Skip to main content
Download PDF

Efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy for chordomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Radiation Oncology volume 18, Article number: 152 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

Carbon ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) for chordomas has been gradually performed in several research centres. This study aimed to systematically review the results of clinical reports from these institutions and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of C-ion RT.

Methods

In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and set search strategies, we searched four databases for articles from their inception to February 11, 2023. These articles were screened, and data were extracted independently by two researchers. STATA 14.0 was used for statistical analysis of survival results.

Results

A total of 942 related articles were retrieved, 11 of which were included. Regarding lesion location, 57% (n = 552) originated in the sacral region, 41% (n = 398) in the skull base, and 2% (n = 19) in the spine (upper cervical). The local control (LC) rates at 1, 2, 3, 5, 9, and 10 years in these studies were 96%, 93%, 83%, 76%, 71%, and 54%, respectively. The overall survival (OS) rates at 1, 2, 3, 5, 9, and 10 years in these studies were 99%, 100%, 93%, 85%, 76%, and 69%, respectively. Acute and late toxicities were acceptable, acute toxicities were mainly grade 1 to grade 2 and late toxicities were mainly grade 1 to grade 3.

Conclusion

C-ion RT has attractive clinical application prospects and is an important local treatment strategy for chordomas. Encouraging results were observed in terms of LC and OS. Meanwhile, the acute and late toxicities were acceptable.

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023398792.

Introduction

Chordomas are locally aggressive malignant bone tumours with a low incidence that arise from cells of notochord remnants. Thus, chordomas are often located in the midline from the skull base to the sacrococcygeal bone [1]. Overall, chordomas have an incidence of 0.8–1 per million, with approximately 50–55% of cases located in the sacrococcygeal bone, followed by the clival region (30–35%) and mobile spine (10–20%) [2,3,4,5,6]. Chordomas have a low potential for metastasis, and the preferred treatment strategy for them is complete surgical resection [7]. Previous studies have reported that local control (LC) is a significant survival outcome [7]. However, complete resection of some chordomas are often difficult in patients with adjacent to critical anatomical structures such as the brainstem, spinal cord, and optic pathways [8, 9]. Radiotherapy (RT) plays an irreplaceable role in the treatment of chordomas, especially those that are inoperable or have residual tumours after surgery [10].

Chordomas are known to have low radiosensitivity, requiring higher-dose irradiation (at least 70 Gy) to gain adequate LC [11]. However, because of the proximity of some chordomas to critical risk organs, such as the brain stem, spinal cord, and optic nerve pathways, achieving high doses of tumour irradiation can be difficult with traditional photon therapy. In recent decades, particle radiotherapies, such as proton beam therapy (PBT) and carbon ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT), have emerged as RT techniques. A higher dose can be delivered to the tumour area (Bragg peak effect) compared to photons while protecting the organs at risk (OARs). Compared with PBT and photons, C-ion RT has better relative biological effectiveness (RBE). Considering the abovementioned technical advantages, C-ion RT can become a new treatment option for chordomas [12].

In recent years, C-ion RT for chordomas has been gradually performed in several research centres. This study aimed to systematically review the results of clinical reports from these institutions and to evaluate its safety and efficacy.

Materials and methods

Literature identification

This study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic reviews (PROSPERO) (Registration No. CRD42023398792). This systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the PRISMA guidelines and recommendations [13].

Search strategy

Candidate articles were obtained by searching four databases (Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science) from their inception to 11 February 2023. Literature not written in English was excluded. The search terms were as follows: ((“Chordoma OR Chordomas OR Chordoma*”) AND (“Heavy Ion Radiotherapy OR Heavy Ion Radiotherapies OR Heavy Ion Therap* OR Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy OR Carbon Ion Radiotherapy OR Carbon Ion Therap* OR Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy OR C-ion therapy OR hadron OR particle OR charged particle”)). In addition, we traced the relevant references and manually searched the abstracts of congress meetings.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

These articles were screened, and data were extracted independently by two researchers (MD and QZ). The inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) all patients were pathologically diagnosed with chordoma; (b) patients received C-ion RT; and (c) reported incidence of toxicity and survival outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and LC from initial diagnosis. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (a) studies on patients receiving other RT techniques, including photons, PBT, brachytherapy, and other charged particles; (b) duplicate publications; (c) overlapping cohorts (only the most complete studies were included); (d) re-irradiation studies; (e) sample size of < 10 patients; (f) lack of detailed data; and (g) other irrelevant studies (case reports, reviews, and protocols).

Data extraction

Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers (RL and QZ), and the results were verified by a third reviewer (DW). The following data were extracted: (a) research institution, study period, and study design; (b) baseline patient characteristics; (c) clinical features and treatment regimens; (d) survival and toxicity data; and (e) evaluation indicators of quality and bias.

Quality and bias assessments

The Joanna Briggs Institute criteria were used to assess the quality and bias of the included literature [14], which were independently completed by two researchers (QZ and MD) (Table 1) [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25].

Table 1 Assessment of risk of bias in included studies
Full size table

Statistical analysis

Baseline variables and incidence of toxicity were analysed using descriptive statistics. Data descriptions included frequencies and percentages for dichotomous data, and means with standard deviations or medians with interquartile ranges for continuous data. We used a random effects model to provide an overall pooled estimate for the case series studies. We computed proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to estimate the effect sizes for continuous outcomes. All the analyses were performed using STATA version 14.0 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA).

Results

Search strategy

A total of 942 candidate articles were identified through the systematic literature search (Fig. 1). Based on the exclusion criteria, 61 relevant studies were screened. As demonstrated in Fig. 1, we excluded another 50 additional items. Eleven studies from different regions were included as follows (Table 1): Japan (n = 7), Italy (n = 2), and Germany (n = 2). In terms of research design, more than half were retrospective studies (n = 7), and the other four were prospective studies (n = 3) and phase I/II or II trials (n = 1) (Table 2) [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Search results per the PRISMA guidelines

Full size image
Table 2 Baseline characteristics of included studies
Full size table

Baseline characteristics

As listed in Table 2, C-ion RT was performed on 969 patients with chordomas from seven different research institutions. All 11 included studies reported primary endpoints (LC and OS) and secondary endpoints (toxicity) after C-ion RT. Table 2 summarizes the main details of the patients’ baseline characteristics in all the included studies [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25].

Clinical features and treatment regimens

In total, 969 patients were pathologically diagnosed with chordomas. Regarding lesion location, 57% (n = 552) of the tumours arose in the sacral region, 41 (n = 398) in the skull base, and 2 (n = 19) in the spine (upper cervical). Nine studies have reported on tumour status; the recurrent presentations were 13.2% (n = 119) and primary presentations were 86.8% (n = 785). Table 3 summarizes the main details of the tumour status, histology, surgery, and chemotherapy [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25].

Table 3 Clinical features and treatment regimens main results of all included studies
Full size table

C-ion RT

In terms of C-ion RT, nine studies have reported on the beam delivery mode (Table 3). Radiation oncologists in Japan tend to use passive scanning, whereas those in Germany and Italy tend to use active scanning. Overall, the median target volume was 13 374 cc. Regarding dose regimens (Table 3), significant differences among different research institutions were observed [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25].

Pooled incidences of LC

The LC incidence at 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, 9-, and 10-years in these studies were 96% (95% CI = 0.93–1, I2 = 0%), 93% (95% CI = 0.85–1.01, I2 = 0%), 83% (95% CI = 0.77–0.9, I2 = 64%), 76% (95% CI = 0.71–0.81, I2 = 67.5%), 71% (95% CI = 0.55–0.86, I2 = 0%), and 54% (95% CI = 0.49–0.59, I2 = 0%) respectively (Fig. 2) [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. For the five studies regarding skull base chordomas, LC incidence at 1-, 3-, 5-, 9-, and 10-years were 96% (95% CI = 0.93–1, I2 = 0%), 80% (95% CI = 0.76–0.85, I2 = 0%), 73% (95% CI = 0.67–0.79, I2 = 43.9%), 71% (95% CI = 0.55–0.86, I2 = 0%), and 56% (95% CI = 0.49–0.63, I2 = 3.4%), respectively (Additional file 1: Fig. S1) [15, 18, 23,24,25]. For the five studies regarding sacral chordomas, LC incidence at 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-years were 89% (95% CI = 0.74–1.03, I2 = 0%), 94% (95% CI = 0.85–1.02, I2 = 0%), 80% (95% CI = 0.72–0.88, I2 = 79.2%), and 52% (95% CI = 0.45–0.59, I2 = 0%), respectively (Additional file 2: Fig. S2) [16, 17, 19, 20, 22].

Fig. 2
figure 2

The pooled incidences of LC after C-ion RT for chordoma

Full size image

Pooled incidences of OS

As presented in Fig. 3, after undergoing CIRT for 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, 9-, and 10-years, the OS rates for chordomas were 99% (95% CI = 0.97–1.01, I2 = 0%), 100% (95% CI = 0.99–1.01, I2 = 0%), 93% (95% CI = 0.9–0.96, I2 = 0%), 85% (95% CI = 0.82–0.88, I2 = 22%), 76% (95% CI = 0.62–0.91, I2 = 0%), and 69% (95% CI = 0.62–0.76, I2 = 41.6%), respectively (Fig. 3) [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. For different tumour sites, the OS rates at 1-, 3-, 5-, 9-, and 10-years for skull base chordomas were 99% (95% CI = 0.97–1.01, I2 = 0%), 93% (95% CI = 0.91–0.96, I2 = 0%), 86% (95% CI = 0.82–0.90, I2 = 27.1%), 76% (95% CI = 0.62–0.91, I2 = 0%), and 74% (95% CI = 0.67–0.80, I2 = 0%), respectively (Additional file 3: Fig. S3) [15, 18, 23,24,25]; the OS rates at 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-years for sacral chordomas were 100% (95% CI = 0.99–1.01, I2 = 0%), 91% (95% CI = 0.81–1.01, I2 = 0%), 84% (95% CI = 0.81–0.87, I2 = 0%), and 67% (95% CI = 0.60–0.74, I2 = 0%), respectively (Additional file 4: Fig. S4) [16, 17, 19, 20, 22].

Fig. 3
figure 3

The pooled incidences of OS after C-ion RT for chordoma

Full size image

Toxicity

Assessment on the toxicity of C-ion RT is presented in Table 4 [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Our systematic review observed grade 3 and 4 acute toxicity, with incidences of 2.9–5.3% and 0.5%, respectively [16, 18, 19, 21]. For grade 4 and 5 late toxicities, the incidences were 2.1–5.9% and 2.9%, respectively [16,17,18,19]. A study on skull base chordomas identified grade 3 acute and grade 4 and 5 late toxicities; the incidence were 2.9% and 2.9–5.9%, respectively [18]. Serious late toxicities included mucositis (grade 5, n = 1) and optic nerve injury (grade 4, n = 2) [18]. Regarding chordomas in the sacral region, grade 4 acute and late toxicities were observed, with incidences of 0.5% and 1.1–2.3%, respectively [16, 17, 19]. The major radiation-induced acute and late toxicities were skin erythema or dermatitis, gastrointestinal tract, neuropathy, myositis, insufficiency fracture, pain, and urinary retention. Serious late toxicities included skin erythema or dermatitis (grade 4, n = 8) and pain (grade 4, n = 1) [16, 17, 19]. In one study on chordomas in the spine (upper cervical), toxicity above grade 3 was not observed [16]. The late toxicities included dysphagia (n = 1), myelitis (n = 1), encephalomyelitis (n = 5), and vertebral compression fractures (n = 5) [23].

Table 4 Survival outcomes, toxicity incidence and prognostic factors on patients of all included studies
Full size table

Prognostic factors of C-ion RT effectiveness

The following factors were evaluated in nine studies: age, sex, Karnofsky performance status, gross target volume, planning target volume, tumour volume, level of proximal invasion, total irradiated dose, tumour status, eye symptoms, prior treatment, tumour-gastrointestinal distance, chemotherapy, spinal cord infiltration, and histology. Table 4 (Boldface indicates statistically significant difference) shows the main details of the prognostic factors of C-ion RT effectiveness in all the included studies [15, 17,18,19,20,21, 23,24,25].

Discussion

Chordomas often occur adjacent to critical neuroaxes, such as the brainstem, spinal cord, and optic pathways [8, 9]. Therefore, complete resection of some chordomas is often difficult. A previous study has reported that the total resection rate of chordomas is approximately 20–70%, with an LC rate of 60–80% [26,27,28,29]. However, the LC rate in patients with subtotal resection is approximately 25–50% [26,27,28,29]. According to the practical guide from the Spine Oncology Society, RT plays an important role, especially PBT and C-ion RT, for some chordomas [30]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of C-ion RT for chordomas, including the skull base, sacral, and mobile spine.

Achieving high doses of tumour irradiation is difficult with traditional photon therapy because of chordomas adjacent to the critical neuroaxis OAR. Performing photon irradiation therapy in patients postoperatively has also been reported. After five years, LC reached only 39% [31]. Satisfactory LC may be equally difficult to achieve with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Debus et al. have reported the results of SBRT in the treatment of chordomas, with a 5-year LC rate of only 50% [32]. Similarly, in a study of 93 patients with intracranial chordomas treated with SRS, the LC rate was 54.7% after 5 years [33]. However, C-ion RT demonstrated an impressive LC rate compared to photon therapy in our study, with pooled LC rates of 76% and 54% at 5 years and 10 years, respectively (Fig. 2).

C-ion RT and PBT have similar physical advantages (Bragg peaks). Moreover, the C ion has a better RBE than PBT. However, whether C-ion RT or PBT is more favourable for chordoma treatment remains a long-term challenge in the field of charged-particle therapy. A systematic review of RT for chordoma included 2 prospective and 21 retrospective studies of PBT published by Redmond et al. [30]. The median LC and OS after 5 years among the reported studies were 73.3% and 81.3%, respectively [30]. In our meta-analysis, the pooled incidence of LC and OS at 5 years were 76% and 85%, respectively (Figs. 2 and 3). Unfortunately, survival outcomes at follow-up times of ≥ 10 years could not be compared in the two studies. Using only prospective data, Iannalfi et al. have reported on PBT and C-ion RT for skull base chordomas [23]. They observed a 5-year LC rate of 84% in the PBT group and 71% in the C-ion RT group, although they stated that patients with poor prognosis were specifically assigned to the C-ion RT group [23]. An imbalance in the baseline of patients was observed, and comparing survival outcomes between the two techniques was not appropriate. The Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center has published a retrospective study of PBT and C-ion RT for skull base chordomas [25]. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year LC rates of the PBT group were 97%, 80%, and 61%, respectively, whereas those in the C-ion group were 96%, 80%, and 65%, respectively [25]. The corresponding 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 100%, 92%, and 92% for the PBT group and 99%, 91%, and 83% for the C-ion RT group [25]. Outcomes of C-ion RT and PBT treatment of skull base chordomas may be similar in terms of tumour control, survival, and toxicity [25]. Therefore, the advantages of different charged particle RT techniques for chordomas need to be determined in more prospective studies, especially randomised controlled clinical trials.

Of the 11 included articles, five were on skull base chordomas, five were on sacral chordomas, and one was regarding a mobile spine chordoma (Table 2). As reported in Additional files 1–4, the pooled LC and OS rates at 5 years and 10 years were very similar for the skull base and sacral chordomas, which indicates that C-ion RT may have similar tumour control and survival in different sites of chordomas [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Chordomas have various pathological subtypes (classic, chondroid, and dedifferentiated subtypes), among which the prognosis of the chondroid type and dedifferentiated subtypes is very different. A model of individualised C-ion RT for chordomas requires further investigation. To the best of our knowledge, no reports on particle therapy (C-ion or PBT) for the different pathological subtypes of chordoma have been published.

Regarding toxicity, the most frequent toxicity was skin reaction [15,16,17, 19, 20, 22], and the incidences of grade 3 acute and grade 4 late skin toxicity were 3.2% and 1.1–2.1%, respectively [16, 17, 19]. Kamada et al. have suggested that 73.6 Gy (RBE) may be the maximum tolerated dose for patients without subcutaneous tumours in order to reduce the incidence of skin toxicity [34]. For patients with subcutaneous tumour involvement, the maximum dose may not exceed 70.4 Gy (RBE) [34]. Koto et al. have reported on a one case with a recurrent skull base chordoma that developed grade 5 late toxicity (fatal bleeding from the nasopharynx) at 9 years and 3 months after C-ion RT [18]. This patient had undergone transsphenoidal approach surgery 3 years before C-ion RT, and received a second surgery through the transpetrosal approach 1 year prior to C-ion RT [18]. Late neuropathy (grade 3) and optic nerve injury toxicity (grade 4) had an incidence of 0.9–3.2% and 5.9%, respectively [17,18,19]. According to a review on RT for chordomas published by Redmond et al., the median follow-up time for photon RT was 10–50 months [30]. However, the median follow-up time in our included studies was longer, ranging from 23.3 to 108 months (Table 2). Therefore, directly comparing the toxicity between photon RT and C-ion RT is difficult.

This meta-analysis has several limitations. First, only 11 of 61 relevant full-text articles met the inclusion criteria, and grey literature was ignored, which may have a higher risk of publication bias. Second, the metadata were from different regions: Japan (64%), Italy (18%), and Germany (18%); only four studies were prospective or phase I/II or II trials. Therefore, the metadata were mainly obtained from small retrospective studies, and there could be patients lost to follow-up, selection biases, and reporting biases. Finally, chordomas are generally slow-growing; Scampa et al. have reported a median OS of approximately 10 years [35], although four studies had a follow-up period of > 10 years in our study.

Further, C-ion RT has some limitations as a therapeutic strategy for chordomas. Chordomas have various pathological subtypes (classic, chondroid, and dedifferentiated subtypes), among which the chondroid subtype has the best prognosis, and the dedifferentiated subtype has the worst prognosis [36,37,38]. Therefore, it is interesting to hypothesise whether the dose is sufficient for pathological types with poor prognosis. In addition, clinical observations have demonstrated the metastatic potential of chordomas, with 5–40% of patients developing distant metastases during the course of the disease [39]. Moreover, systemic therapies, including chemotherapy and targeted therapy, may be occasionally necessary, although no recommended consensus or treatment guidelines have been established.

Conclusion

C-ion RT has attractive clinical application prospects and is an important local treatment strategy for chordomas. Encouraging results were observed in terms of LC and OS. Meanwhile, the acute and late toxicities were acceptable.

Availability of data and materials

Data and material are available on request.

Abbreviations

C-ion RT:

Carbon ion radiotherapy

LC:

Local control

CI:

Confidence interval

OS:

Overall survival

RT:

Radiotherapy

OAR:

Organs at risk

PBT:

Proton beam therapy

CI(s):

Confidence interval(s)

RBE:

Relative biological effectiveness

SBRT:

Stereotactic body radiotherapy

SRS:

Stereotactic radiosurgery

References

  1. Salisbury JR, Deverell MH, Cookson MJ, et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction of human embryonic notochords: clue to the pathogenesis of chordoma. J Pathol. 1993;171:59–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Smoll NR, Gautschi OP, Radovanovic I, et al. Incidence and relative survival of chordomas: the standardized mortality ratio and the impact of chordomas on a population. Cancer. 2013;119:2029–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Flanagan AM, Yamaguchi T. Chordoma. In: Fletcher CDM, editor. World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone. France: Pathology and Genetics; 2013. p. 328–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bjornsson J, Wold LE, Ebersold MJ, et al. Chordoma of the mobile spine. A clinicopathologic analysis of 40 patients. Cancer. 1993;71:735–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pan Y, Lu L, Chen J, et al. Analysis of prognostic factors for survival in patients with primary spinal chordoma using the SEER Registry from 1973 to 2014. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13:76.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zuckerman SL, Bilsky MH, Laufer I. Chordomas of the skull base, mobile spine, and sacrum: an epidemiologic investigation of presentation, treatment, and survival. World Neurosurg. 2018;113:e618–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Noël G, Feuvret L, Ferrand R, et al. Radiotherapeutic factors in the management of cervical-basal chordomas and chondrosarcomas. Neurosurgery. 2004;55:1252–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hug EB, Loredo LN, Slater JD, et al. Proton radiation therapy for chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base. J Neurosurg. 1999;91:432–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Samii A, Gerganov VM, Herold C, et al. Chordomas of the skull base: surgical management and outcome. J Neurosurg. 2007;107:319–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pennicooke B, Laufer I, Sahgal A, et al. Safety and local control of radiation therapy for chordoma of the spine and sacrum: a systematic review. Spine. 2016;41(Suppl 20):S186–92.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pearlman AW, Friedman M. Radical radiation therapy of chordoma. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1970;108:332–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamada N, Imaoka T, Masunaga S, et al. Recent advances in the biology of heavy-ion cancer therapy. J Radiat Res. 2010;51:365–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7): e1000097.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Munn Z, Barker TH, Moola S, et al. Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18:2127–33.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mizoe JE, Hasegawa A, Takagi R, et al. Carbon ion radiotherapy for skull base chordoma. Skull Base. 2009;19:219–24.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Imai R, Kamada T, Sugahara S, et al. Carbon ion radiotherapy for sacral chordoma. Br J Radiol. 2011;84(Spec No 1):S48-54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Imai R, Kamada T, Araki N. Carbon ion radiation therapy for unresectable sacral chordoma: an analysis of 188 cases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;95:322–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Koto M, Ikawa H, Kaneko T, et al. Long-term outcomes of skull base chordoma treated with high-dose carbon-ion radiotherapy. Head Neck. 2020;42:2607–13.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Demizu Y, Imai R, Kiyohara H, et al. Carbon ion radiotherapy for sacral chordoma: a retrospective nationwide multicentre study in Japan. Radiother Oncol. 2021;154:1–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shiba S, Okamoto M, Kiyohara H, et al. Impact of carbon ion radiotherapy on inoperable bone sarcoma. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13:1099.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Aoki S, Koto M, Ikawa H, et al. Long-term outcomes of high dose carbon-ion radiation therapy for unresectable upper cervical (C1–2) chordoma. Head Neck. 2022;44:2162–70.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Evangelisti G, Fiore MR, Bandiera S, et al. Carbon ions therapy as single treatment in chordoma of the sacrum Histologic and metabolic outcome studies. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23:4002–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Iannalfi A, D’Ippolito E, Riva G, et al. Proton and carbon ion radiotherapy in skull base chordomas: a prospective study based on a dual particle and a patient-customized treatment strategy. Neuro Oncol. 2020;22:1348–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Uhl M, Mattke M, Welzel T, et al. Highly effective treatment of skull base chordoma with carbon ion irradiation using a raster scan technique in 155 patients: first long-term results. Cancer. 2014;120:3410–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mattke M, Ohlinger M, Bougatf N, et al. Proton and carbon ion beam treatment with active raster scanning method in 147 patients with skull base chordoma at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center-a single-center experience. Strahlenther Onkol. 2023;199:160–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ozaki T, Hillmann A, Winkelmann W. Surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal chordoma. J Surg Oncol. 1997;64:274–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yonemoto T, Tatezaki S, Takenouchi T, et al. The surgical management of sacrococcygeal chordoma. Cancer. 1999;85:878–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cheng EY, Ozerdemoglu RA, Transfeldt EE, et al. Lumbosacral chordoma. Prognostic factors and treatment. Spine. 1999;24:1639–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bergh P, Kindblom LG, Gunterberg B, et al. Prognostic factors in chordoma of the sacrum and mobile spine: a study of 39 patients. Cancer. 2000;88:2122–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Redmond KJ, Schaub SK, Lo SL, et al. Radiotherapy for mobile spine and sacral chordoma: a critical review and practical guide from the spine tumor academy. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15:2359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Forsyth PA, Cascino TL, Shaw EG, et al. Intracranial chordomas: a clinicopathological and prognostic study of 51 cases. J Neurosurg. 1993;78:741–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Debus J, Schulz-Ertner D, Schad L, et al. Stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy for chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;47:591–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pikis S, Mantziaris G, Peker S, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial chordomas: an international multiinstitutional study. J Neurosurg. 2022;4:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kamada T, Tsujii H, Tsuji H, et al. Efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy in bone and soft tissue sarcomas. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:4466–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Scampa M, Tessitore E, Dominguez DE, et al. Sacral chordoma: a population-based analysis of epidemiology and survival outcomes. Anticancer Res. 2022;42:929–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Barnes L, Kapadia SB. The biology and pathology of selected skull base tumors. J Neurooncol. 1994;20:213–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Mitchell A, Scheithauer BW, Unni KK, et al. Chordoma and chondroid neoplasms of the spheno-occiput. An immunohistochemical study of 41 cases with prognostic and nosologic implications. Cancer. 1993;72:2943–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Jian BJ, Bloch OG, Yang I, et al. Adjuvant radiation therapy and chondroid chordoma subtype are associated with a lower tumor recurrence rate of cranial chordoma. J Neurooncol. 2010;98:101–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. McPherson CM, Suki D, McCutcheon IE, et al. Metastatic disease from spinal chordoma: a 10-year experience. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;5:277–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Qiuning Zhang for her support during the study.

Funding

The systematic review was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2022YFC2401505); Science and Technology Plan Project of Chengguan District of Lanzhou (No.2020-2-2-5); Talent innovation and venture project of Lanzhou city (No. 2020-RC-113); Key R&D Program of Science and Technology Department of Gansu Province (No. 20YF8FA116); The authorized project of Lanzhou KejinTaiji Corporation, Ltd (No. BMP-B-02-002).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Meng Dong and Ruifeng Liu have contributed equally to this study.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China

    Meng Dong, Dandan Wang, Yuhang Wang, Junru Chen, Yuhong Ou & Xiaohu Wang

  2. Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.1, Yanxia Road, Chenguan District, Lanzhou, 730030, People’s Republic of China

    Meng Dong, Ruifeng Liu, Qiuning Zhang, Dandan Wang, Hongtao Luo, Yuhang Wang, Junru Chen, Yuhong Ou & Xiaohu Wang

  3. Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Ruifeng Liu, Qiuning Zhang, Hongtao Luo & Xiaohu Wang

  4. Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, China

    Ruifeng Liu, Qiuning Zhang, Hongtao Luo & Xiaohu Wang

Authors
  1. Meng Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ruifeng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qiuning Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dandan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hongtao Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yuhang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Junru Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yuhong Ou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Xiaohu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conception/design: XW and MD. Provision of study materials and patients: MD, RL, and QZ. Data collection and/or assembly: QZ, DW, and YW. Data analysis and interpretation: MD, RL, DW, QZ, HL, DW, YW, JC, YO. Manuscript writing: MD and QZ. Final approval of the manuscript: XW and QZ.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qiuning Zhang or Xiaohu Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Fig. S1

. The pooled incidences of LC after C-ion RT for skull base chordoma

Additional file 2: Fig. S2

. The pooled incidences of OS after C-ion RT for skull base chordoma

Additional file 3: Fig. S3

. The pooled incidences of LC after C-ion RT for sacral chordoma

Additional file 4: Fig. S4

. The pooled incidences of OS after C-ion RT for sacral chordoma

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dong, M., Liu, R., Zhang, Q. et al. Efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy for chordomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiat Oncol 18, 152 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-023-02337-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-023-02337-x

Keywords

Radiation Oncology

ISSN: 1748-717X

Contact us