Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of patients’ characteristics between training set and test set

From: A nomogram based on pretreatment CT radiomics features for predicting complete response to chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer

Variables

Training set (n = 160)

Validation set (n = 66)

χ2/t

P

Age (years), mean ± SD

65.12 ± 10.22

66.20 ± 9.23

− 0.741

0.459

Gender

  

0.004

0.951

 Male

117 (73.1)

48 (72.7)

  

 Female

43 (26.9)

18 (27.3)

  

Tumor location

  

1.120

0.772

 Cervical

10 (6.3)

4 (6.1)

  

 Upper thoracic

39 (24.4)

12 (18.2)

  

 Middle thoracic

87 (54.4)

40 (60.6)

  

 Lower thoracic

24 (15.0)

10 (15.2)

  

T stage

  

1.362

0.715

 T1

1 (0.6)

1 (1.5)

  

 T2

16 (10.0)

4 (6.1)

  

 T3

65 (40.6)

29 (43.9)

  

 T4

78 (48.8)

32 (48.5)

  

N stage

  

0.522

0.914

 N0

23 (14.4)

11 (16.7)

  

 N1

71 (44.4)

27 (40.9)

  

 N2

54 (33.8)

24 (36.4)

  

 N3

12 (7.5)

4 (6.1)

  

Clinical stage

  

1.759

0.624

 I

1 (0.6)

1 (1.5)

  

 II

17 (10.6)

10 (15.2)

  

 III

92 (57.5)

33 (50.0)

  

 Iva

50 (31.3)

22 (33.3)

  

Radiation dose, median (range)

64 (60–66)

64 (60–66)

− 0.630

0.529

Chemotherapy regimen

  

1.580

0.209

 PF

113 (68.5)

52 (31.5)

  

 TP

47 (77.0)

14 (23.0)

  

LDH group

  

3.189

0.074

 High

79 (50.6)

42 (63.6)

  

 Normal

81 (49.4)

24 (36.4)

  

NLR, median (range)

2.73 (2.00–3.71)

2.82 (1.82–3.71)

− 0.149

0.882

PLR, median (range)

134.49 (102.43–176.55)

144.47 (96.72–196.38)

0.571

0.568

CR ratio

56 (35.0)

22 (33.3)

0.057

0.811

Rad-score, mean ± SD

− 16.1105 ± 4.03384

− 15.8565 ± 3.69877

− 0.441

0.660