Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of included studies comparing S + IORT versus S alone

From: The role of intraoperative radiation therapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Nation

Study design

Study period

Sample size, n

Mean age (year)

Male, %

Tumor Size (mean, cm)

Median Survival Time (month)

Tumor Staging, n

(+) vs. (−)

Study quality

(+)

(−)

(+)

(−)

(+)

(−)

(+)

(−)

(+)

(−)

Hiraoka 1990 [33]

Japan

R

1969–1989

15

19

63.6

61.2

53

73.7

NA

NA

8.8

8.2

Stage I: 0 vs. 2

Stage II: 3 vs. 5

Stage III: 9 vs. 7

Stage IV: 3 vs. 5

*******

Shibamoto-1 1990 [26]

Japan

R

1975–1989

2

31

60.1a

60.9a

48.7a

67.9a

NA

NA

8.5

9.0

Stage I: 0 vs. 11a

Stage II: 0 vs. 16a

Stage III: 7 vs. 45a

Stage IV: 7 vs. 40a

*******

Shibamoto-2 1990 [26]

Japan

R

1975–1989

2

17

60.1a

60.9a

48.7a

67.9a

NA

NA

23.0

6.5

Stage I: 0 vs. 11a

Stage II: 0 vs. 16a

Stage III: 7 vs. 45a

Stage IV: 7 vs. 40a

*******

Kawamura 1992 [30]

Japan

R

1978–1990

8

13

67a

64a

51.4a

62.5a

NA

NA

18.4

14.3

Stage I: 2 vs. 6a

Stage II: 7 vs. 8a

Stage III: 28 vs. 26a

Stage IV: 0 vs. 0a

*******

Johnstone 1993 [31]

USA

P

1980–1984

7

4

61.5

59.4

25

71.4

NA

NA

NA

NA

Stage I: 0 vs. 4

Stage II-IV: 7 vs. 0

******

Kasperk 1995 [23]

Germany

R

NA

12

18

62.5a

64a

69.7a

70.7a

NA

NA

10.9

12.2

All patients

(curative resection)

******

Dobelbower-2 1997 [14]

USA

R

1980–1995

6

14

58.8

69.1

54.5a

4.9

4.7

9.0

6.5

Stage I: 2 vs. 5

Stage II: 2 vs. 5

Stage III: 2 vs. 4

*******

Ouchi 1998 [27]

Japan

R

1982–1996

5

6

64.7a

61.0a

66.7a

100a

NA

NA

8.0

14.0

Stage I: 0 vs. 0

Stage II: 1 vs. 1a

Stage III: 5 vs. 6a

Stage IV: 0 vs. 0

*******

Takahashi

1999 [24]

Japan

R

1985–1997

16

32

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

10.0

9.0

Stage I: 0 vs. 3

Stage II: 1 vs. 4

Stage III: 5 vs. 14

Stage IVA: 6 vs. 8

Stage IVB: 4 vs. 3

*******

Koukubo-1 2000 [15]

Japan

R

1980–1997

34

39

63.0a

63.0a

60.1a

60.1a

NA

NA

15.0

11.0

All patients (resectable)

*******

Koukubo-2 2000 [15]

Japan

R

1980–1997

7

14

63.0a

63.0a

60.1a

60.1a

NA

NA

8.0

6.0

All patients (resectable)

*******

Alfieri 2001 [32]

Italy

R

1985–1995

26

20

62.5

58.4

40.0

42.3

3.04

2.73

14.3

10.8

Stage I: 7 vs. 5

Stage II: 5 vs. 5

Stage III: 10 vs. 7

Stage IVA: 4 vs. 3

*******

  1. Shibamoto-1 indicates R0 resection; Shibamoto-2, Non-R0 resection; Koukubo-1, R0 resection; Koukubo-2, Non-R0 resection
  2. S indicates surgery, IORT intraoperative radiotherapy, P prospective study, R retrospective case-matched study, NAT neoadjuvant treatment, NA no available
  3. a, The Whole study; (+), IORT group; (−), Non-IORT group; *represented one point, a score of 0 to 9 was assigned to each study and studies achieving a score of 6 or greater were considered high quality