Open Access

3D-image-guided high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for salvage treatment of locally persistent nasopharyngeal carcinoma

  • Yu Feng Ren1, 2,
  • Xin Ping Cao1Email author,
  • Jia Xu3,
  • Wei Jun Ye1,
  • Yuan Hong Gao1,
  • Bin S Teh4, 5 and
  • Bi Xiu Wen2
Contributed equally
Radiation Oncology20138:165

https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-165

Received: 17 December 2012

Accepted: 8 May 2013

Published: 5 July 2013

Abstract

Background

To evaluate the therapeutic benefit of 3D-image-guided high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (3D-image-guided HDR-BT) used as a salvage treatment of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with locally persistent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

Methods

Thirty-two patients with locally persistent NPC after full dose of IMRT were evaluated retrospectively. 3D-image-guided HDR-BT treatment plan was performed on a 3D treatment planning system (PLATO BPS 14.2). The median dose of 16 Gy was delivered to the 100% isodose line of the Gross Tumor Volume.

Results

The whole procedure was well tolerated under local anesthesia. The actuarial 5-y local control rate for 3D-image-guided HDR-BT was 93.8%, patients with early-T stage at initial diagnosis had 100% local control rate. The 5-y actuarial progression-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival rate were 78.1%, 87.5%. One patient developed and died of lung metastases. The 5-y actuarial overall survival rate was 96.9%.

Conclusions

Our results showed that 3D-image-guided HDR-BT would provide excellent local control as a salvage therapeutic modality to IMRT for patients with locally persistent disease at initial diagnosis of early-T stage NPC.

Keywords

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma Intensity-modulated radiotherapy Persistent disease 3D-image-guided HDR Brachytherapy Local tumor control

Background

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a radiosensitive disease, and radiotherapy is the standard therapy for non-disseminated NPC. A growing data showed that improvement in NPC patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was demonstrated in achieving excellent local tumor control, especially in the locally early-T stage patients with the least toxicity [14]. However, local persistence of disease remains a major hindrance to successful treatment, and the locally persistent NPC patient carries a risk of local recurrence if the salvaging treatment is not given, locally persistent disease was defined as relapsed tumor within 6 months of completion of primary radiotherapy, and local recurrence was failure beyond 6 months [5, 6]. Kwong et al. [7] showed their experience in the patterns of failure in NPC patients after the completion of radiotherapy was associated with an increased risk of local failure. Among 803 NPC patients, fifty-five (6.8%) showed persistent disease and positive biopsies at 12 weeks post-radiotherapy with only 40% of 5-year local control rate. Likewise, Sze et al. and Yan et al. also showed that the local persistence of NPC post therapy was associated with an increased risk of local recurrence [8, 9]. Therefore, aggressive and effective salvage treatment for locally persistent NPC is very important [1013].

Various salvage treatment techniques have reportedly been effective for locally persistent NPC, including surgical nasopharyngectomy [14], brachytherapy [5], stereotactic radiosurgery [15, 16], and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) [17]. In our cancer center, routine 2D brachytherapy was given for salvaging NPC with biopsy-proven persistence before May 2005. Since then, 3D-image-guided high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (3D-image-guided HDR-BT) was used instead for this group of patients. 3D-image-guided HDR-BT is a new treatment method that uses PLATO BPS workstation (Nucletron B.V., Veenendal, the Netherlands). 3D-brachytherapy treatment planning is based on a set of CT, MR or UltraSound (US) images. Empty catheters are placed within the patient via meatus. Once the catheters are in place, a set of CT images is taken and the catheters are reconstructed on these images. Following the catheter reconstruction, the source positions and dwell times are planned and the plan is optimized [1822]. This planning strategy enables us to build up the real time isodose distribution in all CT slices to increase accuracy of delivery of the prescribed dose. Previous studies have reported that external beam radiotherapy (ERT) combined with 3D-HDR-ICBT treatment was an effective treatment modality in cervical cancer [23, 24], breast cancer [25], and prostate cancer patients [26], and so on. In 2010, Johanne et al. [27] compared the dose conformity of CT-based 3D high-dose-rate brachytherapy (3D-HDR-BT) and IMRT to deliver a boost to the prostate after external beam radiotherapy, they reported that CT-based 3D HDR-BT produced a more conformal plan for the boost to the prostate than IMRT.

Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the therapeutic benefit of 3D-image-guided HDR-BT modality for salvage treatment of locally persistent disease after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

Methods

Selection criteria for 3D-image-guided HDR-BT

This retrospective analysis recruited 32 NPC patients with locally persistence. The study was approved by the institutional reviewed board at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Locally persistent disease was defined as relapsed tumor within 6 months of completion of primary radiotherapy, and local recurrence was failure beyond 6 months [28]. Once proven pathologically by biopsy to have local persistence, each patient underwent physical examination, fiber-optic nasopharyngoscopy, chest X-ray, abdominal ultrasonography, and MRI/CT scan of the base of the skull, nasopharynx, and neck. Additional tests to evaluate the extent of disease included liver function tests, alkaline phosphatase, chest x-ray, liver or bone scans when indicated. 3D-image-guided HDR-BT was given when the following criteria were satisfied: 1). the persistent disease was biopsy-proven; 2). persistent tumors either confined to the nasopharynx or involving the upper choana with 5 mm nasal extension.

Treatment methods and response assessment

The patients with locally persistence were treated with 3D-image-guided HDR-BT using a 192Ir source (microSelectron; Nucletron) when the selection criteria were satisfied at a median of 12 weeks after IMRT. The 3D-image-guided HDR intracavitary brachytherapy was delivered using a high-dose-rate (HDR) afterloading machine (microSelectron, Nucletron, Veenendaal, the Netherlands). All patients were treated under local anesthesia with fiberoptic endoscopic guidance via the inferior meatus to the treatment positions. Patients were immobilized in the supine position with a thermoplastic mask. All procedures were performed by the experienced radiation oncologist. Treatment plan was performed as follows: 1) two to four customer designed nasopharyngeal brachytherapy applicators (Figure 1) were placed at treatment position under local anesthesia with fiberoptic endoscopic guidance via the inferior meatus and the applicators were then immobilized (Figures 2, 3 and 4); 2) CT scanning using a 0.2 cm step to obtain 0.2 cm thick slices was performed and CT images were subsequently transferred to a 3D treatment planning system (PLATO PBS 14.2); 3) For all patients, gross tumor volume (GTV), clinical target volume(CTV) were assessed. To delineate these target volumes, MR images that were obtained were used as the reference. The GTV was determined by a radiation oncologist as the macroscopic extent of the persistent disease area. The CTV included the persistent disease area & a margin (0.5 cm) around the GTV; 4) following all target volumes defined and the applicators reconstruction, The PLATO PBS was used to calculate the dosimetry for a HDR 192Ir stepping source. The distance between each source step was 2.5 mm; 5) the dose optimization was done step by step manually. This planning strategy enables us to build up the real time isodose distribution in all CT slices to increase accurate delivery of the prescribed dose (Figure 5). Conformity index (CI=VRI/TV, where VRI= reference isodose volume and TV= target volume) are calculated [29]. After approval of the plan, the treatment was delivered to the patients accordingly.
Figure 1

The customer-designed applicator for nasopharyngeal intracavitary brachytherapy.

Figure 2

Customer-designed applicator for nasopharyngeal brachytherapy was placed at treatment positions near the persistent tumor under local anesthesia with fiberoptic endoscopic guidance via the inferior meatus.

Figure 3

Four customer designed applicators for nasopharyngeal brachytherapy were immobilized.

Figure 4

Patient was immobilized in the supine position with a thermoplastic mask.

Figure 5

Axial computed tomography (CT) image showed the applicators in situ for brachytherapy intracavitary with different isodose lines.

Treatment responses for all patients were evaluated according to the WHO response criteria [30]. Confirmation of response was assessed by nasopharyngoscopy, biopsy and MRI scans 12 weeks after the completion of the 3D-image-guided HDR-BT treatment. All acute and late radiotherapy toxicity was graded according to the criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) [31].

Follow-up and statistical analyses

All patients were seen and carefully evaluated by an experienced radiation oncologist. The duration of follow-up was calculated from the first day of brachytherapy to either the day of death or the day of last examination.

Survival rates were calculated based on the date of diagnosis of local persistence. The primary endpoint of this study (interval to the first defining event) were assessed: local failure free survival (LFFS), disease-free survival rate (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival rate (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). Actuarial survival was calculated according to the method of Kaplan-Meier [32].

Results

Patient populations and characteristics

Between May 2005 and December 2009, 32 consecutive patients with locally persistence received 3D-image-guided HDR-BT as salvage treatment 12 weeks after a full course of IMRT in our institute. Evaluation of treatment response and toxicity was made in single individual patient. The demographic details are shown in Table 1. The male/female ratio was 3.5:1 with 25 males and 7 females, and the median age was 44 y (range, 29~68 y). Histological examination showed that 96.9% of the patients had World Health Organization (WHO) Type II or III disease, 3.1% had WHO Type I disease.
Table 1

Characteristics of 32 NPC patients with locally persistent after IMRT

Characteristic

 

N

%

Age (years)

Median

44

 

Range

29 ~68

 

Gender

Male

25

78.1

Female

7

21.9

Histology

WHO type I

1

3.1

WHO type II

6

18.8

WHO type III

25

78.1

T stage

T1

6

18.8

T2

12

37.5

T3

12

37.5

T4

2

6.2

N stage

N0

12

37.5

N1

14

43.8

N2

5

15.6

N3

1

3.1

AJCC Stage

I

4

12.5

II

12

37.5

III

13

40.6

IV

3

9.4

Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy

Received

6

18.8

Not received

26

81.2

NPC: Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma; IMRT: Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy; WHO: World Health Organization; AJCC: the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging 7th edition (2011).

Response to radiotherapy and survival

The 3D-image-guided HDR-BT was given as salvage treatment at median 12 weeks (range 10~16 weeks) after the primary treatment. Figure 5 shows the conformality of the dose distribution, the dosimetry planning was done based on CT images, the CTV was covered 100% of the prescription dose of 12 to 20 Gy (mean 16 Gy/4 fractions). All 32 patients achieved complete response (CR = 100%). Median time to complete regression was 1.0 months (range, 0.5~1.8 months).

With a median follow-up of 39 months, 7 patients developed local recurrence and/or distant metastasis (Table 2). Two patients developed locoregional failure, the one patient (T3N1, WHO III) had recurrence in parapharyngeal space at 14 months after completing treatment, and the other one (T4N2, WHO III) in the skull base at 16 months, respectively, they were successfully retreated. The 5-y actuarial LFFS rate was 93.8% shown in Figure 6. Further study showed that the patients with local persistence at initial diagnosis of early-T stage NPC had excellent 5-y LFFS rate (100%) comparing to those with advanced T stage NPC.
Table 2

Failure patterns in NPC patients with locally persistent disease

Pt. No.

Sex /Age

AJCC T stage at initial diagnosis

AJCC T stage at relapse

Primary treatment

Second treatment for relapse

Time to relapse (mo)

Relapse site

1

F/47

T3

rT1

IMRT 68 Gy

3D-HDR-ICBT

14

Parapharyngeal space

     

16 Gy

  

2

M/33

T4

rT2a

IMRT 68 Gy

3D-HDR-ICBT

16

Skull base

12 Gy

3

F/59

T2

rT1

IMRT 68 Gy

3D-HDR-ICBT

34

Bone

12 Gy

4

F/44

T1

rT1

IMRT 68 Gy

3D-HDR-ICBT

27

Bone

12 Gy

5

M/57

T1

rT1

IMRT 68 Gy

3D-HDR-ICBT

19

Neck nodal

16 Gy

6

F/62

T1

rT1

IMRT 68 Gy

3D-HDR-ICBT

24

Liver

12 Gy

7

F/42

T2

rT2a

IMRT 68 Gy

3D-HDR-ICBT

17

Lung(29 months died)

20 Gy

AJCC: American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system (2002); Pt. No.:patient number; F/M: female, male; IMRT: Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy; Chemo-IMRT: concurrent IMRT and chemotherapy; 3D-HDR-ICBT: Three-Dimensional CT-based high-Dose-Rate Intracavitary Brachytherapy. Time to relapse (mo): After second treatment(3D-HDR-ICBT) for relapse, the time, patients developed local recurrence and/or distant metastasis, is defined as Time to relapse (mo).

Figure 6

Actuarial local failure-free survival (LFFS) curves in patients with locally persistent NPC disease treated with the 3D-image-guided HDR-BT after IMRT.

Four patients developed distant metastases: bone metastasis in two patients at 27, 34 months respectively; liver metastasis in one patient at 24 months and lung metastases in one who died at 29 months after 3D-image-guided HDR-BT treatment. As shown in Figure 7. The actuarial 5-y DMFS rate after treatment was 87.5%.
Figure 7

5-y actuarial distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) curves in patients with locally persistent NPC disease treated with IMRT and 3D-image-guided HDR-BT.

One patient developed neck node recurrence at 19 months after 3D-image-guided HDR-BT treatment. The 5-y actuarial DFS rate was 78.1%, and the PFS curve is shown in Figure 8. In the present study, one patient died of lung metastasis at 29 months after 3D-image-guided HDR-BT treatment. The 5-y actuarial OS rate was 96.9%.
Figure 8

5-y actuarial disease-free survival (DFS) curves in patients with locally persistent NPC disease treated with the 3D-image-guided HDR-BT after IMRT.

Side effects and complications

The whole procedure of 3D-image-guided HDR-BT was generally well tolerated under local anesthesia. On follow-up examination, toxicity was mainly grade 1 or grade 2. The most common radiation-related complication was grade I or II xerostomia. No patient experienced beyond grade II xerostomia. Thirteen patients experienced grade I/II mucositis, which recovered to normal except a small white scar corresponding to the brachytherapy applicator position. Nasopharyngeal middle ulceration was observed in two patients with foul-smelling crust, one patient developed synechiae of the nasal mucosal linings at 23 months after treatment. The maximum oral aperture was measured in all 32 patients to assess temporomandibular joint dysfunction, and the mean pre- and post-treatment aperture was 4.5 cm and 4.0 cm, respectively. The difference between pre- and post-treatment aperture was not statistically significant. Total hearing loss, neck fibrosis limiting movement, and neurological complications (temporal lobe necrosis and cranial nerve palsy) were not observed in this study.

Discussion

Recently, the use of 3D treatment planning system has increased in most radiotherapy facilities. This method allows for a better assessment of GTV and the definition and delineation of CTV compared with traditional approaches. A 100% isodose line was selected to cover the entire target as optimally as possible, then manual optimization on each CT slice was done interactively by dragging the 100% isodose line to cover the target volume as conformally as possible in this study. Our experience has shown that this CT-based-3D planning approach improved target volume delineation and optimal isodose coverage, and is more accurate and much easier than the conventional orthogonal film dosimetry.

In the current study, we treated 32 consecutive nonmetastatic NPC patients with local persistence disease using 3D-image-guided HDR-BT after IMRT. The whole procedure was well tolerated under local anesthesia. The results showed the 3D-image-guided HDR-BT was an effective treatment technique for local persistence, the actuarial 5-y LFFS rate was 93.8% with minimal toxicity. On subgroup analysis, the corresponding 5-y LFFS rates for T1, T2, T3, T4 at initial diagnosis were 100%, 100%, 91.7%, 50% respectively. The flexible customer designed applicators can be easily placed close to the nasopharyngeal mucosa resulting in a higher dose to the persistent lesion. With higher mucosal dose delivered by this technique, the benefit was gained in improving the local control of patient treated with this technique. This treatment results support our hypothesis that an adequate Salvage treatment to the locally persistence could compensate for primary treatment. In our study, 2 patients (T3 and T4 one each) with an initial complete response developed locoregional failure (one in parapharyngeal space and one in skull base) as assessed by nasopharyngoscopy, biopsy and MRI scans beyond 6 months at the completion of Salvage treatment. For advanced T stage NPC at initial diagnosis, the locally persistence may not be confined to the nasopharynx after IMRT. Due to its dosimetric limitations, 3D-HDR-BT therapy seemed to be not enough for patients with persistent disease beyond the area of nasopharynx.

Five patients developed relapse in other sites, one in the neck; the other 4 distant metastasis including one in the liver; 1 in the lung and 2 in the bone. 3D-image-guided CT-based HDR-BT did not improve the distant control rates as a salvage treatment. These results concurred with a previous study by Leibel SA et al. [33], which showed that nasopharynx tumors have a higher probability of micrometastatic dissemination at initial diagnosis, and concluded that the effect of local tumor control on survival cannot be determined without more effective methods to treat disseminated disease. Chang JT et al. [34] used 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and found that 11% of distant metastases in NPC patients were not discovered using the conventional staging workup (CWU). Based on this finding, they suggested that FDG-PET diagnosed stage M for NPC should be more accurate and sensitive than CWU. Due to its cost and availability, FDG-PET was not performed for each single patient in our study. Therefore, it was uncertain whether improved local tumor control by 3D-HDR-ICBT was associated with improved distant tumor control.

Due to its rapid dose fall-off, brachytherapy with Ir-192 to the locally persistent NPC post primary IMRT can deliver a high radiation dose to the target volume while sparing parotid glands and other vital structures, achieving higher local tumor control rate with relatively lower complications compared to external beam boost. The xerostomia syndrome was commonly seen as a long-term side effect in NPC patients when treated with primary radiotherapy. Our data showed patients with locally persistent NPC lesion experienced mild xerostomia when 3D-image-guided CT-based HDR-BT was used as salvage treatment to IMRT. Three patients experienced Grade-II mucositis could be ascribed to the high dose to the nasopharyngeal mucosa. During the long-term follow-up, the only complication related to brachytherapy was synechiae of the nasal mucosal linings in one patients, which can be treated easily by surgery, or adjust the loading pattern during the course of placing applicators to 3D-HDR BT.

At present, the optional gap time for salvage of locally persistent NPC patients after the completion of primary radiotherapy is still an issue. In this respective analysis, the mean gap period was 12 weeks. Zheng et al. [17] reported, the median of their gap period is also 12 weeks. Kwong et al. [7] recommended a confirmatory biopsy at 10 weeks before first salvage treatment. They analyzed the time course of histologic remission after radiotherapy in 803 NPC patients. Their results showed 6.9% of the total patients had residual disease at week 12, 16.3% had spontaneous remission observed in repeated biopsy after initial positive histologic proven, defined as delayed histologic remission; 76.8% had negative histologic features within 12 weeks after the completion of RT, defined as early histologic remission. They found that the delayed histologic remission is not a poor prognostic factor and the salvage treatment might be unnecessary. According to their study, some patients might have delayed histologic remission and the additional salvage treatment might be unnecessary in our series. In contrast, Withers et al. [35] revealed evidence of accelerated tumor regrowth in analysis nearly 500 oropharyngeal cancer patients with extensions of treatment from 5 to 8 weeks, a dose increment of about 0.6 Gy per day was required to compensate for tumor repopulation. Considering tumor repopulation between the completion of the first course radiotherapy and the salvage treatment, a shorter gap period could achieve higher local control. In our current series, the overall 5-y actuarial LFFS rate was 93.8%, and the excellent LFFS rate was also reported by Zheng et al. [17] 100%, 94.12%, 84.38%, 83.92% for stage T1,T2,T3,T4 disease using 3D-CRT salvage treatment at the short gap time period. Those results showed that early intervention for persistent NPC patients required a low salvaging radiation dose, obtained an excellent local tumor control with low rate of complications.

In conclusion, 3D-image-guided CT-based HDR-BT achieved excellent local tumor control rate as salvage treatment to primary IMRT for patients with locally persistent NPC disease, especially for those with T1-2 disease at the initial diagnosis. Xerostomia syndrome and other toxicities associated with this approach have decreased. Despite high locoregional control, distant metastasis remains main obstacle to the successful treatment for this group of patients; more effective therapy is warranted to improve the outcome.

Consent (Adult)

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this report and any accompanying images.

Notes

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University
(2)
Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 58 Zhongshan Rd II
(3)
Division of Emergency Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
(4)
Department of Radiation Oncology, The Methodist Hospital
(5)
The Methodist Hospital Research Institute

References

  1. Lee N, Harris J, Garden AS, Straube W, Glisson B, Xia P, et al.: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: radiation therapy oncology group phase II trial 0225. J Clin Oncol 2009,27(22):3684-3690. 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.9109View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Kwong DL, Pow EH, Sham JS, McMillan AS, Leung LH, Leung WK, et al.: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a prospective study on disease control and preservation of salivary function. Cancer 2004,101(7):1584-1593. 10.1002/cncr.20552View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lee N, Xia P, Quivey JM, Sultanem K, Poon I, Akazawa C, et al.: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an update of the UCSF experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002,53(1):12-22. 10.1016/S0360-3016(02)02724-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kam MK, Teo PM, Chau RM, Cheung KY, Choi PH, Kwan WH, et al.: Treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with intensity-modulated radiotherapy: the Hong Kong experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004,60(5):1440-1450. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.022View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Leung TW, Tung SY, Sze WK, Sze WM, Wong VY OSK: Salvage brachytherapy for patients with locally persistent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000,47(2):405-412. 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00463-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Zhang Y, Lin ZA, Pan JJ, Zheng Z, Yang L, Lin SJ, et al.: Concurrent control study of different radiotherapy for primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma: intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy. Chin J Cancer 2009,28(11):1143-1148. 10.5732/cjc.009.10427View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Kwong DL, Nicholls J, Wei WI, Chua DT, Sham JS, Yuen PW, et al.: The time course of histologic remission after treatment of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer 1999,85(7):1446-1453. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990401)85:7<1446::AID-CNCR4>3.0.CO;2-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Yan JH, Xu GZ, Hu YH, Li SY, Lie YZ, Qin DX, et al.: Management of local residual primary lesion of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: II. Results of prospective randomized trial on booster dose. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1990,18(2):295-298. 10.1016/0360-3016(90)90092-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Sze WM LAYT: The prognostic value of endoscopic findings after radical radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Singapore: Proc UICC Workshop on Nasopharyngeal Cancer; 1998:239.Google Scholar
  10. Yu KH, Leung SF, Tung SY, Zee B, Chua DT, Sze WM, et al.: Survival outcome of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma with first local failure: a study by the Hong Kong Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Study Group. Head Neck 2005,27(5):397-405. 10.1002/hed.20161View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Yi JL, Gao L, Huang XD, Li SY, Luo JW, Cai WM, et al.: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by radical radiotherapy alone: Ten-year experience of a single institution. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006,65(1):161-168. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.12.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Yeo R, Fong KW, Hee SW, Chua ET, Tan T, Wee J: Brachytherapy boost for T1/T2 nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Head Neck 2009,31(12):1610-1618. 10.1002/hed.21130View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Yan JH, Qin DX, Hu YH, Cai WM, Xu GZ, Wu XL, et al.: Management of local residual primary lesion of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC): are higher doses beneficial? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1989,16(6):1465-1469. 10.1016/0360-3016(89)90950-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen MY, Guo X, Wen WP, Hua YJ, Guo L, Li NW, et al.: Salvage surgical operation via endoscopic transnasal approach for local persistent or recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Ai Zheng 2007,26(7):673-678.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Wu SX, Chua DT, Deng ML, Zhao C, Li FY, Sham JS, et al.: Outcome of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for 90 patients with locally persistent and recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007,69(3):761-769. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.03.037View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Chua DT, Sham JS, Kwong PW, Hung KN, Leung LH: Linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery for limited, locally persistent, and recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: efficacy and complications. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003,56(1):177-183. 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00074-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Zheng XK, Chen LH, Chen YQ, Deng XG: Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy versus intracavitary brachytherapy for salvage treatment of locally persistent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004,60(1):165-170. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.02.059View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Milickovic N, Baltast D, Giannouli S, Lahanas M, Zamboglou N: CT imaging based digitally reconstructed radiographs and their application in brachytherapy. Phys Med Biol 2000,45(10):2787-2800. 10.1088/0031-9155/45/10/305View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang ZY, Li SX: A 3D brachytherapy treatment planning system. Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi 2000,24(5):254-259.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Xiang H, Zhuang TG: CT/MRI-based software for 3-D brachytherapy planning system. Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi 2002,26(6):398-401.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kolotas C, Baltas D, Zamboglou N: CT-Based interstitial HDR brachytherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 1999,175(9):419-427. 10.1007/s000660050031View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Peiffert D: What is new in brachytherapy? Bull Cancer 2006,93(1):125-132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Charra-Brunaud C, Peiffert D: Preliminary results of a French prospective-multicentric study of 3D pulsed dose-rate brachytherapy for cervix carcinoma. Cancer Radiother 2008,12(6–7):527-531.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Dolezel M, Vanasek J, Odrazka K, Tichy M: The progress in the treatment of cervical cancer--3D brachytherapy CT/MR-based planning. Ceska Gynekol 2008,73(3):144-149.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Das RK, Patel R, Shah H, Odau H, Kuske RR: 3D CT-based high-dose-rate breast brachytherapy implants: treatment planning and quality assurance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004,59(4):1224-1228. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.03.030View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Martin T, Roddiger S, Kurek R, Dannenberg T, Eckart O, Kolotas C, et al.: 3D conformal HDR brachytherapy and external beam irradiation combined with temporary androgen deprivation in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2004,71(1):35-41. 10.1016/j.radonc.2003.10.004View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hermesse J, Biver S, Jansen N, Lenaerts E, Nickers P: Dosimetric comparison of high-dose-rate brachytherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy as a boost to the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010,76(1):269-276. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.05.046View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Feuvret L, Noel G, Mazeron JJ, Bey P: Conformity index: a review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006,64(2):333-342. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.09.028View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A: Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 1981,47(1):207-214. 10.1002/1097-0142(19810101)47:1<207::AID-CNCR2820470134>3.0.CO;2-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Cox JD, Stetz J, Pajak TF: Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995,31(5):1341-1346. 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00060-CView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaplan ELMP: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958, 53: 457-481. 10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Leibel SA, Scott CB, Mohiuddin M, Marcial VA, Coia LR, Davis LW, et al.: The effect of local-regional control on distant metastatic dissemination in carcinoma of the head and neck: results of an analysis from the RTOG head and neck database. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991,21(3):549-556. 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90669-UView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Chang JT, Chan SC, Yen TC, Liao CT, Lin CY, Lin KJ, et al.: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging by (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005,62(2):501-507. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.09.057View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Levendag PC, Lagerwaard FJ, De Pan C, Noever I, Van Nimwegen A, Wijers O, et al.: High-dose, high-precision treatment options for boosting cancer of the nasopharynx. Radiother Oncol 2002,63(1):67-74. 10.1016/S0167-8140(02)00008-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Withers HR, Taylor JM, Maciejewski B: The hazard of accelerated tumor clonogen repopulation during radiotherapy. Acta Oncol 1988,27(2):131-146. 10.3109/02841868809090333View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ren et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement