Skip to main content

Ocular complications with the use of radium-223: a case series

Abstract

Background

Radium-223 is used for the treatment of osseous metastases in castrate-resistant prostate cancer, and has been shown to increase time to the first skeletal-related event, reduce the rate of hospitalization, and improve quality of life. It is well tolerated, with hematologic toxicity as the main adverse event. Thus far, no ocular complication has been reported in the literature after initial administration of radium-223 with a single case reported of ocular complications after a patient’s second course of radium-223.

Case presentations

We present three cases of ocular complications after the use of radium-223 in patients with metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma. Ocular complications presented as blurry vision, and formal diagnosis included uveitis and hyphema.

Conclusions

Documentation of adverse events is exceedingly important due to the high incidence of metastatic prostate cancer and increasing interest for the use of radium-223 in other osteoblastic disease. The authors postulate that these ocular complications may be a result of radiation’s potential effect on neovascularization, polypharmacy, or the biomolecular effects of radium-223 on integral signaling proteins, potentially coupled with poor underlying ocular health.

Background

Radium-223 dichloride (Ra-223) is an alpha-emitting radionuclide, approved for treatment of osseous metastases in castrate-resistant prostate cancer, without known visceral metastases. The use of Ra-223 has been shown to improve overall survival, bone pain, increase time to the first skeletal-related event, reduce rate of spinal cord compression, hospitalization, improve quality of life, and decrease the use of external beam radiation therapy [1,2,3,4,5].

As an alkaline earth element, similar to calcium, Ra-223 accumulates in areas of increased bone remodeling [6]. At sites of active bone formation, Ra-223 is used in place of calcium as part of the calcium hydroxyapatite matrix [7]. It has a half-life of 11.4 days; with each decay, it emits four alpha-particles with high linear energy transfer of 27.4 MeV [8]. The short range (~ 100 micro meters (um)), or maximum distance traveled, of alpha particles allows local deposition of energy in bone producing cytotoxic, double-strand DNA breaks in tumor cells, while minimizing adverse normal tissue effects [9].

Ra-223 is extremely well tolerated and poses acceptable toxicities. In a randomized trial of Ra-223 vs placebo, Ra-223 presented with fewer adverse events (AEs), less grade 3 or 4 toxicity-related AEs, and less serious AEs [1]. The most common side effects are hematologic including anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia, secondary to the impact of radiation on the bone marrow [1]. The most common non-hematologic side effects include bone pain flare, fatigue, nausea, and diarrhea [10]. To date there has been few documented ocular toxicities in humans related to Ra-223 [11]. In the early assessment of Ra-223, single injections of high-dose Ra-223 in canines resulted in retinal detachment, thought to be due to increased uptake of alpha radiation in pigmented epithelium due to its increased number of calcium binding sites. However, humans do not have this epithelial layer, the tapetum lucidum. No cases of retinal detachment or optic toxicities have been reported in clinical trials [12].

Ocular complications from local radiation therapy are varied, and dependent on specific parameters including total radiation dose, dose volume, dose rate, proximity to macular and optic disc, and biologic variable response [13]. Acute toxicities include uveitis, conjunctivitis, iridocyclitis, keratitis, and transient myopia. Late toxicities include dry eye, cataract formation, corneal ulceration, nasolacrimal duct obstruction, neovascularization of the iris or the optic nerve head, neovascular glaucoma, optic neuropathy, and retinopathy [14, 15]. These reported ocular complications may occur when the eye is directly in the field of radiation therapy, treated with external beam radiation therapy or brachytherapy. For patients who receive plaque brachytherapy, dry eye may be experienced in up to 9% of patients, keratitis in 4–21% of patients, and iris neovascularization and neovascular glaucoma in 4–23% of patients. [16, 17] Radiation-induced retinopathy ranges from 10 to 63% [18]. Optic neuropathy which may present as sudden, painless monocular vision loss may occur between 8 to 46% of patients at 5 years, dependent on tumor size [19].

Here we present three cases in which Ra-223 may have had a detrimental effect on ocular health, see Table 1.

Table 1. Case characteristics, timeline and outcome

Case presentations

Case 1

Patient 1 is a 74 year-old male with a history of coronary artery disease, inferior myocardial infarction status-post stent placements, aortic valve stenosis, bilateral cataracts, bilateral ocular hypertension, and prostate cancer (PCa), pT3b, Gleason 9 (4 + 5) with pre-treatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 14.2 ng/mL. He underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) in June 2013 with subsequent biochemical failure, and received salvage external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to 70.2 Gy in 39 fractions with adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). He developed mCRPC to the bones and initiated abiraterone 3 years later; he subsequently switched to enzalutamide. Two years later, he was started on apalutamide, and completed Ra-223, 6 cycles. He received further systemic therapy including docetaxel and olaparib, after being found to have ATM and BRAF mutations.

The patient then started a second course of Ra-223; two weeks after the patient’s first cycle, he presented to the emergency room with new onset bilateral blurry vision. The patient was found to have anterior uveitis and hyphema in the left eye for which he was started on prednisolone acetate 1% four times daily, brimonidine 0.2% and atropine 1% once daily in the left eye. During a later outpatient ophthalmology visit, visual acuity in the right eye (OD) was noted to be 20/30 and in the left eye (OS) 20/60, while intraocular pressure was 23 and 13, respectively. Slit lamp examination revealed trace white cell and cataract in the right eye; left eye had a quiet anterior chamber with few iris synechiae, evidence of resolved left eye anterior uveitis, as well as a cataract. Gonioscopy revealed the patient was open to the ciliary body in both eyes with no evidence of neovascularization of the iris or angle, with inferior layering hyphema found only in the left eye. Fundus examination showed a healthy cup to disc ratio of 0.3 in both eyes and bilateral epiretinal membranes (ERM). The patient was continued on the previous drops and sent for basic uveitis lab workup; however, the patient never underwent this testing due to systemic issues and hospitalizations.

With continuation of the above treatment his bilateral anterior uveitis and left eye hyphema resolved within 2 months; however, he continued to have spikes in intraocular pressures in both eyes for which brimonidine was switched to latanoprost 0.05% nightly in both eyes with improvement in intraocular pressures. The patient's visual acuity at last follow-up was 20/40 in both eyes.

Case 2

Patient 2 is a 78 year-old male with a history of hypertension (HTN), hyperlipidemia, right eye strabismic amblyopia, bilateral macular drusen, bilateral narrow angles status post laser iridotomy, and PCa initially diagnosed. He received definitive EBRT, but was unfortunately diagnosed with biochemical failure and maintained on bicalutamide for 10 years. Twelve years after initial diagnosis, he was found to have radiographic evidence of osseous metastatic disease and received treatment including ADT, EBRT to sites of osseous disease, enzalutamide, abiraterone, and darolutamide.

While maintained on ADT and denosumab, he initiated Ra-223. One week after the infusion, he experienced transient left eye blurry vision. At that time, he was taking tadalafil 5 mg daily, amlodipine 10 mg daily, ibuprofen 600 mg daily, omeprazole 40 mg daily, mirabegron 50 mg daily, darolutamide 300 mg daily and alfuzosin 10 mg daily. There were no recent changes in medications or dosing. After the 5th infusion, the patient was seen by his ophthalmologist, his macular degeneration was noted to be stable. He had a best corrected visual acuity of hand motion OD and 20/40 OS. Intraocular pressure was 13 OD and 15 OS. Slit lamp exam revealed bilateral laser peripheral iridotomies as well as a 1 + posterior capsular opacity OS for which he underwent yttrium–aluminum-garnet laser capsulotomy. Per the patient, he experienced a moderate improvement in his vision, and after capsulotomy visual acuity had improved to 20/25 OS. Bone scan after his 6th Ra-223 infusion demonstrated stable osteoblastic lesions.

Case 3

Patient 3 is a 74 year-old male with a history of mild cognitive impairment, diabetes mellitus type II (HbA1c 8.7, insulin-dependent), HTN, and Stage IIIB, pT3bN0 Gleason 7 (4 + 3) PCa. He underwent RALP and lymphadenectomy, and, ultimately, salvage EBRT with concurrent ADT. Three years later, he was diagnosed with osseous metastatic disease and was started on intermittent ADT. He was ultimately enrolled in a clinical trial and initiated study pharmaceuticals including abiraterone, cabazitaxel, and carboplatin. He was scheduled for Ra-223 as part of the trial with concurrent ADT.

Forty-eight hours after undergoing the first infusion of Ra-223 with concurrent enzalutamide 40 mg oral tablet, he noted new mild, bilateral blurry vision. The patient was referred to an ophthalmologist where ocular exam revealed a visual acuity of 20/25 OD, no visual acuity was notated for the left eye. Intraocular pressures were normal, 15 bilaterally. Anterior exam showed white and quiet conjunctiva, clear corneas, and deep and quiet anterior chambers, while fundus exam was found to be unremarkable. Auto-perimetry visual field testing was normal in both eyes. The patient was prescribed a new pair of glasses for his myopia with no further ophthalmology follow up to date. Within weeks, the blurry vision stabilized. Follow-up bone scan one month later revealed stable multiple osseous metastatic disease.

Discussion

These cases present an interesting association between patients’ receiving Ra-223 for mCRPC and ocular changes. All three cases presented with blurry vision as the main ocular symptom with blurry vision resolving or stabilizing within 2 months in all patients. All ocular complications occurred after the first cycle, while timing of onset varied between 48 hours and 2 weeks after the first cycle.

To our knowledge, only one previous study has demonstrated ocular sequalae in patients who received Ra-223, although this was after retreatment with Ra-223 [11]. In this phase I/II study assessing retreatment with Ra-223 for mCRPC, ocular AEs including cataract formation, cataract worsening, iritis, uveitis, glaucoma, and photopsia occurred in 11% (5/44) of patients. Two patients had a history of uveitis and glaucoma, in addition to diabetic retinopathy and other risk factors. All ocular events were considered unrelated to Ra-223 by the investigator except for one case of grade 1 photopsia.

Uveitis and hyphema with the use of radiation

The first case presented here shows an example of bilateral uveitis and unilateral hyphema in a patient with no known prior history of either condition. Uveitis can be seen as an acute dose-dependent effect of radiation therapy thought to be caused by an increase in vascular permeability leading to permeation of inflammatory proteins and cells [14]. However, the etiology of this patient’s hyphema remains unclear.

Hyphema—the collection of blood in the anterior chamber of the eye—is most commonly secondary to blunt or penetrating trauma with additional causes including local neoplasm, uveitis, juvenile xanthogranuloma, coagulopathies, post-surgical, neovascularization of the iris, or anterior segment ischemia [14]. Neovascularization of the iris, in the context of local radiation therapy, is dose dependent and usually occurs on the time frame of months to years after the initiation of therapy [20]. Hyphema formation has been reported in patients treated with both local plaque brachytherapy and ocular proton beam radiation therapy, but has not been reported with use of systemic, particle radiation therapy [21,22,23].

In this first case, the hyphema occurred shortly after radiation therapy and no neovascularization of the iris or angle was noted on exam. A limited view during the acute phase of a hyphema could obscure evidence of neovascularization at the time of examination leaving neovascularization of the iris a possibility, although neovascularization is usually a late complication. Additionally, low-dose irradiation induces an increased expression of angiostimulatory growth factors including VEGF both in the tumor microenvironment and systemically [24, 25]. Upregulation of these factors could stimulate neovascularization in a shorter time frame. The patient’s elevated intraocular pressures are most likely secondary to a history of ocular hypertension, although the inflammation from the uveitis may be a contributing factor.

Polypharmacy in relation to ocular symptoms

In the second and third cases, polypharmacy may play a role in the manifestation of ocular symptoms as both patients had mostly unremarkable or stable eye exams despite the new onset of symptoms. The third case includes a patient on several medications during the time of Ra-223 administration including enzalutamide. Single case reports of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) have been observed in individuals receiving enzalutamide [26]. PRES is characterized by seizure, headache, impaired vision, and hypertension. A relationship between PRES and cancer medications including cytotoxic chemotherapeutics and newer agents that target VEGF such as bevacizumab, sunitinib, and pazopanib has been observed [27, 28]. Case reports suggest visual disturbance symptoms 10 week to 4 months after systemic therapy initiation with these agents. In this patient’s case enzalutamide was started 14 days prior to Ra-223, with onset of ocular symptoms within 48 hours after Ra-223 administration.

In the case of the second patient, the patient is concurrently taking two potentially problematic medications. Mirabegron, an anticholinergic, is known to cause blurry vision secondary to blockage of cholinergic stimulation to the ciliary muscle of the crystalline lens. Additionally, transient visual loss secondary to polypharmacy can occur from hypoperfusion or fluctuations in ocular blood flow. The patient is taking tadalafil, which may have predisposed this patient to develop symptoms. This patient had been on these medications for several months prior to onset of blurry vision.

In both of these cases, the addition of Ra-223 with another medication may have lowered the threshold for ocular complications to occur in an additive or synergistic manner, since otherwise ocular examination in both cases were unremarkable. Should a correlation exist, it is imperative to recognize the possibility and consequence of polypharmacy, and perhaps these patients should be temporarily suspended from receiving other non-pertinent medications around the time of administration of Ra-223 or receive appropriate risk counseling.

Poor underlying ocular health

Of the patients presented, 2 of 3 had poor underlying ocular health which may have predisposed the patient to ocular complications. The first patient had a history of bilateral cataracts and ocular hypertension; the second patient’s history was notable for monocular strabismic amblyopia, bilateral macular drusen and bilateral narrow angles. There is a known tendency for ocular comorbidities (e.g., cataracts, glaucoma, macular degeneration) to be associated with development of other ocular conditions and manifestations [29]. One case–control study found that patients with a previous diagnosis of open angle glaucoma were more likely to develop neovascular age-related macular degeneration [30]. It has also been shown that ocular manifestations such as posterior capsular tear, hyphema, macular edema, and retinal detachment following ophthalmic procedures are more common in patients with underlying comorbidities [31]. Therefore, ocular manifestations with the use of Ra-223 are conceivably more likely in patients with underlying ocular comorbid conditions.

Biologic considerations

Ra-223 is known to preferentially incorporate into newly formed bone matrix, including within osteoblastic metastatic lesions. High energy alpha particles emitted induce DNA double-strand breaks, leading to cell death in tumor cells and nearby osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Disruption of these cells and signaling pathways, alters feedback loops of morphogenetic proteins such as TGFB, insulin-like growth factor 1, platelet-derived growth factor, endothelin-1 and VEGF. An intimate connection between angiogenesis and osteogenesis is known to exist [32, 33]. As is well established, VEGF has been shown to be an endothelial cell-specific mitogen and angiogenic inducer [34, 35]. Antibodies that bind to all subtypes of VEGF, including bevacizumab, are used to reduce macular edema, vascular permeability, retinal neovascularization, and ultimately restore vision [36]. The authors postulate that perhaps the incidence of blurry vision in relation to Ra-223, may be a result of the impact of radiation on the production of VEGF, manifesting as ocular toxicities including in the form of hyphema.

As aforementioned, in canines, the use of Ra-223 caused ocular toxicities, thought to be secondary to the calcium-receptors in the retinal epithelial layer, the tapetum lucidum [12]. While humans do not contain this reflective layer, the human retinal pigment epithelium is coupled with the activity of calcium channels. Excessive stimulation or interference in this epithelial monolayer can disrupt vision processes [37]. Although the dose of Ra-223 that precipitated ocular toxicities in animal studies was 3–9 times what is used clinically in humans, perhaps certain individuals may be sensitive to this interference.

Finally, a recent study by Mao et al. looked to characterize oxidative damage and apoptosis in retinal endothelial cells after exposure to gamma, proton and oxygen (16O) radiation to better understand why individuals may experience degradation of vision as a result of space travel. After exposure to radiation, mice eyes were isolated and examined for endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) expression and apoptosis within the retina 2 weeks after radiation therapy. Radiation exposure with low dose 16O, as little as 0.1 Gy exposure, elicited increased apoptosis within retinal endothelial cells. This data suggests significant changes may occur in retinal endothelial cells with low dose ionizing radiation therapy [38]. The maximum distance traveled of alpha particles is about 100 μm, so that the skeletal endosteum receives a dose coefficient of about 16 Gy while bone marrow receives 1.5 Gy. Therefore, it is feasible that the retina may receive a small dose of ionizing radiation therapy leading to ocular deficits [6].

Conclusion

As the usage of Ra-223 potentially expands to use in other high-volume osteoblastic metastatic disease such as in hormone-receptor positive breast cancer, osseous tumors, multiple myeloma, differentiated thyroid cancer and renal cell carcinoma patients, it is imperative the full side effect profile is recognized and understood to potentially avoid adverse events [39,40,41]. In this case series, ocular consequences are experienced in three patients. The authors postulate that these clinical changes may be a result of radiation’s potential effect on neovascularization, poor ocular health, polypharmacy, and/or the biomolecular effects of radium-223. We present the first cases of potential ocular toxicities in those receiving Ra-223 for the first time in hopes to shed light on possible clinical adverse events in relation to this therapeutic treatment option.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

AE:

Adverse event

ADT:

Androgen deprivation therapy

ERM:

Epiretinal membranes

EBRT:

External beam radiation therapy

HTN:

Hypertension

mCRPC:

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

OD:

Oculus dextrus

OS:

Oculus sinister

PRES:

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome

PCa:

Prostate cancer

PSA:

Prostate-specific antigen

Ra-223:

Radium-223

RALP:

Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

TGF-B:

Transforming growth factor B

VEGF:

Vascular endothelial growth factor

References

  1. Parker C, Nilsson S, Heinrich D, Helle SI, O’Sullivan JM, Fosså SD, et al. Alpha emitter radium-223 and survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:213–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Saad F, Carles J, Gillessen S, Heindenreich A, Heinrich D, Gratt J, et al. Radium-223 and concomitant therapies in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: an international, early access, open-label, single-arm phase 3b trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:1306–16.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sartor O, Coleman R, Nilsson S, Heinrich D, Helle SI, O’Sullivan JM, et al. Effect of radium-223 dichloride on symptomatic skeletal events in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases: Results from a phase 3, double-blind, randomized trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:738–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Parker C, Zhan L, Cislo P, Reuning-Scherer J, Vogelzang NJ, Nilsson S, et al. Effect of radium-223 dichloride (Ra-223) on hospitalization: an analysis from the phase 3 randomised Alpharadin in Symptomatic Prostate Cancer Patients (ALSYMPCA) trial. Eur J Cancer. 2017;71:1–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nilsson S, Cislo P, Sartor O, Vogelzang NJ, Coleman RE, O’Sullivan JM, et al. Patient-reported quality-of-life analysis of radium-223 dichloride from the phase III ALSYMPCA study. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:868–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lassmann M, Nosske D. Dosimetry of 223Ra-chloride: Dose to normal organs and tissues. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:207–12.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brito AE, Etchebehere E. Radium-223 as an approved modality for treatment of bone metastases. Sem Nuclear Med. 2020;50:177–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bruland OS, Nilsson S, Fisher DR, et al. High-linear energy transfer irradiation targeted to skeletal metastases by the -emitter 223Ra: adjuvant or alternative to conventional modalities? Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:6250s–7s.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nilsson S. Radionuclide therapies in prostate cancer: integrating radium-223 in the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2016;18:14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Etchebehere EC, Milton DR, Araujo JC, Swanston NM, Macapinlac HA, Rohren EM. Factors affecting (223)Ra therapy: clinical experience after 532 cycles from a single institution. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:8–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sartor O, Heinrich D, Mariados N, Vidal MJM, Keizman D, Karlsson CT, et al. Re-treatment with radium-223: first experience from an international, open-label, phase I/II study in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:2464–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. Assessment Report: Xofigo; Common name: Radium-223 dichloride. European Medicines Agency;2013.

  13. Finger PT. Radiation therapy for choroidal melanoma. Surv Opthalmol. 1997;42(3):215–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ober M, Servodidio C, Abramson D. Ocular complications due to cancer treatment. Survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer. Pediatric Oncology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2005:81–94.

  15. Finger PT. Radiation therapy for orbital tumors: concepts, current use, and ophthalmic radiation side effects. Surv Ophthalmol. 2009;54:545–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Quivey JM, Char DH, Phillips TL, Weaver KA, Castro JR, Kroll SM. High intensity 125-iodine (125I) plaque treatment of uveal melanoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;26(4):613–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Detorakis ET, Engstrom RE Jr, Wallace R, Straatsma BR. Iris and anterior chamber angle neovascularization after iodine 125 brachytherapy for uveal melanoma. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(3):505–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fontanesi J, Meyer D, Xu S, Tai D. Treatment of choroidal melanoma with I-125 plaque. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;26(4):619–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Puusaari I, Heikkonen J, Kivela T. Ocular complications after iodine brachytherapy for large uveal melanomas. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(9):1768–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zafar S, Canner JK, Mir T, Srikumaran D, Channa R, Goldberg MF, et al. Epidemiology of hyphema-related emergency department visits in the United States between 2006 and 2015. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2019;26:208–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Thariat J, Rahmi A, Salleron J, Mosci C, Butet B, Maschi C, et al. Proton beam therapy for iris melanomas in 107 patients. Opthalmology. 2018;125(4):606–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pathan AHK, Barash A, Tena LB, Finger PT. Palladium-103 plaque radiation therapy for ciliary body melanoma through a functioning glaucoma filtering bleb. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018;28:119–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Petousis V, Finger PT, Milman T. Multifocal iris melanoma treated with total anterior segment palladium-103 plaque radiation therapy. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249:937–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chung YL, Jian JJM, Cheng SH, Tsai SYC, Chuang VP, Soong T, et al. Sublethal irradiation induces vascular endothelial growth factor and promotes growth of hepatoma cells: implications for radiotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:2706–15.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Solberg TD, Nearman J, Mullins J, Li S, Baranowska-Kortylewicz J. Correlation between tumor growth delay and expression of cancer and host VEGF, VEGFR2, and osteopontin in response to radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncool. 2008;72:918–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Crona DJ, Whang YE. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome induced by enzalutamide in a patient with castration-resistant prostate cancer. Invest New Drugs. 2015;33:751–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hauben M. Cyclosporine neurotoxicity. Pharmacotherapy. 1996;16(4):576–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dos Reissimões da Silva FM, Burgos Pêgo PMB, HenriquesVendrell MC, Dos Santos Farias M, Timóteo ACR, Martinsda Costa MC, et al. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome and anti-angiogenic agents: a case report. Neuroophthalmology. 2011;35(1):32–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pinazo-Durán MD, Zanón-Moreno V, García-Medina JJ, Areválo JF, Gallego-Pinaxo R, Nucci C. Eclectic ocular comorbidities and systemic diseases with eye involvement: a review. Biomed Res Int. 2016;6215745.

  30. Hu CC, Ho JD, Lin HC, Kao LT. Association between open-angle glaucoma and neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a case-control study. Eye (Lond). 2017;31(6):872–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Greenberg PB, Tseng VL, Wu WC, Liu J, Jiang L, Chen CK, Scott IU, Friedmann PD. Prevalence and predictors of ocular complications associated with cataract surgery in United States veterans. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(3):507–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hu K, Olsen BR. Osteoblast-derived VGF regulates osteoblast differentiation and bone formation during bone repair. J Clin Invest. 2016;126:509–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hu K, Olsen BR. Vascular endothelial growth factor control mechanisms in skeletal growth and repair. Dev Dyn. 2017;246:227–34.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Grosso A, Burger MG, Lunger A, Schaefer DJ, Banfi A, Maggio ND. It takes two to tango: coupling of angiogenesis and osteogenesis for bone regeneration. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2017;5:68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor: basic science and clinical progress. Endocr Rev. 2004;25:581–611.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Spaide RF, Fisher YL. Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy complicated by vitreous hemorrhage. Retina. 2006;26:275–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Vainio I, Khamidakh AA, Paci M, Skottman H, Juuti-UusitaloHyttinen J, et al. Computational model of Ca2+ wave propagation in human retinal pigment epithelial ARPE19 cells. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(6):e0128434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mao WX, Boerma M, Rodriguez D, Campbell-Beachler M, Jones T, Stanbouly S, et al. Acute effect of low-dose space radiation on mouse retina and retinal endothelial cells. Radiat Res. 2018;190(1):45–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Coleman RE, Fried G, Petrenciuc O, Sawhney A, Li R, Rugo HS. Abstract OT1-04-04: A phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of endocrine therapy +/- radium-223 dichloride in HER2-negative, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients with bone metastases. Ongoing Clinical Trials. American Association for Cancer Research. 2017:77.

  40. Subbiah V, Anderson PM, Kairemo K, Hess K, Huh WW, Ravi V, et al. Alpha particle radium 223 dichloride in high risk osteosarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:11029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. McKay RR, Gray KP, Polacek L, Pomerantz MM, Krajewski KM, Jacene H, et al. An exploratory study of radium-223 and vascular endothelial growth factor targeted therapy (VEGF TT) in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and bone metastases (BM). J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received related to this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.B. composed case series, performed background and discussion analysis; she is guarantor of overall content. A.C. composed case series, edited the manuscript, and performed background and discussion analysis; B.J. edited the manuscript and assisted in discussion conception; N.P. edited the manuscript and assisted in discussion conception; B.R. edited the manuscript and assisted in discussion conception; R.S. edited the manuscript and assisted with conception of case series. All authors reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie R. Bloom.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Patient consent to participate completed, patients deidentified.

Consent for publication

Complete.

Competing interests

Julie R Bloom has no conflict of interests to disclose. Alexandra G Castillejos has no conflict of interests to disclose. Brianna Jones has no conflict of interests to disclose. Nimesh Patel has no conflict of interests to disclose. Richard G Stock has no conflict of interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bloom, J.R., Castillejos, A.G., Jones, B. et al. Ocular complications with the use of radium-223: a case series. Radiat Oncol 17, 97 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02060-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02060-z

Keywords

  • Ocular toxicity
  • Ophthalmology
  • Radium-223
  • Radiation Therapy
  • Uveitis
  • Hyphema
  • Prostate cancer
  • Adverse events
  • Polypharmacy