Study name | Citations | Functional imaging agent | Intervention aim | Treatment | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Improve standard RTtarget delineation | Facilitate doseescalation | Facilitate organ at risk sparing | Map recurrence & RT treated volumes | Map functional volumes& RT planning volumes | Map treated functionalvolumes & survival | Map radiomic features& RT volumes | Standard targetvolumes changed | Dose escalation | Functional OAR sparing | |||
Piroth | F18-FET PET | Â | \(\checkmark\) | Â | \(\checkmark\) | Â | \(\checkmark\) | Â | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | Â | |
Laouiti | [38] | F18-FET PET | \(\checkmark\) | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | \(\checkmark\) | Â |
Miwa | [39] | F18-FET PET | \(\checkmark\) | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | \(\checkmark\) | Â |
Munck Af Rosenschold | F18-FET PET | \(\checkmark\) | Â | Â | Â | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | Â | \(\checkmark\) | Â | Â | |
Lundemann | F18-FET PET | \(\checkmark\) | Â | Â | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | Â | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | Â | Â | |
Poulsen | F18-FET PET | \(\checkmark\) | Â | Â | Â | Â | \(\checkmark\) | Â | \(\checkmark\) | Â | Â | |
Vigil | C11-MET PET | Â | \(\checkmark\) | Â | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | Â | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | Â | |
Brinkmann | F18-FDOPA PET | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | Â | Â | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | Â | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | Â | |
Kim | DW MRI & DCE MRI | Â | \(\checkmark\) | Â | Â | Â | \(\checkmark\) | Â | Â | \(\checkmark\) | Â | |
Wang | [70] | DTI MRI & BOLD MRI | Â | Â | \(\checkmark\) | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | \(\checkmark\) |
Zhang | [71] | DTT MRI | \(\checkmark\) | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | \(\checkmark\) | Â | Â |
Altabella | [72] | DTI MRI | Â | Â | Â | Â | \(\checkmark\) | Â | Â | Â | Â | \(\checkmark\) |
Morin | [74] | DW MRI | \(\checkmark\) | Â | Â | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | Â | Â | \(\checkmark\) | Â | Â |
Opposits | [76] | BOLD MRI | Â | Â | \(\checkmark\) | Â | Â | Â | Â | \(\checkmark\) | Â | Â |
Laprie | MRSI | Â | \(\checkmark\) | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | \(\checkmark\) | Â | |
Mellon | [82] | MRSI | Â | \(\checkmark\) | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | \(\checkmark\) | Â |
Study name | Max dose | Â | Â | Dose fractionation (Gy / fractions) | Toxicity/OAR dose metric | Survival | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BED\(_{2}\) (Gy) | BED\(_{10}\) (Gy) | EQD\(_2\) (Gy) | Â | Â | Median OS Mths | Median PFS Mths | 12 Mths OS % | 12 Mths PFS % | ||||
Piroth | 158.4 | 89.3 | 74.4 | 72/30 | No grade 3 or 4 toxicity | 14.8 | 7.8 | 63.6 | 25.4 | |||
Laouiti | 158.4 | 89.3 | 74.4 | 72/30 | Maximum grade CTCAE acute toxicity was 1 (median), range 0-2 | Â | Â | 38.4 | 28.6 | |||
Miwa | 357 | 125.8 | 104.8 | 68/8 | Â | 20 | 13 | 71.2 | 52.6 | |||
Munck Af Rosenschold | 120 | 72 | 60 | 60/30 | Plan OAR (brain, brain stem...) receive less dose in PET-image guided-VMAT plans | 15 | 6 | Â | Â | |||
Lundemann | 120 | 72 | 60 | 60/30 | Â | 20.7 | 11.7 | Â | Â | |||
Poulsen | 120 | 72 | 60 | 60/30 | Â | 16.5 | 6.5 | Â | Â | |||
Vigil | Not reported but escalated | Â | 20 | 6.7 | Â | Â | ||||||
Brinkmann | 172.3 | 95.3 | 79.4 | 76/30 | Grade 3 CNS necrosis was noted in 3 patients (4.4%), 1 patient (1.5%) with pre-existing vision dysfunction had Grade 4 optic nerve dysfunction | 16 | 8.7 | Â | Â | |||
Kim | 168.8 | 93.8 | 78.1 | 75/30 | Side effects were similar in incidence to standard therapy | 20 | Â | 90 | Â | |||
Wang | 120 | 72 | 60 | 60/30 | Plan OAR (white matter tracks) received less dose in functionally optimised plan | Â | Â | Â | Â | |||
Zhang | 120 | 72 | 60 | 60/30 | Thecognition dysfunction was mild and the radiation-induced brain oedema was mild to moderate | 17.6 | Â | 76 | 66 | |||
Altabella | 120 | 72 | 60 | 60/30 | Plan OAR (white matter structures) received less dose in DTI-optimised plans | Â | Â | Â | Â | |||
Morin | 120 | 72 | 60 | 60/30 | Plan OAR (hippocampus) received less dose in DW-optimised plans | Â | Â | Â | Â | |||
Opposits | 120 | 72 | 60 | 60/30 | Reduced dose in the functionally active areas of the brain | Â | Â | Â | Â | |||
Laprie | 158.4 | 89.3 | 74.4 | 72/30 | SIB plan OAR (brainstem and brain) received lower doses than CRT plans | Â | Â | Â | Â | |||
Mellon | 168.8 | 93.8 | 78.1 | 75/30 | No observed serious adverse events | Â | Â | Â | Â |