Skip to main content

Table 3 Claims Made on Proton Therapy Centre Websites

From: Online advertising and marketing claims by providers of proton beam therapy: are they guideline-based?

 

All Websites % (n) (N = 46 unless otherwise specified)

Claims about Proton Therapy

 Improved Disease Control or Cure

60.9% (28)

 Standard of Care

13.0% (6)

 Fewer Side Effects

84.8% (39)

 Specific Side Effects Listed

67.4% (31)

 Quicker Recovery Time

15.2% (7)

 Increased Quality-of-Life

39.1% (18)

 Dose Distribution Advantage

97.8% (45)

Claims and comparison to Other Modalities

 Photon RT: Increased Efficacy

60.9% (28)

 Photon RT: Decreased Morbidity

84.8% (39)

 Surgery: Increased Efficacy

2.2% (1)

 Surgery: Decreased Morbidity

21.7% (10)

Evidence Provided for Claims on Website

 All Claims Referenced

4.4% (2)

 Some Claims Referenced

32.6% (15)

 Generic References (e.g. Studies show that…)

6.5% (3)

 No Claims Referenced

56.5% (26)

Alternative Treatment(s) to Proton Therapy Listed

89.1% (41)

Claim Local/Regional Leader in Proton Therapy

43.5% (20)

Length of Time Treating/Patient Volume Listed

71.7% (33)

Mention of Cost/Insurance of Proton Therapy

69.6% (32)

Proton Therapy as Clinical Trial Listed

56.5% (26)