Skip to main content

Radiotherapy modulates tumor cell fate decisions: a review

Abstract

Cancer has always been a worldwide problem, and the application of radiotherapy has greatly improved the survival rate of cancer patients. Radiotherapy can modulate multiple cell fate decisions to kill tumor cells and achieve its therapeutic effect. With the development of radiotherapy technology, how to increase the killing effect of tumor cells and reduce the side effects on normal cells has become a new problem. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms by which radiotherapy induces tumor cell apoptosis, necrosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, ferroptosis, autophagy, senescence, mitotic catastrophe, and cuproptosis. An in-depth understanding of these radiotherapy-related cell fate decisions can greatly improve the efficiency of radiotherapy for cancer.

Introduction

Cancer has always been a worldwide health problem and is the second leading cause of death after heart disease. In the United States, approximately 1.9 million new cancer cases are expected to appear in 2022 [1]. With the development of medical technology, radiotherapy (RT) has been widely applied to the treatment of cancer. X-rays were discovered in 1895 and radium and polonium were discovered by Marie Curie at the end of the century; thus, RT has been used for more than 100 years. It is estimated that approximately half of cancer patients use RT during treatment, which has led to a significant decrease in cancer mortality [2].

Cell fate decision (CFD) is an important mechanism of multicellular organisms and one of the foundations for maintaining biological stability. Compared with normal cells in the body, the biggest feature of tumor cells is the ability to escape death and proliferate indefinitely [3]. Therefore, inhibiting the proliferation ability of tumor cells, inducing tumor cell death, and eliminating tumor cells are the key steps to the treatment of tumors. Current studies have confirmed that RT could induce multiple tumor CFDs, such as programmed cell death (PCD): apoptosis, necroptosis, autophagy, pyroptosis, ferroptosis, and cuproptosis; non PCD: unregulated forms of necrosis, and non-lethal processes: senescence and mitotic catastrophe (Table 1). This article reviews how RT induces tumor CFDs, looking for breakthroughs in cancer mechanisms and treatments.

Table 1 Radiotherapy induces different cell fate decisions in tumor cells

Radiotherapy and cell fate decisions

The purpose of RT is to stop tumor cell proliferation and induce tumor cell death [4]. RT does not kill cells immediately, and tumor cell death may persist for days or even months after RT [3]. When ionizing radiation acts on cells, it can directly act on the molecules of cells, damaging DNA (about 30–40%) [5, 6]; it can also ionize water in cells (about 80% of cells are water) to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS), indirect damage to DNA (about 60–70%) [5, 6]. Tumor cells are more susceptible to RT than normal cells due to their high replication rate and defects in DNA damage response (DDR) pathways (such as mutations in ATR or ATM) [7, 8]. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most serious DNA damage. When DSBs are not repaired in time, they can lead to different cell fate decisions. Currently, known RT-induced CFDs include PCDs such as apoptosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, ferroptosis, and cuproptosis; unregulated forms of necrosis; and non-lethal processes of senescence and mitotic catastrophe. Different tumor CFDs induced by RT are related to various factors such as tumor cell type, time and dose of radiation, and tumor microenvironment.

Radiotherapy and apoptosis

Apoptosis is a type of PCD that was first defined in 1972 [9]. Apoptosis occurs during growth, development, and aging, maintains the homeostasis of tissue cells and can also be triggered under the influence of diseases or various pathological stimuli [10]. In the process of apoptosis, shrinkage of the cell, chromatin condensation, nuclear fragmentation, blebbing of the plasma membrane, and the production of apoptotic bodies can be seen [11]. Apoptotic cells are quickly engulfed by neighboring phagocytes, without causing inflammation [12]. Despite the lack of systematic studies of the dose–response of RT in different tumor cell lines, many studies have shown that apoptosis, as a low-immunogenic PCD, was more easily induced by low-dose RT (high-dose RT was more likely to induce necrosis) [7, 13, 14]. This suggests that low-dose RT is less immunogenic.

RT-induced apoptosis includes the intrinsic pathway and the extrinsic pathway [15]. In the intrinsic pathway, RT induces apoptosis mainly through a caspase-dependent pathway [16]. Caspases belong to the interleukin-1β-converting enzyme family of proteases [17]. At present, 14 subfamily members of the caspase family have been identified, and they are divided into 3 subfamilies according to the homology of the amino acid sequence: apoptosis activators: caspase-2, -8 and -9; apoptosis executioners: caspase-3, -6 and -7; and inflammatory mediators: caspase-1, -4, -5, -11, -12, -13 and -14 [17]. RT can alter mitochondrial membrane permeability through a caspase-dependent intrinsic pathway, increasing and releasing proapoptotic factors into the cytoplasm, thereby triggering a series of apoptotic cascades [18].

Ionizing radiation affects all organelles in the cell, and the most important effect is DNA damage, which can directly affect the proliferation ability of cells. After ionizing radiation damages cellular DNA, the tumor suppressor protein p53 can be rapidly activated by ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) serine/threonine kinases [19]. p53 is a transcriptional regulator of apoptosis mediator proteins, such as B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia/lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2), Bcl-2-associated X protein (Bax), p53 upregulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA), and NOXA [20]. Bcl-2 and Bax belong to the Bcl-2 protein family, which can control the permeability of the mitochondrial membrane, thereby regulating the release of cytochrome c [21]. In the Bcl-2 protein family, Bcl-2 inhibits apoptosis by controlling the activation of caspase proteases, while Bax promotes apoptosis [22]. PUMA and NOXA also belong to the Bcl-2 protein family and promote cell apoptosis. Overexpression of PUMA can cause a reduction in mitochondrial membrane potential and the release of cytochrome C; NOXA can activate caspase-9 to exert a proapoptotic effect [23]. Cytochrome C release into the cytoplasm interacts with apoptotic protease activating factor-1 (Apaf-1), ATP, and pro-caspase-9 to form a structure called "apoptosome", which activates the apoptosis activator caspase-9 and further activates the apoptosis executioners caspase-3, -6 and -7 [24].

The extrinsic pathway is mediated by death ligand-receptor-specific binding to form constructs, such as tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a)/TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)-TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1) or Fas ligand (FasL)-Fas/CD95 receptor [15]. Death ligand-receptor binding forms a death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), which activates caspase-8 and further activates caspase-3, -6, and -7 [25]. The extrinsic pathway and the intrinsic pathway are closely related. CD95 and TRAIL2 contain p53 response elements that can be activated by RT-induced upregulation of p53, thereby activating caspase-8 [26].

Caspase-3 is a key enzyme in apoptosis and can activate various downstream substrates, such as the caspase-activated deoxyribonuclease (CAD)-ICAD complex, lamin A, fodrin, DNA-PK and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) [27]. CAD binds to its inhibitor ICAD in the nucleus in normal cells. Caspase-3 cleaves the CAD-ICAD complex, releases CAD, and degrades DNA [28]. Lamin A and fodrin are components of the cytoskeleton [29]. DNA-PK and PARP are involved in DNA repair [30]. When caspase-3 activates its substrates, cell changes occur, such as shrinkage, chromatin condensation, nuclear fragmentation, blebbing of the plasma membrane, and the production of apoptotic bodies, leading to apoptosis.

There are many studies on apoptosis in RT, such as the targeted therapies against apoptotic pathways. Studies have shown that hypofractionated RT induced miR-34a expression and promoted apoptosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells through a p53-dependent pathway [31]; LncRNA CCAT2 inhibited p53 and increased radioresistance in colon cancer [32].

Radiotherapy and unregulated forms of necrosis

RT can cause necrosis-like death of tumor cells [33]. Morphologically, necrotic cells swell, the plasma membrane ruptures, and the cellular contents flow out, subsequently leading to a cascade of inflammation and injury [34]. According to different mechanisms, CFDs with necrotic morphology can be classified into unregulated forms of necrosis (necrosis) and various types of PCDs, such as necroptosis, pyroptosis, ferroptosis, and cuproptosis [33]. Depletion of the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) pool and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) and an increase in intracellular Ca2+ can lead to cell necrosis after radiation-induced DNA damage [35]. RT-induced DNA damage in tumor cells can induce cell necrosis. High-dose RT is more likely to cause necrosis than low-dose RT [13, 14]. In addition, necrosis can also be secondary to apoptosis [14]. When cancer RT induces massive apoptosis, if the local phagocytic compartment is overwhelmed, the apoptotic cells are not phagocytosed in time, which can also cause secondary necrosis and cause an inflammatory response [36, 37]. Schildkopf et al. found that RT induced limited apoptosis in epithelial origin-tumor cells, but could stimulate necrosis when combined with hyperthermia [38].

Radiotherapy and necroptosis

Necroptosis is a mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL) -dependent PCD with a necrosis morphology, and it is also one of the RT-induced cell fate decisions [39, 40]. The activation of necroptosis is mostly related to the death receptor pathway[41]. Taking the TNF-α-TNFR signaling pathway as an example, when the TNF-α-TNFR1 complex forms, it recruits receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 (RIPK1), TNF receptor-associated death domain (TRADD), cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein 1 (cIAP1), cIAP2, and TNF receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2) to form prosurvival complex I [41]. Complex I can be deubiquitinated to form multiple complex II [42].

Different complex II is associated with apoptosis or necroptosis. Complex IIa consists of TRADD, Fas-associating protein with a novel death domain (FADD), and caspase-8, which can activate caspase-8 and promote apoptosis [43]. RIPK1 and RIPK3 play important roles in necroptosis, and caspase-8 is closely related to the occurrence of necroptosis. When caspase-8 is activated, it forms complex IIb with RIPK1, RIPK3, and FADD, which cleaves RIPK1 and RIPK3, causing their inactivation and ultimately leading to apoptosis [44]. Conversely, the activity of caspase-8 may be inhibited with increasing radiation dose, as in glioblastoma [39, 45]. At this point, FADD, RIPK1, and RIPK3 form complex IIc, also known as necrosome, which subsequently induces necroptosis [39, 43, 45]. RIPK1 can recruit and activate RIPK3 to form necrosomes. RIPK3 can recruit MLKL and promote its phosphorylation [46]. MLKL then oligomerizes and migrates to the cell membrane, changing the permeability of the cell membrane and promoting necroptosis. Yang et al. found that ablation of caspase-8 could promote RT-induced necroptosis, increase the expression of MLKL, and improve the sensitivity of tumor cells MC38, A54, and B16-SIY to RT [47]. Figure 1 shows the mechanisms of RT-induced apoptosis and necroptosis in tumor cells.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The mechanisms of RT-induced apoptosis and necroptosis in tumor cells. RT induces tumor cell apoptosis through the intrinsic pathway and the extrinsic pathway. In the intrinsic pathway, ionizing radiation damages DNA, leading to the activation of ATM and p53, which subsequently act on downstream molecules. These molecules alter the permeability of the mitochondrial membrane, leading to the release of cyt-c. Cyt-c interacts with Apaf-1 and pro-caspase-9 to activate caspase-9. Caspase-9 promotes the maturation of caspase-3 and leads to apoptosis. In the extrinsic pathway, TNF-αbinds to its receptor and subsequently recruits TRADD, cIAP1, cIAP2, TRAF2, and RIPK1 to form complex I. Complex I forms various complexes through deubiquitination. Complex IIa is composed of TRADD, FADD, and caspase-8, which can lead to the activation of caspase-8 and activate caspase-3 to promote apoptosis. Necroptosis is associated with the activity of caspase-8. When caspase-8 is activated, it can form complex IIb with RIPK1, RIPK3, and FADD, inactivate RIPK1 and RIPK3, and eventually lead to apoptosis; when caspase-8 is inactivated, complex IIc is formed. RIPK1 activates RIPK3, which recruits and activates MLKL. MLKL oligomerizes and changes the permeability of cell membranes, promoting necroptosis. Apaf-1: apoptotic protease activating factor-1; CAD: caspase-activated deoxyribonuclease; cIAP: cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein; cyt-c: cytochrome-c; FADD: Fas-associating protein with a novel death domain; IKK: inhibitor of NF-κB (IκB) kinase; MLKL: mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein; RIPK: receptor-interacting serine/ threonine-protein kinase; RT: radiotherapy; TRADD: TNF receptor-associated death domain; TRAF2: TNF receptor-associated factor 2

Radiotherapy and pyroptosis

Pyroptosis is an inflammatory PCD mediated by the GSDM family [48]. GSDM family members GSDM A-E have two characteristic conserved domains: N-terminal pore-forming domain (N-PFD) and C-terminal repression domain (C-RD) [49]. Under physiological conditions, C-RD interacts with N-PFD and inhibits N-PFD activity [49]. When cells are stimulated, the structure can be cleaved by caspase-dependent or -independent pathways and release cytotoxic N-PFD [50]. N-PFD oligomerizes in the membrane and forms membrane pores, causing the release of the inflammatory mediators IL-1β and IL-18 and pyroptosis [50].

RT can induce tumor cell pyroptosis through the inflammasome pathway and the non-inflammasome pathway. In the inflammasome pathway, RT can activate inflammasome AIM2 and NLRP3, recruit apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing CARD (ASC) and pro-caspase-1, and activate caspase-1 [51,52,53]. Caspase-1 subsequently cleaves GSDMD and forms the GSDMD-N pore. Caspase-1 also cleaved pro-IL-18 and pro-IL-1β, promoting IL-18 and IL-1β maturation and release through the GSDMD-N pore [54]. Han et al. found that in a mouse model of colorectal cancer, RT could simultaneously activate the inflammasomes AIM2 and NLRP3 to trigger pyroptosis [51]. Their study showed that caspase-1−/− mice and AIM2−/−NLRP3−/− mice were radioresistant, while AIM2−/− mice and NLRP3−/− mice were similar to wild-type mice [51]. Zhang et al. showed that RT in lung adenocarcinoma could induce tumor cell pyroptosis and exert a therapeutic effect [52]. In their study, RT damaged tumor cell DNA, activated AIM2, and subsequently induced caspase-1-GSDMD pathway-mediated pyroptosis, and reduced tumor volume and weight. Radiation dose-dependently downregulated circNEIL3 and activated AIM2 via the circNEIL3/ miR-1184/ PIF1 axis, triggering pyroptosis. In addition, overexpression of circNEIL3 inhibited caspase-1 and reduced the therapeutic effect of RT [52].

Radiation also induces pyroptosis through the non-inflammasome pathway. GSDMs can be cleaved by a variety of apoptosis-related caspases and play a role in the transition from apoptosis to pyroptosis [48]. Tan et al. found that the resistance of colorectal cancer to RT was related to the low expression of GSDME, and RT could induce pyroptosis through the caspase-3-GSDME pathway after upregulation of GSDME [55]. In addition, despite the lack of relevant studies, the caspase-8-GSDMC pathway may also play a role in RT, as it has been shown that PD-L1 could mediate the conversion of cancer cell apoptosis to pyroptosis by GSDMC [56]. Figure 2 shows the mechanisms of RT-induced pyroptosis in tumor cells.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The mechanisms of RT-induced pyroptosis in tumor cells.RT-induced pyroptosis in tumor cells through the inflammasome pathway and the non-inflammasome pathway. In the inflammasome pathway, NLRP3 and AIM2 recruit ASC and pro-caspase 1 in response to RT, leading to the activation of caspase-1. Caspase-1 cleaves GSDMD, exposes N-PFD, and forms pores on the plasma membrane; caspase-1 cleaves pro-IL-1β and pro-IL-18, leading to maturation of the inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18 and released from GSDMD wells. In the non-inflammasome pathway, RT activates caspase-3 and -8 through the intrinsic pathway and the extrinsic pathway. Caspase-3 cleaves GSDME and caspase-8 cleaves GSDMC, forming GSDME and GSDMC pores in the plasma membrane, respectively, and inducing tumor cell pyroptosis. ASC: adaptor apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD; DAMP: damage-associated molecular pattern; DR: death receptor, GSDM: gasdermin; N-PFD: N-terminal pore-forming domain; RT: radiotherapy; TRAIL2: TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand 2

Radiotherapy and ferroptosis

Ferroptosis was proposed in 2012 and is a new PCD different from apoptosis, necroptosis, and pyroptosis [57]. Increased mitochondrial membrane density, reduced mitochondrial cristae, and mitochondrial atrophy can be seen during ferroptosis [58]. Its pathogenesis is closely related to the accumulation of ROS and iron-dependent lipid peroxidation [59]. In cells, unstable iron free radicals can generate oxygen free radicals through the Fenton reaction to promote lipid peroxidation; iron also promotes ferroptosis as a cofactor in enzymes that promote lipid oxidation [60]. Ferroptosis plays an important role in RT-induced CFD.

The SLC7A11-GSH-GPX4 pathway plays an important role in the defense against ferroptosis. Glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) can play an important role in inhibiting lipid peroxidation. GPX4 converts reduced glutathione (GSH) to oxidized glutathione (GSSG) and lipid hydroperoxide (L-OOH, toxic) to lipid alcohol (L-OH, no toxicity), thereby promoting the decomposition of H2O2 and inhibiting ferroptosis [61]. The rate-limiting precursor of the antioxidant GSH is cysteine, which is formed by the reduction of cysteine [62]. Intracellular cystine import is controlled by the cystine/glutamate antiporter (system Xc-), and a core component of this system is solute carrier family 7 member 11 (SLC7A11) [63]. Inhibition of the SLC7A11-GSH-GPX4 pathway can lead to the accumulation of lipid peroxides and promote ferroptosis. Radiation damage to cellular DNA leads to an increase in ATM. Studies have shown that ATM could inhibit SLC7A11, reduce cystine import, and promote ferroptosis [64]. Meanwhile, p53 activation after DNA damage may play a dual role in the SLC7A11-GSH-GPX4 pathway. On the one hand, p53 can inhibit the transcription of SLC7A11 and promote ferroptosis [65]; on the other hand, activated p53 can upregulate p21, maintain GSH levels during stress, and inhibit ferroptosis [66]. p21 can also inhibit ferroptosis through a p53-independent pathway, possibly related to CDKs [67]. ROS generated by RT can also bind to GSH and then convert it to GSSG, thereby promoting ferroptosis [68].

Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) are important for the normal physiological function of cells and can maintain the fluidity of cell membranes [69]. Due to the presence of bis-allylic in PUFAs, PUFAs are prone to lipid peroxidation, which is also required in ferroptosis [58].

During ferroptosis, acyl-CoA synthase long-chain 4 (ACSL4) and lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase 3 (LPCAT3) are key regulators and rate-limiting factors. ACSL4 can catalyze PUFA to form the corresponding acyl-coenzyme A (CoA) derivative PUFA-CoA [70]. PUFA-CoA is processed to form lysophospholipids (LysoPLs) and then is combined with phospholipids (PLs) by LPCAT3 to form PUFA-PLs [71]. PUFA-PLs are highly prone to peroxidation due to the presence of bis-allylic moieties. When the ACSL4 and LPCAT3 genes are knocked out, the synthesis of PUFA-PLs is reduced, and ferroptosis is suppressed [72]. In radiotherapy, the absorption of ionizing radiation by water results in ROS production, and ROS subsequently act on PUFAs, leading to lipid peroxidation in a dose-dependent manner [73]; meanwhile, although the mechanism remains unclear, radiotherapy can induce ACSL4 expression to promote PUFA-PL synthesis and ferroptosis [73].

RT-induced ferroptosis may also be associated with other signaling pathways [75, 76]. In addition to the effect of p53 on the SLC7A11-GSH-GPX4 pathway, it may induce or inhibit ferroptosis in other ways. p53 can induce the activation of mouse double minute 2 (MDM2) [77]. Studies have shown that MDM2 could regulate lipid metabolism and ferroptosis suppressor protein 1 (FSP1) to promote ferroptosis [78]. FSP1 is a key factor in the NAD(P)H-FSP1-ubiquinone (CoQ) pathway. FSP1 can consume NAD(P)H, reducing CoQ to CoQH2. CoQH2 can bind to lipophilic free radicals and inhibit ferroptosis [79]. The NAD(P)H-FSP1-CoQ pathway is a GPX4-independent ferroptosis defense pathway [80]. Increased ROS during RT can induce the nuclear factor erythroid-2 related factor 2 (Nrf2)- heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) pathway. The role of the Nrf2-HO-1 pathway in ferroptosis is also two-sided. Feng et al. found that Nrf2 could activate SLC7A11 to inhibit ferroptosis, and reduce the radiosensitivity of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [74, 81]; Ruiran Wei et al. found that the activated Nrf2-HO-1 pathway could increase the level of Fe2+ and induce ferroptosis in colorectal cancer cells [82]. Figure 3 shows the mechanisms of RT-induced ferroptosis in tumor cells.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The mechanisms of RT-induced ferroptosis in tumor cells. Intracellular cystine import is controlled by the cystine/glutamate antiporter (System Xc-), with SLC7A11 being the core component. Inhibition of the SLC7A11-GSH-GPX4 pathway leads to accumulation of lipid peroxides and promotes ferroptosis. Damage to cellular DNA by radiation leads to increased ATM. ATM has been shown to inhibit SLC7A11, reduce cystine import, and promote ferroptosis. Also, p53 activation following DNA damage may play a dual role in the SLC7A11-GSH-GPX4 pathway. On the one hand, p53 can inhibit SLC7A11 transcription and promote ferroptosis; on the other hand, activated p53 can up-regulate p21, maintain GSH levels during stress, and inhibit ferroptosis. During ferroptosis, ACSL4 and LPCAT3 are critical regulators and rate-limiting factors. ACSL4 can catalyze PUFA to generate PUFA-CoA. PUFA-CoA is processed to form lysophospholipids, which are then combined with phospholipids (PLs) by LPCAT3 to form PUFA-PLs. In RT, ROS can act on PUFAs and lead to lipid peroxidation in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, RT can induce ACSL4 expression, promote PUFA-PLs synthesis, and ultimately lead to ferroptosis. ACSL4, acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain 4; Cys2, cystine; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; GGC, γ-Glutamylcysteine; LPCAT3: lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase 3; PLOOH, phospholipid hydroperoxide. PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid; PUFA-PL, phospholipid containing polyunsaturated fatty acid chain; RT: radiotherapy; SLC7A11: solute carrier family 7 member 11

Induction of ferroptosis in tumor cells is one of the ways of radiosensitization. For example, [83] pancreatic cancer and renal cell carcinoma are sensitive to RT, which may be related to their dependence on cystine uptake [73, 84]; inhibition of SLC7A11 and promotion of ferroptosis can increase the radiosensitivity of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [74]. Ferroptosis is also a new synergistic point for RT and immunotherapy. Lang et al. found that RT-activated ATM and immunotherapy-activated CD8+ T cells synergistically aligned SLC7A11 to enhance tumor cell ferroptosis and improve treatment outcomes [64].

Radiotherapy and autophagy

Autophagy is a pathway by which cells engulf cytoplasmic components through autophagosomes and present them to lysosomes for degradation to maintain homeostasis and health [85]. During autophagy, characteristic double-membrane vesicles can be seen. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)- Protein Kinase B (AKT)- mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) pathway is important for regulating autophagy [86]. Many studies have shown that a variety of drugs can inhibit the expression of members of the PI3K-AKT-mTORC1 pathway and induce autophagy [87,88,89].

RT can induce two types of autophagy in tumor cells: protective autophagy and autophagic cell death [90]. Genes, such as p53, p73, and E2F1, play an important role in this process [91,92,93]. RT can cause DNA damage through direct and indirect means while generating large amounts of ROS, which can induce cytoprotective autophagy. Activated protective autophagy can remove damaged mitochondria, reduce cellular oxidative stress, and improve tumor cell resistance to radiation [90]. Mo et al. found that reduced Rad51 expression could inhibit autophagy and increase radiosensitivity in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells [94]. Wang et al. found that SMAD4 gene mutation could increase the radioresistance of pancreatic cancer by promoting autophagy [95].

On the other hand, some studies have found that the self-renewal ability of tumor cells is destroyed after ionizing radiation, and the mitosis of cells is blocked, which stimulates excessive autophagy of cells, resulting in autophagic cell death [90]. Djuzenova et al. [96] found that the radiosensitivity of glioblastoma increased after inhibition of the PI3K-AKT-mTORC1 pathway and induction of autophagy. Palumbo et al. found that the glioblastoma cell line T98G exhibited high radiosensitivity after treatment with an ionizing radiation-temozolomide combination, which was associated with the activation of autophagy [97]. After autophagy inhibition, the radiosensitivity of T98G cells decreased, indicating that RT played an anticancer effect through autophagic cell death. After induction of autophagy with rapamycin, the radiosensitivity of T98G was also enhanced [97].

Different forms of autophagy occur during RT, and the strength of autophagy activation and the targets of autophagy are key to determining whether autophagy promotes survival or death during RT-induced CFDs. An in-depth understanding of different forms of autophagy will be key to the development of individualized tumor therapy in the future.

Radiotherapy and senescence

Senescence is a common non-lethal CFD induced by tumor RT [98]. Senescence refers to a state in which cells lose their ability to proliferate [99]. Senescent cells remain metabolically active, but cell cycle arrest [98]. Senescent cells show flattening, vacuolization, and altered DNA structure. Radiation-induced senescence is mainly controlled by the activation of the p53-p21 pathway and the p16INK4a-retinoblastoma protein (pRB) pathway [14, 100]. After ionizing radiation damages tumor cell DNA, activated p53 upregulates the expression of p21, a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor that inhibits the expression of CDK-cyclin complexes [101,102,103]. Inhibition of CDK1-cyclin A complex arrests cells in the G2/M phase [101, 103]. Inhibition of CDK2-cyclin E/A complex and CDK4-cyclin D complex promotes dephosphorylation of pRB and arrests cells in the G1/S phase [101, 103]. Ionizing radiation-induced elevation of intracellular ROS and protein kinase C (PKC) can also increase p16INK4a expression, inhibit CDK-cyclin complexes and promote pRB dephosphorylation, leading to tumor cell senescence [104].

Senescence plays an important role in tumor RT. Senescence can stop the proliferation of tumor cells, especially in tumor cells that have received non-lethal doses of radiation [101]. At an early stage, senescent cells can promote the recruitment of immune cells through senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) [99]. Meanwhile, in some tumors (such as lung cancer and glioblastoma), RT-induced tumor cell senescence will preferentially induce apoptosis [101, 105]. However, in the later stages of RT, the accumulation of senescent cells may adversely affect prognosis, as the immune microenvironment generated by SASP may promote tumor recurrence [101, 106] The high recurrence rate of some cancers after RT may be related to the accumulation of senescent cells [101, 107]. For example, patients with non-small cell lung cancer who received stereotactic body RT had higher tumor recurrence rates than patients who received surgery at the same stage [101, 107, 108].

Radiotherapy and mitotic catastrophe

Mitotic catastrophe usually occurs during or after abnormal mitosis. Due to abnormal cell mitosis, cells undergo atypical chromosome segregation and cell division, resulting in giant cells with abnormal nuclear morphology, multiple nuclei, and multiple micronuclei [109]. The mechanism of mitotic catastrophe is related to the promotion of mitosis and centrosome hyperamplification [110]. The role of mitotic catastrophe in anticancer therapy increases as tumor cells become more resistant to the induction of intrinsic apoptosis [98]. Like senescence, mitotic catastrophe is considered a non-lethal process, and the mitotic catastrophe does not always lead to apoptosis or necrosis, but sometimes to cellular senescence [98].

p53 is an important tumor suppressor gene that is mutated or inactivated in many tumors. p53 plays an important role in the regulation of mitotic checkpoints. Tumor cells readily undergo mitotic catastrophe after RT-induced DNA damage. Fragkos et al. found that following p53 inactivation, RT neither activated p21 nor inhibited CDK1-cyclin A complex, resulting in G2/M checkpoint inactivation and premature entry into mitosis [111]. p53 is also important for DNA repair, and cells that enter mitosis prematurely will carry unrepaired RT-induced DNA damage, promoting mitotic catastrophe.

Mitotic catastrophe is also associated with centrosome hyperamplification. When p53 is inactivated, RT does not upregulate p21 and does not inhibit the activity of the CDK2-cyclin E/A complex. The activity of the CDK2-cyclin E/A complex is critical for the initiation of centrosome amplification [112]. Studies have shown that centrosome hyperamplification can be seen when p53 is inactivated [113]. Centrosomes can form bipolar mitotic spindles during mitosis, and hyperamplified centrosomes can lead to multipolar spindles during mitosis. Multipolar spindles lead to abnormal chromosome segregation and produce giant cells with abnormal nuclear morphology, multiple nuclei, and multiple micronuclei, leading to mitotic catastrophe [109].

When a mitotic catastrophe occurs, cells continue mitosis after a brief G2 arrest, and then the expression of multiple mitotic checkpoint proteins is increased and mitotic delay or arrest is promoted [114]. During this period, delayed apoptosis is activated in metaphase. Studies have shown that caspase-2 plays a key role in delayed apoptosis after mitotic catastrophe [115]. In general, however, cells do not die in metaphase because they can adapt to the mitotic checkpoint. At this time, the cells continue through one or more cell cycles and acquire an increasing number of chromosomal aberrations, becoming aneuploid or polyploid. Ultimately, these cells die due to delayed apoptosis or necrosis or enter cellular senescence [98]. It depends on the time of mitotic arrest, the capability of cells to exit from abnormal mitosis, and the activity of signaling pathways such as p53 and Hippo [98, 116, 117]. Studies have reported that delayed death after RT-induced mitotic catastrophe generally occurs 2–6 days after RT [118]. Cheng et al. found that 2 Gy RT could induce mitotic catastrophe in oral cancer cells in vitro and in vivo with B12536 [119]; Gordon et al. found that combined treatment of LB100 and protein phosphatase 2A could significantly reduce p53 expression, induce mitotic catastrophe, and increase the radiosensitivity of glioblastoma cells [120]. Figure 4 shows the mechanisms of RT-induced senescence and mitotic catastrophe in tumor cells.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The mechanisms of RT-induced senescence and mitotic catastrophe in tumor cells. When p53 functions normally, ionizing radiation damages the DNA of tumor cells and activates the p53-p21 pathway and the p16INK4a-pRB pathway. The activation of p21 inhibits CDK1/2/4-cyclin complex, and the inhibition of CDK1-cyclin A complex arrests the cell cycle in the G2/M phase; p16INK4a inhibits CDK2-cyclin E/A complex and CDK4-cyclin D complex, promotes the dephosphorylation of pRB, and arrests the cell cycle in the G1/S phase, resulting in tumor cell senescence. When p53 is inactivated or mutated in tumor cells, ionizing radiation cannot activate the p53-p21 pathway, CDK1-cyclin A complex and CDK2-cyclin E/A complex are activated, and cells enter mitosis in advance; CDK2-cyclin E/A complex activation leads to centrosome hyperamplification. Tumor cells enter mitosis prematurely with unrepaired DNA damage, leading to mitotic catastrophe. CDK: cyclin-dependent kinase; pRB: retinoblastoma protein; RT: radiotherapy

Radiotherapy and cuproptosis

Like iron, copper is also a trace element necessary for human survival. Copper is a cofactor for many essential enzymes in the body and is involved in various metabolic pathways, but high concentrations of copper can also lead to cell death [121].

In 2022, Tsvetkov et al. discovered a novel copper-dependent PCD and named it cuproptosis [122]. Their studies confirmed that ferredoxin 1 (FDX1) and protein acylation are key factors in the induction of cuproptosis [122]. FDX1 encodes a reductase that reduces Cu2+ to the more toxic Cu+. Cu+ is the target of the efficient copper ionophore elesclomol (ES) [122]. Studies have shown that ESs, such as disulfiram and NSC319726, can target tumor cells with high concentrations of copper [123]. Deletion of FDX1 leads to resistance to many copper ionophores.

In the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA), pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) complexes are acylated by key enzymes in the lipoic acid pathway (such as lipoyl synthase (LIAS)) and play important physiological functions [122]. Cu+ can directly bind to acylated proteins and promote their oligomerization and dysregulation, block TCA, trigger proteotoxic stress, and induce cuproptosis [122].

Studies have reported that RT could target copper metabolism in hepatocellular carcinoma, but the mechanism of RT-induced cell cuproptosis remains unclear [124, 125]. It has been determined that copper uptake in tumor cells is higher than that in normal cells, and in-depth research on the mechanism of radiation-induced cuproptosis will play an important role in developing methods to precisely kill tumor cells.

Immunological consequences of RT-related cell fate decisions and tumor radiotherapy

RT can kill tumor cells by various CFDs, and then stimulate the immune response of the body to increase the therapeutic effect. Tumor suppresses the immune system during its growth and innate immunity and adaptive immunity both have anti-cancer effects [34]. The immune response activated by RT is related to the dose. Apoptosis is a cell death with low immunogenicity [11]. Apoptosis cells are engulfed by adjacent macrophages and presented to lymphocytes to promote immune response [12]. Necrosis and various PCDs with necrosis-like morphology are highly immunogenic cell death. Rupture of cell membrane and release of cell contents can promote the infiltration of inflammatory cells and immune cells, promote a stronger immune response, and alleviate the immunosuppression of the tumor microenvironment [34]. Compared with high-dose RT, the role of apoptosis and non-lethal processes is greater in low-dose RT, and senescence and mitotic catastrophe can also enter apoptosis [13, 98, 101]; In high-dose RT, necrosis-like cell death may play a greater role [13]. However, the response of immune cells to RT is also an important part to determine the effect of RT. Regulatory T cells (Treg) with immunosuppressive function are more sensitive to low-dose RT than CD4+ T and CD8+ T cells with immune response function; CD4+ T and CD8+ T cells are more sensitive to high-dose RT than Tregs, NK cells, and dendritic cells [126,127,128]. Studies have shown that low-dose RT was more effective in the local control of tumors, and had fewer side effects on normal cells and tissues [126, 129]. Therefore, apoptosis resistance of tumor cells is an important part of radioresistance, and also an important factor hindering the effect of RT. Because it reduces the effect of low-dose RT, the side effects of high-dose RT on immune cells and normal cells still need to be overcome.

Conclusion

RT plays an important role in cancer treatment, and various cell fate decisions play an important role in tumor radiotherapy. Radiation-induced different cell fate decisions are related to various factors such as tumor cell line, tumor microenvironment, and radiation dose. However, studies that systematically discuss the conditions under which radiation induces different cell fate decisions are still lacking. For different tumors, especially various RT-resistant tumors, an in-depth understanding of the relevant cell fate decision mechanism will be helpful for the application of RT. On top of this, targeted therapy that modulates various cell fate decisions, such as targeting CFDs-related non-coding RNAs, will be an important therapy to increase the specificity and sensitivity of RT to tumor cells.

Abbreviations

ACSL4:

Acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain 4

Apaf-1:

Apoptotic protease activating factor-1

ASC:

Adaptor apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD

Akt:

Protein kinase B

CAD:

Caspase-activated deoxyribonuclease

CDK:

Cyclin-dependent kinase

CFD:

Cell fate decision

cIAP:

Cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein

Cys2:

Cystine

cyt-c:

Cytochrome-c

DAMP:

Damage-associated molecular pattern

DR:

Death receptor

ER:

Endoplasmic reticulum

FADD:

Fas-associating protein with a novel death domain

GGC:

γ-Glutamylcysteine

GSDM:

Gasdermin

IKK:

Inhibitor of NF-κB (IκB) kinase

LPCAT3:

Lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase 3

MLKL:

Mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein

MTORC1:

Mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1

N-PFD:

N-terminal pore-forming domain

PCD:

Programmed cell death

PI3K:

Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase

PLOOH:

Phospholipid hydroperoxide

pRB:

Retinoblastoma protein

PRR:

Pattern recognition receptor

PUFA:

Polyunsaturated fatty acid

PUFA-PL:

Phospholipid containing polyunsaturated fatty acid chain

RIPK:

Receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase

RT:

Radiotherapy

SLC7A11:

Solute carrier family 7 member 11

TRADD:

TNF receptor-associated death domain

TRAF2:

TNF receptor-associated factor 2

TRAIL2:

TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand 2

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(1):7–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baskar R, Lee KA, Yeo R, Yeoh KW. Cancer and radiation therapy: current advances and future directions. Int J Med Sci. 2012;9(3):193–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hayes JD, Dinkova-Kostova AT, Tew KD. Oxidative stress in cancer. Cancer Cell. 2020;38(2):167–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Baskar R. Emerging role of radiation induced bystander effects: cell communications and carcinogenesis. Genome Integr. 2010;1(1):13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ward JF. DNA damage produced by ionizing radiation in mammalian cells: identities, mechanisms of formation, and reparability. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1988;35:95–125.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Santivasi WL, Xia F. Ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage, response, and repair. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2014;21(2):251–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Adjemian S, Oltean T, Martens S, Wiernicki B, Goossens V, Vanden Berghe T, et al. Ionizing radiation results in a mixture of cellular outcomes including mitotic catastrophe, senescence, methuosis, and iron-dependent cell death. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(11):1003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Srinivas US, Tan BWQ, Vellayappan BA, Jeyasekharan AD. ROS and the DNA damage response in cancer. Redox Biol. 2019;25:101084.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Elmore S. Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxicol Pathol. 2007;35(4):495–516.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. D’Arcy MS. Cell death: a review of the major forms of apoptosis, necrosis and autophagy. Cell Biol Int. 2019;43(6):582–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pistritto G, Trisciuoglio D, Ceci C, Garufi A, D’Orazi G. Apoptosis as anticancer mechanism: function and dysfunction of its modulators and targeted therapeutic strategies. Aging (Albany NY). 2016;8(4):603–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Majtnerova P, Rousar T. An overview of apoptosis assays detecting DNA fragmentation. Mol Biol Rep. 2018;45(5):1469–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hellevik T, Martinez-Zubiaurre I. Radiotherapy and the tumor stroma: the importance of dose and fractionation. Front Oncol. 2014;4:1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lauber K, Ernst A, Orth M, Herrmann M, Belka C. Dying cell clearance and its impact on the outcome of tumor radiotherapy. Front Oncol. 2012;2:116.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wong RS. Apoptosis in cancer: from pathogenesis to treatment. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2011;30:87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Fan TJ, Han LH, Cong RS, Liang J. Caspase family proteases and apoptosis. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2005;37(11):719–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bolivar BE, Vogel TP, Bouchier-Hayes L. Inflammatory caspase regulation: maintaining balance between inflammation and cell death in health and disease. FEBS J. 2019;286(14):2628–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Vinod SK, Hau E. Radiotherapy treatment for lung cancer: Current status and future directions. Respirology. 2020;25(Suppl 2):61–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang M, Zhang L, Bi N, Ji W, Tan W, Zhao L, et al. Association of P53 and ATM polymorphisms with risk of radiation-induced pneumonitis in lung cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;79(5):1402–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sabapathy K, Lane DP. Understanding p53 functions through p53 antibodies. J Mol Cell Biol. 2019;11(4):317–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hafezi S, Rahmani M. Targeting BCL-2 in cancer: advances, challenges, and perspectives. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(6):1292.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Edlich F. BCL-2 proteins and apoptosis: recent insights and unknowns. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;500(1):26–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang J, Thomas HR, Li Z, Yeo NCF, Scott HE, Dang N, et al. Puma, noxa, p53, and p63 differentially mediate stress pathway induced apoptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(7):659.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Li P, Zhou L, Zhao T, Liu X, Zhang P, Liu Y, et al. Caspase-9: structure, mechanisms and clinical application. Oncotarget. 2017;8(14):23996–4008.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Green DR. The death receptor pathway of apoptosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2022;14(2):a041053.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chatzitolios A, Venizelos I, Tripsiannis G, Anastassopoulos G, Papadopoulos N. Prognostic significance of CD95, P53, and BCL2 expression in extranodal non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Ann Hematol. 2010;89(9):889–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Asadi M, Taghizadeh S, Kaviani E, Vakili O, Taheri-Anganeh M, Tahamtan M, et al. Caspase-3: structure, function, and biotechnological aspects. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/bab.2233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Larsen BD, Sorensen CS. The caspase-activated DNase: apoptosis and beyond. FEBS J. 2017;284(8):1160–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Islam MI, Hossain MS, Park IS. Differential involvement of caspase-6 in amyloid-beta-induced fragmentation of lamin A and B. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2020;24:100839.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu SW, Su CH, Ho YC, Huang-Liu R, Tseng CC, Chiang YW, et al. Genotoxic effects of 1-nitropyrene in macrophages are mediated through a p53-dependent pathway involving cytochrome c release, caspase activation, and PARP-1 cleavage. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021;213:112062.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Long Z, Wang B, Tao D, Huang Y, Tao Z. Hypofractionated radiotherapy induces miR-34a expression and enhances apoptosis in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Int J Mol Med. 2014;34(5):1388–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang M, Wang L, He X, Zhang J, Zhu Z, Zhang M, et al. lncRNA CCAT2 promotes radiotherapy resistance for human esophageal carcinoma cells via the miR145/p70S6K1 and p53 pathway. Int J Oncol. 2020;56(1):327–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Woo Y, Lee HJ, Jung YM, Jung YJ. Regulated necrotic cell death in alternative tumor therapeutic strategies. Cells. 2020;9(12):2709.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Carvalho HA, Villar RC. Radiotherapy and immune response: the systemic effects of a local treatment. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2018;73(suppl 1):e557s.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Verheij M. Clinical biomarkers and imaging for radiotherapy-induced cell death. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2008;27(3):471–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Silva MT. Secondary necrosis: the natural outcome of the complete apoptotic program. FEBS Lett. 2010;584(22):4491–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Munoz LE, Lauber K, Schiller M, Manfredi AA, Herrmann M. The role of defective clearance of apoptotic cells in systemic autoimmunity. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010;6(5):280–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Schildkopf P, Frey B, Mantel F, Ott OJ, Weiss EM, Sieber R, et al. Application of hyperthermia in addition to ionizing irradiation fosters necrotic cell death and HMGB1 release of colorectal tumor cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;391(1):1014–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gong Y, Fan Z, Luo G, Yang C, Huang Q, Fan K, et al. The role of necroptosis in cancer biology and therapy. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Li L, Tong A, Zhang Q, Wei Y, Wei X. The molecular mechanisms of MLKL-dependent and MLKL-independent necrosis. J Mol Cell Biol. 2021;13(1):3–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Newton K, Manning G. Necroptosis and Inflammation. Annu Rev Biochem. 2016;85:743–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Liu Y, Liu T, Lei T, Zhang D, Du S, Girani L, et al. RIP1/RIP3-regulated necroptosis as a target for multifaceted disease therapy (review). Int J Mol Med. 2019;44(3):771–86.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Schwabe RF, Luedde T. Apoptosis and necroptosis in the liver: a matter of life and death. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;15(12):738–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Yang ZH, Wu XN, He P, Wang X, Wu J, Ai T, et al. A Non-canonical PDK1-RSK signal diminishes pro-caspase-8-mediated necroptosis blockade. Mol Cell. 2020;80(2):296-310.e6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Das A, McDonald DG, Dixon-Mah YN, Jacqmin DJ, Samant VN, et al. RIP1 and RIP3 complex regulates radiation-induced programmed necrosis in glioblastoma. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(6):7525–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Speir M, Nowell CJ, Chen AA, O’Donnell JA, Shamie IS, Lakin PR, et al. Ptpn6 inhibits caspase-8- and Ripk3/Mlkl-dependent inflammation. Nat Immunol. 2020;21(1):54–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Yang Y, Wu M, Cao D, Yang C, Jin J, Wu L, et al. ZBP1-MLKL necroptotic signaling potentiates radiation-induced antitumor immunity via intratumoral STING pathway activation. Sci Adv. 2021;7(41):eabf6290.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Yu P, Zhang X, Liu N, Tang L, Peng C, Chen X. Pyroptosis: mechanisms and diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6(1):128.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Li L, Li Y, Bai Y. Role of GSDMB in pyroptosis and cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:3033–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Fang Y, Tian S, Pan Y, Li W, Wang Q, Tang Y, et al. Pyroptosis: a new frontier in cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;121:109595.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Han C, Godfrey V, Liu Z, Han Y, Liu L, Peng H, et al. The AIM2 and NLRP3 inflammasomes trigger IL-1-mediated antitumor effects during radiation. Sci Immunol. 2021;6(59):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhang T, Wu DM, Luo PW, Liu T, Han R, Deng SH, et al. CircNEIL3 mediates pyroptosis to influence lung adenocarcinoma radiotherapy by upregulating PIF1 through miR-1184 inhibition. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13(2):167.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Man SM, Kanneganti TD. Regulation of inflammasome activation. Immunol Rev. 2015;265(1):6–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Karmakar M, Minns M, Greenberg EN, Diaz-Aponte J, Pestonjamasp K, Johnson JL, et al. N-GSDMD trafficking to neutrophil organelles facilitates IL-1beta release independently of plasma membrane pores and pyroptosis. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):2212.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Tan G, Lin C, Huang C, Chen B, Chen J, Shi Y, et al. Radiosensitivity of colorectal cancer and radiation-induced gut damages are regulated by gasdermin E. Cancer Lett. 2022;529:1–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Hou J, Zhao R, Xia W, Chang CW, You Y, Hsu JM, et al. PD-L1-mediated gasdermin C expression switches apoptosis to pyroptosis in cancer cells and facilitates tumour necrosis. Nat Cell Biol. 2020;22(10):1264–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Dixon SJ, Lemberg KM, Lamprecht MR, Skouta R, Zaitsev EM, Gleason CE, et al. Ferroptosis: an iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell. 2012;149(5):1060–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Liang C, Zhang X, Yang M, Dong X. Recent progress in ferroptosis inducers for cancer therapy. Adv Mater. 2019;31(51):e1904197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Su Y, Zhao B, Zhou L, Zhang Z, Shen Y, Lv H, et al. Ferroptosis, a novel pharmacological mechanism of anti-cancer drugs. Cancer Lett. 2020;483:127–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Li J, Cao F, Yin HL, Huang ZJ, Lin ZT, Mao N, et al. Ferroptosis: past, present and future. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(2):88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Maiorino M, Conrad M, Ursini F. GPx4, lipid peroxidation, and cell death: discoveries, rediscoveries, and open issues. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2018;29(1):61–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ursini F, Maiorino M. Lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis: the role of GSH and GPx4. Free Radic Biol Med. 2020;152:175–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Liu MR, Zhu WT, Pei DS. System Xc(-): a key regulatory target of ferroptosis in cancer. Invest New Drugs. 2021;39(4):1123–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Lang X, Green MD, Wang W, Yu J, Choi JE, Jiang L, et al. Radiotherapy and immunotherapy promote tumoral lipid oxidation and ferroptosis via synergistic repression of SLC7A11. Cancer Discov. 2019;9(12):1673–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Jiang L, Kon N, Li T, Wang SJ, Su T, Hibshoosh H, et al. Ferroptosis as a p53-mediated activity during tumour suppression. Nature. 2015;520(7545):57–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Tarangelo A, Magtanong L, Bieging-Rolett KT, Li Y, Ye J, Attardi LD, et al. p53 suppresses metabolic stress-induced ferroptosis in cancer cells. Cell Rep. 2018;22(3):569–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Venkatesh D, Stockwell BR, Prives C. p21 can be a barrier to ferroptosis independent of p53. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12(18):17800–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Diaz-Vivancos P, de Simone A, Kiddle G, Foyer CH. Glutathione–linking cell proliferation to oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 2015;89:1154–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Chen X, Li J, Kang R, Klionsky DJ, Tang D. Ferroptosis: machinery and regulation. Autophagy. 2021;17(9):2054–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Doll S, Proneth B, Tyurina YY, Panzilius E, Kobayashi S, Ingold I, et al. ACSL4 dictates ferroptosis sensitivity by shaping cellular lipid composition. Nat Chem Biol. 2017;13(1):91–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Liu J, Kang R, Tang D. Signaling pathways and defense mechanisms of ferroptosis. FEBS J. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.16059.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Wang L, Wang A, Fu Q, Shi Z, Chen X, Wang Y, et al. Ferroptosis plays an important role in promoting ionizing radiation-induced intestinal injuries. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2022;595:7–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Lei G, Mao C, Yan Y, Zhuang L, Gan B. Ferroptosis, radiotherapy, and combination therapeutic strategies. Protein Cell. 2021;12(11):836–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Feng L, Zhao K, Sun L, Yin X, Zhang J, Liu C, et al. SLC7A11 regulated by NRF2 modulates esophageal squamous cell carcinoma radiosensitivity by inhibiting ferroptosis. J Transl Med. 2021;19(1):367.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Song X, Zhu S, Chen P, Hou W, Wen Q, Liu J, et al. AMPK-mediated BECN1 phosphorylation promotes ferroptosis by directly blocking system Xc(-) activity. Curr Biol. 2018;28(15):2388-2399.e5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Lee H, Zandkarimi F, Zhang Y, Meena JK, Kim J, Zhuang L, et al. Energy-stress-mediated AMPK activation inhibits ferroptosis. Nat Cell Biol. 2020;22(2):225–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Zafar A, Wang W, Liu G, Xian W, McKeon F, Zhou J, et al. Targeting the p53-MDM2 pathway for neuroblastoma therapy: Rays of hope. Cancer Lett. 2021;496:16–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Venkatesh D, O’Brien NA, Zandkarimi F, Tong DR, Stokes ME, Dunn DE, et al. MDM2 and MDMX promote ferroptosis by PPARalpha-mediated lipid remodeling. Genes Dev. 2020;34(7–8):526–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Doll S, Freitas FP, Shah R, Aldrovandi M, da Silva MC, Ingold I, et al. FSP1 is a glutathione-independent ferroptosis suppressor. Nature. 2019;575(7784):693–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Bersuker K, Hendricks JM, Li Z, Magtanong L, Ford B, Tang PH, et al. The CoQ oxidoreductase FSP1 acts parallel to GPX4 to inhibit ferroptosis. Nature. 2019;575(7784):688–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Dong H, Qiang Z, Chai D, Peng J, Xia Y, Hu R, et al. Nrf2 inhibits ferroptosis and protects against acute lung injury due to intestinal ischemia reperfusion via regulating SLC7A11 and HO-1. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12(13):12943–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Wei R, Zhao Y, Wang J, Yang X, Li S, Wang Y, et al. Tagitinin C induces ferroptosis through PERK-Nrf2-HO-1 signaling pathway in colorectal cancer cells. Int J Biol Sci. 2021;17(11):2703–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Bump EA, Brown JM. Role of glutathione in the radiation response of mammalian cells in vitro and in vivo. Pharmacol Ther. 1990;47(1):117–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Zou Y, Schreiber SL. Progress in understanding ferroptosis and challenges in its targeting for therapeutic benefit. Cell Chem Biol. 2020;27(4):463–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Camuzard O, Santucci-Darmanin S, Carle GF, Pierrefite-Carle V. Autophagy in the crosstalk between tumor and microenvironment. Cancer Lett. 2020;490:143–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Xu Z, Han X, Ou D, Liu T, Li Z, Jiang G, et al. Targeting PI3K/AKT/mTOR-mediated autophagy for tumor therapy. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;104(2):575–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Ma Z, Lou S, Jiang Z. PHLDA2 regulates EMT and autophagy in colorectal cancer via the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12(9):7985–8000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Zhou J, Jiang YY, Chen H, Wu YC, Zhang L. Tanshinone I attenuates the malignant biological properties of ovarian cancer by inducing apoptosis and autophagy via the inactivation of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Cell Prolif. 2020;53(2):e12739.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Rong L, Li Z, Leng X, Li H, Ma Y, Chen Y, et al. Salidroside induces apoptosis and protective autophagy in human gastric cancer AGS cells through the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;122:109726.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Gao L, Zheng H, Cai Q, Wei L. Autophagy and tumour radiotherapy. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1207:375–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Yang Y, Karsli-Uzunbas G, Poillet-Perez L, Sawant A, Hu ZS, Zhao Y, et al. Autophagy promotes mammalian survival by suppressing oxidative stress and p53. Genes Dev. 2020;34(9–10):688–700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Nguyen D, Yang K, Chiao L, Deng Y, Zhou X, Zhang Z, et al. Inhibition of tumor suppressor p73 by nerve growth factor receptor via chaperone-mediated autophagy. J Mol Cell Biol. 2020;12(9):700–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Xiong M, Hu W, Tan Y, Yu H, Zhang Q, Zhao C, et al. Transcription factor E2F1 knockout promotes mice white adipose tissue browning through autophagy inhibition. Front Physiol. 2021;12:748040.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Mo N, Lu YK, Xie WM, Liu Y, Zhou WX, Wang HX, et al. Inhibition of autophagy enhances the radiosensitivity of nasopharyngeal carcinoma by reducing Rad51 expression. Oncol Rep. 2014;32(5):1905–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Wang F, Xia X, Yang C, Shen J, Mai J, Kim HC, et al. SMAD4 gene mutation renders pancreatic cancer resistance to radiotherapy through promotion of autophagy. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(13):3176–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Djuzenova CS, Fischer T, Katzer A, Sisario D, Korsa T, Steussloff G, et al. Opposite effects of the triple target (DNA-PK/PI3K/mTOR) inhibitor PI-103 on the radiation sensitivity of glioblastoma cell lines proficient and deficient in DNA-PKcs. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):1201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Palumbo S, Pirtoli L, Tini P, Cevenini G, Calderaro F, Toscano M, et al. Different involvement of autophagy in human malignant glioma cell lines undergoing irradiation and temozolomide combined treatments. J Cell Biochem. 2012;113(7):2308–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Aaronson SA, Abrams JM, Adam D, Agostinis P, et al. Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the nomenclature committee on cell death 2018. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25(3):486–541.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Campisi J. Aging, cellular senescence, and cancer. Annu Rev Physiol. 2013;75:685–705.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Pawge G, Khatik GL. p53 regulated senescence mechanism and role of its modulators in age-related disorders. Biochem Pharmacol. 2021;190:114651.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Tabasso AFS, Jones DJL, Jones GDD, Macip S. Radiotherapy-induced senescence and its effects on responses to treatment. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2019;31(5):283–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Gu YF, Kong LT. Inhibiting p21-activated kinase (PAK7) enhances radiosensitivity in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2021;40(12):2202–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Karimian A, Ahmadi Y, Yousefi B. Multiple functions of p21 in cell cycle, apoptosis and transcriptional regulation after DNA damage. DNA Repair (Amst). 2016;42:63–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Wang G, Cheng X, Zhang J, Liao Y, Jia Y, Qing C. Possibility of inducing tumor cell senescence during therapy. Oncol Lett. 2021;22(1):496.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Jeon HY, Kim JK, Ham SW, Oh SY, Kim J, Park JB, et al. Irradiation induces glioblastoma cell senescence and senescence-associated secretory phenotype. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(5):5857–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Kang TW, Yevsa T, Woller N, Hoenicke L, Wuestefeld T, Dauch D, et al. Senescence surveillance of pre-malignant hepatocytes limits liver cancer development. Nature. 2011;479(7374):547–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Liao EC, Hsu YT, Chuah QY, Lee YJ, Hu JY, Huang TC, et al. Radiation induces senescence and a bystander effect through metabolic alterations. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1255.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. van den Berg LL, Klinkenberg TJ, Groen HJM, Widder J. Patterns of recurrence and survival after surgery or stereotactic radiotherapy for early stage NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10(5):826–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Sazonova EV, Petrichuk SV, Kopeina GS, Zhivotovsky B. A link between mitotic defects and mitotic catastrophe: detection and cell fate. Biol Direct. 2021;16(1):25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Slade D. PARP and PARG inhibitors in cancer treatment. Genes Dev. 2020;34(5–6):360–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. Fragkos M, Beard P. Mitotic catastrophe occurs in the absence of apoptosis in p53-null cells with a defective G1 checkpoint. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(8):e22946.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Galimberti F, Thompson SL, Ravi S, Compton DA, Dmitrovsky E. Anaphase catastrophe is a target for cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(6):1218–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. Tarapore P, Fukasawa K. Loss of p53 and centrosome hyperamplification. Oncogene. 2002;21(40):6234–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Vitale I, Manic G, Castedo M, Kroemer G. Caspase 2 in mitotic catastrophe: the terminator of aneuploid and tetraploid cells. Mol Cell Oncol. 2017;4(3):e1299274.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. Lim Y, De Bellis D, Sandow JJ, Capalbo L, D’Avino PP, Murphy JM, et al. Phosphorylation by Aurora B kinase regulates caspase-2 activity and function. Cell Death Differ. 2021;28(1):349–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Furth N, Aylon Y. The LATS1 and LATS2 tumor suppressors: beyond the Hippo pathway. Cell Death Differ. 2017;24(9):1488–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Manic G, Signore M, Sistigu A, Russo G, Corradi F, Siteni S, et al. CHK1-targeted therapy to deplete DNA replication-stressed, p53-deficient, hyperdiploid colorectal cancer stem cells. Gut. 2018;67(5):903–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Kondo T. Radiation-induced cell death. Nihon Rinsho. 2012;70(3):389–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Cheng CY, Liu CJ, Huang YC, Wu SH, Fang HW, Chen YJ. BI2536 induces mitotic catastrophe and radiosensitization in human oral cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2018;9(30):21231–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Gordon IK, Lu J, Graves CA, Huntoon K, Frerich JM, Hanson RH, et al. Protein phosphatase 2A inhibition with LB100 enhances radiation-induced mitotic catastrophe and tumor growth delay in glioblastoma. Mol Cancer Ther. 2015;14(7):1540–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Ruiz LM, Libedinsky A, Elorza AA. Role of copper on mitochondrial function and metabolism. Front Mol Biosci. 2021;8:711227.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Tsvetkov P, Coy S, Petrova B, Dreishpoon M, Verma A, Abdusamad M, et al. Copper induces cell death by targeting lipoylated TCA cycle proteins. Science. 2022;375(6586):1254–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Nagai M, Vo NH, Shin Ogawa L, Chimmanamada D, Inoue T, Chu J, et al. The oncology drug elesclomol selectively transports copper to the mitochondria to induce oxidative stress in cancer cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 2012;52(10):2142–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Jie J, Hao S, Hongxiu Y, Huiying Y, Jun M, Chenji W, et al. Evaluation of Cu in hepatocellular carcinoma by particle induced X-ray emission. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2007;21(4):255–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Oliveri V. Selective targeting of cancer cells by copper ionophores: an overview. Front Mol Biosci. 2022;9:841814.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. Farooque A, Mathur R, Verma A, Kaul V, Bhatt AN, Adhikari JS, et al. Low-dose radiation therapy of cancer: role of immune enhancement. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2011;11(5):791–802.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Liu R, Xiong S, Zhang L, Chu Y. Enhancement of antitumor immunity by low-dose total body irradiationis associated with selectively decreasing the proportion and number of T regulatory cells. Cell Mol Immunol. 2010;7(2):157–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. Qu Y, Jin S, Zhang A, Zhang B, Shi X, Wang J, et al. Gamma-ray resistance of regulatory CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells in mice. Radiat Res. 2010;173(2):148–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Liu SZ. Cancer control related to stimulation of immunity by low-dose radiation. Dose Response. 2006;5(1):39–47.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Chengdu Medical Research Project (2022573).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HRC and ZYH collected published articles and wrote the manuscript. QL, YW, QJL, LSZ revised the content of the article. HDZ edited the manuscript. All author read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Houdong Zuo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, H., Han, Z., Luo, Q. et al. Radiotherapy modulates tumor cell fate decisions: a review. Radiat Oncol 17, 196 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02171-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02171-7

Keywords