Skip to main content

Aggressive unifocal bone Langerhans cell histiocytosis with soft tissue extension both responsive to radiotherapy: a case report

Abstract

Background

Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare haematological neoplasm characterized by the accumulation of CD1a+, CD207/Langerin+ histiocytes within inflammatory lesions. LCH can involve any organ, but osteolytic bone lesions are most often encountered. Unifocal bone lesions may regress spontaneously after a thick needle biopsy has been taken.

Case presentation

In this case report, we describe the initial presentation of a single BRAFV600E mutated osteolytic LCH lesion in the left proximal humerus of a 46-year-old previously healthy woman. Despite multiple surgical interventions, she unexpectedly experienced progressive disease manifestation with significant soft tissue extension to the surrounding musculature, subcutis and epidermis. Because the disease manifestation remained loco-regional, radiotherapy (RT) (total dose of 20 Gy in 10 fractions) was initiated.

Conclusion

The patient achieved a complete remission without any side effects. This case highlights that RT is a rational and relative mild local treatment option for patients with aggressive LCH affecting the bone and surrounding soft tissue.

Background

Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare haematological neoplasm characterized by the accumulation of CD1a+, CD207/Langerin+ histiocytes within inflammatory lesions. These neoplastic cells are the result of sporadic activating mutations in genes of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway expressed by multipotent hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells or committed myeloid precursors [1]. LCH can affect any organ system, but most frequently occurs in the bones as osteolytic lesions. Therapeutic interventions depend on the number or site of involved organ systems [2]. In patients with a single bone lesion and no other organ involvement (so-called single-system unifocal bone LCH), taking a biopsy with or without subsequent surgical debulking (with or without intralesional steroids) followed by active monitoring is mostly applied. Although radiotherapy (RT) is not considered standard-of-care for osseous LCH [2], previous reports have suggested clinical benefit of this treatment modality in cases of uni- or multifocal (extra-)osseous single-system disease [3,4,5]. We present the rapid and sustained therapeutic efficacy of radiotherapy in an unusual case with progressive unifocal LCH of the proximal humerus involving both osseous and surrounding soft-tissue compartments.

Case presentation

A 46-year-old previously healthy woman was referred to the orthopedic surgeon because of progressive pain and dysmobility of her left shoulder since a few months. X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed an osteolytic lesion in the proximal humeral diaphysis of 2.3 × 2.0 × 4.0 cm (Fig. 1A, B). The major part of the lesion showed a sclerotic boundary, and there was high suspicion of glenohumeral joint involvement. In addition, cortical destruction was observed on the medial side. Given the radiologic aspect of the lesion and extensive reactive changes, subacute osteomyelitis with additional arthritis of the glenohumeral joint was initially suspected; malignant disease like chondrosarcoma was considered less likely. Histopathological analysis of a thick needle biopsy demonstrated, however, a dense infiltrate of S100, CD1a and CD207/Langerin positive histiocytes accompanied by many eosinophilic granulocytes (Fig. 2A), compatible with a diagnosis of LCH. Disease staging by fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET-CT) demonstrated no other active sites of disease. Surgical curettage and debridement was performed at five and nine months after initial presentation, respectively, due to progressive clinical complaints and radiological progression of the disease. Histopathological analyses performed on lesional tissue taken at each surgical intervention confirmed the presence of active LCH (Fig. 2B). Since surgical interventions often initiate a healing process in osteolytic LCH lesions [6], a watch-and-wait approach was initiated. Seven months after the debridement, the complaints returned and an MRI revealed a significant soft tissue mass surrounding the modestly increased humeral bone lesion, compatible with transformation into an “aggressive form” of unifocal bone LCH (Fig. 1C). PET-CT demonstrated strong FDG uptake in the lesion (Fig. 1F). A new biopsy ruled out malignant transformation or infectious complications and demonstrated, again, active LCH (Fig. 2C). Clinically, the patient also began to experience regional abscess-like soft tissue ulceration of the skin (Fig. 1G). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) performed on lesional DNA isolated from the second, third and fourth tissue sample from the affected humerus all demonstrated the same somatic BRAFV600E mutation with a variant allele frequency ranging between 21–34% [7, 8] in the absence of copy number alterations. Using a more sensitive technique for detection of mutant BRAF alleles (droplet digital PCR) [9], BRAFV600E was not detected in DNA extracted from myeloid or lymphoid cells isolated by flowcytometric sorting from a peripheral blood sample collected at the time of the fourth bone sample. Microbiological analysis of the bone and blood samples showed no signs of bacterial infection.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Coronal X-ray (A) and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI (B) images demonstrating a unifocal lesion in the left proximal humeral diaphysis at time of diagnosis. After seventeen months and two surgical interventions, axial gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI demonstrated progressive disease with significant soft tissue extension (C). Radiation treatment plan of the humerus. The planning target volume (PTV) is indicated by the red line, the clinical target volume (CTV) by the blue line, and gross tumor volume (GTV) by the yellow line (D). Three months following RT, T2-weighted MRI demonstrates a full radiological response (E). Successive PET-CT images show strong FDG uptake in the bone and surrounding soft-tissues, with a remarkable decrease in both tumoral mass and FDG uptake after RT, compatible with a complete radiological response (F). Abscess-like soft tissue extension through the skin prior to RT (G). Clinical response at 9 months post RT (20 Gy in 10 fractions) showing marked improvement of skin and subcutis inflammation (H)

Fig. 2
figure 2

Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and immunohistochemical stains of a thick needle biopsy demonstrate a dense infiltrate of CD1a and CD207 positive histiocytes with variable S100 expression (A). Immunohistochemical analysis of lesional tissue obtained at surgical debridement shows CD207 positive histiocytes and multinucleated giant cells (B). Histopathological analysis of a biopsy taken at time of disease progression demonstrates CD1a and CD207 positive histiocytes, indicative of active LCH, with frequent nuclear indentations and rare mitoses—one of which is shown (C)

The unusual and aggressive clinical course necessitated intensified therapy. Both systemic (chemo)therapy and RT are rational treatment options for osseous LCH lesions with surrounding soft tissue extension [2,3,4]. Topical RT was preferred over systemic therapy because of the unifocal nature, expected better therapeutic efficacy, minimal risk of side effects, and low risk of LCH relapse generally associated with unifocal bone lesions, especially in adult patients. Based on previous reports [3, 4, 6], a total dose of 20 Gy in 10 fractions was administered, using a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique (Fig. 1D). This approach resulted in swift clinical improvement, with a notable reduction of pain already after 7 days. MRI and PET-CT imaging performed 2.5 months after the last RT dose showed a substantial decrease of both tumoral mass and FDG-uptake, indicating a significant radiological response (Fig. 1E, F). Follow-up MRI’s and PET-CT’s demonstrated complete radiological remission at 30 months after RT, without any new lesions. Complete cutaneous and soft tissue healing was observed at 9 months after RT (Fig. 1H).

Discussion

Since decades, RT is sporadically applied in adults for the treatment of (particularly) osseous LCH lesions [4]. Rates of complete remission in adult LCH with uni- or multifocal osseous single-system disease range from 79–100% [6]. The disease course of the presented case is unusual since LCH bone lesions often respond well to surgery or can even resolve spontaneously [10]. However, our case had progressive localized disease with massive soft tissue extension. Both bone and soft tissue lesions responded swiftly to RT and our patient achieved complete remission without any side effects during the course of treatment, nor a relapse of the disease during the 30 months of follow-up thereafter. Thus, RT might be considered as a less toxic alternative for aggressive osseous LCH with extensive soft tissue involvement compared to systemic therapy, especially in adult patients with loco-regional disease manifestation.

NGS analysis performed on resected tissue collected at time of disease progression, and at 2 other time points in the disease course, consistently demonstrated the prototypical BRAFV600E mutation [8]. Unfortunately, we could not verify that this mutation was already displayed by histiocytes present in the initial osteolytic lesion, as NGS analysis on DNA extracted from this decalcified specimen gave non-conclusive results. Since 2010, recurrent BRAFV600E mutations have been found in approximately 50% of LCH cases [7]. An association between the oncogenic BRAFV600E mutation and clinical parameters has been suggested in pediatric LCH [11], and the mutation also appeared to correlate with bone involvement in adults with LCH [12]. Given the aggressive clinical behavior in our patient, we specifically looked for additional genomic aberrations. Neither copy number variations nor additional cancer-associated driver mutations were found in any of the three tissue specimens, further opposing the possibility of LCH transformation into Langerhans cell sarcoma [13], which was also excluded based on the absence of major nuclear atypia and the presence of only sporadic mitoses.

Conclusions

We describe a case where localized RT for an aggressive unifocal bone LCH lesion with striking soft tissue extension led to a robust and durable complete response. Although the bone lesion with aggressively behaving soft tissue extension displayed a targetable BRAFV600E mutation, our case demonstrates that RT may be considered as a relative mild, yet effective, local treatment option for adult patients presenting with aggressive LCH involving the bone and/or soft tissues. Although RAF and MEK inhibitors are increasingly applied for refractory histiocytosis [14], reported toxicities [15, 16] in patients provide a rationale to choose RT above systemic therapy in selected cases.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as additional datasets were not generated.

Abbreviations

LCH:

Langerhans cell histiocytosis

RT:

Radiotherapy

MAPK:

Mitogen-activated protein kinase

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

FDG:

Fluorodeoxyglucose

PET-CT:

Positron emission tomography

NGS:

Next-generation sequencing

References

  1. Allen CE, Beverley PCL, Collin M, Diamond EL, Egeler RM, Ginhoux F, et al. The coming of age of Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Nat Immunol. 2020;21(1):1–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Goyal G, Tazi A, Go RS, Rech KL, Picarsic JL, Vassallo R, et al. International expert consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of Langerhans cell histiocytosis in adults. Blood. 2022;139(17):2601–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Laird J, Ma J, Chau K, Chelius M, Shi W, Zhang Z, et al. Outcome after radiation therapy for Langerhans cell histiocytosis is dependent on site of involvement. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;100(3):670–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kriz J, Eich HT, Bruns F, Heyd R, Schäfer U, Haverkamp U, et al. Radiotherapy in langerhans cell histiocytosis—a rare indication in a rare disease. Radiat Oncol. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-233.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Hiroshima Y, Tamaki Y, Sawada T, Murakami M, Ishida T, Saitoh T, et al. A case report of radiotherapy for skull lesions of langerhans cell histiocytosis with dural invasion. Cancer Diagnosis Progn. 2022;2(2):258–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Girschikofsky M, Arico M, Castillo D, Chu A, Doberauer C, Fichter J, et al. Management of adult patients with Langerhans cell histiocytosis: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of Euro-Histio-Net. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013;8(1):72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Badalian-Very G, Vergilio JA, Degar BA, MacConaill LE, Brandner B, Calicchio ML, et al. Recurrent BRAF mutations in Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Blood. 2010;116(11):1919–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Durham BH. Molecular characterization of the histiocytoses: neoplasia of dendritic cells and macrophages. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2019;86:62–76.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xiao Y, Van Halteren AGS, Lei X, Borst J, Steenwijk E, De Wit T, et al. Bone marrow-derived myeloid progenitors as driver mutation carriers in high- and low-risk Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Blood. 2020;136(19):2188–99.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Steinbok P, Cheong A, Dix DB, Bhatia S, Handler MH, Limbrick DD, et al. Nonoperative management of childhood calvarial langerhans-cell histiocytosis. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(26):2532–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Héritier S, Emile JF, Barkaoui MA, Thomas C, Fraitag S, Boudjemaa S, et al. BRAF mutation correlates with high-risk langerhans cell histiocytosis and increased resistance to first-line therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(25):3023–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cao XX, Duan MH, Zhao AL, Cai H, Chen J, Gao XM, et al. Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of patients with adult Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Am J Hematol. 2022;97(2):203–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Massoth LR, Hung YP, Ferry JA, Hasserjian RP, Nardi V, Nielsen GP, et al. Histiocytic and dendritic cell sarcomas of hematopoietic origin share targetable genomic alterations distinct from follicular dendritic cell sarcoma. Oncologist. 2021;26(7):e1263–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Diamond EL, Durham BH, Ulaner GA, Drill E, Buthorn J, Ki M, et al. Efficacy of MEK inhibition in patients with histiocytic neoplasms. Nature. 2019;567(7749):521–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lacouture ME, Duvic M, Hauschild A, Prieto VG, Robert C, Schadendorf D, et al. Analysis of dermatologic events in vemurafenib-treated patients with melanoma. Oncologist. 2013;18(3):314–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tardieu M, Néron A, Duvert-Lehembre S, Amine Larabi I, Barkaoui M, Emile JF, et al. Cutaneous adverse events in children treated with vemurafenib for refractory BRAFV600E mutated Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.29140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

WG, PK, MC, RV, RW, AH and JL participated in data generation and/or interpretation. Figures were prepared by WG and PGK. WG drafted the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan A. M. van Laar.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

The patient provided informed consent for publication of this case report and accompanying images.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghuijs, W., Kemps, P.G., Capala, M.E. et al. Aggressive unifocal bone Langerhans cell histiocytosis with soft tissue extension both responsive to radiotherapy: a case report. Radiat Oncol 17, 137 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02108-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02108-0

Keywords

  • Bone
  • Langerhans cell histiocytosis
  • LCH
  • BRAF
  • Radiotherapy