Skip to main content

Table 7 Summary of the 2D GPR, predicted 3D GPR, and predicted per-organ 3D GPR under 2% global/2 mm criterion in 7 patients in the case of the change of beam modeling parameter of RayStation

From: Comparison of gamma index based on dosimetric error and clinically relevant dose–volume index based on three-dimensional dose prediction in breast intensity-modulated radiation therapy

RayStation (n = 7) 2% global/2 mm

Original leaf tip width: 0.1

leaf tip width: 0.25

leaf tip width: 0.4

Mean ± SD (range)

Mean ± SD (range)

Mean ± SD (range)

2D GPR

99.8 ± 0.4

99.5 ± 0.7

98.8 ± 1.8

(98.7–100.0)

(97.9–100.0)

(93.2–100.0)

Predicted 3D GPR

88.9 ± 1.5

88.4 ± 2.4

87.4 ± 2.9

(86.1–90.6)

(84.7–90.5)

(83.1–90.3)

Predicted 3D GPR of PTV

88.8 ± 5.6

85.2 ± 7.0

80.6 ± 8.1

(76.8–93.2)

(71.3–93.6)

(64.7–87.8)

Predicted 3D GPR of ipsilateral lung

85.7 ± 5.2

84.8 ± 5.8

85.7 ± 5.9

(76.6–93.0)

(75.9–93.1)

(75.3–93.9)

Predicted 3D GPR of heart

96.8 ± 5.8

97.0 ± 4.9

97.4 ± 4.1

(83.8–99.8)

(86.2–99.7)

(88.5–99.7)