Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of statistical methods

From: A focused review of statistical practices for relating radiation dose-volume exposure and toxicity

Characteristic

N (%) of 325

Analytic approach1

 Non-directional test of means

102 (31.3)

 Logistic regression

180 (55.4)

 Linear regression

39 (12.0)

 Cox proportional hazards

67 (20.6)

 Other

75 (23.1)

No. of OARs assessed

 1

194 (59.7)

 2

55 (16.9)

   ≥ 3

76 (23.3)

No. of DVH parameters assessed

 1–5

109 (33.5)

 6–20

141 (43.4)

 21–100

54 (16.6)

  > 100

18 (5.5)

 Not explicitly stated

3 (0.9)

Method of selecting DVH parameters

 Prior research

28 (11.7)

 Institutional treatment protocol

18 (5.5)

 Not stated

279 (85.8)

Multivariable statistics

 Yes

226 (69.5)

 No

99 (30.5)

Multiple comparisons performed

 Yes

258 (79.4)

 No

67 (20.6)

Correction for multiple comparisons2

 None

214 (82.9)

 Bonferroni

15 (5.8)

 Bootstrapping

12 (3.7)

 Benjamini-Hochberg

5 (1.5)

 Cross validation

3 (0.9)

 Other

9 (2.8)

Cut points used

 Yes

154 (47.4)

 No

171 (52.6)

Method of determining cut points3

 Prior research or protocol

8 (5.2)

 Set to mean, median, or quartile values

17 (11.0)

 Maximize discriminant value from ROC curve

63 (40.9)

 Recursive partitioning

9 (5.8)

 Not stated

23 (14.9)

 Other

37 (24.0)

Non-dosimetric variables included

 Yes

242 (74.5)

 No

83 (25.5)

  1. 1Total number sums to greater than 100% due to some studies using multiple types of analyses
  2. 2Denominator adjusted to reflect the 258 studies with multiple comparisons
  3. 3Denominator adjusted to reflect the 154 studies using cut points and numbers do not sum to 154 due to 3 studies that utilized both recursive partitioning and ROC methods to establish cut points