Open Access

Organizing pneumonia after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of the lung

  • Taro Murai1Email author,
  • Yuta Shibamoto1,
  • Takeshi Nishiyama2,
  • Fumiya Baba3,
  • Akifumi Miyakawa1,
  • Shiho Ayakawa4,
  • Hiroyuki Ogino1,
  • Shinya Otsuka1 and
  • Hiromitsu Iwata1
Radiation Oncology20127:123

https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-123

Received: 16 April 2012

Accepted: 17 July 2012

Published: 1 August 2012

Abstract

Background

Organizing pneumonia (OP), so called bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia after postoperative irradiation for breast cancer has been often reported. There is little information about OP after other radiation modalities. This cohort study investigated the clinical features and risk factors of OP after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of the lung (SABR).

Methods

Patients undergoing SABR between 2004 and 2010 in two institutions were investigated. Blood test and chest computed tomography were performed at intervals of 1 to 3 months after SABR. The criteria for diagnosing OP were: 1) mixture of patchy and ground-glass opacity, 2) general and/or respiratory symptoms lasting for at least 2 weeks, 3) radiographic lesion in the lung volume receiving < 0.5 Gy, and 4) no evidence of a specific cause.

Results

Among 189 patients (164 with stage I lung cancer and 25 with single lung metastasis) analyzed, nine developed OP. The incidence at 2 years was 5.2% (95% confidence interval; 2.6-9.3%). Dyspnea were observed in all patients. Four had fever. These symptoms and pulmonary infiltration rapidly improved after corticosteroid therapy. Eight patients had presented with symptomatic radiation pneumonitis (RP) around the tumor 2 to 7 months before OP. The prior RP history was strongly associated with OP (hazard ratio 61.7; p = 0.0028) in multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

This is the first report on OP after SABR. The incidence appeared to be relatively high. The symptoms were sometimes severe, but corticosteroid therapy was effective. When patients after SABR present with unusual pneumonia, OP should be considered as a differential diagnosis, especially in patients with prior symptomatic RP.

Keywords

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)Organizing pneumoniaLung cancerRadiation pneumonitis

Introduction

Organizing pneumonia (OP), so called bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia, is a rare interstitial lung disease having unique clinical, radiological and pathological characteristics[13]. Typical OP patients present with dyspnea, cough, and fever that have been developing over a few weeks. Dramatic improvement is achieved by corticosteroids, but relapses occur frequently after corticosteroid therapy is tapered or stopped. Since Crestani et al.[4]. reported OP after postoperative irradiation for breast cancer in 1998, several reports have described the features, which are different from those of radiation pneumonitis (RP)[510]. The infiltrates initially appear in the irradiated side of the lung and migrate outside the radiation field. These features lead to the notion that radiation injury may prime the development of OP. However, no reports have demonstrated the relationship between radiation injury and OP, and there is little information about OP after other radiation modalities.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of the lung (SABR), previously called stereotactic body radiotherapy of the lung is a technique to precisely deliver radiation to a targeted tumor. Although surgical resection has been regarded as standard therapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and solitary lung metastases, recent reports on SABR for inoperable patients show minimal morbidity and high local control rates[1115]. Accordingly, the numbers of patients with lung cancer or solitary lung metastasis treated with SABR have recently increased for the reasons they are medically inoperable or refuse surgery[16].

To the best of our knowledge, OP after SABR has not been reported yet. We herein describe the clinical features of OP after SABR performed at two institutions. The objective of this study was 1) to describe the incidence and characteristics of OP after SABR, and 2) to investigate risk factors.

Method

Patients

Nearly all data used in this study were obtained from patients enrolled in multi-institutional protocol-based SABR studies[13, 14, 1719]. Between April 2004 and May 2010, 210 patients entered the SABR studies at two institutions (Nagoya City University Hospital and Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital). All these patients had T1N0M0 or T2aN0M0 stage NSCLC according to the 7th edition of TNM staging at diagnosis, or single lung metastasis. Local recurrences after surgery less than 5 cm in diameter were included. The patients’ medical records, radiotherapy documents and images were reviewed. Of the 210 patients, seven had undergone prior chest irradiation and 14 had interstitial lung disease diagnosed based on clinical symptoms, Kerbs von Lungren (KL)-6 elevation, computed tomography (CT) findings and/or biopsy[18]. These patients were excluded from analysis because it is hard to distinguish RP after prior radiotherapy or exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia from OP after SABR. Thus, 189 patients were analyzed. The characteristics of these patients are shown in Table1. Four patients had a previous diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. All patients provided written informed consent. This study was approved by the institutional research and ethics committees (Nagoya City University Hospital, No. 532 and Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, IRB20110125-1).
Table 1

Patient characteristics and SABR parameters

 

Patient Number

(%)

Male/Female

120/69

(63.5/26.5)

Institution

  
 

Nagoya City University Hospital

175

(92.6)

 

Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital

14

(7.4)

Disease stage

   
 

T1N0M0

110

(58.2)

 

T2aM0N0

47

(24.9)

 

Metastasis

25

(13.2)

 

Local recurrence

7

(3.7)

Prescribed dose (Gy/fractions)

   
 

52/4

50

(26.5)

 

50/4

26

(13.8)

 

48/4

97

(51.3)

 

44/4

3

(1.6)

 

36/2

4

(2.1)

 

34/2

6

(3.2)

 

24/2

1*

(0.5)

 

54/6

2

(1.1)

Age (years)

Median 76 (Range 16 - 89)

Planning target volume (cm 3 )

52.7 ± 29.1**

Mean lung dose (Gy)

4.5 ± 1.8*

V20 Gy (%)

6.7 ± 3.1*

*This patient could not complete the planned protocol of 48 Gy in 4 fractions.

** Mean ± standard deviation.

V20 Gy, lung volume covered with 20 Gy or more.

Treatment methods

Our methods for treatment planning were described in detail previously[13, 14]. The clinical target volume (CTV) was defined as the visible gross tumor volume. The CTV was expanded to the internal target volume (ITV), considering respiratory motion of the CTV. The ITV was extended by 5 to 10 mm to represent the planning target volume (PTV). Irradiation to the PTV was delivered using three coplanar and four noncoplanar static ports. SABR was delivered by a linear accelerator with 6-megavolt photons.

Prescription dose

The prescribed dose was delivered to the isocenter depending on the maximum diameter. On the protocols, the dose was 48 or 50 Gy in 4 fractions for both NSCLC and metastasis with a longest diameter of 1.5 to 3 cm, and 52 Gy in 4 fractions for tumors larger than 3 cm. Smaller NSCLC (< 1.5 cm) were treated with 44 or 48 Gy in 4 fractions and smaller metastases (< 1.5 cm) were irradiated at 34 or 36 Gy in 2 fractions. Beginning in January 2009, concurrent chemotherapy with TS-1 (80 mg/m[2] per day) was administered to 4 patients with T2a NSCLC over 28 days. Chemotherapy for other cancers such as colorectal cancer and small cell lung cancer was carried out in 3 patients during SABR.

All patients, except for two initial cases treated with 54 Gy in 6 fractions, were treated on this protocol (Table1). Most patients (175/189) received 48 to 52 Gy in 4 fractions. The Eclipse AAA system or Pinnacle (3) collapsed cone convolution were used as the dose calculation algorithm. Lung volume covered with 20 Gy or more (V20 Gy), mean lung dose and PTV (cm[3]) were evaluated on the treatment planning workstation.

Diagnosis of OP after SABR

The criteria for the diagnosis of OP after SABR were defined by reference to previous criteria in breast cancer studies:[4, 610] 1) mixture of patchy and ground-glass opacity, 2) general and/or respiratory symptoms lasting for at least 2 weeks, 3) radiographic lesion in the lung volume receiving less than 0.5 Gy, and 4) no evidence of a specific cause. Most patients in this study were elderly or had severe comorbid disease. Thus, biopsy could not be included in these criteria in accordance with the previous breast cancer studies. The diagnosis was determined by two physicians (T. M. and A. M.) using the 2-item questionnaire.

Follow-up studies

Patients were followed at 1- to 2-month intervals after SABR. Physical examinations, chest radiographs or CT, and laboratory tests were routinely performed at each visit. Toxicity was evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4. The follow-up period after SABR ranged from 2 to 85 months (median, 26 months).

Statistical analyses

The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of OP. The time was measured from the date of starting SABR. First, the cumulative incidence of OP was calculated by accounting for death or other thoracic irradiation as competing risks[20, 21]. To select variables used in the multivariate analysis, the OP incidence was compared with the Gray test for equality among levels of covariates: age, sex, site, stage, dose, chemo, rheumatoid arthritis, PTV (cm[3]), V20 Gy and mean lung dose[22]. Variables for which p-value was < 0.20 in the Gray test were included in the multivariate regression analysis, using the semiparametric proportional hazards model of Fine and Gray[20, 23]. The subdistributional hazard ratio (HR) for a categorical covariate was the ratio to subdistribution hazards for the actual group with respect to the baseline, with all other covariates being equal[20, 23].

Second, to investigate the impact of the RP incidence as a time-dependent covariate, the multi-state model was developed by five clinical states (Figure1)[24]. The transitions from SABR to either OP incidence, death, or other thoracic irradiation are modeled by a competing risk model. Thus, this multi-state model generalizes the competing risk model by including an intermediate event of RP. We assumed that two transitions (Figure1, black arrows and white arrows) had common baseline hazards, respectively. We introduced a time-dependent covariate that indicated whether or not RP has already occurred. For a transition from SABR to OP, the value of this covariate equals zero, while for a transition from RP to OP, the value equals one. In this analysis, we also included variables used in the Fine and Gray analysis. A Kappa agreement score was calculated to evaluate agreement of two physicians.
Figure 1

Five clinical states and transitions in the multi-state model. The multi-state model was developed with five clinical states: the index SABR, RP, OP, death and other thoracic irradiation. Each arrow denotes the transition between two clinical states. A transition to RP (gray arrow) was considered as an intermediate event.

Proportional hazard assumptions for all variables included in the univariate and multivariate models were checked by inspection of the Schoenfeld’s residuals. All statistical tests were two-sided. These analyses were implemented in the R package vdc, cmprsk[20, 21]or package mstate[25]. All analyses were performed in R version 2.13.0 for Windows[26].

Results

Clinical courses of patients with OP after SABR

Nine patients developed OP at 6–16 months after SABR. The incidences of OP were 4.0% (95% confidence interval: 1.7-7.6%) and 5.2% (2.6-9.3%) at 1 and 2 years, respectively (Figure2). A Kappa agreement score was 1.0. Opacity outside radiation ports was observed in 2 patients. However, they were asymptomatic, so we did not regard them as OP patients.
Figure 2

The incidence of OP after SABR. CI denotes confidence interval.

The clinical features of OP patients are shown in Table2. An example of OP is shown in Figure3. Two of the nine were nonsmokers. Three had emphysema. No patient had a history of allergy-related symptoms or rheumatoid arthritis. All these patients had NSCLC (T1N0M0, 4 patients; T2aN0M0, 5 patients) and were treated with SABR alone. The median PTV (cm[3]), V20Gy and mean lung dose were 74.3 cm[3] (range: 42.6-102.1), 7.5% (3.6-9.7%) and 5.5 Gy (3.6-10.1 Gy), respectively, in these patients. Eight of the 9 patients had experienced symptomatic RP around the tumor within 3 to 9 months after SABR. OP in the opposite lung and outside ports appeared 2 to 7 months after the RP. Opacity around the tumor did not increase in any patient. Screening examinations for infectious diseases were negative. All OP patients presented with dyspnea (Grade 2 in 4 patients and Grade 3 in 5). Of the 9 patients, 5 had Grade 3 general fatigue, 5 had fever (≥ 37.5 degrees Celsius) and/or persistent cough, 3 had sputum and 1 had chest pain. C-reactive protein (CRP) elevation (≥ 5.0 IU/ml) was observed in 6 patients. KL-6 elevation (≥ 500 U/ml) was observed in 4 of the 9 patients. Elevation of white blood cell count (> 10,000/μl) was observed in only 2 patients. Prednisone (0.5-1 mg/kg) was administered to 5 of the 9 patients and their symptoms and pulmonary infiltrates were improved within 1 to 4 weeks. Prednisone treatment was tapered over 4 to 8 weeks. Antibiotics were administered to 2 patients without steroids and 2 patients did not receive any treatment at all. In these cases, the chest radiograph findings and symptoms improved gradually within 4 to 16 weeks.
Table 2

Clinical characteristics of OP patients

No.

Age

Sex

Dose (Gy/4 fr * )

Toxicity grade (CTCAE ver4)

CRP (IU/ml)

KL-6 (U/ml)

Treatment after first OP

Dyspnea

Fever

Fatigue

1

62

M

52

2

 

2

5.7

813

 

2

80

M

48

2

 

3

0.9

456

 

3

79

M

48

3

1

2

22.7

558

PSL** + Abx††

4

71

F

52

2

1

2

4.0

299

Abx

5

76

M

52

2

 

2

1.1

414

PSL

6

82

M

52

3

2

3

21.0

653

PSL + Abx

7

83

M

52

3

2

3

10.6

231

Abx

8

79

M

50

3

2

3

5.8

531

PSL + Abx

9

83

F

50

3

 

3

5.9

314

PSL + Abx

*fr = fractions. **PSL = Prednisone. ††Abx = antibiotics.

Normal range for KL-6 is ≤ 500 U/ml in the institutions.

CRP and KL-6 data represent the maximum level during the initial OP course. Relapse of OP occurred in patients No. 6-9.

Figure 3

Chest CT, radiograph and dose distribution of SABR of an 82-year-old patient. Blue represents areas receiving more than 0.5 Gy (Figure3a, b). The patient presented with RP around the tumor 8 months after SABR (Figure3c, d arrow). OP occurred 3 months after RP resolution (Figure3e, f arrow head). Opacity around the tumor did not increase significantly (Figure3e, f, arrow). After administration of 5 mg prednisone, symptoms and radiological findings improved (Figure3g, h).

Relapse of OP occurred in 4 patients (Table2, patient number 6–9). They received treatment similar to that used for first OP. One patient needed intubation for Grade IV dyspnea. One and two episodes of relapse occurred in 2 patients each. One patient suffered first relapse during prednisone tapering. Increasing the prednisone dose was effective in these patients. At latest follow-up, none of the 4 patients had clinical symptoms, although 3 of them were still receiving prednisone at a dose of 5 mg, and chest roentgenograms revealed small residual opacities and linear densities in all patients.

Multivariate analyses of factors associated with OP after SABR

In the Gray test, risk factors with a p-value < 0.20 were PTV (cm[3]) (p = 0.039) and dose (p = 0.19). In the Fine and Gray analysis, no factor showed statistical significance (Table3). We then investigated the impact of the RP incidence using a multi-state model (Figure1). In this analysis, we also included variables used in the Fine and Gray analysis. This analysis showed that only prior symptomatic RP was significantly associated with OP after SABR (HR: 61.7: 95% confidence interval: 4.1-928.1, p = 0.0028) (Figure4).
Table 3

Fine and Gray regression analysis

 

Patient number

HR

(95% CI)

p-value

Total

(with OP)

Dose (Gy/fractions)

    

0.4

   48/4

97

(2)

1

  

   50/4

26

(2)

3.21

(0.47 -21.86)

 

   52/4 and other

66

(5)

2.56

(0.57 -11.53)

 

PTV (cm 3 )

    

0.4

   4.5 -44.2

93

(1)

1

  

   44.2 -71.6

48

(3)

5.98

(0.65 -54.7)

 

   71.6 -192

48

(5)

7.46

(0.84 -66.3)

 
Figure 4

Incidence of OP after SABR in patients with (+) and without (−) prior symptomatic RP in multi-state model. CI denotes confidence interval.

Discussion

We have described the clinical features of OP after SABR. They were quite similar to those of OP after postoperative irradiation for breast cancer and clearly differed from those of RP[4, 610, 27, 28]. To the best of our knowledge, this report represents the first cohort study on OP after SABR. This study suggests some clinical implications for SABR. First, OP after SABR occurred in 9 out of 189 (4.8%) in the present study, while previous reports described OP incidences after postoperative irradiation for breast cancer as 1.9% to 2.5%. Our incidence of OP after SABR appears to be relatively high, and this may be related to the relatively large volume of the lung irradiated at SABR as compared with postoperative irradiation for breast cancer. The symptoms were sometimes severe, compared to those of patients developing OP after postoperative irradiation for breast cancer[8]. Secondly, most OP occurred a few months after RP in this study. A very strong association between prior RP history and OP was also shown statistically. All OP developed within 16 months after SABR. Thus, when a patient after SABR presents with unusual pneumonia, OP should be considered in the differential diagnosis. Patients after SABR should be carefully followed up for at least 2 years, especially when RP is symptomatic. Finally, the clinical features of OP after radiation could differ from those of RP. Patchy consolidation and ground-glass opacity are frequently observed in both of these diseases.[610] In addition, bilateral RP outside the radiation port is occasionally observed. However, RP in the contra-lateral lung is less marked than that around the tumor[610]. In OP patients, opacity appeared dominantly outside radiation ports a few months after the RP improvement as was the case in our study. At the same time, worsening of RP around the tumor was not observed. Future studies on SABR would prove OP after SABR as a complication separate from RP.

The mechanism of OP after radiation has not been understood well. This study offers some clues and insights. Most OP patients had a history of prior RP around the tumor in this study. This result would indicate that radiation injury plays an important role in the development of OP after SABR. Previous studies reported that radiation can directly induce Fas expression in cells and activate inflammatory cells expressing Fas-ligand (macrophages and T cells)[2931]. Martin et al.[32]. reported that unilateral thoracic irradiation induced elevation of lymphocytes in bilateral lungs. In OP model mice, neonatal thymectomy inhibited the development of OP[33]. Mice with blockage of the Fas/Fas-ligand apoptotic pathway could not develop OP[34]. Thus, OP development may require the T-cell and Fas/Fas-ligand pathways, which can be activated by radiation in OP after SABR.

Interestingly, OP after SABR occurred outside the lung volume receiving less than 0.5 Gy. Although a radiation dose less than 0.5 Gy is generally too low to induce cell death directly, it is sufficient to induce a bystander effect[35, 36]. The bystander effect is defined as a non-targeted phenomenon induced by low dose radiation, and includes mutations, genetic instability, formation of micronuclei and apoptosis[35]. The mechanisms involve inflammatory cells and biochemical and molecular signals, for example, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, nitric oxide and superoxide. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha enhances Fas mediated apoptosis in lung epithelial cells[37]. In this study, no significant relationships between OP and radiation intensity, such as prescribed doses were observed. This result is consistent with previous reports on bystander effects; in most studies, the magnitude had no simple relationship with dose[35, 38]. Saturation of responses may occur due to a limit of how much signal can be produced by the irradiated cells. Therefore, if an interaction between the bystander effect and activated T-cells and Fas/Fas-ligands by direct radiation plays an important role in OP after SABR, a dose response model may not apply to OP after radiation.

This study had some limitations. First, the definition of OP in this study was determined by the clinical course and radiological findings with reference to previous criteria in breast cancer studies. Neither biopsy nor bronchoalveolar lavage could be performed in this study, because the OP patients were too frail or too old to undergo these invasive examinations, or refused them. Generally, characteristics of OP on CT images are well correlated with histological characteristics[1, 3, 39]. OP is characterized by mixture of patchy and ground-glass opacity in subpleural or peribronchial areas on CT. These findings correspond to the histological findings of mild inflammation and polypoid plugs of loose organizing connective tissue with or without endobronchiolar intraluminal polyps. The architecture of the lung is preserved. Although most of the differential diagnoses like other malignancies and pulmonary infectious diseases could be excluded in the appropriate clinical context, it is possible that the true incidence of OP was overestimated[3, 39]. Secondly, we could not completely exclude other causes, especially lung cancer. Malignancy sometimes induces OP[3, 40]. Thus, we started a multi-cohort study to evaluate OP incidences between a surgery group and an SABR group.

In conclusion, this report is the first cohort study to describe the incidence and characteristics of OP after SABR. Prior symptomatic RP was strongly associated with OP. The symptoms were sometimes severe and corticosteroids were effective. Patients after SABR should be carefully followed, especially when RP is symptomatic. When patients after SABR present with unusual pneumonia, this disease should be considered in the differential diagnosis.

Abbreviations

OP: 

Organizing pneumonia

RP: 

Radiation pneumonitis

SABR: 

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of the lung

NSCLC: 

Non-small cell lung cancer

CTV: 

Clinical target volume

ITV: 

Internal target volume

PTV: 

Planning target volume

V20 Gy: 

Lung volume covered with 20 Gy or more

CRP: 

C-reactive protein

KL-6: 

Kerbs von Lungren-6

CT: 

Computed tomography

HR: 

Hazard ratio.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences
(2)
Department of Public Health, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences
(3)
Department of Radiology, Social Insurance Chukyo Hospital
(4)
Department of Radiology, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital

References

  1. American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Consensus Classification of the Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias: This joint statement of the American Thoracic Society (ATS), and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) was adopted by the ATS board of directors, June 2001 and by the ERS Executive Committee, June 2001. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002, 165: 277-304.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Drakopanagiotakis F, Paschalaki K, Abu-Hijleh M, et al.: Cryptogenic and secondary organizing pneumonia: clinical presentation, radiographic findings, treatment response, and prognosis. Chest 2011, 139: 893-900. 10.1378/chest.10-0883View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cordier JF: Cryptogenic organising pneumonia. Eur Respir J 2006, 28: 422-446. 10.1183/09031936.06.00013505View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Crestani B, Valeyre D, Roden S, et al.: Bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia syndrome primed by radiation therapy to the breast. The Groupe d'Etudes et de Recherche sur les Maladies Orphelines Pulmonaires (GERM"O"P). Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998, 158: 1929-1935.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gudavalli R, Diaz-Guzman E, Arrossi AV, et al.: Fleeting alveolar infiltrates and reversed halo sign in patients with breast cancer treated with tangential beam irradiation. Chest 2011, 139: 454-459. 10.1378/chest.10-1573View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kubo A, Osaki K, Kawanaka T, et al.: Risk factors for radiation pneumonitis caused by whole breast irradiation following breast-conserving surgery. J Med Invest 2009, 56: 99-110. 10.2152/jmi.56.99View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Takigawa N, Segawa Y, Saeki T, et al.: Bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia syndrome in breast-conserving therapy for early breast cancer: radiation-induced lung toxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000, 48: 751-755. 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00654-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ogo E, Komaki R, Abe T, et al.: The clinical characteristics and non-steroidal treatment for radiation-induced bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia syndrome after breast-conserving therapy. Radiother Oncol 2010, 97: 95-100. 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.02.032View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ogo E, Komaki R, Fujimoto K, et al.: A survey of radiation-induced bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia syndrome after breast-conserving therapy in Japan. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008, 71: 123-131. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.09.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Katayama N, Sato S, Katsui K, et al.: Analysis of factors associated with radiation-induced bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia syndrome after breast-conserving therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009, 73: 1049-1054. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.05.050View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Scott WJ, Howington J, Feigenberg S, et al.: Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer stage I and stage II: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest 2007, 132: 234S-242S. 10.1378/chest.07-1378View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Takeda A, Kunieda E, Ohashi T, et al.: Severe COPD is correlated with mild radiation pneumonitis following stereotactic body radiotherapy. Chest 2012, 141: 858-866. 10.1378/chest.11-1193View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Shibamoto Y, Hashizume C, Baba F, et al.: Stereotactic body radiotherapy using a radiobiology-based regimen for stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer: A multicenter study. Cancer 2012, 118: 2078-2084. 10.1002/cncr.26470View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Baba F, Shibamoto Y, Ogino H, et al.: Clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer using different doses depending on tumor size. Radiat Oncol 2010, 5: 81. 10.1186/1748-717X-5-81PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Nagata Y, Wulf J, Lax I, et al.: Stereotactic radiotherapy of primary lung cancer and other targets: results of consultant meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011, 79: 660-669. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.004View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Pan H, Simpson DR, Mell LK, et al.: A survey of stereotactic body radiotherapy use in the United States. Cancer 2011, 117: 4566-4572. 10.1002/cncr.26067PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Baba F, Shibamoto Y, Tomita N, et al.: Stereotactic body radiotherapy for stage I lung cancer and small lung metastasis: evaluation of an immobilization system for suppression of respiratory tumor movement and preliminary results. Radiat Oncol 2009, 4: 15. 10.1186/1748-717X-4-15PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Iwata H, Shibamoto Y, Baba F, et al.: Correlation between the serum KL-6 level and the grade of radiation pneumonitis after stereotactic body radiotherapy for stage I lung cancer or small lung metastasis. Radiother Oncol 2011, 101: 267-270. 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.05.031View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Murai T, Shibamoto Y, Baba F, et al.: Progression of non-small-cell lung cancer during the interval before stereotactic body radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012, 82: 463-467. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Scrucca L, Santucci A, Aversa F: Regression modeling of competing risk using R: an in depth guide for clinicians. Bone Marrow Transplant 2010, 45: 1388-1395. 10.1038/bmt.2009.359View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Scrucca L, Santucci A, Aversa F: Competing risk analysis using R: an easy guide for clinicians. Bone Marrow Transplant 2007, 40: 381-387. 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705727View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gray RJ: A class of K-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Statist 1988, 16: 1141-1154. 10.1214/aos/1176350951View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Fine JP, Gray RJ: A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Amer Statist Assoc 1994, 94: 496-509.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Putter H, Fiocco M, Geskus RB: Tutorial in biostatistics: competing risks and multi-state models. Stat Med 2007, 26: 2389-2430. 10.1002/sim.2712View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. De Wreede LC, Fiocco M, Putter H: The mstate package for estimation and prediction in non- and semi-parametric multi-state and competing risks models. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2010, 99: 261-274. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.01.001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. R Development Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R. Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; 2011.Google Scholar
  27. Stover DE, Milite F, Zakowski M: A newly recognized syndrome–radiation-related bronchiolitis obliterans and organizing pneumonia. A case report and literature review. Respiration 2001, 68: 540-544. 10.1159/000050566View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Cornelissen R, Senan S, Antonisse IE, et al.: Bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia (BOOP) after thoracic radiotherapy for breast carcinoma. Radiat Oncol 2007, 2: 2. 10.1186/1748-717X-2-2PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Chakraborty M, Abrams SI, Camphausen K, et al.: Irradiation of tumor cells up-regulates Fas and enhances CTL lytic activity and CTL adoptive immunotherapy. J Immunol 2003, 170: 6338-6347.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Chakraborty M, Wansley EK, Carrasquillo JA, et al.: The use of chelated radionuclide (samarium-153-ethylenediaminetetramethylenephosphonate) to modulate phenotype of tumor cells and enhance T cell-mediated killing. Clin Cancer Res 2008, 14: 4241-4249. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0335PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Garnett CT, Palena C, Chakraborty M, et al.: Sublethal irradiation of human tumor cells modulates phenotype resulting in enhanced killing by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Cancer Res 2004, 64: 7985-7994. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1525View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Martin C, Romero S, Sanchez-Paya J, et al.: Bilateral lymphocytic alveolitis: a common reaction after unilateral thoracic irradiation. Eur Respir J 1999, 13: 727-732. 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.13d05.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Majeski EI, Harley RA, Bellum SC, et al.: Differential role for T cells in the development of fibrotic lesions associated with reovirus 1/L-induced bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia versus Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2003, 28: 208-217. 10.1165/rcmb.4891View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lopez AD, Avasarala S, Grewal S, et al.: Differential role of the Fas/Fas ligand apoptotic pathway in inflammation and lung fibrosis associated with reovirus 1/L-induced bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Immunol 2009, 183: 8244-8257. 10.4049/jimmunol.0901958PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Blyth BJ, Sykes PJ: Radiation-induced bystander effects: what are they, and how relevant are they to human radiation exposures? Radiat Res 2011, 176: 139-157. 10.1667/RR2548.1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Matsumoto H, Tomita M, Otsuka K, et al.: A new paradigm in radioadaptive response developing from microbeam research. J Radiat Res (Tokyo) 2009,50(Suppl A):A67-A79.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Frankel SK, Cosgrove GP, Cha SI, et al.: TNF-alpha sensitizes normal and fibrotic human lung fibroblasts to Fas-induced apoptosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2006, 34: 293-304.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Prise KM, O'Sullivan JM: Radiation-induced bystander signalling in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2009, 9: 351-360. 10.1038/nrc2603PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Wittram C, Mark EJ, McLoud TC: CT-histologic correlation of the ATS/ERS 2002 classification of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. Radiographics 2003, 23: 1057-1071. 10.1148/rg.235035702View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Mokhtari M, Bach PB, Tietjen PA, et al.: Bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia in cancer: a case series. Respir Med 2002, 96: 280-286. 10.1053/rmed.2001.1269View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Murai et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement