Table 3 Performance of different models for the prediction of patient-specific quality assurance with different percent dose difference/distance to agreement criteria
Criteria | Models/parameters | AUC (95% CI) | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3%/3 mm | PC model | 0.914 (0.809–1.000) | 0.845 | 1.000 | 0.869 |
D model | 0.914 (0.841–0.987) | 0.914 | 1.000 | 0.918 | |
DL model | 0.943 (0.840–1.000) | 0.845 | 1.000 | 0.853 | |
PC + D model | 0.940 (0.844–1.000) | 0.845 | 1.000 | 0.853 | |
Overall model | 0.948 (0.880–1.000) | 0.914 | 1.000 | 0.918 | |
3%/2 mm | PC model | 0.762 (0.569–0.955) | 0.875 | 0.717 | 0.738 |
D model | 0.783 (0.612–0.955) | 0.875 | 0.679 | 0.705 | |
DL model | 0.849 (0.724–0.974) | 1.000 | 0.566 | 0.623 | |
PC + D model | 0.872 (0.764–0.979) | 0.875 | 0.755 | 0.771 | |
Overall model | 0.890 (0.801–0.980) | 1.000 | 0.755 | 0.787 | |
2%/2 mm | PC model | 0.789 (0.530–1.000) | 0.833 | 0.836 | 0.836 |
D model | 0.842 (0.709–0.975) | 0.833 | 0.782 | 0.787 | |
DL model | 0.841 (0.702–0.979) | 1.000 | 0.600 | 0.639 | |
PC + D model | 0.915 (0.825–1.000) | 0.833 | 0.927 | 0.918 | |
Overall model | 0.942 (0.856–1.000) | 1.000 | 0.818 | 0.836 |