Skip to main content
Download PDF

Correlation between hematological parameters and PET/CT metabolic parameters in patients with head and neck cancer

Radiation Oncology volume 17, Article number: 141 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Systemic inflammation is predictive of the overall survival in cancer patients and is related to the density of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment of cancer, which in turn correlates with 18F -fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) metabolic parameters (MPs). The density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in the microenvironment has the potential to be a biomarker that can be used clinically to optimize patient selection in oropharyngeal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). There is little to no data regarding the association of systemic inflammation with PET/CT-MPs, especially in HNSCC. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between markers of host inflammation, namely blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), with the PET/CT-MPs standardized uptake value (SUV), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of the primary tumor, derived from FDG-PET/CT in patients with nonmetastatic (cM0) HNSCC before treatment. We hypothesized that NLR and PLR at baseline are positively correlated with PET/CT-MPs.

Methods

A retrospective review of consecutive patients with HNSCC with a pretreatment PET/CT was performed. NLR and PLR were computed using complete blood counts measured within 10 days before the start of any treatment. The correlation between NLR and PLR with PET/CT-MPs was evaluated with Spearman's rho test.

Results

Seventy-one patients were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) at 1, 2, and 3 years was 86%, 76%, and 68%. PLR was found to be correlated with MTV (rho = 0.26, P = .03) and TLG (rho = 0.28, P = .02) but not with maximum SUV or mean SUV. There was no correlation between NLR and the analyzed PET/CT-MPs. TLG was associated with worse survival in uni- and multivariable analysis, but no other PET/CT-MPs were associated with either OS or disease-specific survival (DSS). NLR and PLR were associated with OS and DSS on uni- and multivariable analysis.

Conclusions

In patients with HNSCC before any treatment such as definitive radio (chemo)therapy or oncologic surgery followed by adjuvant RT, baseline PLR correlated with MTV and TLG but not with SUV. NLR was not correlated with any PET/CT-MPs analyzed in our study. Confirmatory studies are needed, and a potential interaction between tumor microenvironment, host inflammation, and FDG-PET/CT measures warrants further investigation.

Introduction

Radiotherapy (RT) is the standard of care for most patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated definitively or adjuvantly. Besides the effects of RT through direct or indirect deoxyribonucleic acid damage, RT can also induce antitumor immune responses that contribute to indirect tumor cell killing [1, 2]. Several studies have demonstrated that tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are present in the tumor microenvironment in various malignant tumors [3,4,5]. In oropharyngeal carcinoma, TILs can identify stage I human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated patients likely to be poor candidates for treatment de-escalation [6]. In non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), studies have shown that the tumor microenvironment correlates with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) metabolic parameters (MPs) [7]. The therapeutic potential of radioimmunotherapy in HNSCCs is as vast as the tumor microenvironment of HNSCCs is complex [8]. This field awaits results from ongoing clinical trials providing immunological and genomic analyses from radioimmunotherapy trials, hopefully revealing information on tumor behavior and therapeutic options [8]. The expression of programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) by tumor cells and TILs have been proposed as promising prognostic biomarkers for response to immunotherapy in HNSCCs [9, 10]. In NSCLCs, Wang et al. showed an association between FDG-PET/CT-MPs and immune cell expression in the tumor microenvironment [7]. This association suggests that PET/CT-MPs could be potential predictors for selecting immunotherapy candidates for treatment with anti-programmed cell death-1/PD-L1 antibodies [7, 11]. Systemic inflammation is also correlated with cancer prognosis. Many lines of evidence indicate that markers of systemic inflammation are independent prognostic factors for survival in many malignancies [5, 12,13,14,15,16,17]. The neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is one such commonly used marker that has been reported as a prognostic factor [16,17,18]. Since the correlation between systemic inflammation and tumor microenvironment has been described [7] and owing to the scarcity of retrospective data as well as relevant literature concerning interactions between the tumor microenvironment and MPs derived from FDG-PET/CT in HNSCC, we aimed to evaluate correlations between readily available markers of host inflammation with PET/CT-MPs in patients with nonmetastatic HNSCC before definitive treatment such as surgery followed by adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy or definitive radio(chemo)therapy alone. As described in other tumor entities, e.g., breast [19] and lung cancer [7], we hypothesized that NLR and platelet-to-lymphocyte-ratio (PLR) at baseline are positively correlated with PET/CT-MPs such as standardized uptake value (SUV), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of the primary tumor.

Methods

Patients and complete blood count

We identified consecutive patients with HNSCC in our institutional database treated with primary or adjuvant intensity-modulated RT with or without concomitant systemic treatment between January 2007 and December 2010 at the Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University. Treatment for these patients was with curative intent in all cases. Exclusion criteria were history of another malignancy within 5 years of diagnosis, prior radiation to the head and neck, non-squamous cell carcinoma histology, distant metastases, lack of differentiated complete blood count within 10 days before oncologic surgery or starting RT, and lack of PET/CT before beginning of any treatment. Pretreatment complete blood counts with differential values were used to calculate NLR and PLR. NLR was calculated by dividing absolute neutrophil count by absolute lymphocyte count; PLR was calculated by dividing absolute thrombocyte count by absolute lymphocyte count. Patients with leukocytosis caused by other reasons (e.g., infection, steroid use, etc.) were excluded from the analysis. This study was approved by the local ethics committee (289/2014) and was conducted in full accordance with ethical principles, including the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (version 2002) and local legislation.

PET/CT acquisition

All patients fasted for at least 6 h before intravenous administration of FDG. All examinations were performed on one of two cross-calibrated BIOGRAPH-mCT PET/CT scanners (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Image acquisition started 60 min after tracer injection, and patients were studied as follows. First, a non-contrast-enhanced CT scan was performed from the skull base to mid-thigh with arms elevated using the following parameters: slice thickness of 5 mm; increment of 3.0 mm; soft tissue reconstruction kernel; maximum of 100 keV and 90 mAs by applying CARE kV and CARE Dose. Immediately after the CT scan, a whole-body PET (pelvis to vertex) was acquired in three dimensions (3D; matrix 200 × 200) with a zoom factor of 1. For each bed position (16.2 cm, overlapping scale 4.2 cm), a 2-min acquisition time with a 15.5 cm field of view was used. The emission data were corrected for randoms, scatter, and decay. Reconstruction was conducted with an ordered subset expectation maximization algorithm with four iterations/21 subsets and Gauss filtered to a transaxial resolution of 5 mm at full width at half maximum. Attenuation correction was performed using the low-dose non-enhanced CT data. After the whole-body PET/CT imaging, a dedicated head and neck acquisition was performed from the cranial vertex to the thoracic inlet in an arm-down position for use in the SUV and MTV calculations. PET images were obtained in two table positions (10 min per table position). The PET data were reconstructed iteratively (four iterations/21 subsets) and an image matrix of 512 × 512 pixels was used. The head and neck CT scan parameters were: 120 kV, 80 mA, helical thickness of 3 mm, and field of view of 78 cm.

PET/CT analysis

FDG-PET/CT data were analyzed using an appropriate workstation and software (SyngoVia; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). PET/CT images were visually interpreted for increased FDG uptake by the first author (BB) and a board-certified nuclear medicine physician with more than 15 years (JW) of clinical experience in oncological PET/CT. Compared to the FDG uptake of background and liver, the primary tumor with focally increased FDG uptake was considered positive for carcinoma. Semiquantitative analysis was based on manually placed regions of interest around the primary tumor with increased FDG uptake to calculate the MTV. The mean and maximum SUV values (SUVmean and SUVmax, respectively) of the lesions were calculated according to the formula:

SUV = tissue concentration (Bq/mL)/(injected dose (Bq)/body weight (kg)).

The region of interest was delineated on the primary tumor site. SUVmax, SUVmean, and MTV were measured from 3D isocontour at 40% of maximal pixel value [20]. TLG was calculated by multiplying SUVmean by MTV for the lesion [21].

Treatment and follow-up

As previously published, the standard treatment was based on institutional policies following the multidisciplinary tumor board decision [22, 23]. The standard treatment for oral cavity cancer was to perform surgery followed by adjuvant RT [22, 24, 25]. In oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, and laryngeal cancers, the joint recommendation of the multidisciplinary meeting was primary RT [26]. The standard concomitant therapy consisted of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 in 3-week intervals for all patients. Patients not deemed medically fit for cisplatin chemotherapy because of pre-existing comorbidities were evaluated for weekly treatment with the monoclonal antibody cetuximab [27] or carboplatin every 3 weeks. In a few cases of induction chemotherapy, the triplet of cisplatin, docetaxel, and 5-fluorouracil was used. Patients were regularly followed, and toxicities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.03) [28].

Statistical analysis

NLR was calculated by dividing absolute neutrophil count by absolute lymphocyte count measured in peripheral blood. PLR was calculated by dividing absolute thrombocyte count by absolute lymphocyte count. Thresholds were set as described by De Felice et al. [29]. Frequencies and percentages were reported for categorical variables; continuous variables were reported as medians with range or interquartile range. The endpoints of the study were the correlation between NLR and PLR with PET/CT-MPs, overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS). The correlation between NLR and PLR with PET/CT-MPs (i.e., SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV log, TLG log) was examined using Spearman's rho test. Time to event was calculated for OS and DSS from the start of RT to death, with censoring patients without such events at the last follow-up. The median time to event was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The prognostic value of NLR and PLR and other variables (i.e., age, sex, tumor localization, SUVmax, MTV, TLG) was assessed by univariable Cox regression-analysis. Subsequently, a multivariable analysis with backward elimination was performed, including all variables with a P-value < 0.05 in the univariable analysis. Analyses were carried out using JMP® version 14.3.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The threshold for statistical significance was set at P < 0.05, and no correction for multiple testing was performed.

Results

A total of 189 patients were identified, of whom 118 patients (62%) were excluded. Of these, 105 were excluded because no pretreatment PET/CT was available. In 12 patients, the PET/CT scan was obtained after surgery. The remaining patient received induction chemotherapy before his PET/CT scan. Thus, a total of 71 patients with a pathologically proven diagnosis of oral cavity, oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, or laryngeal cancer were eligible and included for analysis. Eight patients underwent postoperative treatment, 6 of them being OCC patients having the standard of care treatment with primary surgery and adjuvant RT. The other 2 patients received a postoperative RT after an oncologic tonsillectomy could be performed. In 4 patients, due to the locally advanced stage and the inoperability of the primary tumor, it was not possible to distinguish between an oropharyngeal and an hypopharyngeal origin. Therefore we defined these primary tumors as multicompartmental. The median follow-up was 41 months (range 6–71 months). Patient and disease characteristics are presented in Table 1. The majority of patients were male (86%) and had good performance status (Karnofsky performance status > 70). Median NLR and PLR were 3.5 (IQR 2.1–4.7) and 195 (IQR 133–249), respectively.

Table 1 Patient and disease characteristics
Full size table

Correlation between NLR and PLR with MPs

Median MTV, SUVmax, and TLG were 6.5 (IQR 3.7–11.2), 15.7 (IQR 10.2–18.6), and 54 (IQR 31.6–108.7), respectively (Table 1). NLR did not correlate with any of the PET/CT-MPs, while there was a statistically significant correlation between PLR and MTV (rho 0.26, P = 0.03) (Fig. 1), and between PLR and TLG (rho 0.28, P = 0.02) (Fig. 2) but not with SUVmax or SUVmean (Table 2). We repeated the analysis, excluding oral cavity carcinomas. The results examining the correlation of NLR and SUVmax remained unchanged (Additional file 1: Figure S1). For a solid calculation of the correlation of NLR and SUVmax for oral cavity carcinomas alone, the sample size (N = 6) is not large enough (Additional file 1: Figure S2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Scatter diagram for correlation between PET and hematological parameters. MTV = metabolic tumor volume; PLR = platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Scatter diagram for correlation between PET and hematological parameters. TLG = total lesion glycolysis; PLR = platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio

Full size image
Table 2 Correlation between PET and hematological parameters
Full size table

Predictors of DSS and OS

At 1, 2, and 3 years, the OS was 86%, 76%, and 68% (Fig. 3). The DSS at 1, 2, and 3 years was 90%, 81%, and 77%, respectively (Fig. 4). On univariable analysis, TLG > 32 was associated with worse survival (P = 0.003). No other PET/CT-MPs were associated with either OS or with DSS. In contrast, NLR and PLR were associated with OS and DSS (Table 3). NLR, PLR, and TLG remained statistically associated with OS on multivariable analysis (Table 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Kaplan–Meier plot for overall survival at 3 years

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Kaplan–Meier plot for disease-specific survival at 3 years

Full size image
Table 3 Univariable and multivariable analysis
Full size table

Discussion

In this retrospective analysis of 71 patients with HNSCC with a relatively long follow-up of 41 months treated with definitive or adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy after oncologic surgery, we found a statistically significant correlation between pretreatment PET/CT-MPs and hematological parameters (HPs; i.e., NLR and PLR). To our knowledge, the present study results are the first to show in patients with HNSCC that MTV and TLG correlate with pretreatment systemic inflammatory parameters, i.e., PLR. These findings align with the few other studies analyzing relationships between PET/CT-MPs and HPs in different tumor entities (Table 4). A positive correlation between HPs and PET/CT-MPs has previously been demonstrated in carcinomas of the rectum [21], esophagus [20], cervix [30], breast [19], and lung [7, 31]. In colorectal cancers, NLR was correlated with SUV, MTV, and TLG [21], except in the recurrent setting [32]. In esophageal carcinomas, NLR correlated with MTV but not with SUV [20]. In cervical carcinomas, a correlation was described between NLR and MTV with PLR and TLG [30]. In lymph node-positive breast carcinomas, a correlation between NLR and SUV and TLG of regional metastases in the axilla was shown [19]. Similarly, correlations between NLR, PLR, SUV, and MTV could also be demonstrated in small cell [31] and non-small cell [7] lung carcinomas.

Table 4 Selection of studies reporting on PET/CT-MPs and HP
Full size table

Overall, the limited number of studies published on this topic have mainly described a correlation between NLR and SUV and MTV, and less frequently between PLR and SUV. Interestingly, we found no correlation between NLR and SUV in our analyses. In contrast, the analysis of PLR with MTV and TLG shows a significant positive correlation, albeit not strong. The same results are provided by Sürücü et al., showing no correlation between NLR and SUV [20] in esophageal cancer. The investigators of this work attribute this to the relatively small cohort (n = 52) they analyzed. How the interaction of the tumor microenvironment and FDG-PET/CT could influence treatment decisions has also been evaluated. In NSCLCs, Wang et al. described a correlation between PD-L1-expression and PET/CT-MPs. This correlation between SUVmax and immune cell expression in the tumor microenvironment of NSCLC suggests that SUVmax on FDG-PET/CT could be predicting for immunotherapy receiving patient selection [7]. Several studies have demonstrated that TILs are present in the tumor microenvironment in various malignant tumors [3,4,5]. In oropharyngeal carcinoma, TILs can identify stage I HPV-associated patients likely to be poor candidates for treatment de-escalation [6]. An interplay between systemic inflammatory parameters and tumor microenvironment has also been shown. In gastric cancer, systemic inflammation is associated with the density of CD4 + lymphocytes in the tumor microenvironment [33]. We investigated whether systemic inflammatory parameters correlate with PET/CT MPs to potentially provide indirect information about the tumor microenvironment with easily accessible blood tests in combination with PET/CT-MPs. Hitherto, such analyses have not been performed in HNSCC using FDG-PET/CT. We propose that such findings would be particularly prescient in oligometastatic disease. For example, it might be possible to identify lesions that respond less to immunotherapy. FDG-PET/CT, in combination with NLR and PLR, might identify candidate lesions amenable to stereotactic radiation. We note that histopathological analysis is not always available for several patients, either for local lesions, which are not easily biopsied due to their anatomical location, or for distant metastases.

Furthermore, primary tumor and nodal metastases show poor to fair agreement when comparing biopsy material and resection tissue [34]. Predictive biomarkers, such as the composite positive score developed by Roach et al. in 2017 [35], have the potential to surmount some of these challenges and have shown promise in NSCLC [34, 36, 37]. The idea of using HPs in combination with PET/CT-MPs in patients with oligometastatic disease as a clinically useful prognostic tool for therapy response of a metastasis that is difficult to access through biopsy holds potential, not only in NSCLC but also in HNSCC.

More is known about the relationship between systemic inflammatory parameters and outcomes. In multiple studies, retrospective analyses and meta-analyses have shown that baseline circulatory NLR is a strong predictor of survival outcomes after radio(chemo)therapy for patients with HNSCC [38,39,40,41,42]. Cancer is a systemic disease whose course and prognosis is influenced by inflammatory reactions in the micromillieu, as a hallmark of cancer by tumor invasion and metastasis [12]. Two decades ago, Balkwill et al. reported that inflammatory cells and cytokines in the tumor could contribute to tumor growth, progression, and immunosuppression [43]. Since then, several HPs, such as platelets, neutrophils, lymphocytes, NLR, PLR, and MPV, have been studied in various malignant tumors for their effects on tumor pathology [44,45,46,47,48]. In patients with HNSCC, numerous analyses have been performed concerning PET/CT-MPs regarding tumor control and prognosis, reporting MTV defined from pretreatment FDG-PET scans as the strongest predictor of patient outcome after radio(chemo)therapy [49]. The effect of pretreatment SUVmax and SUVmean on patient outcome seems to be a less important factor compared with MTV [49].

There is no clear answer on the relationship between systemic inflammatory parameters and outcome. A possible explanation is that distant (micro)metastases are already manifest at initial diagnosis, which cannot yet be detected by any imaging modality [50]. For clinical routine, it might be interesting to compute a score comprising PET/CT-MPs and HPs for the prediction of already existing but subclinical distant metastases, in order to adapt individual therapy concepts.

In addition to its retrospective design, this hypothesis-generating study has a number of limitations. Using our small cohort, we did not observe a correlation between NLR and PET/CT-MP. Studies with larger or pre-defined cohort sizes are required to further test these potential relationships, because of a substantial type II error risk due to our under-powered sample size. At the time patients in this study were examined, HPV status was not routinely acquired, and we are unable to assess the influence of HPV status on the parameters measured in this study. Furthermore, the effect of some PET/CT-MPs, in particular MTV, could be influenced by the tumor lesion's size, similar to the influence of tumor volume on the TNM stage [51, 52]. For example, the relationship with PLR could be a result of the platelets' contribution to tumor growth [53]. Moreover, we have only recorded PET/CT-MPs for the primary lesions, and other FDG-avid metastatic lesions should be considered by future studies, ideally of prospective design. Finally, although our historical patient collective (2007–2010) afforded a follow-up for clinical outcomes, the scanner type used does not represent the state of the art, where digital and long axial field-of-view PET/CT systems can show improved lesion quantification [54].

Conclusions

In patients with HNSCC treated with definitive radio(chemo)therapy or oncologic surgery followed by adjuvant RT, baseline PLR is correlated with MTV and TLG but not with SUV. NLR did not correlate with any PET/CT-MPs analyzed in our study. Confirmatory studies and further investigation concerning immunohistochemistry in HNSCC are needed, and a potential interaction between tumor microenvironment, host inflammation, and FDG-PET/CT measures warrants more detailed research, maybe yielding information on tumor behavior and decision-making in radioimmunotherapeutic or treatment deescalating options.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

N:

Patient number

PET/CT:

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography

MP:

Metabolic parameter

HP:

Hematological parameter

NLR:

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio

PLR:

Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio

SUVmax:

Standardized uptake value

MTV:

Metabolic tumor volume

TLG:

Tumor lesion glycolysis

LMR:

Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio

MLR:

Monocyte-lymphocyte ratio

ICH:

Immunohistochemistry

ALN:

Axillary lymph node

PFS:

Progression-free survival

OS:

Overall survival

RFS:

Recurrence-free survival

SCC-ag:

Squamous cell carcinoma antigen

mGPS:

Modified glasgow prognostic score

EGFR:

Epidermal growth factor receptor

TAMs:

Tumor-associated macrophages

MPV:

Mean platelet volume

Na:

Not applicable

UICC:

Union for International Cancer Control

RT:

Radiotherapy

HNSCC:

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

TILs:

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes

NSCLC:

Non-small-cell lung carcinoma

FDG 18:

F fluorodeoxyglucose

PET/CT:

Positron-emission tomography/computed tomography

MPs:

Metabolic parameters

PD-L1:

Programmed cell death ligand-1

References

  1. Weichselbaum RR, Liang H, Deng L, Fu YX. Radiotherapy and immunotherapy: a beneficial liaison? Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14(6):365–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vanpouille-Box C, Diamond JM, Pilones KA, Zavadil J, Babb JS, Formenti SC, et al. TGFbeta is a master regulator of radiation therapy-induced antitumor immunity. Cancer Res. 2015;75(11):2232–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bremnes RM, Al-Shibli K, Donnem T, Sirera R, Al-Saad S, Andersen S, et al. The role of tumor-infiltrating immune cells and chronic inflammation at the tumor site on cancer development, progression, and prognosis: emphasis on non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6(4):824–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cai T, Nesi G, Boddi V, Mazzoli S, Dal Canto M, Bartoletti R. Prognostic role of the tumor-associated tissue inflammatory reaction in transitional bladder cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2006;16(2):329–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Garcia-Martinez E, Gil GL, Benito AC, Gonzalez-Billalabeitia E, Conesa MA, Garcia Garcia T, et al. Tumor-infiltrating immune cell profiles and their change after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predict response and prognosis of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16(6):488.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Corredor G, Toro P, Koyuncu C, Lu C, Buzzy C, Bera K, et al. An Imaging biomarker of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes to risk-stratify patients with HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022;114(4):609–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang Y, Zhao N, Wu Z, Pan N, Shen X, Liu T, et al. New insight on the correlation of metabolic status on (18)F-FDG PET/CT with immune marker expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47(5):1127–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Karam SD, Raben D. Radioimmunotherapy for the treatment of head and neck cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(8):e404–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fukushima Y, Someya M, Nakata K, Hori M, Kitagawa M, Hasegawa T, et al. Influence of PD-L1 expression in immune cells on the response to radiation therapy in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Radiother Oncol. 2018;129(2):409–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schoenfeld JD, Gjini E, Rodig SJ, Tishler RB, Rawal B, Catalano PJ, et al. Evaluating the PD-1 axis and immune effector cell infiltration in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;102(1):137–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee NY, Ferris RL, Psyrri A, Haddad RI, Tahara M, Bourhis J, et al. Avelumab plus standard-of-care chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(4):450–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Anraku M, Cunningham KS, Yun Z, Tsao MS, Zhang L, Keshavjee S, et al. Impact of tumor-infiltrating T cells on survival in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135(4):823–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gajewski TF, Schreiber H, Fu YX. Innate and adaptive immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Nat Immunol. 2013;14(10):1014–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Chang WJ, Du Y, Zhao X, Ma LY, Cao GW. Inflammation-related factors predicting prognosis of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(16):4586–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Proctor MJ, Morrison DS, Talwar D, Balmer SM, Fletcher CD, O’Reilly DS, et al. A comparison of inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients with cancer. A glasgow inflammation outcome study. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(17):2633–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fox P, Hudson M, Brown C, Lord S, Gebski V, De Souza P, et al. Markers of systemic inflammation predict survival in patients with advanced renal cell cancer. Br J Cancer. 2013;109(1):147–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim JH, Han DS, Bang HY, Kim PS, Lee KY. Preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with gastric cancer. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2015;89(2):81–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Can C, Komek H. Metabolic and volume-based parameters of (18F)FDG PET/CT for primary mass and axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma: a retrospective analysis in relation to molecular subtype, axillary lymph node metastasis and immunohistochemistry and inflammatory markers. Nucl Med Commun. 2019;40(10):1051–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Surucu E, Demir Y, Sengoz T. The correlation between the metabolic tumor volume and hematological parameters in patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Nucl Med. 2015;29(10):906–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu J, Li Y, Hu S, Lu L, Gao Z, Yuan H. The significant value of predicting prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer using (18)F-FDG PET metabolic parameters of primary tumors and hematological parameters. Ann Nucl Med. 2019;33(1):32–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Geretschlager A, Bojaxhiu B, Crowe S, Arnold A, Manser P, Hallermann W, et al. Outcome and patterns of failure after postoperative intensity modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced or high-risk oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Radiat Oncol. 2012;7:175.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Geretschlager A, Bojaxhiu B, Dal Pra A, Leiser D, Schmucking M, Arnold A, et al. Definitive intensity modulated radiotherapy in locally advanced hypopharygeal and laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: mature treatment results and patterns of locoregional failure. Radiat Oncol. 2015;10:20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. De Felice F, Musio D, Terenzi V, Valentini V, Cassoni A, Tombolini M, et al. Treatment improvement and better patient care: which is the most important one in oral cavity cancer? Radiat Oncol. 2014;9:263.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Blanchard P, Belkhir F, Temam S, El Khoury C, De Felice F, Casiraghi O, et al. Outcomes and prognostic factors for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue in young adults: a single-institution case-matched analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274(3):1683–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tehrany N, Kitz J, Rave-Frank M, Lorenzen S, Li L, Kuffer S, et al. High-grade acute organ toxicity and p16(INK4A) expression as positive prognostic factors in primary radio(chemo)therapy for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Strahlenther Onkol. 2015;191(7):566–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J, Azarnia N, Shin DM, Cohen RB, et al. Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(6):567–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) CTCAE_4.03_2010–06–14_QuickReference_5x7.pdf [Available from: https://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03/CTCAE_4.03_2010-06-14_QuickReference_8.5x11.pdf.

  29. De Felice F, Tombolini M, Abate G, Salerno F, Bulzonetti N, Tombolini V, et al. Prognostic significance of the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in patients with non-human papilloma virus-related oropharyngeal cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Oncology. 2019;96(1):8–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Du S, Sun H, Gao S, Xin J, Lu Z. Metabolic parameters with different thresholds for evaluating tumor recurrence and their correlations with hematological parameters in locally advanced squamous cell cervical carcinoma: an observational (18)F-FDG PET/CT study. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2019;9(3):440–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Mirili C, Guney IB, Paydas S, Seydaoglu G, Kapukaya TK, Ogul A, et al. Prognostic significance of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and correlation with PET-CT metabolic parameters in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Int J Clin Oncol. 2019;24(2):168–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. McSorley ST, Khor BY, Tsang K, Colville D, Han S, Horgan PG, et al. The relationship between (18) F-FDG-PETCT-derived markers of tumour metabolism and systemic inflammation in patients with recurrent disease following surgery for colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2018;20(5):407–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Choi Y, Kim JW, Nam KH, Han SH, Kim JW, Ahn SH, et al. Systemic inflammation is associated with the density of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment of gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2017;20(4):602–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. De Meulenaere A, Vermassen T, Creytens D, Aspeslagh S, Deron P, Duprez F, et al. Importance of choice of materials and methods in PD-L1 and TIL assessment in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Histopathology. 2018;73(3):500–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Roach C, Zhang N, Corigliano E, Jansson M, Toland G, Ponto G, et al. Development of a companion diagnostic PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assay for pembrolizumab therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2016;24(6):392–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Seiwert TY, Burtness B, Mehra R, Weiss J, Berger R, Eder JP, et al. Safety and clinical activity of pembrolizumab for treatment of recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-012): an open-label, multicentre, phase 1b trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(7):956–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chow LQM, Haddad R, Gupta S, Mahipal A, Mehra R, Tahara M, et al. Antitumor activity of Pembrolizumab in biomarker-unselected patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: results from the phase Ib KEYNOTE-012 expansion cohort. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(32):3838–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Bojaxhiu B, Templeton AJ, Elicin O, Shelan M, Zaugg K, Walser M, et al. Relation of baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio to survival and toxicity in head and neck cancer patients treated with (chemo-) radiation. Radiat Oncol. 2018;13(1):216.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Yilmaz B, Sengul E, Gul A, Alabalik U, Ozkurt FE, Akdag M, et al. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor in laryngeal carcinoma. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;70(2):175–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yu Y, Wang H, Yan A, Wang H, Li X, Liu J, et al. Pretreatment neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in determining the prognosis of head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):383.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang Y, Wang P, Andrukhov O, Wang T, Song S, Yan C, et al. Meta-analysis of the prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med. 2018;47(4):353–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Du J, Liu J, Zhang X, Chen X, Yu R, Gu D, et al. Pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts survival in patients with laryngeal cancer. Oncol Lett. 2018;15(2):1664–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Balkwill F, Mantovani A. Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow? Lancet. 2001;357(9255):539–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Templeton AJ, McNamara MG, Šeruga B, Vera-Badillo FE, Aneja P, Ocaña A, et al. Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Mei Z, Shi L, Wang B, Yang J, Xiao Z, Du P, et al. Prognostic role of pretreatment blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in advanced cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 66 cohort studies. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017;58:1–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Bowen RC, Little NAB, Harmer JR, Ma J, Mirabelli LG, Roller KD, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as prognostic indicator in gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(19):32171–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Ethier JL, Desautels DN, Templeton AJ, Oza A, Amir E, Lheureux S. Is the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio prognostic of survival outcomes in gynecologic cancers? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;145(3):584–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ethier JL, Desautels D, Templeton A, Shah PS, Amir E. Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res. 2017;19(1):2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Bonomo P, Merlotti A, Olmetto E, Bianchi A, Desideri I, Bacigalupo A, et al. What is the prognostic impact of FDG PET in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(12):2122–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Abu-Shawer O, Abu-Shawer M, Hirmas N, Alhouri A, Massad A, Alsibai B, et al. Hematologic markers of distant metastases and poor prognosis in gynecological cancers. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):141.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. O’Sullivan B, Huang SH, Su J, Garden AS, Sturgis EM, Dahlstrom K, et al. Development and validation of a staging system for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer by the international collaboration on oropharyngeal cancer network for staging (ICON-S): a multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(4):440–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Lydiatt WM, Patel SG, O’Sullivan B, Brandwein MS, Ridge JA, Migliacci JC, et al. Head and neck cancers-major changes in the American joint committee on cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual: head and neck cancers-major 8th edition changes. CA: A Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(2):122–37. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Yan M, Jurasz P. The role of platelets in the tumor microenvironment: from solid tumors to leukemia. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1863(3):392–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Efthimiou N. New challenges for PET image reconstruction for total-body imaging. PET Clin. 2020;15(4):453–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Dr. Christos Sachpekidis for his assistance in data gathering in this project.

Funding

No funding was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3010, Bern, Switzerland

    Beat Bojaxhiu, Olgun Elicin, Mohamed Shelan, Daniel M. Aebersold & Kathrin Zaugg

  2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Stadtspital Triemli, Zurich, Switzerland

    Beat Bojaxhiu, Dubravko Sinovcic & Kathrin Zaugg

  3. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    Jan Wartenberg, Ian Alberts & Axel Rominger

  4. Department of Medical Oncology, St. Claraspital Basel and Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

    Arnoud J. Templeton

Authors
  1. Beat Bojaxhiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dubravko Sinovcic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Olgun Elicin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Arnoud J. Templeton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mohamed Shelan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jan Wartenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ian Alberts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Axel Rominger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Daniel M. Aebersold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Kathrin Zaugg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Each author had participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content. KZ, OE, and BB designed the study. BB and OE performed the statistical analysis. BB collected the data and interpreted the results with DS, OE, AT, MS, JW, IA, AR, DMA, and KZ. BB, DS, and KZ wrote the manuscript, and all other authors reviewed and finally approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beat Bojaxhiu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All patients provided written consent for the use of their medical data for research purposes. Approval of the regional ethics committee (Kantonale Ethikkommission Bern-289/2014) was obtained.

Consent for publication

All patients provided written consent for the publication of research performed with their medical data.

Competing interests

No potential conflicts of interests are to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1. Fig. S1

Scatter diagram for correlation between PET and hematological parameters excluding oral cavity cancers from the analysis. Abbreviations: SUVmax = maximum standardized uptake value; NLR = neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio.

Additional file 2. Fig. S2

Scatter diagram for correlation between PET and hematological parameters in oral cavity cancers only. Abbreviations: SUVmax = maximum standardized uptake value; NLR = neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bojaxhiu, B., Sinovcic, D., Elicin, O. et al. Correlation between hematological parameters and PET/CT metabolic parameters in patients with head and neck cancer. Radiat Oncol 17, 141 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02112-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02112-4

Keywords

Radiation Oncology

ISSN: 1748-717X

Contact us