Skip to main content

Table 1 Studies of potential radiomic biomarkers for PDAC patients considering radiotherapy

From: Selection of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who may benefit from radiotherapy

Study

Study type

Pt No.

PDAC stage

Image

Timing

Radiomic parameter

Endpoints

Conclusion

Significance

2019

Khalvati F [32]

Retrospective

98

Resectable

Baseline CT

Pre-op

Sum entropy, cluster tendency features

OS

May stratify patients for NAT or alternatives

HR 1.56, 1.35 p = 0.005; 0.022 for two readers

2022

Elsherif SB [33]

Retrospective

54

Resectable/ BR

Baseline Dual energy CT

Pre-NAT

∫ T (HU·mL) (PPP) = 507.85

OS,

PFS

Predict pathologic lymph node status

P = 0.006

P = 0.001

2020

Parr E [34]

Retrospective

74

Localized

Contrast- enhance CT

RT planning CT

6 or 7 radio-genomic features

OS

Loco-regional recurrence

OS and local recurrence better predict by radiomic features than clinical features

6 features for OS: p < 0.0001;

7 features for loco-regional recurrence: p < 0.0001

2022

Wang CX [35]

Retrospective

297

BR & LA

Pre, arterial, venous phase contrast-enhanced CT

Before CRT

Normalized area under the curve (nAUC)

OS

nAUC, correspond to tumor cell death validated by histo-pathology, predict OS

P < 0.0001

2022

Koay EJ [36]

Prospective Nab-Cape with concomitant RT after ICT

23

BR & LA

Baseline (post- ICT) and follow-up (post-CRT) CT

Post-ICT, post-CRT

Type I (remains or sharper) and II (blurring) interface response

OS, PFS

Type I interface response associate with better OS and PFS

p = 0.004, p = 0.03

2022

Rossi G [37]

Retrospective

71

LA

Contrast-enhanced planning CT for RT

Post-ICT

4/1655 radiomic features

Resectability

4 features-model predict resectability after NAT

AUC: 0.944

2019

Cozzi L [38]

Retrospective

100

LA for SBRT

Contrast free planning CT

Before SBRT

9 features for OS

4 features for local control

OS

Local control

Low risk group had OS 15.1 and local control 28.6 months

P = 0.05

P = 0.004

2018

Cheng Z [39]

Retrospective

191

BR & LA

Planning CT for SBRT

Before SBRT

Overlap-volume histograms of GTV to key arterial structure

Margin negative resection

Tumor involved > 1 cm key arterial structure, less likely to have margin negative resection (23% vs. 77%)

P < 0.01

2019

Nasief H [40]

Retrospective

24

Resectable or BR

Daily non-contrast CTs during CT-guided CRT

During CRT

73 Delta radiomic features/ >1300 radiomic features

Response and OS

Decreased delta radiomic features and CA19-9 predict better OS

P = 0.001

P = 0.031

2019 Yamamoto KN [41]

Retrospective

1089

LA

Three sequential CT during ICT

FFX,

GEM or Gem + Nab

Time series tumor volume data derived Local/metastatic advancement index (LAI/MAI)

Primary tumor size, metastatic number, OS

1. RT after ICT improves OS in larger LAI

2. CRT leads to a significant survival benefit when FFX but not GEM or GEM + Nab

1.P = 0.0547,0.0429,0.0379 for FFX, Gem, Gem + Nab;

2. p = 0.008, 0.236, 0.253 for FFX, GEM, GEM + Nab

2018

Bali MA [42]

Prospective

24

PDAC receiving chemotherapy

DW-MR

Baseline, wk2, wk8 post-chemotherapy

ROI-ADC, DW-volume, diffusion parameters

Response

At wk2, 25th percentile of H-D and H-PF change correctly classified response in 20/24 pts; at wk8, DW-volume change correctly classified 22/24 pts

P = 0.003

P < 0.0001

2020

Itchins M [44]

Retrospective

115

Resectable & BR

PET

Baseline and pre-op

SUV(max)

OS

Pre-op SUV(max) < 5 after NAT predict improved OS (42.95 vs. 26.05 months)

P = 0.02

2022

Abdelrahman AM [45]

Retrospective

202

Resected BR/LA

PET

Before and after NAT

Metabolic response

Pathologic response, OS

Metabolic response predict pathologic response and OS

P < 0.001

P < 0.001

2021

Panda A [46]

Retrospective

44

BR & LA

PET

Before and after NAT

Complete metabolic response, mean change in SUVmax

Pathologic response

OS

Change in SUVmax and complete metabolic response were associated with OS

P < 0.05

2021

Zimmermann C [47]

Prospective

25

Resectable BR & LA

PET/CT

Before and after NAT

Decreased SUVmax ≥ 30%

Response

Median SUVmax decreased after NAT (8.29 and 3.83)

p < 0.001

2017

Sakane M [48]

Retrospective

25

Resectable & BR

PET/CT

Before and after CRT

SUVpeak, MTV, TLG

Pathologic response

Higher post-CRT SUVpeak, positive MTV/TLG predict unfavorable pathologic effects of CRT

P = 0.013

P = 0.014

  1. Pt: patient; Pre-op: preoperative; BR: borderline resectable; LA: locally advanced; NAT: neoadjuvant therapy; RT: radiotherapy; SBRT: stereotactic body radiotherapy; CRT: chemoradiotherapy; GTV: gross tumor volumne; ICT: induction chemotherapy; OS: overall survival; PFS: progression free survival; FFX: FOLFIRINOX; GEM: gemcitabine; Nab: nab-paclitaxel; Cape: capecitabine; ROI-ADC: regions-of-interest-apparent diffusion coefficent; DW-volume: diffusion weighted-volume; H-D: histogram D pure diffusion; H-PF: histogram perfusion fraction; SUV: standardized uptake value; TLG: total lesion glycolysis; MTV: metabolic tumor volume