Skip to main content
Download PDF

Online MR evaluation of inter- and intra-fraction uterus motions and bladder volume changes during cervical cancer external beam radiotherapy

Radiation Oncology volume 16, Article number: 179 (2021) Cite this article

A Correction to this article was published on 12 October 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Purpose/objective(s)

The purpose of the study was to assess the uterus motions and bladder volume changes of fractional movements in cervical sites throughout the external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) treatment.

Materials/methods

A prospective online MR imaging tracking study was conducted in EBRT 43 patients with at least 4 scans during each treatment (before: ultrasound scan, MRI scan, CBCT scan, after: MRI scan) were included. In order to improve the treatment repeatability, each patient was instructed to empty the bladder and drink 500 ml water 1 h before CT simulation and each treatment. If the ultrasound scan result reached the CT simulation volume of bladder, the treatment began. Bladder was outlined on the T2 weighted axial sequence and CBCT image by the two observers to avoid the influence of contouring. The data of bladder volume and scanning time were accurately recorded. The bladder volumes, filling rates and uterus motion were retrospectively analyzed by MIM software.

Results

Inter-fraction variation of the bladder volume was significant (p < 0.0001). Intra-fraction mean increase of the bladder volume was modest (30 cc) but significant (p < 0.001). Both inter- and intra-fraction of the uterus motion were significant. The average time between the pre-and post-fraction MRI scans was 27.82 ± 7.12 min (range 10–55 min) for IMRT plans and 24.14 ± 5.86 min (range7-38 min) for VMAT plan. Average bladder filling rate was 3.43 ml/min. The bladder filling rate did not change significantly with the course of treatment, but the bladder was more intolerant.

Conclusion

This is the most detailed assessment of intra-fraction and inter-fraction motion during EBRT for cervical cancer. Finally, this study will inform appropriate treatment margins for online adaptive radiotherapy. We suggest that at least one image scan is needed before the EBRT. The portable US scanner provides a quick but unreliable measurement of the bladder volume. There is a significant statistical difference between the results of ultrasonic scanning and that of image scanning.

Introduction

The EBRT plays an important role in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer [1]. During EBRT for cervical cancer, a larger planned target volume was needed to include potential organ movement during treatment. But these huge profits promote the treatment toxicity [2]. The introduction of online adaptive MR-guided EBRT will adapt the plan to the daily anatomical position, but the effect of bladder motion for cervical cancer was not certain [3].

The radiotherapy process of cervical cancer is usually long, the difference of organ movement between different parts has a greater impact on the accuracy of dose delivery [4]. At the same time, population-based standard marginal therapy is ineffective for cervical cancer due to significant differences in the degree and complexity of cervical and uterine movement between patients. Several studies have found that the uterus and cervix can significantly move and disappear during treatment [5,6,7]. In order to improve the coverage of the target area, the planned target volume around the CTV is to ensure geometric uncertainty during treatment.

Unfortunately, knowledge of what constitutes an appropriate planning margin is currently limited. Although many authors and many methods, such as cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), have extensively studied bladder movement between fractional stages and within fractional levels, there has not been much verification of repeatability and reliability [8,9,10].

At our clinic, an image-guided cervical radiotherapy protocol is underway that includes pretreatment ultrasound scan as well as intra-fraction positional measurements of the bladder. Pretreatment CBCTs and MRI-scans are acquired at each fraction and include bladder information. But the bladder volume information after treatment is not clear. The purpose of this study is therefore to compare and quantify inter-and intra-fraction bladder volume and uterus position variation during EBRT of cervical cancer by different measured techniques.

Methods and materials

Patients and treatment

Forty-three patients with locally advanced cervical cancer patients were prospectively included in this study. The distribution of FIGO (International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics) stages was as follows: IB: 3 patients, IIA: 3 patients, IIB: 6 patients, IIIA: 12 patients, IIIB: 15 patients, and IV:4 patients. The patients’ ages ranged from 26 to 67 years (median 49). Radiotherapy combined external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with brachytherapy delivered in the last 1–2 weeks of EBRT [11]. For 13 patients, radiotherapy was combined with either chemotherapy. The doses at the ICRU reference point were 46 or 50 Gy, which were delivered in 23 or 25 daily fractions of 2 Gy (4–5 weeks of full treatment course). In an attempt to achieve day-to-day reproducibility in bladder filling, the patients were asked to drink 500 ml of water 1 h prior to each EBRT treatment fraction (Fig. 1). Patients were treated in supine position on a belly board and with a foot rest.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The workflow of scan methods

Full size image

Data acquisition and delineation

In each session of each patient, five scans were obtained at different points in time. The first image scan was CT simulation. As for the simulation, patients are required to drink 500 ml of water an hour before simulation. In order to achieve consistent results, before CT simulation acquisition, the bladder volume was measured using a portable bladder US scanner. Simulation scan starts only when the volume of the bladder reaches CT simulation standard, and the corresponding volume measurement is carried out by portable US scanner. As for daily treatment, patients were also asked to drink 500 ml of water 1 h prior to each session. The volume of bladder was detected by portable US scanner before each treatment. When the volume of bladder reaches CT simulation standard, the treatment process started. MRI scan is performed when the urine volume meets the requirements (the same bladder volume as CT simulation), which was scanned by ultrasound. This study uses fast pelvic MRI sequence, the scan time is 2 min. The scanning parameters of Unity are ACQ matrix = 268 × 267, FOV = 400 × 400 mm, TR = 1532 ms, TE = 278 ms. After acquisition of this MRI scan, the patient is asked to do radiotherapy. Before radiotherapy, the CBCT-scan was performed. After the radiotherapy, the MRI-scan were did again by using the same MRI sequence. The bladder wall was delineated by two experienced radiographers on planning CT-scan and each pre- CBCT-scan, MRI-scan and post MRI-scan by using Monaco 5.40.01 version treatment planning system (TPS).

Analysis of bladder volume and position change

Bladder volume change rate and uterus motion were analyzed by separately. Bladder volumes were calculated by the manual delineation data. The volume increase was calculated by CBCT scan and MRI scans, and the pre-treatment bladder volume was subtracted from the post-treatment volume. The filling rate was then calculated by dividing the volume increase by the time between pre-treatment scans and post-scan MRI scan recorded by the device. Bladder volume change rate and uterus motion were analyzed by using MIM software (the version was 7.0.4).

Statistics

The statistics of bladder volumes and uterus motion was based on CBCT-scan bladders, MRI-scan bladders, and the planning CT bladders. Statistics of the variations for the population of patients was calculated as follows: The group mean value was calculated as the average value of each patient, and the systematic error (P) was the standard deviation (SD) of the average value per patient. The root mean square error (r) of all SD patients in all scores of each patient was calculated. We tested whether group statistics significantly differed between the different scan groups. Mean inter-fraction bladder movement was compared using an independent-samples t-test.

Results

The mean time between the pre-and post-fraction MRI scans was 27.82 ± 7.12 min(range 10–55 min) for IMRT plans and 24.14 ± 5.86 min (range7-38 min) for VMAT plan. A summary of the results can be found in Table 1. As the Fig. 2 showed that there is no statistical difference (p = 0.5312) in bladder volume pre- and post-treatment in imrt and vmat treat mode. The bladder filling rate is statistically different between imrt and vmat(p = 0.0472). A total of 215 CBCT-scans, 476 MRI-scans, 281 Ultrasound-scan and 43 planning CT-scans were analyzed. All patients were able to follow all treatment flow. The bladders were delineated in all scans except ultrasound scans.

Table 1 Variations in bladder volume and filling rate
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

There is no statistical difference (p = 0.5312) in bladder volume pre- and post treatment in imrt and vmat treat mode. The bladder filling rate is statistically different between imrt and vmat (p = 0.0472)

Full size image

Inter-fraction volume and position variation

A summary of the results can be found in Table 2 and Fig. 3. Bladder filling rate was 3.43 ± 3.05 ml/min over all treatment fractions. A significant positive correlation was found between bladder filling rate and volume of the bladder at the start of a fraction, as measured in the pre-fraction MRI scan (r = 0.46, p < 0.01). This means that a larger bladder volume observed at the start of treatment was predictive of a higher inflow rate. Regression analysis showed a constant of 1.5 and a coefficient of 0.007, which means that for every 100 ml extra bladder volume at the start of treatment, the inflow rate increased with approximately 0.7 ml/min. As shown in Fig. 4, the bladder volume in plan CT is statistically different from the volume measured by ultrasound (p = 0.0336), and the volume measured by ultrasound is statistically different from the volume before treatment (p < 0.0001), but there is no statistical difference between the ultrasound results and after treatment(p = 0.2595).

Table 2 Variations in bladder volume for all patients. The group x means number of treatments (x − 1) * 5 + 1 ~ (x − 1) * 5 + 5
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Distribution of bladder volume with treatment time. The Vus: the bladder volume of US scanner measured; Vpre: the bladder volume of MRI scanner measured before treatment; Vpost: the bladder volume of MRI scanner measured after teatment. Vplan: the bladder volume of CT simulation scan

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

The distribution of bladder volume under different measurements.There was no significant statistical difference between ultrasound scan and the post treatment scan.One asterisk mean that the p value was less than 0.01.Three asterisks mean that the p-value was less than 0.001.Four asterisks mean that the p-value was less than 0.0001

Full size image

Bladder volume increased on average by 86.37 ± 70.63 over all treatment fractions. The median bladder volume increase rate of the whole group was 3.43 ml/min, with an intra-patient SD of 3.05 ml/min. As the treatment progresses, the rate of bladder volume change gradually decreases(from 3.68 ± 3.33 to 2.33 ± 2.30 ml/min, p < 0.05). The Vus(the volume of US scanner measured) is statistically different from the Vpre (the volume of MRI scanner measured before treatment)and Vpost (the volume of MRI scanner measured after teatment).

The maximum mean directional displacements of the bladder walls for the 43 patients over the scan for the full bladders were 10.8 mm superiorly, 1.5 mm inferiorly, 3.19 mm anteriorly, 3.43 mm posteriorly, 2.74 mm to the left and 2.48 mm to the right. Largest displacements are found in the cranial-anterior direction. Average displacement per treatment fraction was 3.6 mm in that direction. In 15.6% of the cases, we found a dis-placement equal or more than 14 mm in the cranial-anterior direction. In the AP and CC direction the group-mean was significantly different from 0 (p < 0.05), indicating a preferred direction for the systematic intra-fraction displacements. The movement of the bladder during treatment and the resulting cervical-uterine movement seems to be a reasonable explanation. A similar trend was observed in the AP and CC direction.

Discussion

Accurately accounting for daily uncertainties in target position is an important goal in treating cervical cancer [12]. Uncertainties can arise due to setup variation and both inter- and intra-fraction motion [13]. While increasingly rapid treatment times may mitigate the effects of intrafraction motion, inter-fraction motion is generally addressed by encompassing the target with a planning margin[14]. Presently, quantitative evidence supporting recommended planning margins for intact cervical cancer remains sparse, and the effects of inter-fraction changes on CTV coverage are not fully understood [15,16,17].

It has been shown that the variation in initial bladder volume was large mean SD 70.63 cc, despite the fact that consistent drinking and voiding instructions were followed prior to acquisition. This could be due to several effects. First, we found that some patients (No. 4, 7,18,26, and 33) had difficulties completing the whole treatment process. Second, the waiting time before the start of a treatment was not always equal, and this could the main reason in variation in initial volume.

This study is, to our knowledge, the first to use daily pre- and post-fraction MRI scans to quantify changers in bladder and uterus motions. The results showed that inter-fraction and intra-fraction cervix-uterus motion were considerable in each treatment. The average intra-fraction (inter-fraction) displacement of the group was 6.11 mm (5.9 mm) in the AP direction and 11.5 mm (10.3 mm) in the CC direction. As shown in Fig. 4, there is a certain difference between the volume measured by ultrasound and the volume measured by planned CT. We currently lack effective means to ensure the consistency of bladder volume. At the same time, it can also be seen that the bladder volume changes significantly with the treatment process.

Individual patient displacements may be even larger and extend more than 10 mm. In this study, we also observed that there was a significant correlation between bladder volume difference and cervical-uterine displacement (r = 0.61, p < 0.01). Obviously, variations in the position and shape of the bladder were primarily caused by changes in bladder filling. As many studies have shown that MR-guided daily-adaptive radiotherapy seems a promising approach for minimizing treatment uncertainties and to improve treatment outcome. Nicosia et al.[18] found MR-guided daily-adaptive SBRT seems a feasible and accurate strategy for treating prostate cancer with ablative doses. The MR-guided strategy provides a comparable level of accuracy and acceptable real-dose distribution over treatment fractions. Francesco et al. [19] using 1.5 T MR-guided radiotherapy to assess daily variations for both target coverage and organs-at-risk. The study found that daily-adaptive can improve single intestinal loop sparing for lymph-nodal oligometastases. The same team also study the organ motion is a crucial feature for prostate SBRT. They shown that MRI-Linac is a new frontier in radiation oncology in showing visualization of the real-time anatomy of the patient[20, 21].

As other investigators have found [10, 22], we observed significant motions in bladder volume and uterus. Agreements to ensure that these organs are consistent in size will help reduce the source of CTV location changes. For interfraction motion, Yee et al. [23] found in a landmark study of bladder cancer CBCT that the movement is the most significant in anteriorly. Without daily imaging guidance, a large part of the target volume may be lost. Haripotepornkul et al.[24] using cervical implanted markers, daily kV imaging was used to study the intra-segmental movement of patients with cervical cancer throughout the IMRT process. An intermediate marker offset of 2–4 mm is observed in any given direction, which is smaller than our analysis, especially in the AP direction. However, this can be explained because the markers only represent the position of the cervix, and the cervix is affected by changes in bladder filling smaller than the uterus motion [8].Chen et al. found that the largest movement was found at the bottom of the uterus over a time range of 31 min, averaging 1.1 mm in the AP direction and 3.1 mm in the CC direction [25]. This is smaller than what we found, however, it can be explained that we only include patients with large uterine tip displacement measured in full and empty bladder CT scans before treatment [26]. In addition, we would like to point out that we analyzed the scans in pairs, that is, we compared the pre-and post- MRI and CBCT scans of each part. In this way, the effect is mainly reduced to the interpretation difference between pre- and post- image scans. In addition, the accuracy of non-rigid registration used to measure intra-graded motion may be a potential source of error [27]. However, we have seen that this error is very small, so its effect on the observed internal motion is limited. In this study, we used pre-and post-fractionated CBCT scans to quantify the shape of cervix and uterus, and bladder filling, and intra-fractionated changes in patient settings. There is almost no change in the amount of exercise set by the patient. The movement of cervix and uterus is quite large, which is related to bladder filling [28]. The gradual cervical-uterine movement should not be ignored, especially when designing daily planning strategies. The maximum mean directional displacements of the bladder walls over the 43 patients over the scan for the full bladders were 10.8 mm superiorly, 1.5 mm inferiorly, 3.19 mm anteriorly, 3.43 mm posteriorly, 2.74 mm to the left and 2.48 mm to the right. Largest displacements are found in the cranial-anterior direction. Average displacement per treatment fraction was 3.6 mm in that direction. Statistically significant differences were seen in the posterior, left and right displacements but were quantitatively small.

Patient factors may lead to inter-and intra-temporal changes in the size and position of the bladder. Cervical cancer, especially in patients receiving radiation therapy, usually occurs in the elderly. Despite formal recommendations, deterioration in bladder and renal function may limit a patient's ability to continuously empty the bladder and may also affect the rate at which urine fills the bladder [29]. Adamson and Wu[30], in a study of pretreatment and posttreatment CBCT in prostate cancer patients, found that the median bladder increase was 14%. As expected, we found that the largest proportion of bladder volume increase before and after treatment was in patients with small bladder before treatment. This may simply reflect a relatively constant rate of urine production; therefore, patients with a smaller bladder before treatment have a relatively larger increase in volume than patients with a larger bladder before treatment. This suggests that a larger bladder may require a smaller edge than a smaller preconditioned bladder if the CTV-PTV edge is personalized to take into account intra-segmented movement. Although this hypothesis is logical, it needs to be confirmed by further research.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Change history

Abbreviations

EBRT:

External beam radiotherapy treatment

CBCT:

Cone beam computed tomography

CTV:

Clinical target volume

FIGO:

International federation of gynaecology and obstetrics

US:

Ultrasound

FOV:

Filed of view

TR:

Repetition time

TE:

Echo time

TPS:

Treatment planning system

SD:

Standard deviation

References

  1. Cohen PA, Jhingran A, Oaknin A, et al. Cervical cancer. Lancet. 2019;393(10167):169–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sturdza A, Pötter R, Fokdal LU, Haie-Meder C, Tan LT, Mazeron R, Petric P, Šegedin B, Jurgenliemk-Schulz IM, Nomden C, Gillham C, McArdle O, Van Limbergen E, Janssen H, Hoskin P, Lowe G, Tharavichitkul E, Villafranca E, Mahantshetty U, Georg P, Kirchheiner K, Kirisits C, Tanderup K, Lindegaard JC. Image guided brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: improved pelvic control and survival in RetroEMBRACE, a multicenter cohort study. Radiother Oncol. 2016;120(3):428–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Padgett KR, Simpson G, Asher D, Portelance L, Bossart E, Dogan N. Assessment of online adaptive MR-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver cancers. Phys Med. 2020;77:54–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mahmoud O, Kilic S, Khan AJ, Beriwal S, Small W Jr. External beam techniques to boost cervical cancer when brachytherapy is not an option-theories and applications. Ann Transl Med. 2017;5(10):207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stolnicu S, Hoang L, Soslow RA. Recent advances in invasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Virchows Arch. 2019;475(5):537–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Srivastava A, Datta NR. Brachytherapy in cancer cervix: Time to move ahead from point A? World J Clin Oncol. 2014;5(4):764–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kunos CA. Novel radiosensitization strategies in uterine cervix cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2020;30(4):281–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ríos I, Vásquez I, Cuervo E, Garzón Ó, Burbano J. Problems and solutions in IGRT for cervical cancer. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2018;23(6):517–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rigaud B, Simon A, Gobeli M, Lafond C, Leseur J, Barateau A, Jaksic N, Castelli J, Williaume D, Haigron P, De Crevoisier R. CBCT-guided evolutive library for cervical adaptive IMRT. Med Phys. 2018;45(4):1379–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Maemoto H, Toita T, Ariga T, Heianna J, Yamashiro T, Murayama S. Predictive factors of uterine movement during definitive radiotherapy for cervical cancer. J Radiat Res. 2017;58(3):397–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Foroudi F, Wong J, Kron T, et al. Online adaptive radiotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: results of a pilot study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:765–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Patni N, Burela N, Pasricha R, Goyal J, Soni TP, Kumar TS, Natarajan T. Assessment of three-dimensional setup errors in image-guided pelvic radiotherapy for uterine and cervical cancer using kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography and its effect on planning target volume margins. J Cancer Res Ther. 2017;13(1):131–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Guerreiro F, Seravalli E, Janssens GO, van de Ven CP, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Raaymakers BW. Intra- and inter-fraction uncertainties during IGRT for Wilms’ tumor. Acta Oncol. 2018;57(7):941–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tyagi N, Lewis JH, Yashar CM, Vo D, Jiang SB, Mundt AJ, Mell LK. Daily online cone beam computed tomography to assess interfractional motion in patients with intact cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;80(1):273–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang X, Yu M, Wang J, Zhong R, Shen Y, Zhao Y, Li Z, Bai S, Xu F. An assessment of interfractional bladder, rectum and vagina motion in postoperative cervical cancer based on daily cone-beam computed tomography. Mol Clin Oncol. 2016;4(2):271–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Heijkoop ST, Langerak TR, Quint S, Bondar L, Mens JW, Heijmen BJ, Hoogeman MS. Clinical implementation of an online adaptive plan-of-the-day protocol for nonrigid motion management in locally advanced cervical cancer IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;90(3):673–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lim K, Kelly V, Stewart J, Xie J, Cho YB, Moseley J, Brock K, Fyles A, Lundin A, Rehbinder H, Milosevic M. Pelvic radiotherapy for cancer of the cervix: is what you plan actually what you deliver? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;74(1):304–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nicosia L, Sicignano G, Rigo M, Figlia V, Cuccia F, De Simone A, Giaj-Levra N, Mazzola R, Naccarato S, Ricchetti F, Vitale C, Ruggieri R, Alongi F. Daily dosimetric variation between image-guided volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy and MR-guided daily adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy. Acta Oncol. 2021;60(2):215–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cuccia F, Rigo M, Gurrera D, Nicosia L, Mazzola R, Figlia V, Giaj-Levra N, Ricchetti F, Attinà G, Pastorello E, De Simone A, Naccarato S, Sicignano G, Ruggieri R, Alongi F. Mitigation on bowel loops daily variations by 1.5-T MR-guided daily-adaptive SBRT for abdomino-pelvic lymph-nodal oligometastases. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021.

  20. Mazzola R, Sicignano G, Cuccia F, Vitale C, Rigo M, Giaj-Levra N, Nicosia L, Figlia V, Ricchetti F, Attinà G, Pastorello E, De Simone A, Gurrera D, Naccarato S, Ruggieri R, Alongi F. Impact of hydrogel peri-rectal spacer insertion on seminal vesicles intrafraction motion during 1.5 T-MRI-guided adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Br J Radiol. 2021;20:20210521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cuccia F, Mazzola R, Nicosia L, Figlia V, Giaj-Levra N, Ricchetti F, Rigo M, Vitale C, Mantoan B, De Simone A, Sicignano G, Ruggieri R, Cavalleri S, Alongi F. Impact of hydrogel peri-rectal spacer insertion on prostate gland intra-fraction motion during 1.5 T MR-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol. 2020;15(1):178.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Eminowicz G, Rompokos V, Stacey C, Hall L, McCormack M. Understanding the impact of pelvic organ motion on dose delivered to target volumes during IMRT for cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2017;122(1):116–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yee D, Parliament M, Rathee S, et al. Cone beam CT imaging analysis of interfractional variations in bladder volume and position during radiotherapy for bladder cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:1045–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Haripotepornkul NH, Nath SK, Scanderbeg D, Saenz C, Yashar CM. Evaluation of intra- and inter-fraction movement of the cervix during intensity modulated radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol. 2011;98(3):347–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen MF, Tseng CJ, Tseng CC, Kuo YC, Yu CY, Chen WC. Clinical outcome in posthysterectomy cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent Cisplatin and intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy: comparison with conventional radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67:1438–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ahmad R, Hoogeman MS, Bondar M, Dhawtal V, Quint S, De Pree I, Mens JW, Heijmen BJ. Increasing treatment accuracy for cervical cancer patients using correlations between bladder-filling change and cervix-uterus displacements: proof of principle. Radiother Oncol. 2011;98(3):340–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Datteri RD, Liu Y, D’Haese PF, Dawant BM. Validation of a nonrigid registration error detection algorithm using clinical MRI brain data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015;34(1):86–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pfisterer MH, Griffiths DJ, Schaefer W, et al. The effect of age on lower urinary tract function: a study in women. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:405–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Heppner TJ, Tykocki NR, Hill-Eubanks D, Nelson MT. Transient contractions of urinary bladder smooth muscle are drivers of afferent nerve activity during filling. J Gen Physiol. 2016;147(4):323–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Adamson J, Wu Q. Inferences about prostate intrafraction motion from pre- and posttreatment volumetric imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;75:260–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported in part National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants 82102173; National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0105106); Academic promotion program of Shandong First Medical University (2019LJ004), Jinan Science and Technology Development Plan(201907108), and by Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province, China (Grant NO. ts20120505).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xu Li and Lizhen Wang have contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiation Oncology Physics and Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, No.440 Jiyan road, Huaiyin district, Jinan City, 250117, Shandong Province, China

    Xu Li, Lizhen Wang, Zhen Cui, Yukun Li, Pei Liu, Yungang Wang, Jinhong Zhu, Jianmin Zhu, Yong Yin & Zhenjiang Li

Authors
  1. Xu Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lizhen Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhen Cui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yukun Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pei Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yungang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jinhong Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jianmin Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yong Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Zhenjiang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Manuscript: XL, LZW, ZJL, YY; Sample acquisition and patient cohort: ZC, JMZ, JJZ, PL, XL;Statistical analysis: ZJL. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yong Yin or Zhenjiang Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

All patients gave informed consent to participate.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Xu Li and Lizhen Wang have authors share first authorship

The original online version of this article was revised: the authors reported that Jinhong Zhu was incorrectly denoted as one of the corresponding authors

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Wang, L., Cui, Z. et al. Online MR evaluation of inter- and intra-fraction uterus motions and bladder volume changes during cervical cancer external beam radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 16, 179 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01907-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01907-1

Keywords

Radiation Oncology

ISSN: 1748-717X

Contact us