all 412,104 clinical trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov were downloaded on the 15th of April 2022. The following fields were searched for BM and related keywords (brain metastases, tumors metastatic to brain, cerebral metastases): short title, scientific title, conditions, a short summary and detailed description. We analyzed all trials registered during the last ten years (from April 2012 to April 2022). After exclusion of trials that were prematurely closed, completed with results, withdrawn, unknown, suspended, phase I or observational trials, and trials not specific for brain metastases, 168 trials were selected for final analysis. The trial selection process is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram of the trial selection process

Full size image

All registered interventions were classified according to their specific role within the trial as part of the standard treatment or the experimental approach. Date of trial registration was considered. Systemic treatments were categorized based on the resources available on the following databases: www.drugbank.ca [25] National Cancer Institute Dictionary of Cancer Terms (www.cancer.gov), pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov as well as the Scopus database, the PubMed Database, Google Scholar and through a generic internet search (Google search engine).

According to their role in a clinical trial, radiotherapy, surgical procedures, drugs, experimental drugs, and imaging procedures were classified as part of the standard treatment or as an experimental intervention. If the procedure was in the focus of a particular trial, it was considered as an experimental intervention. Similarly, all surgical, as well as RT approaches in BM setting and other interventions that were evaluated within a trial protocol were considered as experimental. Otherwise, all procedures were considered standard treatment. In classifying the characteristics of trials, we used a modified strategy based on the methodology previously described [21].

Results

A total of 168 trials were selected for the analysis (Additional file 1). Trial design characteristics and a general overview of the trials are shown in Table 1. The number of trials initiated between 2012 and 2017 were 32 (19%), and 136 (81%) those initiated between 2017 and 2022. At the time of analysis, there were 133 phase II trials and 35 phase III trials; amongst them,—13 trials were completed with no published results,—22 trials were active and not recruiting,—107 trials were still actively recruiting participants, and—26 trials were completed and not yet recruiting.

Table 1 Trial design characteristics
Full size table

Most of the trials enrolled patients with BM from lung cancer (67 trials, 39.9%); 53 NSCLC, 5 Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) and 9 not specified. BM from primary breast cancer were evaluated in 41 (24.4%) trials, with 20 trials specifically evaluating HER-2 positive breast cancer patients with BM. Melanoma BM were included in 28 (16.6%) trials, four of them specifically for BRAF mutated melanoma. Forty-six (27.4%) trials included BM from various primary cancers or unspecified histology. The primary purpose was “treatment” in 158 (94%) trials, “diagnostic” in 5 (3%) trials, “supportive” care in 2 (1.2%) trials, “prevention” in 2 (1.2%) trials, and “other” in one (0.6%) trial.

For “treatment” trials, systemic therapies alone given either as single agent or in combination have been evaluated in 73 (46.2%) trials. RT was investigated in 84 trials: 44 trials as exclusive treatment, 40 trials in combination with systemic therapies. Eighty-five trials were single arm with no masking for treatment and 80 trials had two or more treatment arms. Amongst multiple arms trials, 70 were randomized and 10 were non-randomized trials; 75 were with parallel assignment and 5 with sequential assignment. The median patient enrollment size was 70.5 with a maximum size of 601 patients. Fifty-five (32.7%) trials analyzed less than 50 patients in, 63 (37.5%) trials 50–100 patients, and 28 (16.8%) trials from 101 to 200 patients, 11 (6.5%) trials from 201 to 300 patients, and 11 (6.5%) trials more than 300 patients.

Trials on brain metastases

Systemic therapy

One hundred and fifty-four trials evaluated the use of systemic treatments for patients with BM (Fig. 2A). Fifty-eight trials used TKIs (Fig. 2B), 14 trials used anti-HER2 (9) or anti-VEGF (10) monoclonal antibodies (MAB) (Fig. 2C), 48 trials used immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), 34 trials used chemotherapeutic agents (CHT) (Fig. 2D). Sixty-three trials used a single agent and 50 two or more agents; the type and combination of drugs depended on type of primary tumor.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Pie charts of the systemic therapies used

Full size image

Radiotherapy

Ninety-six trials explored the use of RT in patients with BM (Fig. 2E). Amongst them, we identified 63 phase II trials and 33 phase III trials. RT alone was used in 54 trials and in combination with systemic therapy in 42 trials. RT was used as part of standard treatment in 22 (26.2%) trials and as experimental approach in 62 (73.8%) trials. Regarding the radiation technique, SRS and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) were the most used treatments for either intact or surgically resected BMs (47 trials). WBRT was employed in 27 trials, with 10 of them exploring the use of WBRT with hippocampal avoidance (HA-WBRT). Two trials aimed to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative SRS in patients with BM, one trial explored the use of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT), and one trial the use of brachytherapy. RT technique was not specified In 10 trials.

Discussion

Trials focusing on BM treatment have been increased over time, with the total number of initiated trials showing a positive trend through the years. Our analysis showed that 32 (19%) trials started between 2012 and 2017 and 136 (81%) started between 2017 and 2022, testifying the availability of new effective treatments for BM, either innovative targeted therapies and immunotherapies or advanced radiation techniques. BM management varies per patient and should involve multidisciplinary discussion as well as patient-centered decision making focusing on maximizing tumor control and minimizing toxicity and improving the quality of life of patient [26]. In this regard, the Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (DS-GPA) is a valid prognostic score that might improve shared decision making in clinical practice as well as patient stratification in prospective clinical trials [27].

Current treatment options for patients with BM include surgical resection, WBRT, SRS, and systemic therapy (chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and/or immunotherapy). Surgical resection, usually used for patients with a symptomatic large brain lesion and well controlled systemic disease [28], was present in 4 trials including pre- or post- SRS, intraoperative RT or brachytherapy. No trials are currently exploring new surgical techniques as experimental treatments in the management of BM.

New strategies to reduce neurocognitive decline induced by WBRT, associated or not with simultaneous integrated boost to BMs [29, 30]. a historical mainstay treatment of BM p In our analysis, we found 5 studies aimed to explore WBRT delivered with technique that spare exposure to the hippocampus (NCT04804644 [31], and NCT04277403 [32]), or concurrent delivery of a neuroprotective agent N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist memantine (NCT05045950 [33]) or association between hippocampal sparing and memantine use (NCT04801342 [34], NCT03550391 [35]).

SRS and SRT have increasingly used as an alternative to WBRT in patients with BM [20]. Based on randomized studies comparing SRS vs WBRT plus SRS, SRS is the current recommended treatment in patients with a limited number of BM (1–4). Its use has been conditionally recommended up to 10 BM in patients with good performance status [4, 36, 37], by using different approaches, including different monoisocentric techniques [38]. In the present analysis, SRS, given as single-fraction or fractionated schedule (2–5 fractions), is one of the most investigated radiation techniques used in interventional clinical trials for BM as either exclusive treatment or in combination with systemic therapy and surgery. Ongoing trials are exploring the use of preoperative SRS/SRT versus post-operative SRS (NCT04422639 [39], NCT04365374 [40], NCT05124236 [41]), or comparing SRS alone to HA-WBRT in patients with multiple BM (NCT03550391 [35], NCT04277403 [32], NCT03075072 [42]).

Recent data support a role for immunotherapy and targeted systemic therapies as effective treatment for BM [4]. Therefore, it is not surprising that most ongoing trials explore the use of systemic therapies. EGFR TKIs inhibitors are the most used targeted agents in ongoing trials, specifically the third-generation agent osimertinib for its high CNS activity and efficacy in treatment-resistant, EGFR-mutant NSCLC (NCT03769103 [43], NCT02736513 [44], NCT05104281 [45], NCT02971501 [46], NCT03497767 [47], NCT03257124 [48], NCT04233021 [49]). In patients with HER2-postive breast cancer, ongoing trials in BM treatments explore use of two main target therapies, pyrotinib and trastuzumab deruxtecan. Pyrotinib is a novel irreversible EGFR/HER2 dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor used in combination with other drugs (NCT04639271 [50], NCT03691051 [51], NCT03933982 [52]), RT (NCT04582968 [53]) or both (NCT05042791 [54]). Trastuzumab deruxtecan is a HER2-directed antibody and topoisomerase inhibitor conjugate; the DESTINY-Breast01 trial demonstrated that the drug had strong anti-tumor activity in pretreated patients with HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer, especially, those ones with BM [55]. Different ongoing trials are exploring the efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan in BM HER-2 positive patients (NCT04752059 [56]; NCT04739761 [57]; NCT04420598 [58]) alone or in combination with other drugs (NCT04538742 [59]).

In patients with melanoma BM, either immunotherapy or BRAF and MEK inhibitors have been associated with high brain control and survival benefit [60,61,62,63,64,65]. For patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma, four trials are exploring a combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors agents, including BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib in combination with MEK inhibitor cobimetinib (NCT03430947 [66], NCT02537600 [67]), and BRAF inhibitor encorafenib combined with MEK inhibitor binimetinib (NCT03911869 [68], NCT04511013 [69], NCT03898908 [70]). ICI include large monoclonal antibody-based therapies and small molecule inhibitors that upregulate the immune system and its antitumor activity. Ipilimumab is the most frequent immunotherapy investigated in ongoing trials, given alone or in association with nivolumab. Investigated histologies include melanoma (NCT03903640 [71], NCT02621515 [72]), NSCLC (NCT05012254 [73], NCT02696993 [74]), or mixed histologies (NCT04434560 [75]). Another immunotherapy agent frequently used in ongoing BM trials is the anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody pembrolizumab. Several trials are currently investigating the use of pembrolizumabgiven alone in patients with BM from multiple histologies (NCT02886585 [76], NCT03563729 [77]), or in combination with ipilimumab for melanoma BM (NCT03873818 [78]), with bevacizumab for melanoma and NSCLC BM (NCT02681549 [79]), with TKI in melanoma and renal cell carcinoma BM (NCT04955743 [80]), in triple-negative breast cancer and NSCLS BM (NCT05064280 [81]), with chemotherapy in NSCLC (NCT04967417 [82]) and triple-negative breast cancer BM (NCT05255666 [83]), and in combination with NovoTTF-200A (Optune) device (NCT04129515 [84]) or SRS in patients with breast cancer BM (NCT03449238 [85]),

Conclusion

Recent advances both in RT and systemic treatment have created a paradigm shift in the management of BMs. SRS has progressively replaced the use of WBRT in patients with multiple BM for its ability to reduce the risk of neurocognitive decline. Novel targeted therapies and ICI have also revolutionized the systemic management of several tumors showing impressive activity in patients with BM from immunosensitive tumors or harboring druggable mutations. Areas of research for BM being explored in ongoing clinical trials mostly include the evaluation of systemic therapies, given as single agent or two drugs combined, or concurrently to SRS. All these trials intend to address multiple questions on the management of patients with BM, including the recommended upfront treatment for different cancer histologies and the optimal timing between systemic therapies and radiation regarding brain control and neurocognitive outcome and quality of life.

Abbreviations

BM:

Brain metastases

WBRT:

Whole brain radiotherapy

SRS:

Stereotactic radiosurgery

TKI:

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor

EGFR:

Epidermal growth factor receptor

ALK:

Anaplastic lymphoma

NSCLC:

Non-small-cell lung cancers

HER2:

Epidermal growth factor receptor 2

BRAF:

V-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1

MEK:

Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase

CTLA-4:

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen

MAB:

Monoclonal antibodies

ICI:

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)

RT:

Radiotherapy

SCLC:

Small cell lung cancer

References

  1. Sacks P, Rahman M. Epidemiology of brain metastases. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2020;31:481–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boire A, Brastianos PK, Garzia L, Valiente M. Brain metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2020;20:4–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lamba N, Wen PY, Aizer AA. Epidemiology of brain metastases and leptomeningeal disease. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23:1447–56.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. le Rhun E, Guckenberger M, Smits M, Dummer R, Bachelot T, Sahm F, et al. EANO–ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with brain metastasis from solid tumours. Ann Oncol. 2021;32:1332–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Suh JH, Kotecha R, Chao ST, Ahluwalia MS, Sahgal A, Chang EL. Current approaches to the management of brain metastases. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17:279–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Soffietti R, Ahluwalia M, Lin N, Rudà R. Management of brain metastases according to molecular subtypes. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;16:557–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Galldiks N, Kocher M, Ceccon G, Werner J-M, Brunn A, Deckert M, et al. Imaging challenges of immunotherapy and targeted therapy in patients with brain metastases: response, progression, and pseudoprogression. Neuro Oncol. 2020;22:17–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lau PKH. Brain metastases: lessons and challenges in the targeted therapy and immunotherapy era. J Thorac Dis. 2020;12:4527–30.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun J, Carr MJ, Khushalani NI. Principles of targeted therapy for melanoma. Surg Clin North Am. 2020;100:175–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Loibl S, Poortmans P, Morrow M, Denkert C, Curigliano G. Breast cancer. Lancet. 2021;397:1750–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hirsch FR, Scagliotti GV, Mulshine JL, Kwon R, Curran WJ, Wu Y-L, et al. Lung cancer: current therapies and new targeted treatments. Lancet. 2017;389:299–311.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Albittar AA, Alhalabi O, Glitza Oliva IC. Immunotherapy for Melanoma. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1244:51–68.

  13. Emens LA. Breast cancer immunotherapy: facts and hopes. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:511–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Doroshow DB, Sanmamed MF, Hastings K, Politi K, Rimm DL, Chen L, et al. Immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: facts and hopes. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:4592–602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vanneman M, Dranoff G. Combining immunotherapy and targeted therapies in cancer treatment. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:237–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. di Giacomo AM, Valente M, Cerase A, Lofiego MF, Piazzini F, Calabrò L, et al. Immunotherapy of brain metastases: breaking a “dogma.” J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38:419.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Petrelli F, de Stefani A, Trevisan F, Parati C, Inno A, Merelli B, et al. Combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy for brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2019;144: 102830.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tallet AV, Dhermain F, le Rhun E, Noël G, Kirova YM. Combined irradiation and targeted therapy or immune checkpoint blockade in brain metastases: toxicities and efficacy. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:2962–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Koo J, Roh TH, Lee SR, Heo J, Oh Y-T, Kim S-H. Whole-brain radiotherapy vs. localized radiotherapy after resection of brain metastases in the era of targeted therapy: a retrospective study. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13:4711.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rubino S, Oliver DE, Tran ND, Vogelbaum MA, Forsyth PA, Yu H-HM, et al. Improving brain metastases outcomes through therapeutic synergy between stereotactic radiosurgery and targeted cancer therapies. Front Oncol. 2022;12:657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Califf RM. Characteristics of clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov. JAMA. 2012;307:1838.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Becker JE, Ross JS. Reporting discrepancies between the ClinicalTrials.gov results database and peer-reviewed publications. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161:760.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tse T, Williams RJ, Zarin DA. Update on registration of clinical trials in ClinicalTrials.gov. Chest. 2009;136:304–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gillen JE, Tse T, Ide NC, McCray AT. Design, implementation and management of a web-based data entry system for ClinicalTrials.gov. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107:1466–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wishart DS. DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:D668–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gondi V, Meyer J, Shih HA. Advances in radiotherapy for brain metastases. Neurooncol Adv. 2021;3:v26-34.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nieder C, Andratschke NH, Geinitz H, Grosu AL. Diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment score is valid in patients with brain metastases treated in routine clinical practice in two European countries. Med Sci Monit. 2012;18:CR450–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schödel P, Jünger ST, Wittersheim M, Reinhardt HC, Schmidt N, Goldbrunner R, et al. Surgical resection of symptomatic brain metastases improves the clinical status and facilitates further treatment. Cancer Med. 2020;9:7503–10.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chao J-H, Phillips R, Nickson JJ. Roentgen-ray therapy of cerebral metastases. Cancer. 1954;7:682–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Giaj Levra N, Sicignano G, Fiorentino A, Fersino S, Ricchetti F, Mazzola R, et al. Whole brain radiotherapy with hippocampal avoidance and simultaneous integrated boost for brain metastases: a dosimetric volumetric-modulated arc therapy study. Radiol Med. 2016;121:60–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04804644.

  32. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04277403.

  33. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05045950.

  34. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04801342.

  35. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03550391.

  36. Mathis NJ, Wijetunga NA, Imber BS, Pike LRG, Yang JT. Recent advances and applications of radiation therapy for brain metastases. Curr Oncol Rep. 2022;24:335–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zindler JD, Bruynzeel AME, Eekers DBP, Hurkmans CW, Swinnen A, Lambin P. Whole brain radiotherapy versus stereotactic radiosurgery for 4–10 brain metastases: a phase III randomised multicentre trial. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:500.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ruggieri R, Naccarato S, Mazzola R, Ricchetti F, Corradini S, Fiorentino A, et al. Linac-based radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: comparison between two mono-isocenter techniques with multiple non-coplanar arcs. Radiother Oncol. 2019;132:70–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04422639.

  40. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04365374.

  41. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05124236.

  42. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03075072.

  43. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03769103.

  44. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02736513.

  45. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05104281.

  46. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02971501.

  47. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03497767.

  48. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03257124.

  49. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04233021.

  50. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04639271.

  51. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03691051.

  52. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03933982.

  53. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04582968.

  54. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05042791.

  55. Jerusalem G, Park YH, Hurvitz SA, Modi S, Andre F et al. Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients with brain metastases: a DESTINY-Breast01 subgroup analysis. Cancer Discov. 2022;12:2754–62.

  56. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04752059.

  57. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04739761.

  58. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04420598.

  59. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04538742.

  60. Forsyth PA, Smalley KSM, Sondak VK. BRAF-MEK inhibition in melanoma brain metastases: a new hope. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:836–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Davies MA, Saiag P, Robert C, Grob J-J, Flaherty KT, Arance A, et al. Dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma brain metastases (COMBI-MB): a multicentre, multicohort, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:863–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Long GV, Trefzer U, Davies MA, Kefford RF, Ascierto PA, Chapman PB, et al. Dabrafenib in patients with Val600Glu or Val600Lys BRAF-mutant melanoma metastatic to the brain (BREAK-MB): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:1087–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Long GV, Atkinson V, Lo S, Sandhu S, Guminski AD, Brown MP, et al. Combination nivolumab and ipilimumab or nivolumab alone in melanoma brain metastases: a multicentre randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:672–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Tawbi HA, Forsyth PA, Algazi A, Hamid O, Hodi FS, Moschos SJ, et al. Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in melanoma metastatic to the brain. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:722–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Tan X-L, Le A, Lam FC, Scherrer E, Kerr RG, Lau AC, et al. Current Treatment Approaches and Global Consensus Guidelines for Brain Metastases in Melanoma. Front Oncol. 2022;12:885472.

  66. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03430947.

  67. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02537600.

  68. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03911869.

  69. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04511013.

  70. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03898908.

  71. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03903640.

  72. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02621515.

  73. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05012254.

  74. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02696993.

  75. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04434560.

  76. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02886585.

  77. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03563729

  78. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03873818.

  79. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02681549.

  80. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04955743.

  81. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05064280.

  82. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04967417.

  83. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05255666.

  84. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04129515.

  85. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03449238.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100, Siena, Italy

    Paolo Tini, Samira Bucelli & Giuseppe Minniti

  2. Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Francesco Marampon

  3. UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, San Pietro Hospital FBF, Rome, Italy

    Martina Giraffa

  4. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany

    Maximilian Niyazi & Claus Belka

  5. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany

    Maximilian Niyazi & Claus Belka

  6. Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany

    Maximilian Niyazi & Claus Belka

  7. IRCCS Neuromed, 86077, Pozzilli, IS, Italy

    Martina Giraffa & Giuseppe Minniti

Authors
  1. Paolo Tini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francesco Marampon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martina Giraffa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Samira Bucelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Maximilian Niyazi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Claus Belka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Giuseppe Minniti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All the listed authors contributed to the work and approved the manuscript for submission. GM, MN and CB designed the study, collected the data. PT, FM, MG, SB and GM performed data analysis and interpretation. PT and FM drafted the manuscript. GM, MN, and CB revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Minniti.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Trials selected for the study.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tini, P., Marampon, F., Giraffa, M. et al. Current status and perspectives of interventional clinical trials for brain metastases: analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov. Radiat Oncol 18, 62 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-023-02243-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-023-02243-2

Keywords

Radiation Oncology

ISSN: 1748-717X

Contact us