Skip to main content

Table 2 Trends in mean dose from simulation CT to fraction #5

From: Strict bladder filling and rectal emptying during prostate SBRT: Does it make a dosimetric or clinical difference?

 

Prostate

Bladder

Bladder Trigone

Rectum

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Simulation

102.80% ± 1.00%

42.10% ± 18.30%

93.50% ± 9.20%

43.90% ± 6.40%

Fraction 1

102.50% ± 1.00%

44.50% ± 18.80%

92.50% ± 9.90%

47.90% ± 8.70%

Fraction 2

103.40% ± 8.10%

46.80% ± 20.80%

92.10% ± 9.60%

47.50% ± 7.70%

Fraction 3

102.50% ± 1.00%

44.80% ± 19.80%

90.90% ± 10.80%

47.20% ± 8.30%

Fraction 4

102.50% ± 1.00%

46.40% ± 20.50%

90.20% ± 10.10%

47.10% ± 7.30%

Fraction 5

102.10% ± 3.20%

46.70% ± 19.90%

89.80% ± 10.50%

46.60% ± 7.10%

Δdose (%)

− 0.60% ± 2.90%

4.50% ± 12.80%

− 3.60% ± 9.60%

7.00% ± 12.90%

Δdose (Gy)

− 0.2 ± 1.1

1.8 ± 4.8

− 1.5 ± 3.3

0.96 ± 1.87

  1. ΔDose denotes percentage or absolute mean dose change from simulation CT to fraction #5. Fraction #1–5 mean doses were significantly different from simulation dose in all OARs (all P < 0.01)