- Short report
- Open Access
Squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate: long-term survival after combined chemo-radiation
© Munoz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 02 February 2007
Accepted: 03 April 2007
Published: 03 April 2007
Carcinoma of the prostate gland is the most frequent malignant tumour affecting male population. While the large majority of tumours is represented by adenocarcinoma, pure squamous cell carcinoma comprises only 0,5–1% of all prostate neoplastic lesions.
It is characterised by a high degree of malignancy, commonly metastasising to the bone (mainly with osteolytic lesions), liver and lungs with a median survival time of 14 months.
Several therapeutic approaches have been employed in the effort to treat prostate pure squamous cell carcinoma, including radical surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and hormonal therapy. All of them mostly failed to gain a significant survival benefit.
We herein report on a case of pure squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate approached with combined-modality treatment, with the administration of 3 courses of cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and continous infusion 5-fluorouracil 750 mg/m2 on day 1 to 5 and, subsequently, radiotherapy, with the delivery of a total dose of 46 Gy to the whole pelvis, with additional boost doses of 20 Gy to the prostatic bed and adjunctive 6 Gy to the prostate gland (72 Gy in total). The patient remained free of disease for 5 years, finally experiencing local relapse and, subsequently, dying of acute renal failure due to bilateral uretero-hydro-nephrosis.
In addition, we provide a complete overview of all reported cases available within the medical literature.
Since it remains questionable which should be the most appropriate therapeutic approach towards prostate pure squamous cell carcinoma, our report demonstrates that a prolonged disease control, with a consistent survival time, may be achieved by the combination of an effective local treatment such as radiotherapy with systemic infusion of chemotherapeutic drugs.
Carcinoma of the prostate gland is the most frequent malignant tumour affecting male population . The large majority of prostate tumours is represented by the adenocarcinoma histotype (up to 95%), while small cell, squamous cell, transitional cell, signet ring cell, mucinous and mixed types carcinomas occurs in less than 2% of cases [2, 3]. Pure squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) comprises only 0,5–1% of all prostate carcinomas . Therefore clinical manifestations, natural history, prognosis and treatment options can be found only in anecdotal descriptions. It usually occurs in the seventh decade of age, with symptoms of urinary obstruction (due to bladder outlet obstacle) or bone pain due to osseous metastases . Deemed rather more malignant than adenocarcinoma, PSCC commonly metastasises to the bone (mainly with osteolytic lesions), liver and lungs with a median post-diagnosis survival time estimated to be 14 months . From the diagnostic point, serum Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) commonly show values within the normal range, even in a metastatic disease context. However, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) antigen might be elevated, allowing a serologic monitoring of disease status . While radical prostatectomy and radiation are the only potentially curative options for prostate adenocarcinomas, several therapeutic approaches have been employed in the management of PSCC of the prostate, such as radical surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and hormonal therapy. All of them have not been able to obtain long-lasting objective responses, neither in terms of local control, nor in terms of systemic efficacy. We herein present a case of PSCC of the prostate treated with a combined chemo-radiotherapeutic approach, resulting in a prolonged disease-free survival of 5 years. Moreover, we provide a systematic overview of all reported cases available within the medical literature.
In June 2001, a 76 years old male was referred to our institution hospital with clinical signs and symptoms of acute urinary retention, complaining of voiding difficulties during the previous 2 months. On catheterisation, 600 ml of urine could be rescued. Physical examination was unremarkable, except from digital rectal examination which disclosed an uneven swollen and enlarged prostate gland, of stony-hard consistency, with an irregular capsule profile. The patient had been healthy until the time of our observation. No history of radiation and hormonal therapy could be highlighted. Hence, a complete diagnostic work-up was planned.
Serum PSA and PAP showed in-range values. Transrectal ultrasound demonstrated hypoechoic lesions in the left peripheral zone of the prostate gland. Excretion urogram, urine cytology and urethro-cystoscopy were negative for malignancy, while bladder neck was slightly elevated on cystoscopy.
An abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) scan was then performed, disclosing an irregularly enlarged prostate with a peripheral hypodense mass within, compressing the base of the bladder and disrupting the prostatic anatomy. No enlarged lymphnodes could be detected at any abdominal site.
On magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the boundary between the transition zone and the peripheral zone of the prostate gland was unclear and the signal intensity had decreased in the left peripheral zone on T2-weighted images. Extra-capsular disease could be documented in at least 2 sites of the prostatic profile. No osseous spread could be observed at total body bone scan.
Sextant transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the prostate was subsequently performed, with histological examination demonstrating nests and sheets of moderately differentiated squamous carcinomatous cells characterised by intercellular bridges. Focal areas presented with evidence of keratin pearl formation. No squamous metaplasia or transitional cell or adenocarcinomatous components could be observed.
The patient was given 3 courses of chemotherapy (CT) with cisplatin (CDDP) 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and continous infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 750 mg/m2 on day 1 to 5.
He subsequently underwent a full-course of radiation therapy (RT) using linear accelerator (18 MV photons), with a conventional four-field box technique up to 46 Gy to the whole pelvis followed by a boost dose to the prostate bed of 20 Gy and by an adjunctive dose of 6 Gy to the prostate gland (72 Gy in total). The patient was treated in supine position, with a six-field conformal field arrangement, delivered using three-dimensional conformal RT. Treatment was, generally, well tolerated, with no acute toxicity recorded.
After therapy had been completed, the patient was periodically examinated, with a clinical, radiological and serologic follow-up. He remained free from disease for 5 years, finally relapsing locally within the pelvis and subsequently dying of acute renal failure due to bilateral uretero-hydro-nephrosis in June 2006.
PSCC of the prostate gland is an extremely rare pathological and clinical entity. Its histogenesis remains unclear. Mainly 2 principal origins are presumed for the neoplastic cells: the basal or reserve cells of prostatic acini, as pointed out by Sieracki, and the transitional epithelium lining the urethra or major ducts, as preferred by Kahler and Thompson et al [8–10]. Several theories have been proposed in order to explain prostate PSCC histogenesis: 1) a metaplastic transformation of adenocarcinoma cells, 2) a collision-type tumour, with the squamous component developing from metaplastic foci after radiation or hormonal therapy, 3) possible deviation from pluripotent stem cells capable of multidirectional differentiation [11–14]. It has been speculated that the squamous cell component might be derived from squamous metaplasia of acini and ductal elements following radiation or hormonal therapy for prostatic adenocarcinoma . While squamous metaplasia is known for occurring within the prostate gland during chronic prostatitis, around prostatic infarcts and after estrogen therapy or radiation therapy, malignant transformation is rare . Moreover, even though prostate PSCC has been described in association with the use of a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonist and flutamide or after seed implantation for adenocarcinoma, all of these explanations could not reach satisfactory evidence [15, 16].
Mott suggested strict criteria for the diagnosis of primary PSCC: (i) a clearly malignant neoplasm as judged by invasion, disordered growth and cellular anaplasia; (ii) definite squamous features of keratinization, squamous pearls and/or numerous distinct intercellular bridges; (iii) a lack of any glandular or acinar pattern (such a finding should be interpreted as evidence of adenocarcinoma with squamous metaplasia); (iv) no prior estrogen therapy; (v) an absence of primary squamous cancer elsewhere, particularly within the bladder .
Overview on clinical reports
N° of cases
1. Radical surgery reports
Baker et al and Arnheim [25,26]
Survival times: 1 to 3 mo.
Thompson et al 
Survival times: 3 mo.-6 yrs range
5/7 pts survived less than 1 year
Survival times: 8 days-9 yrs range
Gray et al 
Died 1 year after diagnosis
Corder et al 
5 mo. response to CT
Al Adnani 
Asuero et al 
Alive 1 year after treatment
Sarma et al 
Died 6 mo. after diagnosis of d-MTS
Masuda et al 
Disease-free 6 yrs after surgery
Moskovitz et al 
Died 5 mo. after diagnosis
Little et al 
Disease-free 40 mo. after surgery
Lung MTS 25 mo. after diagnosis
Braslis et al 
Disease-free 6 mo. after surgery
Okamoto et al 
Died 14 mo. after surgery
Imamura et al 
Disease-free 5 yrs after surgery
Kanthan et al 
Survival rates from 1 to 13 mo.
2. Radio-chemotherapy combined modality treatment reports
Inaba et al 
Died 13 months after diagnosis
Kuwahara et al 
Died 9 mo. after diagnosis
Uchibayashi et al 
Disease-free 21 mo. after diagnosis
Okada et al 
Disease-free 18 mo. after diagnosis
5 yrs disease-free survival
Ray et al 
Kastendieck et al 
Died 2 months after diagnosis
Died 8 mo. after diagnosis
Died 5 months after diagnosis
Sharma et al 
Died during diagnostic procedures
Miller et al 
SD for 6 months
Perez Garcia et al 
Alive 5 mo. after treatment
Nabi et al 
Died 5 mo. after diagnosis
Goto et al 
Disease-free 12 mo. after therapy
Mayayo et al 
Died 7 mo. after diagnosis
John et al 
Died 24 mo. after diagnosis
Di Pietro et al 
Died during diagnostic work-up
4. Anecdotal reports
Died 2 days after diagnosis
Okamura et al 
Wernert et al 
Ulloa et al 
Rahmanou et al 
Puyol et al 
Local PD 6 mo. after diagnosis
Herrera et al 
Died 2 mo. after diagnosis
Mohan et al 
Parwani et al 
Survival times: 5–48 mo.
In Japan the longest survivor, who has been described, had a tiny suburethral PSCC; he remained free of recurrence for 6 years, after local excision, as reported by Masuda et al . As far as tumour response to therapy is concerned, prostate PSCC is generally refractory to hormonal manipulation, while few cases might be susceptible to CT and RT. Several drugs have been employed, mainly basing on the experience with epithelial tumours located in other anatomical sites. CDDP-based regimens are the most established ones, possibly combined with bleomycin (BLM), peplomycin (PEP) and methotrexate (MTX). CT may be used as a single agent in a metastatic disease setting or in a combined modality approach, expecially in locally advanced disease. In this context, Uchibayashi et al achieved a favourable local tumour control for 21 months after trans-urethral prostatectomy by means of local irradiation and, subsequently, intravenous administration of BLM and intra-arterial administration of CDDP . Okada et al achieved a 18 months disease-free survival with 50 Gy of pelvic RT plus an additional boost of 10 Gy and systemic administration of PEP and CDDP .
Imamura et al used CT within an adjuvant setting, after radical cystoprostatectomy with positive surgical margins. The patient received the MPD regimen with CDDP, PEP and MTX. No evidence of recurrence could be detected 5 years after treatment .
Corder et al treated one patient with pulmonary metastases from prostate PSCC with the administration of adriamycin 20 mg/m2 daily for 3 days, in 21-days cycles, achieving marked regression of pulmonary nodes. Tumour response lasted 5 months . One patient receiving RT survived almost 9 years as reported by Sieracki et al .
In conclusion, from this concise overview of all reported cases, it appears evident that no definitive conclusions can be drawn up to now regarding the best available treatment option towards prostate PSCC. Nonetheless, certain features might be noteworthy. In a clinical situation of an organ-confined disease, radical surgical extirpation should be performed. The extent of the surgical procedure remains unclear. Radiation therapy as a single modality treatment in limited-stage disease seems to be an investigational approach. Moreover, the role of RT within an adjuvant setting after surgery has rarely been explored. However, within a context of a locally-advanced disease, RT might be usefull (with doses of at least 66 Gy, deriving data from SCC at other anatomic sites), expecially if combined with chemotherapy, in order to achieve local control with organ functional preservation. The possibility to diminish the probability of systemic spread may also be hypotesised. The most effective drugs to be used have yet to be established. More data are needed in the future, maybe collected in a retrospective multicentric setting or through rare cancer networks, in order to, supposedly, enlighten this subject.
Written consent was obtained from patient's relatives for publication of this report.
- Bracarda S, de Cobelli O, Greco C, Prayer-Galetti T, Valdagni R, Gatta G, de Braud F, Bartsch G: Cancer of the prostate. Crit Rev Oncol/Hematol 2005, 56: 379-396. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2005.03.010View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Petersen R: Urologic Pathology. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1986.Google Scholar
- Randolph TL, Amin MB, Ro JY, Ayala AG: Histologic variants of adenocarcinoma and other carcinomas of prostate: pathologic criteria and clinical significance. Mod Pathol 1997, 10: 612-619.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mott LJ: Squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate. Report of 2 cases and review of the literature. J Urol 1979, 121: 833-835.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mohan H, Bal A, Punia RP, Bawa AS: Squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate. Int J Urol 2003, 10: 114-116. 10.1046/j.1442-2042.2003.00580.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moskovitz B, Munichor M, Bolkier M, Livne PM: Squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate. Urol Int 1993, 51: 181-183.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Okamoto T, Ogiu K, Sato M, Kaneko T, Suzuki Y, Tanji S, Fujioka T: Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate: a case report. Hinyokika Kiyo 1996, 42: 67-70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sieracki JC: Epidermoid carcinoma of the human prostate: report of three cases. Laboratory Invest 1955, 4: 232-240.Google Scholar
- Kahler JE: Carcinoma of the prostate gland: a pathologic study. J Urol 1939, 41: 557-574.Google Scholar
- Thompson GJ, Albers DD, Broders AC: Unusual carcinomas involving the prostate gland. J Urol 1953, 69: 416-425.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bennet RS, Edgerton EO: Mixed prostatic carcinoma. J Urol 1973, 110: 561-563.Google Scholar
- Devaney DM, Dorman A, Leader M: Adenosquamous carcinoma of the prostate: a case report. Hum Pathol 1991, 22: 1046-1050. 10.1016/0046-8177(91)90014-GView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moyana TN: Adenosquamous carcinoma of the prostate. Am J Surg Pathol 1987, 11: 403-407. 10.1097/00000478-198705000-00010View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paolo G, Henry JC, Antino C, Melanie JC: Adenosquamous carcinoma of the prostate. Hum Pathol 1995, 26: 123-126. 10.1016/0046-8177(95)90125-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Braslis KG, Davi RC, Nelson E, Civantos F, Soloway MS: Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate: a transformation from adenocarcinoma after the use of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist and flutamide. Urology 1995, 45: 329-331. 10.1016/0090-4295(95)80028-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller VA, Reuter V, Scher HI: Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate after radiation seed implantation for adenocarcinoma. Urology 1995, 46: 111-113. 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80174-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Little NA, Wiener JS, Walther PJ, Paulson DF, Anderson EE: Squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate: 2 cases of a rare malignancy and review of the literature. J Urol 1993, 149: 137-139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gray GF Jr, Marshall VF: Squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 1975, 113: 736-738.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Masuda H, Yamada T, Nagahama K, Nagamatu H, Negishi T: Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate: A case report. Jpn J Urol Surg 1992, 5: 519-521.Google Scholar
- Uchibayashi T, Hisazumi H, Hasegawa M, Shiba N, Muraishi Y, Tanaka T, Nonomura A: Squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1997, 31: 223-224.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Okada E, Kamizaki H: Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate. Int J Urol 2000, 7: 347-350. 10.1046/j.1442-2042.2000.00204.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Imamura M, Nishiyama H, Ohmori K, Nishimura K: Squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate without evidence of recurrence 5 years after operation. Urol Int 2000, 65: 122-124. 10.1159/000064853View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Corder MP, Cicmil GA: Effective treatment of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate with adriamycin. J Urol 1976, 115: 222.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spagnol G: Epitelioma pavimentoso corneificante primitivo della prostata. Pathologica 1926, 18: 590-596.Google Scholar
- Baker WJ, Carney JF: Squamous cell carcinoma of prostate. J Urol 1950, 64: 752-757.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arnheim FK: Carcinoma of the prostate. A study of the post-mortem findings in 176 cases. J Urol 1948, 60: 599-603.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ray GR, Cassady JR, Bagshaw MA: Definitive radiative therapy of carcinoma of the prostate. A report on 15 years of experience. Radiology 1973, 106: 407-418.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kastendieck H, Altenahr E: The squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate as an example of metaplasia in a tumor. Z Krebsforsch Klin Onkol Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1974, 82: 335-340.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sharma SK, Malik AK, Bapna BC: Squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate. Indian J Cancer 1980, 17: 134-135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Okamura K, Ito K, Sahashi M, Shimoji T: Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate: a case report. Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi 1984, 75: 979-983.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Samsonov VA: Prostatic squamous cell cancer and its differential diagnostic contrast with squamous cell metaplasia. Ark Patol 1984, 46: 23-29.Google Scholar
- Al Adnani MS: Schistosomiasis, metaplasia and squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate: histogenesis of the squamous cancer cells determined by localization of specific markers. Neoplasma 1985, 32: 613-622.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Asuero MM, Gomez VM, Leal AJ: A case of epidermoid carcinoma of the prostate. Arch Esp Urol 1987, 40: 681-684.Google Scholar
- Wernert N, Goebbels R, Bonkhoff H, Dhom G: Squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate. Histopathology 1990, 17: 339-344. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1990.tb00738.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sarma DP, Weilbaecher TG, Moon TD: Squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate. Urology 1991, 27: 260-262. 10.1016/0090-4295(91)80299-MView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kuwahara M, Matsushita K, Yoshinaga H, Aki M, Fujisaki N, Furihata M, Ohtsuki Y: Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate: a case report. Hinyokika Kiyo 1993, 39: 77-80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perez Garcia FJ, Veiga Gonzalez M, Rodriguez Martinez JJ, Rabade Rey CJ, Fernandez Gomez JM, Escaf S, Martin Benito JL: Squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate: presentation of a case and review of the literature. Actas Urol Esp 1997, 21: 931-935.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ulloa SA, Iturregui JR, Amezquita M, Ortiz VN: Squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate: a case report and review of the literature. Bol Assoc Med PR 1997, 89: 192-194.Google Scholar
- Rahmanou F, Koo J, Marinbakh AY, Solliday MP, Grob BM, Chin NW: Squamous cell carcinoma at the prostatectomy site: squamous differentiation of recurrent prostate carcinoma. Urology 1999, 54: 744. 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00243-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Puyol Pallas M, Badia F, Gomez Parada J: Squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate. Actas Urol Esp 2001, 25: 71-73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nabi G, Ansari MS, Singh I, Sharma MC, Dogra PN: Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate: a rare clinicopathological entity. Report of 2 cases and review of literature. Urol Int 2001, 66: 216-219. 10.1159/000056618View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goto T, Noguchi A, Hamamoto Y, Minoshima K, Taniguchi M, Takeuchi T, Sakai S, Iwata H, Sasaoka I: Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate forming a rectourethral fistula: a case report. Hinyokika Kiyo 2001, 47: 433-436.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Herrera Puerto J, Barragan Casas JM, Hovos Fitto C, Isusquiza Garro I, Pierna Manzano J: Squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate: a further case. Actas Urol Esp 2002, 26: 366-368.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mayayo Vicente MS, Fernandez Arjona M, Gascon Veguin JP, Jimenez Sanchez F, Puig Rullan AM, Cortes Aranguez I: Prostatic epidermoid carcinoma: report of a new case and review of the literature. Arch Esp Urol 2003, 56: 939-943.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kanthan R, Torkian B: Squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate. A report of 6 cases. Urol Int 2004, 72: 28-31. 10.1159/000075269View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Parwani AV, Kronz JD, Genega EM, Gaudin P, Chang S, Epstein JI: Prostate carcinoma with squamous differentiation. Am J Surg Pathol 2004, 28: 651-657.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- John TT, Bashir J, Burrow CT, Machin DG: Squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate – A case report. Int Urol Nephrol 2005, 37: 311-313. 10.1007/s11255-004-7979-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Di Pietro C, Celia A, De Stefani S, Saredi G, Bianchi G: Squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2006, 78: 75-76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Inaba M, Boku H, Tanaka S, Fujito A: Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate: a case report. Hinyokika Kiko 2007, 53: 39-41.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.