Skip to main content
Download PDF

Radiotherapy-induced diffuse myocardial fibrosis in early-stage breast cancer patients – multimodality imaging study with six-year follow-up

Radiation Oncology volume 18, Article number: 124 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Breast radiotherapy (RT) induces diffuse myocardial changes, which may increase the incidence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. This study aimed to evaluate the early signs of diffuse fibrosis after RT and their evolution during a six-year follow-up.

Methods

Thirty patients with early-stage left-sided breast cancer were studied with echocardiography and electrocardiography (ECG) at baseline, after RT, and at three-year and six-year follow-up visits. Echocardiography analysis included an off-line analysis of integrated backscatter (IBS). ECG was analysed for fragmented QRS (fQRS). In addition, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging was performed at the six-year control. The left ventricle 16-segment model was used in cardiac imaging, and respective local radiation doses were analysed.

Results

Regional myocardial reflectivity in inferoseptal segments increased by 2.02 (4.53) dB (p = 0.026) and the percentage of leads with fQRS increased from 9.2 to 16.4% (p = 0.002) during the follow-up. In CMR imaging, abnormal extracellular volume (ECV) and T1 mapping values were found with anteroseptal and apical localization in a median of 3.5 (1.00–5.75) and 3 (1.25–4.00) segments, respectively. A higher left ventricle radiation dose was associated with an increased likelihood of having changes simultaneously in CMR and echocardiography (OR 1.26, 95% Cl. 1.00–1.59, p = 0.047).

Conclusions

After radiotherapy, progressive changes in markers of diffuse myocardial fibrosis were observed in a multimodal manner in ECG and echocardiography. Changes in echocardiography and abnormal values in CMR were localized in the septal and apical regions, and multiple changes were associated with higher radiation doses.

Background

Radiotherapy (RT) remains an essential part of cancer therapy despite remarkable advances in medical cancer treatment. Refinements in RT treatment protocols have reduced adverse effects on healthy tissue, but some direct radiation and scattering unavoidably affects nearby tissue. Breast RT induces slowly evolving fibrotic changes in cardiac structures, causing excess late cardiac morbidity and mortality [1, 2].

The risk of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is increased 16-fold in breast cancer patients with prior RT compared to nonirradiated matched controls[3] Myocardial diffuse fibrosis and changes in diastology are found in patients with prior chest RT[1, 4] However, there is little knowledge about the evolution of diffuse fibrosis in patients treated with RT. In this study, the evolution and distribution of diffuse myocardial fibrosis were evaluated prospectively in a multimodal manner, including CMR imaging, echocardiography, and electrocardiography (ECG).

Methods

Patient selection

This single-centre prospective study included thirty eligible early-stage female left-sided breast cancer patients. The inclusion and exclusion criteria have been described previously in detail[5] In addition, a clinical contraindication for the CMR study was an exclusion criterion. The study was conducted from June 2011 to April 2019 at the Heart Hospital and Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Finland. The CMR studies were performed at the Heart Imaging Center, Helsinki University Hospital, at the end of the six-year follow-up period. The study complied with the Helsinki Declaration, and the local ethics committee approved the study protocol (R10160 and R11149). All participants signed an informed consent form before study enrolment.

Radiotherapy

After surgery, all patients received adjuvant conformal 3D RT with modern RT techniques (3D-CRT). The treatment was delivered according to the institutional clinical guidelines. All patients underwent 3D computed tomographic treatment planning and were scanned under free breathing, as the voluntary deep-inspiration breath-hold technique (DIBH) was not implemented as clinical practice in our unit then. The radiation dose was either 50 Gy in 2 Gy fractions with an additional boost of 16 Gy in 2 Gy fractions to the tumor bed if clinically indicated or 42.56 Gy in 2.66 Gy fractions (hypofractionation). A mean heart dose constraint of 5 Gy was used in the treatment planning.

The full details of treatment planning and contouring of the primary heart structures have been described previously [6]. A dedicated clinical oncologist (MM) performed the left ventricle myocardial segment contouring with the 16-segment model, adapting the method described by Tang et al. as shown in Fig. 1 [7].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Radiotherapy fields in computed tomography treatment planning. Left ventricle segments are presented. Continuous color scale illustrates radiation doses received in the axial (A) and short-axis (B) views. Gy, gray

Full size image

Cardiac examinations

Cardiac examinations were performed 6 ± 8 days prior to RT, within three days of completion of the RT, and three (2.5–3.3 years) and six years (5.7–6.2 years) after RT. Echocardiography was performed using a 1–5 MHz matrix-array X5-1 transducer. Baseline to three-year control examinations were performed with a Philips iE33 ultrasound machine (Bothell, WA, USA). Due to the clinical update of equipment, the six-year control was performed using a Philips Epiq7 ultrasound machine (Bothell, WA, USA). The off-line analysis of integrated backscatter (IBS) was performed using Philips Qlab version 13 (Bothell, WA, USA). The IBS analysis is explained in Additional file 1: Figure S1. A change from baseline to the six-year control was used in the final analysis. An increase of ≥ 100% in reflectivity was assessed to be a significant change.

A 12-lead ECG was recorded at each study visit. A visible notch in any part of the QRS complex in several consecutive beats was defined as a fragmented QRS (fQRS) (Additional file 2: Figure S2). Each ECG was analysed by the same investigator (ST). All ECGs exhibited a normal sinus rhythm, and all the analysed QRS complexes had a duration less than 120 ms.

All study subjects underwent CMR imaging using a 3T Magnetom Skyrafit system (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Cine-images were acquired using a balanced steady-state gradient echo (TrueFISP) sequence. All studies included standard long and short axis images. T1- and T2-mapping sequences were included in the standard protocol using a shortened Modified Look-Locker Inversion-recovery (ShMOLLI) sequence (Additional file 3: Figure S3). Pre- and 12 min post-gadolinium injection T1-mapping sequences were obtained to enable ECV measurements. All studies were analysed using Medis Suite Qmass, QStrain, T1 mapping, and T2/T2* mapping cardiac imaging programs (Medis Medical Imaging Systems, Leiden, The Netherlands).

Statistical analysis

The data are presented as the means with standard deviations (SD) for variables with normal distributions, as medians with quartiles (Q1–Q3) for nonnormally distributed variables, or as numbers with percentages for categorical variables. The differences between groups were tested with the independent samples t-test or Mann–Whitney U test where appropriate. The differences in the measurements were tested with the paired samples t-test, Friedman’s test, Cochran’s Q test, or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Correlations were estimated using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to model the changes in fQRS, T1, ECV, and IBS values, adjusting the models with body mass index (BMI), hypertension, current smoking status, and mean left ventricle radiation dose. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to explain changes for groups formed based on the extent of abnormal imaging values. The analysis was performed with IBM SPSS Statistics software, version 27.0 for Windows (Armonk, NY, USA). All p-values are two-sided. All p-values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

General characteristics

The baseline patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. All patients received RT as planned and completed the six-year follow-up uneventfully.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics
Full size table

Radiation doses

The mean heart radiation dose in the study population was 2.85 Gy (1.71–3.87 Gy). The mean heart dose was < 2 Gy in nine patients (30.0%), 2–4 Gy in 14 (46.7%), and > 4 Gy in seven (23.3%). The radiation doses varied remarkably between different left ventricle segments; please see Additional file 4: Table S1. The highest doses were in the apical and anterior segments, whereas the basal and inferior segments had the lowest doses. Figure 2 illustrates the distribution of radiation dose between the left ventricle segments.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The mean segmental left ventricle radiation dose as a composite of data from all patients in a bulls-eye representation. The dose color map uses a log2 scale where yellow areas receive the highest dose and transition towards purple equals decreasing dose. Gy, gray

Full size image

CMR

At six years, CMR-assessed left ventricle end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, ejection fraction, and mass were within normal range: 73.53 (15.75) mL/m2, 22.87 (7.31) mL/m2, 69.13 (7.04) %, and 48.53 (8.86) g/m2, respectively. In Table 2, regional values are presented. No significant late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was observed in any of the patients. The incidence of abnormal segmental findings is presented in Fig. 3. For segmental values, please see Additional file 5: Table S2.

Table 2 Global and regional T1, ECV, T2, and IBS values
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Incidence of abnormal segmental values of the left ventricle in a bulls-eye configuration. T1 (A), ECV (B), and IBS (C) values are presented according to the same scale (0 – 50%), whereas T2 is scaled from 0–5%. The same color scale is used for every variable where values increase while the color changes from purple to yellow. ECV, extracellular volume; IBS, integrated backscatter

Full size image

T1 mapping. The global median T1 was 1235 ms (1199–1273 ms). The incidence of abnormal T1 values (> 1300 ms) varied between segments, being most frequent in the apical and anteroseptal segments. Twenty-seven patients (90%) had at least one segment with abnormal T1 values (range 1–12). The median for number of abnormal segments was 3.00 (1.25–4.00), corresponding to 18.75% (7.81–25.00%) of the segments. In the multivariable analysis, hypertension predicted higher T1 values in apical segments (β = 0.461, p = 0.017).

T2 mapping. The global median T2 was 35.54 ms (34.61–38.23 ms). Only two patients (6.67%) had abnormal values (> 60 ms) in any of the segments. One patient had abnormal values in two apical segments, the other in five basal segments.

ECV mapping. The global ECV was 28.0% (26–30.2%). The incidence of abnormal ECV values (> 30%) varied between different segments, being most frequent in the apical and septal segments. In total, twenty-four patients (80%) had abnormal ECV values in at least one of the segments (range 1–13). The median number of abnormal segments was 3.50 (1.00–5.75), corresponding to 21.88% (6.25–35.94%) of the segments. In the multivariable analysis, hypertension predicted higher ECV values in apical segments (β = 0.416, p = 0.030).

Integrated backscatter

The change from baseline to six-year follow-up visit was measured with IBS analysis. The global IBS change was 1.04 (2.80) dB (p = 0.060). The most significant change was seen in inferoseptal segments, from 9.29 (3.35) dB at baseline to 11.76 (4.30) dB at six years (p = 0.026). Values were regarded as abnormal if they increased ≥ 100%. Twenty-three patients (77%) had at least one segment with abnormal IBS values (range 1–6). The median number of abnormal segments was 1.00 (1.00–3.00), corresponding to 6.25% (6.25–18.75%) of the segments. In the multivariable analysis, BMI (β = 0.589, p = 0.009) and hypertension (β = -0.382, p = 0.042) predicted IBS change when the whole left ventricle was assessed.

Fragmented QRS

Eighteen patients (60%) had fQRS in at least one lead (range 1–4 leads) at baseline. A spontaneous correction of some or all fragmentation changes was observed in twelve patients during the six-year follow-up.

At six years, twenty-four patients (80%) had fQRS in one to five leads, including eight patients (26.7%) without fQRS at baseline. Novel changes (range 1–5 leads) were seen in twenty (66.7%) patients’ ECGs and the total percentage of leads with fQRS increased from 9.2 to 16.4% (p = 0.002) during the follow-up. Fourteen patients (46.7%) had new fragmentation at least in two different leads. For the distribution of changes, please see Fig. 4.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Fragmented QRS during the six-year follow-up. The leads are arranged according to the Cabrera lead system in order to present the changes in anatomical order

Full size image

Patients were analysed based on whether they had more than one lead with a new fQRS during the six-year follow-up. The group with multiple new fragmentation changes (n = 14) had a statistically lower left ventricle radiation dose (3.77 vs. 8.04 Gy, p = 0.015) and were less frequently hypertensive (29% vs. 44%, p = 0.389). A higher left ventricle dose was associated with fewer new fQRS in the multivariable analysis (β = -0.569, p = 0.013).

Regional analysis combining multiple changes

Additional analyses were performed considering the extent of abnormal values in T1, ECV, and IBS in the different segments. There was no correlation between individual segmental or regional changes and RT doses. However, five patients (16.7%) had simultaneous abnormal values in T1, ECV, and IBS in the same segments. The patients with abnormal values in all three analyses had a higher left ventricle dose (8.04 Gy vs. 4.74 Gy, p = 0.108) than the rest, although this did not reach statistical significance. In the binary logistic regression analysis, increasing left ventricle radiation dose was associated with an increase in the likelihood of having changes in all three measurements (OR 1.26, 95% Cl. 1.00–1.59, p = 0.047).

Discussion

This multimodality imaging study showed that changes indicating diffuse myocardial fibrosis were progressive (IBS and ECG) during a six-year follow-up period, and they were localized in the RT-prone septal and apical segments in the echocardiography and CMR analysis. An association with radiation dose was seen when multiple parameters were combined.

Radiotherapy-induced myocardial changes

A key mechanism of RT-induced cardiotoxicity is the development of diffuse myocardial fibrosis[1] Histological studies have verified the development of fibrosis in later phases after chest RT, with a more severe impact after a higher radiation dose [1, 8].

Diffuse fibrosis is commonly present in the early phases of several heart disorders, and the extent of fibrosis has been associated with the severity of clinical symptoms[9] In fact, Saiki et al. have shown that 8% of breast cancer patients treated with RT developed heart failure within six years of the treatment[3] Most commonly, patients presented with HFpEF and a higher RT dose was associated with elevated end-diastolic pressure and left ventricular stiffness[3, 4] Therefore, the development of diffuse myocardial fibrosis after breast RT has a high clinical importance, and its early recognition is prudent for prognostic and therapeutic reasons. However, there is a lack of studies assessing these modalities in patients treated with RT without chemotherapy.

Diffuse myocardial fibrosis in CMR

The role of CMR in oncology has been established, and growing evidence endorses the use of CMR in evaluating cancer patients receiving systemic cancer therapy[10] Currently, CMR is regarded as the radiological gold standard in determining diffuse myocardial fibrosis, characterized by an increase in native T1 and ECV values, which correlate with histological fibrosis findings [10, 11].

Studies of patient groups receiving chemotherapy and RT include lymphoma and breast, lung, and oesophagus cancer patients[12,13,14,15,16,17] It seems that the first year after the treatment is characterized by an increase in T1 and T2 values in CMR without a clear RT dose relationship, possibly presenting only oedematous tissue change in the early phase[15, 17] In later phases after RT, an increase in ECV has been observed with a linear dose association with segmental cardiac radiation doses in a study by de Groot et al.[12] Furthermore, Bergom et al. showed a correlation between a higher cardiac RT dose and myocardial mass in breast cancer patients[16] Therefore, it seems that while tissue oedema changes dominate the first year, an increase in myocardial mass and ECV becomes evident in the later phase, indicating the evolution of diffuse fibrotic changes. However, all these studies included patients with combination therapies.

In our study, 90% and 80% of the patients (n = 27 and n = 24) presented abnormal segmental values in T1 and ECV mapping, respectively. The proportion of abnormal myocardial segments was 18.75% in T1 mapping and 21.88% in ECV mapping, a significant proportion concentrated in the apical and anteroseptal areas. As RT is known to induce diffuse myocardial fibrosis, our finding of changes indicating diffuse myocardial fibrosis in the areas of higher radiation dose is noteworthy. However, a dose relationship with a segmental radiation dose was not evident comparing single parameters, as has been the case in other studies [14, 15].

While 36.7% of our patients had hypertension at baseline and an increase in the T1 and ECV values have been observed in hypertensive patients, this acts as a possible confounding factor. However, T1 and ECV elevation has been remarkable only among patients with co-occurring left ventricular hypertrophy, which was not present in our study population[18] Besides apical segments, we found no association between hypertension and T1 or ECV. There is no evidence that hypertension would cause isolated CMR changes; therefore, RT is the most plausible explanation for the recorded abnormal values [18].

Integrated backscatter

Integrated backscatter measures myocardial reflectivity. The first studies showed increased values with histologically verified replacement scars[19] Later studies indicate that myocardial reflectivity increases for various reasons, including hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and ischemia[20, 21] In our previous study, we showed that myocardial reflectivity increases after RT in anterior RT-prone areas in contrast to posterior parts [22].

In this study, all left ventricle segments were studied. A doubling of reflectivity was observed in 77% of our patients in at least one segment. Overall, 6.3% of the segments displayed a doubling of myocardial reflectivity, indicating the evolution of myocardial changes. Rising baseline BMI predicted a more significant change in left ventricle IBS values in our study. Obesity has been previously linked to higher IBS values, and it may predispose the heart to the cardiotoxicity of RT [23, 24].

Fragmented QRS

The presence of fQRS has been associated with abnormal myocardial activation and has been investigated in multiple cardiac diseases[25] It has been shown that fQRS holds poor prognostic features[26] An association between fQRS and diffuse fibrosis has been established previously, showing an association between fQRS and CMR findings[27] Furthermore, Konno et al. found that the number of leads with fQRS was associated with the extent of CMR findings in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients, indicating that fQRS can be used both qualitatively and quantitatively to detect myocardial fibrosis [28].

Knowledge about fQRS after RT is scarce. In one study, Adar et al. [29]. followed 52 breast cancer patients treated with RT. In total, 37% of the patients developed a new fQRS during a one-year follow-up. They also observed an association between RT dose and the development of fQRS. However, 86% of their patients also received chemotherapy. In our study, a total of 66.7% of the patients accumulated new fragmentation changes, and half of the patients (47%) had fQRS in multiple leads. The prevalence of leads with fQRS increased from 9.2 to 16.4%. To our knowledge, this is the first study to present a progressive accumulation of fQRS after solely RT-treated patients.

We found an unexpected inverse association between new fQRS and radiation dose. Patients with multiple new fQRS also had hypertension less frequently, although this was not statistically significant. While it is counter-intuitive that a higher RT dose would cause fewer changes in the ECG, it can be speculated whether the hypertension medication protected patients from RT-induced cardiotoxicity, as we know that these medications hold cardioprotective qualities[30] In addition, this could explain why hypertension predicted a decrease in IBS. Additionally, the cancellation of ECG changes in anatomically opposite myocardial segments with advancing myocardial changes could explain the seemingly counter-intuitive results.

Association of multiple changes with left ventricle radiation dose

We found an association with left ventricle RT dose in the situations where abnormal values were observed in the same segment with CMR (T1 and ECV) and echocardiography (IBS). This was most often seen apically and anteroseptally, where the high RT doses were delivered. However, no direct segmental level correlation was found. This might be due to various reasons, including imprecision between various imaging modalities considering the segmental data level. However, an association with the radiation dose was evident when the impact was high enough to simultaneously induce changes in the same segment in both CMR and echocardiography. It may be that milder impact was diluted by imaging inaccuracies, while only a more powerful effect with multiple changes produced an association with radiation heart doses.

Clinical implications

Our study endorses the results of previous studies indicating the evolution of diffuse myocardial fibrosis after RT [12, 13, 15] In addition, our study is the first prospective follow-up study concentrating on findings of diffuse fibrosis in patients treated with postoperative RT without chemotherapy, showing its progressive nature. The early recognition of RT-induced myocardial fibrosis might open a window for effective early treatment, including the diligent management of other contributing factors, such as hypertension, as well as new specific treatment choices for HFpEF [31].

Limitations

There are several limitations to be acknowledged. First, the study population was small and not powered enough to show a statistically meaningful correlation. Second, the results did not translate to clinically significant adverse events, most likely due to too short follow-up time. Third, there is evidence that cancer itself can cause changes in the myocardium shown by the CMR[32] This could not be excluded since there was no baseline CMR imaging. Fourth, there were technical issues with the imaging. In contrast to CMR and echocardiography imaging, CT images were not ECG-gated or acquired with a breath-hold. This might have contributed to the missing segmental associations. In addition, we acknowledge that IBS is an angle-sensitive measurement also affected by depth. However, to overcome difficulties caused by angle and depth, a relative change in tissue reflectivity during the follow-up period was used instead.

Conclusion

During a six-year follow-up, multimodality imaging identified an accumulation of the markers indicating diffuse fibrosis in RT-prone regions of the left ventricle. An association with RT dose was found when multiple modalities were combined.

Data availability

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body mass index

CMR:

Cardiac magnetic resonance

ECG:

Electrocardiography

ECV:

Extracellular volume

fQRS:

Fragmented QRS

HFpEF:

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

IBS:

Integrated backscatter

RT:

Radiotherapy

SD:

standard deviation

ShMOLLI:

Shortened Modified Look-Locker Inversion-recovery

References

  1. Taunk NK, Haffty BG, Kostis JB, Goyal S. Radiation-induced heart disease: pathologic abnormalities and putative mechanisms. Front Oncol. 2015;5. https://doi.org/10.3389/FONC.2015.00039.

  2. Cheng YJ, Nie XY, Ji CC, Lin XX, Liu LJ, Chen XM, et al. Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk after Radiotherapy in Women with breast Cancer. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.005633.

  3. Saiki H, Petersen IA, Scott CG, Bailey KR, Dunlay SM, Finley RR, et al. Risk of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in older women after contemporary radiotherapy for breast Cancer. Circulation. 2017;135:1388–96. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025434.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Saiki H, Moulay G, Guenzel AJ, Liu W, Decklever TD, Classic KL, et al. Experimental cardiac radiation exposure induces ventricular diastolic dysfunction with preserved ejection fraction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2017;313:H392–407. https://doi.org/10.1152/AJPHEART.00124.2017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Tuohinen SS, Skyttä T, Virtanen V, Luukkaala T, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P-L, Raatikainen P. Early effects of adjuvant breast cancer radiotherapy on right ventricular systolic and diastolic function. Anticancer Res. 2015;35:2141–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Skyttä T, Tuohinen S, Virtanen V, Raatikainen P, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P-L. The concurrent use of aromatase inhibitors and radiotherapy induces echocardiographic changes in patients with breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 2015;35:1559–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tang S, Otton J, Holloway L, Delaney GP, Liney G, George A, et al. Quantification of cardiac subvolume dosimetry using a 17 segment model of the left ventricle in breast cancer patients receiving tangential beam radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2019;132:257–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RADONC.2018.09.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brosius FC, Waller BF, Roberts WC. Radiation heart disease. Analysis of 16 young (aged 15 to 33 years) necropsy patients who received over 3,500 rads to the heart. Am J Med. 1981;70:519–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(81)90574-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. López B, Ravassa S, Moreno MU, José GS, Beaumont J, González A, et al. Diffuse myocardial fibrosis: mechanisms, diagnosis and therapeutic approaches. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021;18:479–98. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41569-020-00504-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Harries I, Liang K, Williams M, Berlot B, Biglino G, Lancellotti P, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging to detect Cardiovascular Effects of Cancer Therapy: JACC CardioOncology State-of-the-art review. JACC CardioOncol. 2020;2:270–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JACCAO.2020.04.011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Diao KY, Yang Z, gang, Xu HY, Liu X, Zhang Q, Shi K, et al. Histologic validation of myocardial fibrosis measured by T1 mapping: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12968-016-0313-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. de Groot C, Beukema JC, Langendijk JA, van der Laan HP, van Luijk P, van Melle JP, et al. Radiation-Induced Myocardial Fibrosis in Long-Term Esophageal Cancer Survivors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021;110:1013–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJROBP.2021.02.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Umezawa R, Kadoya N, Ota H, Nakajima Y, Saito M, Takagi H, et al. Dose-Dependent Radiation-Induced myocardial damage in esophageal Cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy: a prospective Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020;5:1170–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ADRO.2020.07.012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ricco A, Slade A, Canada JM, Grizzard J, Dana F, Rezai Gharai L et al. Cardiac MRI utilizing late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and T1 mapping in the detection of radiation induced heart disease. Cardiooncology 2020;6. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40959-020-00061-Z.

  15. Speers C, Murthy VL, Walker EM, Glide-Hurst CK, Marsh R, Tang M, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and blood biomarkers for evaluation of Radiation-Induced cardiotoxicity in patients with breast Cancer: results of a phase 2 clinical trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022;112:417–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJROBP.2021.08.039.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bergom C, Rubenstein J, Wilson JF, Welsh A, Ibrahim ESH, Prior P, et al. A pilot study of Cardiac MRI in breast Cancer Survivors after Cardiotoxic Chemotherapy and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy. Front Oncol. 2020;10. https://doi.org/10.3389/FONC.2020.506739.

  17. Tahir E, Azar M, Shihada S, Seiffert K, Goy Y, Beitzen-Heineke A, et al. Myocardial injury detected by T1 and T2 mapping on CMR predicts subsequent cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction in patients with breast cancer treated by epirubicin-based chemotherapy or left-sided RT. Eur Radiol. 2022;32:1853–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00330-021-08260-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schumann CL, Jaeger NR, Kramer CM. Recent advances in imaging of Hypertensive Heart Disease. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2019;21. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11906-019-0910-6.

  19. Hoyt RH, Collins SM, Skorton DJ, Ericksen EE, Conyers D. Assessment of fibrosis in infarcted human hearts by analysis of ultrasonic backscatter. Circulation. 1985;71:740–4. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.71.4.740.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Naito J, Masuyama T, Tanouchi J, Mano T, Kondo H, Yamamoto K, et al. Analysis of transmural trend of myocardial integrated ultrasound backscatter for differentiation of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and ventricular hypertrophy due to hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:517–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(94)90312-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Picano E, Faletra F, Marini C, Paterni M, Danzi GB, Lombardi M, et al. Increased echodensity of transiently asynergic myocardium in humans: a novel echocardiographic sign of myocardial ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:199–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(93)90737-L.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tuohinen SS, Skyttä T, Virtanen V, Virtanen M, Luukkaala T, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, et al. Detection of radiotherapy-induced myocardial changes by ultrasound tissue characterisation in patients with breast cancer. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;32:767–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10554-016-0837-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Darby SC, Ewertz M, McGale P, Bennet AM, Blom-Goldman U, Brønnum D, et al. Risk of ischemic heart disease in women after radiotherapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:987–98. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMOA1209825.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wong CY, O’Moore-Sullivan T, Leano R, Byrne N, Beller E, Marwick TH. Alterations of left ventricular myocardial characteristics associated with obesity. Circulation. 2004;110:3081–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000147184.13872.0F.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pietrasik G, Zareba W. QRS fragmentation: diagnostic and prognostic significance. Cardiol J. 2012;19:114–21. https://doi.org/10.5603/CJ.2012.0022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gong B, Li Z, Total Mortality. Major adverse cardiac events, and echocardiographic-derived cardiac parameters with fragmented QRS Complex. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2016;21:404–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/ANEC.12325.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dohy Z, Vereckei A, Horvath V, Czimbalmos C, Szabo L, Toth A, et al. How are ECG parameters related to cardiac magnetic resonance images? Electrocardiographic predictors of left ventricular hypertrophy and myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2020;25. https://doi.org/10.1111/ANEC.12763.

  28. Konno T, Hayashi K, Fujino N, Oka R, Nomura A, Nagata Y, et al. Electrocardiographic QRS Fragmentation as a marker for myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26:1081–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/JCE.12742.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Adar A, Canyllmaz E, Kiris A, Ilter A, Serdar L, Memis Y, et al. Radiotherapy induces development of fragmented QRS in patients with breast Cancer. Breast Care (Basel). 2015;10:277–80. https://doi.org/10.1159/000431030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gulati G, Heck SL, Ree AH, Hoffmann P, Schulz-Menger J, Fagerland MW, et al. Prevention of cardiac dysfunction during adjuvant breast cancer therapy (PRADA): a 2 × 2 factorial, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial of candesartan and metoprolol. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:1671–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/EURHEARTJ/EHW022.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Butler J, Siddiqi TJ, Filippatos G, Ferreira JP, Pocock SJ, Zannad F, et al. Early benefit with empagliflozin in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: insights from the EMPEROR-Preserved trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2022;24:245–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/EJHF.2420.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Labib D, Satriano A, Dykstra S, Hansen R, Mikami Y, Guzzardi DG, et al. Effect of active Cancer on the Cardiac phenotype: a Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging-based study of myocardial tissue health and deformation in patients with Chemotherapy-Naïve Cancer. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.019811.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would thank the research nurses Virpi Palomäki, Hanna-Leena Näppilä, Kati Helleharju, and Katri Mikkonen for their expert assistance during the study.

Funding

This study received funding from non-profit trusts: Paavo and Eila Salonen Legacy, Georg and Ella Ehrnrooth Legacy, Aarne Koskelo Legacy, Elli and Elvi Oksanen Legacy, Finnish Cultural Foundation Pirkanmaa Regional fund, the Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Responsibility area of Tampere University Hospital and HUS Diagnostic Center fund. The funding body did not affect the study design, data collection, analysis, or interpretation of data and did not participate in the writing of the manuscript.

Open access funding provided by Tampere University including Tampere University Hospital, Tampere University of Applied Sciences (TUNI).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, PO Box 100, Tampere, 33014, Finland

    Mikko Moisander, Tanja Skyttä, Kjell Nikus & Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen

  2. Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Sädetie 6, PO Box 2000, Tampere, 33521, Finland

    Mikko Moisander, Tanja Skyttä & Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen

  3. Radiology, HUS Diagnostic Center University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, PO Box 100, Helsinki, 00029, Finland

    Sari Kivistö

  4. Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, PO Box 100, Tampere, 33014, Finland

    Heini Huhtala

  5. Heart Hospital, Tampere University Hospital, PO Box 2000, Tampere, 33521, Finland

    Kjell Nikus, Vesa Virtanen & Suvi Tuohinen

  6. Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital and Helsinki University, PO Box 100, Helsinki, 00029, Finland

    Pekka Raatikainen & Suvi Tuohinen

Authors
  1. Mikko Moisander
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tanja Skyttä
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sari Kivistö
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Heini Huhtala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kjell Nikus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Vesa Virtanen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Pekka Raatikainen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Suvi Tuohinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MM prepared the draft of the manuscript and all other authors provided critical revisions of the content. MM, TS, ST, VV, PR, KN and PK contributed to the conception or design of the study. ST performed the echocardiogram examinations and analyzed the ECG’s. SK and ST performed the CMR analysis. MM contoured the left ventricle segments. MM and HH performed and interpreted statistical analyses. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikko Moisander.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by Tampere University hospital ethics committee (reference numbers: R10160 and R11149) and informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moisander, M., Skyttä, T., Kivistö, S. et al. Radiotherapy-induced diffuse myocardial fibrosis in early-stage breast cancer patients – multimodality imaging study with six-year follow-up. Radiat Oncol 18, 124 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-023-02319-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-023-02319-z

Keywords

Radiation Oncology

ISSN: 1748-717X

Contact us