Skip to main content

A case report of pseudoprogression followed by complete remission after proton-beam irradiation for a low-grade glioma in a teenager: the value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI


A fourteen years-old boy was treated post-operatively with proton therapy for a recurrent low-grade oligodendroglioma located in the tectal region. Six months after the end of irradiation (RT), a new enhancing lesion appeared within the radiation fields. To differentiate disease progression from radiation-induced changes, dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced (DSCE) MRI was used with a T2* sequence to study perfusion and permeability characteristics simultaneously. Typically, the lesion showed hypoperfusion and hyperpermeability compared to the controlateral normal brain. Without additional treatment but a short course of steroids, the image disappeared over a six months period allowing us to conclude for a pseudo-progression. The patient is alive in complete remission more than 2 years post-RT.


The occurrence of new contrast enhancing lesions on routine MRI follow-up after radiation therapy (RT) for brain gliomas was observed more than ten years ago but remains problematic because standard MR imaging techniques do not allow a clear distinction between recurrent tumour and radiation-induced lesions [1, 2]. Recently, "pseudo-progression" was defined as conventional MR images compatible with progression, occurring shortly after concomitant radio-chemotherapy (CRC), as a transient phenomenon with spontaneous improvement or stabilization after several months [35]. This was mainly described in adult and paediatric populations with high-grade gliomas whose new standard of care is CRC followed by adjuvant chemotherapy [6, 7].

We report here a clinical case showing a new contrast-enhancing lesion discovered on a systematic MRI proposed to a fourteen years-old boy treated six months before for a recurrent low-grade glioma by surgery and proton-therapy. Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast (DSC) MR imaging and planned follow-up lead to the diagnosis of pseudo-progression. This phenomenon has rarely been described in children with supra-tentorial low-grade gliomas after proton beam RT, particularly with this type of advanced MR technique.

Case Presentation

Initial presentation and conventional MRI description

A healthy ten year-old boy with tinnitus and bilateral papillary oedema underwent a brain MRI showing a small tumour of the tectal plate. The lesion presented a signal of low intensity on T1-weighted and a high signal on T2-weighted sequences. No contrast enhancement was visible. The process was responsible for triventricular hydrocephalus by aqueduct compression. The first treatment was a ventriculocysternostomy followed, fifteen months later, by a partial resection when the lesion increased in size. Histopathological diagnosis was a grade II oligodendroglioma (WHO classification), with a proliferation index (MIB 1) of 5%. Three years after the first surgery, a systematic follow-up MRI revealed a recurrence localized on the quadrigeminal plate, close to the left thalami and the third ventricle, again without gadolinium enhancement. A second surgery was attempted, showing the same histology, but a tumour residue was left on the left thalamus (Figure 1). Treatment was completed six weeks later by RT using proton beams, delivering 54 Gy in 30 fractions of 1.8 Gy. Radiation fields encompassed the medial parts of the thalami (Figure 1C, D). Radiological and clinical data were then evaluated every 3 months thereafter. Six months after RT, systematic MRI found obvious development of a new lesion with an important contrast enhancement and mass effect on the third ventricle (Figure 2), however the patient remained asymptomatic.

Figure 1
figure 1

Conventional MR imaging, Target volume and Dosimetry of a Low-grade Glioma. A left thalamic low-grade oligodendroglioma in a 10 year-old boy after partial resection, without contrast enhancement. [A] T1-weighted transaxial MR image after administration of intravenous Gd-DTPA [B] T2 -weighted sequence which shows ill-defined nodular images. [C] Representation of Gross tumor volume (in red) and Clinical target volume (in green). [D] Radiation field encompassing medial part of the left thalamus.

Figure 2
figure 2

Conventional MR imaging before and six months after exclusive Proton therapy. [A] T1-weighted transaxial MR image after administration of intravenous (iv) Gd-DTPA, one week before radiation. [B] The same sequence, six months after the end of irradiation (54 Gy), showing a strong contrast enhancement with a subtle mass effect (yellow arrow).

Conventional and Dynamic MRI with Permeability visualization and Perfusion estimate

In order to more accurately differentiate tumour recurrence from radiation-induced changes, a DSC-MRI was performed as described previously [8, 9]. The T2* sequence was used in order to assess simultaneously perfusion and permeability characteristics, as recently proposed for predicting risk of recurrence in adult low-grade gliomas [10]. In this case, the typical combination of a focused area of high permeability strictly superimposed on the contrast enhancing lesion combined with the absence of high perfusion estimate in the same region (Figure 3) was compatible with post-radiation modifications, as recently suggested by Hu et al. They found a direct correlation between image-guided tissue histopathology and localized DSC perfusion MR imaging measurements in a series of adult high-grade gliomas [11]. Consequently, we favoured the hypothesis of a delayed radiation injury and began a treatment with oral steroids (prednisone) at one mg/kg/d for one month before clinical and radiological reappraisal. After one month, decrease in size of contrast enhancement became significant while the patient remained asymptomatic. Steroids were therefore discontinued. Gradual improvement continued on conventional MRI and disappearance of both contrast enhancement and high permeability area strongly suggested a pseudo-progression rather than recurrent disease. Follow-up MRI at nine months post-RT showed a complete resolution of the gadolinium uptake and no detectable microvascular leakage (Figure 4). At last follow-up, patient is still in complete remission, more than two years post-RT.

Figure 3
figure 3

Six months after irradiation: superimposed MR images with T1-weighted sequence after iv Gadolinium injection and co-registered Perfusion (left) and Permability maps (right). [A] Gradient-echo axial image with color overlay map showing no focus of hyperperfusion in regard of the strong contrast enhancement [B] The superimposed Permeability map with a strong microvascular leakage (yellow arrow) strictly corresponding with the enhanced area in the T1-weighted sequence.

Figure 4
figure 4

Nine months after irradiation: complete disappearance of the contrast enhancement (left) and no detectable Permeability (right). [A] T1-weighted transaxial MR image after administration of iv Gd-DTPA and [B] the superimposed Permeability map, with no contrast enhancement or detectable microvascular leakage. To be noted, a subtle hypersignal, pre-existing to the irradiation, as a post-operative modification (yellow arrow).

Post-treatment modifications, evolution with time and micro-vascular hypothesis

Subacute radiation-induced modifications have been described previously in childhood gliomas, with or without concomitant or sequential use of chemotherapy [1, 1214]. In adults, these changes are more and more reported after combined radio-chemotherapy [4, 5, 15]. MRI findings usually consist on new contrast enhancing mass on T1-weighted imaging with gadolinium, which is indistinguishable from tumour progression. It occurs usually within the irradiated tumour volume but radiation-induced lesions could be located less commonly in the controlateral hemisphere, remotely from the primary tumour site [6]. To our knowledge, it is the first case of pseudo-progression fully described after exclusive proton RT. Here, time of occurrence was delayed (6 months) since the typical time frame is rather within 3 months after chemo-radiation, possibly due to the absence of concomitant chemotherapy [3, 5, 6]. Cerebral injury has been classified according to time to appearance after RT [8] as "acute", with brain oedema occurring during RT, mostly transient and reversible; subacute or "early delayed" injury, occurring a few weeks to three months post-RT, improving within six weeks; late injury, occurring months to years post-RT, including true radionecrosis. It is often irreversible, progressive, and possibly lethal and constitutes the major dose-limiting clinical complication of brain irradiation, particularly in children. Pseudo-progression (PsP) could be considered as a pathological continuum between acute post-RT reaction and treatment-related necrosis [6]. Mechanisms behind these events are not fully understood but are probably related to micro-vessels changes. Post-RT brain injury induces a focal tissue reaction with inflammatory component and increased capillary permeability, causing fluid transudation into the interstitial space and brain oedema. Transient alterations in the blood-brain barrier may be responsible for new or increased contrast enhancement, falsely suggesting tumour progression, with low perfusion values [11].

Role of PET and advanced MR techniques in the diagnosis of "pseudo-progresion", clinical implication

This DSC-MR technique evaluates tissue changes, close to the physiopathology of PsP, whereas metabolic tools as FDG-PET or MR spectroscopy (MRS) analyse level of glucose uptake or distribution of metabolites peaks. MRS can distinguish recurrent true necrosis from active tumour [1618] but it needs long acquisition time. In 18FDG-PET, FDG uptake is not specific of tumour tissue and false positive can be observed in non malignant inflammatory processes. The use of aminoacid tracers as 11C-methionine better discriminates post-RT necrosis from tumour recurrence [19] but it is rarely available in daily practice. Recently, the DSC-MR technique was proposed for adult high-grade gliomas in this situation [20, 21] as an alternative tool. It can be incorporated in the routine follow-up, within the interval of three to six months post-RT where PsP can be observed. Importantly, there is a risk of including children with gliomas in phase II studies for "recurrent disease" that would be spontaneously reversible, leading to false positive results, consequently delivering salvage treatments for "pseudo-progressive" patients who could be, at the contrary, potentially long term survivors [15].


The lack of typical clinical symptoms and the limits of anatomical MRI techniques imply that any subacute change suggesting disease progression may be considered as possible PsP. Post-RT therapy should not be interrupted too early [22] and DSC-MRI could help for distinguishing PsP from real progression.


Written informed consent was obtained from the parents and the patient for publication of this case report and accompagnying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.


  1. 1.

    Bakardjiev AI, Barnes PD, Goumnerova LC, Black PM, Scott RM, Pomeroy SL, Billet A, Loeffler JS, Tarbell NJ: Magnetic resonance imaging changes after stereotactic radiation therapy for childhood low grade astrocytoma. Cancer 1996, 78: 864-873. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960815)78:4<864::AID-CNCR25>3.0.CO;2-S

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Tomiguchi S, Shigematsu Y, Ikushima I, Kira T, Liang L, Ushio Y, Takahashi M: Posttherapeutic intra-axial brain tumor: the value of perfusion-sensitive contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiating tumor recurrence from non-neoplastic contrast enhancing tissue. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000, 21: 901-909.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    De Wit, de Bruin HG, Eljkenboom W, Sillevis Smitt PA, Bent MJ: Immediate post-radiotherapy changes in malignant glioma can mimic tumor progression. Neurology 2004, 63: 535-537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Chamberlain MC, Glantz MJ, Chalmers L, Van Horn A, Sloan AE: Early necrosis following concurrent Temodar and radiotherapy in patients with glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 2007, 82: 81-83. 10.1007/s11060-006-9241-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Taal W, Brandsma D, de Bruin HG, Bromberg JE, Swaak-Kragten AT, Smitt PA, van Es CA, Bent MJ: Incidence of early pseudo-progression in a cohort of malignant glioma patients treated with chemoirradiation with temozolomide. Cancer 2008,113(2):405-410. 10.1002/cncr.23562

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Brandsma D, Stalpers L, Taal W, Sminia P, Bent M: Clinical features, mechanisms, and management of pseudoprogression in malignant gliomas. Lancet Oncol 2008, 9: 453-461. 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70125-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lafay-cousin L, Feniak J, Wilson B, Wei X, Rotaru C, Bouffet E, Strother D: Pseudoprogression in pediatric diffuse pontine glioma treated with radiation and concomitant temozolomide [Abstract]. Neuroncology 2008, 10: 393.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Cao Y, Shen Z, Chenevert TL, Ewing JR: Estimate of vascular permeability and cerebral blood volume using Gd-DPTA Contrast enhancement and dynamic T2*-weighted MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006, 24: 288-296. 10.1002/jmri.20634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Boxerman JL, Schmainda KM, Weisskoff RM: Relative cerebral blood volume maps corrected for contrast agent extravasation significantly correlate with glioma tumor grade, whereas uncorrected maps do not. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006, 27: 859-867.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Dhermain F, Saliou G, Parker F, Page P, Hoang-Xuan K, Lacroix C, Tournay E, Bourhis J, Ducreux D: Microvascular leakage and contrast enhancement as prognostic factors for recurrence in unfavorable low-grade gliomas. J Neurooncol 2009, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hu LS, Baxter LC, Smith KA, Feuerstein BG, Karis JP, Eschbacher JM, Coons SW, Nakaji P, Yeh RF, Debbins J, Heiserman JE: Relative cerebral blood values to differentiate high-grade glioma recurrence from post-treatment radiation effect: direct correlation between image-guided tissue histopathology and localized dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging measurements. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009, 30: 552-558. 10.3174/ajnr.A1377

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ridola V, Grill J, Doz F, Gentet JC, Frappaz D, Raquin MA, Habrand JL, Sainte-Rose C, Valteau-Couanet D, Kalifa C: High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue followed by posterior fossa irradiation for focal medulloblastoma recurrence or progression after conventional chemotherapy. Cancer 2007, 110: 156-63. 10.1002/cncr.22761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Spreafico F, Gandola L, Marchiano A, Simonetti F, Poggi G, Adduci A, Clerici CA, Luksch R, Biassoni V, Meazza C, Catania S, Terenziani M, Musumeci R, Fossati-Bellani F, Massimino M: Brain magnetic resonance imaging after high-dose chemotherapy and radiotherapy for childhood brain tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008, 70: 1011-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Fouladi M, Chintagumpala M, Laningham FH, Ashley D, Kellie SJ, Langston JW, McCluggage CW, Woo S, Kocak M, Krull K, Kun LE, Mulhern RK, Gajjar A: White matter lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging after radiotherapy and high-dose chemotherapy in children with medulloblastoma or primitive neurectodermal tumor. J Clin Oncol 2004, 22: 4551-60. 10.1200/JCO.2004.03.058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Brandes AA, Tosconi A, Spagnolli F, Frezza G, Leonardi M, Calbucci F, Franceschi E: Disease progression or pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy treatment: pitfalls in neurooncology. Neuro Oncology 2008, 10: 361-367. 10.1215/15228517-2008-008

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Schlemmer HP, Bachert P, Herfarth KK, Zuna I, Debus J, van Kaick G: Proton MR spectroscopic evaluation of suspicious brain lesions after stereotactic radiotherapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001, 22: 1316-1324.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Zeng QS, Li CF, Liu H, Zhen JH, Feng DC: Distinction between recurrent glioma and radiation injury using magnetic resonance spectroscopy in combination with diffusion-weighted imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007, 68: 151-158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Rock JP, Scarpace L, Hearshen D, Gutierrez J, Fisher JL, Rosenblum M, Mikkelsen T: Associations among Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Apparent Diffusion Coefficients, and Image-Guided Histopathology with Special Attention to Radiation Necrosis. Neurosurgery 2004, 54: 1111-1119. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000119328.56431.A7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Terakawa Y, Tsuyuguchi N, Iwai Y, Yamanaka K, Higashiyama S, Takami T, Ohata K: Diagnostic accuracy of 11C-methionine PET for differentiation of recurrent brain tumors from radiation necrosis after radiotherapy. J Nucl Med 2008, 49: 694-99. 10.2967/jnumed.107.048082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Barajas RF Jr, Chang JS, Segal MR, Parsa AT, McDermott MW, Berger MS, Cha S: Differentiation of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme from radiation necrosis after external beam radiation therapy with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging. Radiology 2009, 253: 486-496. 10.1148/radiol.2532090007

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Dandois V, Rommel D, Renard L, Jamart J, Cosnard G: Substitution of 11C-methionine PET by perfusion MRI during the follow-up of treated high-grade gliomas: preliminary results in clinical practice. J Neuroradiol 2009, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Mason WP, Del Maestro M, Eisenstat D, Forsyth P, Fulton D, Laperrière N, Macdonald D, Perry J, Thiessen B, for the Canadian GBM Recommandations Committee: Canadian recommendations for treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. Current Oncol 2007, 14: 110-117. 10.3747/co.2007.119

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacques Grill.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

CM collected the data and wrote the manuscript. FD analysed the imaging studies and contributed to the legend of figures and correction of the manuscript. DD created and developed the software used to treat T2* acquisition and produce the images. JLH supervised the irradiation of the patient. PV analysed the histology of the tumour. CSR operated the patient. CD was the treating physician of the patient. JG supervised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meyzer, C., Dhermain, F., Ducreux, D. et al. A case report of pseudoprogression followed by complete remission after proton-beam irradiation for a low-grade glioma in a teenager: the value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Radiat Oncol 5, 9 (2010).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast
  • Contrast Enhance Lesion
  • Proton Beam Radiation Therapy
  • Left Thalamus
  • Perfusion Estimate