Skip to main content

Table 4 Survival outcomes, toxicity incidence and prognostic factors on patients of all included studies

From: Efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

References

Local failure n (%)

Regional failure n (%)

Metastasis n (%)

Radiation induced cancer n (%)

Local control

Progress-free survival

Overall survival

Toxicity

Prognostic factors

Ladra et al. (2014) [13]

10 (18%)

4 (7%)

5 (9%)

0

3-y (81%)

5-y (81%)

3-y (73%)

5-y (69%)

3-y (81%)

5-y (78%)

Acute: ≤ G3 (G3 = 23%)

Late: ≤ G3 (G3 = 5%)

Age (˂ 2 y vs 2–10 y vs > 10 y); Tumor size (> 5 cm vs ≤ 5 cm); Stage (1 to 2 vs 3 to 4) b; Risk group (Low vs Intermediate) b; Histology (Embryonal/botryoid vs Alveolar/undifferentiated); Group (I to II vs III to IV); Site (Favorable vs Unfavorable)

Indelicato et al. [14]

1 (3%)

0

0

0

5-y (97%)

5-y (97%)

5-y (100%)

Acute: Mild

Late: Unable to evaluate

NR

Ludmir et al. [15]

7 (15%)

9 (20%)

4 (9%)

0

5-y (84%)

5-y (57%)

5-y (76%)

Acute: ≤ G3 (G3 = 9%)

Late: ≤ G3 (G3 = 26%)

Primary tumor size (> 5 cm vs ≤ 5 cm)d; The presence of intracranial extension at diagnosisd; Primary tumor site; Age; Histology; Study protocol; Post-surgical IRS risk group; Cyclophosphamide equivalent dose; PBS-PT vs PSPT; Radiotherapy dose; Radiotherapy timing

Bradley et al. [16]

6 (25%)

0

7 (29%)

0

3-y (66%)

3-y (40%)

3-y (58%)

Acute: ≤ G3

Late: ≤ G3

Age (˂ 4 y vs ≥ 4 y)e; Weeks from chemotherapy to radiation therapy (˂ 14 weeks vs ≥ 14 weeks); Elapsed days (˂ 39 vs ≥ 39); Intracranial extension b,e; Nodal stage (0 vs 1)b,e,f; Primary tumor size (˂ 5 cm vs ≥ 5 cm)e; Race (White vs Other); Sexa; Total dose (˂ 50.4 GyRBE vs ≥ 50.4 GyRBE)

Indelicato et al. [17]

4 (13%)

0

2 (6%)

0

5-y (83%)

5-y (80%)

5-y (84%)

Acute: ≤ G2 (G2 = 16%)

Late: ≤ G3 (G3 = 6%)

Age (0–2 y vs ≥ 3 y)a; Sex; Ethnicity (White vs Other); Histology (Alveolar vs Embryonal)b; Regional lymph nodes (Positive vs Negative); Chemotherapy regimen (EpSSG vs COG); Median duration between chemotherapy and start of radiation (˂ Median vs ≥ Median); Total dose (> 50.4GyRBE vs ≤ 50.4GyRBE); Maximum size at diagnosis (˂ 5 cm vs 5-8 cm vs > 8 cm); Volume at diagnosis (˂ 92cm3 vs 93-382cm3 vs > 383cm3); Surgery (Resected vs Unresected)

Buszek et al. [18]

12 (13%)

20 (21%)

7 (7%)

0

4-y (85%)

4-y (63%)

4-y (71%)

Acute: NR

Late: NR

Tumor size (≤ 5 cm vs > 5 cm)a,b,c; Timing of radiotherapy to chemotherapy (≤ 13 weeks vs > 13 weeks)a,b,c; Cyclophosphamide dose; Intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcomad

Parekh et al. [19]

8 (22%)

0

1 (3%)

0

5-y (83%)

5-y (78%)

5-y (83%)

Acute: No

Late: ≤ G3 (G3 = 16%)

Age (12 months vs > 12 months); Gender; Site (Favorable vs Unfavorable)a,b,c; Histology (Alveolar vs Embryonal)a,b; Size (5 cm vs > 5 cm); Stage (I/II vs III)b,c; Nodal disease (N0 vs N1); Chemotherapy (COG vs Other); Timing of radiotherapy to chemotherapy (≤ 12 weeks vs > 12 weeks)

Mizumoto et al. [20]

5 (9%)

0

8 (15%)

1 (1.8%)

1-y (96%)

2-y (93%)

1-y (82%)

2-y (72%)

1-y (92%)

2-y (85%)

Acute: ≤ G3 (G3 = 16%)ǂ

Late: ≤ G2 (G2 = 15%)

COG Risk groupa,b

Suzuki et al. [21]

9 (19%)

0

3 (6%)

0

3-y (79%)

3-y (69%)

3-y (94%)

Acute: ≤ G3 (G3 = 25%)

Late: Unable to evaluate

NR

Leiser et al. [22]

20 (24%)

0

4 (5%)

2 (2.4%)

5-y (79%)

NR

5-y (81%)

Acute: ≤ G3 (G3 = 15%)

Late: ≤ G3 (G3 = 18%)

Age at first diagnosis (≥ 4.5y); Age at first diagnosis (≤ 10y); Gender; Tumour site (Other vs PM)a; IRS Group (≥ IIIb)a; COG Stage (≥ 3)a; COG Risk group (High vs low/int.)a; Histology of disease (Alveolar vs Embryonal); Size at diagnosis (> 5 cm)a; Positive lymph node at diagnosis; Total dose (≥ 54 GyRBE); In PM RMS (Intracranial extension)a

Weber et al. [23]

9 (23%)

0

2 (5%)

0

5-y (77%)

5-y (72%)

5-y (73%)

Acute: NR

Late: ≤ G3 (G3 = 8%)

Interval time (IT) between the start of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy and start of the proton therapy (> 13 weeks) c

  1. Boldface indicates statistically significant difference
  2. NR no reported, IRS Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study, EpSSG European Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group, COG Children’s Oncology Group, PM Parameningial, RMS Rhabdomyosarcoma, RBE Relative Biologic Effectiveness, PBS-PT Pencil-beam Scanning Proton Beam Therapy, PSPT Passivescattered Proton Beam Therapy
  3. Ç‚Radiation- induced toxicities (including mucositis and dermatitis)
  4. aFactor significantly correlated with local control (LC) (p ≤ 0.05); bfactor significantly correlated with overall survival (OS) (p ≤ 0.05); cfactor significantly correlated with progress-free survival (PFS) (p ≤ 0.05); dfactor significantly correlated with local failure (LF) (p ≤ 0.05); efactor significantly correlated with freedom from metastases (p ≤ 0.05); ffactor significantly correlated with disease-free survival (p ≤ 0.05)