- Case report
- Open Access
A case report of pseudoprogression followed by complete remission after proton-beam irradiation for a low-grade glioma in a teenager: the value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
© Meyzer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 15 October 2009
Accepted: 4 February 2010
Published: 4 February 2010
A fourteen years-old boy was treated post-operatively with proton therapy for a recurrent low-grade oligodendroglioma located in the tectal region. Six months after the end of irradiation (RT), a new enhancing lesion appeared within the radiation fields. To differentiate disease progression from radiation-induced changes, dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced (DSCE) MRI was used with a T2* sequence to study perfusion and permeability characteristics simultaneously. Typically, the lesion showed hypoperfusion and hyperpermeability compared to the controlateral normal brain. Without additional treatment but a short course of steroids, the image disappeared over a six months period allowing us to conclude for a pseudo-progression. The patient is alive in complete remission more than 2 years post-RT.
The occurrence of new contrast enhancing lesions on routine MRI follow-up after radiation therapy (RT) for brain gliomas was observed more than ten years ago but remains problematic because standard MR imaging techniques do not allow a clear distinction between recurrent tumour and radiation-induced lesions [1, 2]. Recently, "pseudo-progression" was defined as conventional MR images compatible with progression, occurring shortly after concomitant radio-chemotherapy (CRC), as a transient phenomenon with spontaneous improvement or stabilization after several months [3–5]. This was mainly described in adult and paediatric populations with high-grade gliomas whose new standard of care is CRC followed by adjuvant chemotherapy [6, 7].
We report here a clinical case showing a new contrast-enhancing lesion discovered on a systematic MRI proposed to a fourteen years-old boy treated six months before for a recurrent low-grade glioma by surgery and proton-therapy. Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast (DSC) MR imaging and planned follow-up lead to the diagnosis of pseudo-progression. This phenomenon has rarely been described in children with supra-tentorial low-grade gliomas after proton beam RT, particularly with this type of advanced MR technique.
Initial presentation and conventional MRI description
Conventional and Dynamic MRI with Permeability visualization and Perfusion estimate
Post-treatment modifications, evolution with time and micro-vascular hypothesis
Subacute radiation-induced modifications have been described previously in childhood gliomas, with or without concomitant or sequential use of chemotherapy [1, 12–14]. In adults, these changes are more and more reported after combined radio-chemotherapy [4, 5, 15]. MRI findings usually consist on new contrast enhancing mass on T1-weighted imaging with gadolinium, which is indistinguishable from tumour progression. It occurs usually within the irradiated tumour volume but radiation-induced lesions could be located less commonly in the controlateral hemisphere, remotely from the primary tumour site . To our knowledge, it is the first case of pseudo-progression fully described after exclusive proton RT. Here, time of occurrence was delayed (6 months) since the typical time frame is rather within 3 months after chemo-radiation, possibly due to the absence of concomitant chemotherapy [3, 5, 6]. Cerebral injury has been classified according to time to appearance after RT  as "acute", with brain oedema occurring during RT, mostly transient and reversible; subacute or "early delayed" injury, occurring a few weeks to three months post-RT, improving within six weeks; late injury, occurring months to years post-RT, including true radionecrosis. It is often irreversible, progressive, and possibly lethal and constitutes the major dose-limiting clinical complication of brain irradiation, particularly in children. Pseudo-progression (PsP) could be considered as a pathological continuum between acute post-RT reaction and treatment-related necrosis . Mechanisms behind these events are not fully understood but are probably related to micro-vessels changes. Post-RT brain injury induces a focal tissue reaction with inflammatory component and increased capillary permeability, causing fluid transudation into the interstitial space and brain oedema. Transient alterations in the blood-brain barrier may be responsible for new or increased contrast enhancement, falsely suggesting tumour progression, with low perfusion values .
Role of PET and advanced MR techniques in the diagnosis of "pseudo-progresion", clinical implication
This DSC-MR technique evaluates tissue changes, close to the physiopathology of PsP, whereas metabolic tools as FDG-PET or MR spectroscopy (MRS) analyse level of glucose uptake or distribution of metabolites peaks. MRS can distinguish recurrent true necrosis from active tumour [16–18] but it needs long acquisition time. In 18FDG-PET, FDG uptake is not specific of tumour tissue and false positive can be observed in non malignant inflammatory processes. The use of aminoacid tracers as 11C-methionine better discriminates post-RT necrosis from tumour recurrence  but it is rarely available in daily practice. Recently, the DSC-MR technique was proposed for adult high-grade gliomas in this situation [20, 21] as an alternative tool. It can be incorporated in the routine follow-up, within the interval of three to six months post-RT where PsP can be observed. Importantly, there is a risk of including children with gliomas in phase II studies for "recurrent disease" that would be spontaneously reversible, leading to false positive results, consequently delivering salvage treatments for "pseudo-progressive" patients who could be, at the contrary, potentially long term survivors .
The lack of typical clinical symptoms and the limits of anatomical MRI techniques imply that any subacute change suggesting disease progression may be considered as possible PsP. Post-RT therapy should not be interrupted too early  and DSC-MRI could help for distinguishing PsP from real progression.
Written informed consent was obtained from the parents and the patient for publication of this case report and accompagnying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
- Bakardjiev AI, Barnes PD, Goumnerova LC, Black PM, Scott RM, Pomeroy SL, Billet A, Loeffler JS, Tarbell NJ: Magnetic resonance imaging changes after stereotactic radiation therapy for childhood low grade astrocytoma. Cancer 1996, 78: 864-873. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960815)78:4<864::AID-CNCR25>3.0.CO;2-SView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Tomiguchi S, Shigematsu Y, Ikushima I, Kira T, Liang L, Ushio Y, Takahashi M: Posttherapeutic intra-axial brain tumor: the value of perfusion-sensitive contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiating tumor recurrence from non-neoplastic contrast enhancing tissue. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000, 21: 901-909.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Wit, de Bruin HG, Eljkenboom W, Sillevis Smitt PA, Bent MJ: Immediate post-radiotherapy changes in malignant glioma can mimic tumor progression. Neurology 2004, 63: 535-537.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chamberlain MC, Glantz MJ, Chalmers L, Van Horn A, Sloan AE: Early necrosis following concurrent Temodar and radiotherapy in patients with glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 2007, 82: 81-83. 10.1007/s11060-006-9241-yView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taal W, Brandsma D, de Bruin HG, Bromberg JE, Swaak-Kragten AT, Smitt PA, van Es CA, Bent MJ: Incidence of early pseudo-progression in a cohort of malignant glioma patients treated with chemoirradiation with temozolomide. Cancer 2008,113(2):405-410. 10.1002/cncr.23562View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brandsma D, Stalpers L, Taal W, Sminia P, Bent M: Clinical features, mechanisms, and management of pseudoprogression in malignant gliomas. Lancet Oncol 2008, 9: 453-461. 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70125-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lafay-cousin L, Feniak J, Wilson B, Wei X, Rotaru C, Bouffet E, Strother D: Pseudoprogression in pediatric diffuse pontine glioma treated with radiation and concomitant temozolomide [Abstract]. Neuroncology 2008, 10: 393.Google Scholar
- Cao Y, Shen Z, Chenevert TL, Ewing JR: Estimate of vascular permeability and cerebral blood volume using Gd-DPTA Contrast enhancement and dynamic T2*-weighted MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006, 24: 288-296. 10.1002/jmri.20634View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boxerman JL, Schmainda KM, Weisskoff RM: Relative cerebral blood volume maps corrected for contrast agent extravasation significantly correlate with glioma tumor grade, whereas uncorrected maps do not. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006, 27: 859-867.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dhermain F, Saliou G, Parker F, Page P, Hoang-Xuan K, Lacroix C, Tournay E, Bourhis J, Ducreux D: Microvascular leakage and contrast enhancement as prognostic factors for recurrence in unfavorable low-grade gliomas. J Neurooncol 2009, in press.Google Scholar
- Hu LS, Baxter LC, Smith KA, Feuerstein BG, Karis JP, Eschbacher JM, Coons SW, Nakaji P, Yeh RF, Debbins J, Heiserman JE: Relative cerebral blood values to differentiate high-grade glioma recurrence from post-treatment radiation effect: direct correlation between image-guided tissue histopathology and localized dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging measurements. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009, 30: 552-558. 10.3174/ajnr.A1377View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ridola V, Grill J, Doz F, Gentet JC, Frappaz D, Raquin MA, Habrand JL, Sainte-Rose C, Valteau-Couanet D, Kalifa C: High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue followed by posterior fossa irradiation for focal medulloblastoma recurrence or progression after conventional chemotherapy. Cancer 2007, 110: 156-63. 10.1002/cncr.22761View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spreafico F, Gandola L, Marchiano A, Simonetti F, Poggi G, Adduci A, Clerici CA, Luksch R, Biassoni V, Meazza C, Catania S, Terenziani M, Musumeci R, Fossati-Bellani F, Massimino M: Brain magnetic resonance imaging after high-dose chemotherapy and radiotherapy for childhood brain tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008, 70: 1011-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fouladi M, Chintagumpala M, Laningham FH, Ashley D, Kellie SJ, Langston JW, McCluggage CW, Woo S, Kocak M, Krull K, Kun LE, Mulhern RK, Gajjar A: White matter lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging after radiotherapy and high-dose chemotherapy in children with medulloblastoma or primitive neurectodermal tumor. J Clin Oncol 2004, 22: 4551-60. 10.1200/JCO.2004.03.058View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brandes AA, Tosconi A, Spagnolli F, Frezza G, Leonardi M, Calbucci F, Franceschi E: Disease progression or pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy treatment: pitfalls in neurooncology. Neuro Oncology 2008, 10: 361-367. 10.1215/15228517-2008-008PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schlemmer HP, Bachert P, Herfarth KK, Zuna I, Debus J, van Kaick G: Proton MR spectroscopic evaluation of suspicious brain lesions after stereotactic radiotherapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001, 22: 1316-1324.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zeng QS, Li CF, Liu H, Zhen JH, Feng DC: Distinction between recurrent glioma and radiation injury using magnetic resonance spectroscopy in combination with diffusion-weighted imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007, 68: 151-158.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rock JP, Scarpace L, Hearshen D, Gutierrez J, Fisher JL, Rosenblum M, Mikkelsen T: Associations among Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Apparent Diffusion Coefficients, and Image-Guided Histopathology with Special Attention to Radiation Necrosis. Neurosurgery 2004, 54: 1111-1119. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000119328.56431.A7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Terakawa Y, Tsuyuguchi N, Iwai Y, Yamanaka K, Higashiyama S, Takami T, Ohata K: Diagnostic accuracy of 11C-methionine PET for differentiation of recurrent brain tumors from radiation necrosis after radiotherapy. J Nucl Med 2008, 49: 694-99. 10.2967/jnumed.107.048082View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barajas RF Jr, Chang JS, Segal MR, Parsa AT, McDermott MW, Berger MS, Cha S: Differentiation of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme from radiation necrosis after external beam radiation therapy with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging. Radiology 2009, 253: 486-496. 10.1148/radiol.2532090007PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dandois V, Rommel D, Renard L, Jamart J, Cosnard G: Substitution of 11 C-methionine PET by perfusion MRI during the follow-up of treated high-grade gliomas: preliminary results in clinical practice. J Neuroradiol 2009, in press.Google Scholar
- Mason WP, Del Maestro M, Eisenstat D, Forsyth P, Fulton D, Laperrière N, Macdonald D, Perry J, Thiessen B, for the Canadian GBM Recommandations Committee: Canadian recommendations for treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. Current Oncol 2007, 14: 110-117. 10.3747/co.2007.119View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.