Open Access

Whole brain radiation therapy in management of brain metastasis: results and prognostic factors

  • Elisa Y Saito1,
  • Gustavo A Viani1Email author,
  • Robson Ferrigno1,
  • Ricardo A Nakamura1,
  • Paulo E Novaes1,
  • Cassio A Pellizzon1,
  • Ricardo C Fogaroli1,
  • Maria A Conte1 and
  • Joao V Salvajoli1
Radiation Oncology20061:20

DOI: 10.1186/1748-717X-1-20

Received: 24 May 2006

Accepted: 29 June 2006

Published: 29 June 2006

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the prognostic factors associated with overall survival in patients with brain metastasis treated with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and estimate the potential improvement in survival for patients with brain metastases, stratified by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class.

Patients and methods

From January 1996 to December 2000, 270 medical records of patients with diagnosis of brain metastasis, who received WBRT in the Hospital do Cancer Sao Paulo A.C. Camargo in the period, were analyzed. The surgery followed by WBRT was used in 15% of patients and 85 % of others patients were submitted at WBRT alone; in this cohort 134 patients (50%) received the fractionation schedule of 30 Gy in 10 fractions. The most common primary tumor type was breast (33%) followed by lung (29%), and solitary brain metastasis was present in 38.1% of patients. The prognostic factors evaluated for overall survival were: gender, age, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), number of lesions, localization of lesions, primary tumor site, surgery, chemotherapy, absence extracranial disease, RPA class and radiation doses and fractionation.

Results

The OS in 1, 2 and 3 years was 25, 1%, 10, 4% e 4, 3% respectively, and the median survival time was 4.6 months. The median survival time in months according to RPA class after WBRT was: 6.2 class I, 4.2 class II and 3.0 class III (p < 0.0001). In univariate analysis, the significant prognostic factors associated with better survival were: KPS higher than 70 (p < 0.0001), neurosurgery (p < 0.0001) and solitary brain metastasis (p = 0.009). In multivariate analysis, KPS higher than 70 (p < 0.001) and neurosurgery (p = 0.001) maintained positively associated with the survival.

Conclusion

In this series, the patients with higher perform status, RPA class I, and treated with surgery followed by whole brain radiotherapy had better survival.

This data suggest that patients with cancer and a single metastasis to the brain may be treated effectively with surgical resection plus radiotherapy. The different radiotherapy doses and fractionation schedules did not altered survival.

Background

Brain metastases represent an important cause of morbidity and mortality, and are the most common intracranial tumors in adults, occurring in approximately 10% to 30% of adult cancer patients [1]. The risk of developing brain metastases varies according to primary tumor type, with lung cancer accounting for approximately one half of all brain metastases [2]. The prognosis of patients with brain metastases is poor; the median survival time of untreated patients is approximately 1 month [3]. With treatment, the overall median survival time after diagnosis is approximately 4 months [4]. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) describes three prognostic classes, defined by age, Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS), and disease status [5]. The most widely used treatment for patients with multiple brain metastases is WBRT. The appropriate use of WBRT can provide rapid attenuation of many neurological symptoms, improve quality of life, and is especially beneficial in patients whose brain metastases are surgically inaccessible or when other medical considerations remove surgery from the list of appropriate options [6, 7]. The use of adjuvant WBRT after resection or radiosurgery has been proven to be effective in terms of improving local control of brain metastases, and thus, the likelihood of neurological death is decreased [8].

The majority of patients who achieve local tumor control die from progression of extracranial disease, whereas the cause of death is most often due to CNS disease in patients with recurrent brain metastases [7, 8]. There is not currently consensus on the optimal radiation schedule for patients with brain metastases. Standard treatment regimens include all of the dose ranges evaluated in the early RTOG studies, and is dependent upon issues such as the severity of CNS symptoms, the extent of systemic disease, and physician preference. In this cohort, we evaluated the prognostic factors and the importance of RPA classification (RTOG) for survival in patients with diagnosis of brain metastasis, who receive WBRT alone or postoperative.

Materials and methods

The records of 270 patients with brain metastases, who were treated with WBRT at our institution between January 1996 and December 2000, were analyzed retrospectively.

At diagnosis of brain metastasis, the follow variables were analyzed for survival: age, sex, location of brain metastasis, primary tumor type, and extent of disease, initial Karnofsky score, dose and fractionation radiotherapy schedule, surgery, chemotherapy and RPA class, showed in table 1. The supportive care (oral prednisone) and neurological status was not evaluated. Chemotherapy was administered to the patients with systemic disease in activity after WBRT. Brain metastases were detected by contrast-enhanced cerebral computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). WBRT was performed in all patients with cobalt 60 gamma rays or with 4 MV photons of a linear accelerator. The whole brain was irradiated by usual bilateral fields that encompassed the cranium with a 1 cm margin. Individual shielding blocks were fabricated for all patients, when necessary. The total dose was 30–40 Gy, with a median of 35 Gy, in daily fractions of 2.0–3.0 Gy. During the study period two fractionation schemes were used: conventional fractionation with daily fractions of 2 Gray (Gy), five days per week to a planned total dose of 40 Gy (n = 102) and hypofractionation with daily fractions of 3 Gy, five days per wk to a planned total dose of 30 Gy (n = 134). The surgical resection was indicated in single brain metastases with diameter less or equal than 3 cm, favorable localization and control systemic disease. The supportive care (prednisone oral) was introduced in begin of treatment or during radiotherapy. The recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to classify the patients with brain metastases. Class I contained all patients with a Karnofsky performance status (KPS ≥ 70, age < 65 years, controlled primary tumor and no extracerebral metastases), Class III contained patients with a KPS <70, and Class II contained all other patients, showed in table 1.
Table 1

characteristic of treatment and patients

AGE

median

range

Patients

57

38 – 82

SEX

number

%

MALE

111

41.1

FEMALE

159

58.9

KPS

number

%

< 70

154

57

>= 70

115

42.6

NEUROSURGERY

number

%

YES

41

15.2

NO

229

84.8

DOSE(Gy) FRACTIONATION (fr)

number

%

40 Gy/20 fr

102

37.8

30 Gy/10 fr

134

49.6

OTHERS

34

12.6

NUMBER LESIONS

number

%

SINGLE

103

38.1

MULTIPLE

161

59.6

CHEMOTHERAPY

number

%

YES

54

20

NO

214

79.2

RPA CLASS

number

%

CLASS I

42

15.5

CLASS II

72

26.6

CLASS III

151

55.9

LOCALIZATION

number

%

SUPRATENTORIAL

140

51.9

INFRATENTORIAL

24

8.9

BOTH

47

17.4

PRIMARY DISEASE CONTROL

  

YES

141

52.2

NO

121

44.8

EXTRA CRANIAL METASTASIS

  

YES

178

65.9

NO

92

34.1

Statistical analysis

All patients alive at the time of analysis were censored with the date of last follow-up. The endpoint of the study was overall survival. Survival was calculated from the first day of radiotherapy using the method of Kaplan Meier. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. The covariates examined in all cases were: age, sex, location of brain metastasis, primary tumor type, extent of disease, initial Karnofsky score, dose and fractionation radiotherapy schedule, neurosurgery and RPA class. All factors with a P-value ≤ 0.05 at univariate analysis were entered into a multivariate analysis using the proportional hazards model (Cox Regression) with confidential interval of 99%.

Results

The overall survival rate in 1, 2 and 3 years was 24%, 9.4%, and 4.3%, respectively (figure 1). Three patients were alive in moment of this analysis with a median survival time of 4.42 years (range, 3.8 – 5.1). All these patients had single brain metastasis, high KPS, cranial extra disease controlled and were submitted to neurosurgery before WBRT. The median survival time for all the studied patients was 4.6 months (CI 95% 3.7 – 6, 4). The RPA class analysis showed strong relation with survival (p < 0.0001) and the median survival time by RPA class in months was: class I 6.2, class II 4.2 and class III 3.0. The significant prognostic factors associated with better survival were: higher KPS (p < 0.0001), neurosurgery (P < 0.0001) and single metastases (p = 0.009), showed in table 2 and figure 2, 3, 4. In multivariate analysis, the factors associated positively with survival were: neurosurgery (p = 0.001, HR = 2, CI99% = 1.2–3.3) and KPS higher than 70 (p < 0.001, HR = 1.56, CI99% = 1.19–2.04), demonstrated in table 3.
Table 2

univariate analysis of significant factors for survival (Log Rank Test)

Variable

number

%

% OS 12 MONTHS

P

AGE

    

< 65 YEARS

195

72.3

22.6

0.84

>= 65 YEARS

75

27.7

28

 

SEX

    

MALE

111

41.1

23

0.17

FEMALE

159

58.9

25.5

 

KPS

    

< 70

154

57

15.4

<0.0001

>= 70

115

42.6

35.2

 

NEUROSURGERY

    

YES

41

15.2

49.2

<0.0001

NO

229

84.8

19.2

 

DOSE(Gy) FRACTIONATION (fr)

    

40 Gy/20 fr

102

37.8

27.3

0.12

30 Gy/10 fr

134

49.6

24.7

 

OTHERS

34

12.6

  

NUMBER LESIONS

    

SINGLE

103

38.1

33.4

0.009

MULTIPLE

161

59.6

17.9

 

CHEMOTHERAPY

    

YES

54

20

36.8

0.09

NO

214

79.2

20.7

 

RPA CLASS

    

CLASS I

42

15.5

43.6

<0.0001

CLASS II

72

26.6

30.8

 

CLASS III

151

55.9

15.3

 

LOCALIZATION

    

SUPRATENTORIAL

140

51.9

27

0.29

INFRATENTORIAL

24

8.9

18

 

BOTH

47

17.4

25.2

 

PRIMARY DISEASE CONTROL

    

YES

141

52.2

30.1

0.06

NO

121

44.8

20.2

 

EXTRA CRANIAL METASTASIS

    

YES

178

65.9

23.3

0.09

NO

92

34.1

28.6

 
Table 3

Multivariate Analysis of significant factors for survival (Cox Regression)

VARIABLE

P

HR *

99% confidential interval

NEUROSURGERY

    

YES

0.001

2

1.2

3.3

NO

 

1(REF)**

  

SINGLE METASTASES

    

YES

0.48

1.11

0.75

1.23

NO

 

1(REF)

  

KPS

    

> = 70

<0.0001

1,56

1.19

2.04

< 70

 

1(REF)

  

*HR = hazard risk

**REF = value reference

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1748-717X-1-20/MediaObjects/13014_2006_Article_20_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Overall Survival (Kaplan Meier).

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1748-717X-1-20/MediaObjects/13014_2006_Article_20_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Overall Survival by KPS (Log Rank).

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1748-717X-1-20/MediaObjects/13014_2006_Article_20_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Overall Survival by RPA CLASS (Log Rank).

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1748-717X-1-20/MediaObjects/13014_2006_Article_20_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Overall Survival by number of lesions (Log Rank).

Discussion

Brain metastases are the most common form intra cranial tumor accounting significantly more than one- half of brain tumors in adults. Because of advanced in the diagnoses and management of this condition, most patients receive palliative treatment and majorities don't die from metastases. In this cohort, we evaluate patients with brain metastasis, multiples or solitaries lesions, who receive WBRT alone or WBRT after surgical resection of lesion.

The goal of postoperative WBRT in patients with solitary brain metastasis is to destroy microscopic residual cancer cells at the site of resection and others localizations within the brain. Until recently, the value of this approach was derived exclusively from retrospective studies[8, 11, 12]. Several of this studies found that adjuvant WBRT reduced the recurrence rate and two studies demonstrated prolong survival[12, 13]. One randomized trial has examined the role of pos operative WBRT in patients with single metastasis[13]. In this study patients who received radiation were significantly less likely to fail in the brain(18% vs 70%) e were significantly less likely to die of neurological causes. In our series, patients submitted at resection plus WBRT were significantly less likely to die (p = 0,001), mainly the patients with solitary metastasis and higher KPS.

The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) has attempted to determine the optimal dose fractionation schedules for patients with brain metastasis in various randomized trials [911]. All these trials have failed to show any benefit in survival for different doses and fractionation schedules of treatment. In this cohort, 40 Gy in 20 fractions or 30 Gy in 10 fractions, were not associated with any benefit to survival. (p = 0,8). The according with our data, patients with good prognosis (RPA class I) who are likely to survive more than six months, such as those with single metastasis with controlled systemic disease, should be treated with prolonged fractionation to decreased the likelihood of late CNS toxicity.

The end point of this cohort was to evaluate the different prognostic factors related with overall survival and to analyze the importance of recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class (RTOG) in patients with brain metastasis. In our data, the prognostic factors associated with better survival were: Higher KPS (p < 0.0001), solitary metastasis (p = 0.009), resection of lesion (p = 0.0001) and RPA class I (p = 0.0001), all these prognostic factors were showed for others authors. [8, 14, 15, 17, 18] The others factors (age, gender, chemotherapy, dose and fractionation schedule) analyzed were not associated with any effect in survival. RPA class in this study showed similar results to RTOG protocols [5], with the median survival time for class I (6.2 months), II (4.2 months) and III (3.0 months) (p = 0.0001), respectively. This data demonstrate that the use of RPA class may identify patients most likely to benefit from treatment and allow new therapies to be evaluated on homogeneous patient groups.

In this study, patients with multiple brain metastases that received WBRT had poorer survival than patients with single brain metastases (P = 0.0001). We did not evaluate the use supportive care (oral predinisone) plus radiotherapy versus supportive care alone or WBRT alone versus supportive care. However, Horton et al. [19] compared WBRT plus supportive care (oral prednisone) versus supportive care alone. Median survival in the prednisone alone arm was 10 weeks compared with 14 weeks in the combined arm (p-value not stated). The proportion of patients with an improvement in performance status was similar in the prednisone- alone and the combined WBRT and prednisone arms (63% versus 61%, respectively). Data on tumor response, intracranial progression-free duration, quality of life, and toxicity were not reported.

In our study no patients received Radiosurgery (SRS); however, a larger recently published trial (RTOG 95-08) [20] provides compelling evidence for the use of SRS boost following WBRT in patients with newly diagnosed one to three brain metastases. In the RTOG 95-08, SRS after WBRT has been validated with level 1 evidence as a standard of care option in the management of patients with single brain metastases.

In other recently published prospective randomized Japanese trial, JROSG 99-1, patients were randomly assigned to SRS alone, versus WBRT and SRS. The actuarial 6 month freedom from new brain metastases was 48% in the SRS alone arm, and 82% in the SRS and WBRT arm (P = 0.003). Actuarial 1 year brain tumor control rate for the lesions treated with SRS was 70% in the SRS alone arm and 86% in the SRS and WBRT arm (P = .019) [21]. Clinical trial-based assessments therefore suggest high rates of intracranial failures and reduced local control rates when WBRT is omitted or delayed.

In conclusion, WBRT continues to be an efficacious treatment in the management of brain metastasis. Patients with RPA class I may be effectively treated with local resection or radiosurgery followed by WBRT, mainly in those patients with single metastases, higher KPS and cranial extra disease controlled. Despite the use of WBRT, outcomes are poor and efforts should be made to incorporate multimodality approaches including surgery, radiosurgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy sensitizers to improve survival.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1748-717X-1-20/MediaObjects/13014_2006_Article_20_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Overall Survival by neurosurgery (Log Rank).

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Radiation, Oncology Hospital do Cancer

References

  1. Wen PY, Black PM, Loeffler JS:Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology (ed 6). In Metastatic Brain Cancer. Edited by: DeVita V, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA. Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott, WIlliams, & Wilkins; 2001:2655-2670.Google Scholar
  2. Zimm S, Wampler GL, Stablein D, et al.: Intracerebral metastases in solid-tumor patients: Natural history and results of treatment. Cancer 1981, 48: 384-394. Publisher Full Text 10.1002/1097-0142(19810715)48:2<384::AID-CNCR2820480227>3.0.CO;2-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Sundstrom JT, Minn H, Lertola KK, et al.: Prognosis of patients treated for intracranial metastase with whole-brain irradiation. Ann Med 1998, 30: 296-299.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chao JH, Phillips R, Nickson JJ: Roentgenraytherapy of cerebral metastases. Cancer 1954, 7: 682-689. Publisher Full Text 10.1002/1097-0142(195407)7:4<682::AID-CNCR2820070409>3.0.CO;2-SView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gaspar L, Scott C, Rotman M, et al.: Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of prognostic factors in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) brain metastases trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997, 37: 745-754. 10.1016/S0360-3016(96)00619-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Patchell RA, Regine WF: The rationale for adjuvant whole brain radiation therapy with radiosurgery in the treatment of single brain metastases. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2003, 2: 111-115.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Arbit E, Wronski M, Burt M, Galicich JH: The treatment of patients with recurrent brain metastases:A retrospective analysis of 109 patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer 1995, 76: 765-773. Publisher Full Text 10.1002/1097-0142(19950901)76:5<765::AID-CNCR2820760509>3.0.CO;2-EView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Wen PY, Loeffler JS: Management of brain metastases. Oncology (Huntingt) 1999, 13: 941.Google Scholar
  9. Borgelt B, Gelber R, Kramer S, Brandy LW, Chang CH, Davis LW, Perez CA, Hendrickson FR: The palliation of brain metastases. Final results of the first two studies by the Radiation Therapy Oncology group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1980, 6: 1-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Vermeulen SS: Whole brain radiotherapy in the treatment of metastatic brain tumors. Semin Surg Oncol 1998, 14: 64-71. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2388(199801/02)14:1<64::AID-SSU8>3.0.CO;2-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Berk L: An overview of radiotherapy trials for the treatment of brain metastases. Oncology (Huntingt) 1995, 9: 1205-1212.Google Scholar
  12. Smalley SR, Schray MF, Laws ER Jr, O' Fallon JR: Adjuvant radiation therapy after surgical resection of solitary brain metastasis: association with pattern of failure and survival. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1987, 13: 1611-1617.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Patchell RA, Tibbs PA, Walsh JW, Maruyama Y, Kryscio RJ, Markesbery WR, Macdonald JS, Young B: A randomized trial of surgery in the treatment of single brain metastases to the brain. N Engl J Med 1990, 322: 494-500.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Wronski M, Arbit E, McCormick B: Surgical treatment of 70 patients with brain metastases from breast carcinoma. Cancer 1997, 80: 1746-1752. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19971101)80:9<1746::AID-CNCR8>3.0.CO;2-CView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Patchell RA, Tibbs PA, Regine WF: Postoperative radiotherapy in the treatment of single brain metastases to the brain. JAMA 1998, 280: 1485-1492. 10.1001/jama.280.17.1485View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hazuka MB, Burleson WD, Stroud DN, Leonard CE, Lillehei KO, Kinzie JJ: Multiple brain metastases are associated with poor survival in patients treated with surgery and radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1993, 11: 369-376.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Swift PS, Phillips T, Martz K, Wara W, Mohiuddin M, Chang CH, Asbell SO: CT characteristics of patients with brain metastases treated in RTOG study 79-16. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993, 25: 209-216.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gaspar LE, Scott C, Murray K, Curran W: Validation of the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification for brain metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000, 47: 1001-1009. 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00547-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Horton J, Baxter DH, Olson KB: The management of metastases to the brain by irradiation and corticosteroids. Am J Roent Rad Ther Nucl Med 1971, 3: 334-340.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Andrews DW, Scott CB, Sperduto PW, Flanders L, Gaspar M, Schell M, Werner-Wasik W, Demas J, Ryu J, Bahary : Whole brain radiation therapy with or without stereotactic radiosurgery boost for patients with one to three brain metastases: Phase III results of the RTOG 9508 randomised trial. Lancet 2004, 363: 1665-1672. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16250-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Aoyama H, Shirato H, Tago M, Nakagawa K, Toyoda T, Hatano K, Keniyo M, Oya N, Hirota S, Shioura H, Kunieda E, Inomata T, Hayakawa K, Katoh N, Kobashi G: Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole-brain radiation therapy vs stereotactic radiosurgery alone for treatment of brain metastases: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2006, 295: 2483-91. 10.1001/jama.295.21.2483View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Saito et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement