Skip to main content

Table 5 Logistic regression of dose escalation status and treatment year adjusting for potential confounders of the NCDB cohort with RT dose exclusions during Period 1 (2004–2010)

From: The use of dose-escalated radiation for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the U.S., 2004–2013

 

NCDB 2004–2010 (N = 11,949)

Study sample characteristics

Escalated dose

Standard dose

Escalated vs standard dose

No. (%)

No. (%)

Adjusted OR (95% CI)

P*

Treatment year

  

1.11 (1.08–1.25)

<0.0001

Age

  ≤ 67 yo

708 (57)

5856 (55)

ref

 

  > 67 yo

524 (43)

4861 (45)

0.89 (0.79–1.01)

0.07

Sex

 Male

689 (56)

6223 (58)

ref

 

 Female

543 (44)

4494 (42)

1.10 (0.97–1.25)

0.12

Race

 White

1062 (86)

9143 (85)

ref

 

 Non-white

162 (13)

1497 (14)

0.91 (0.76–1.09)

0.31

 Missing

8 (1)

77 (1)

Not included

 

Histology

 Squamous

498 (40)

4333 (40)

ref

 

 Non-Squamous

734 (60)

6384 (60)

1.04 (0.89–1.15)

0.82

Derived AJCC v6 T-stage

 T0-2

826 (67)

7286 (68)

ref

 

 T3

406 (33)

3431 (32)

1.03 (0.91–1.18)

0.60

Charlson/Deyo Score

 0

786 (64)

6916 (64)

ref

 

 1

320 (26)

2778 (64)

0.98 (0.85–1.13)

0.81

 2+

126 (10)

1023 (10)

1.05 (0.85–1.29)

0.64

Hospital typea

 Community

901 (73)

7991 (75)

ref

 

 Academic

331 (27)

2726 (25)

1.09 (0.95–1.25)

0.23

Hospital settinga

 Metro

904 (73.4)

7777 (73)

ref

 

 Non-metro

274 (22.2)

2476 (23)

0.96 (0.83–1.11)

0.59

 Missing

54 (4.4)

464 (4)

Not included

 
  1. *Chi-square test. Missing data was excluded from Chi-Square comparison. aHospital characteristics are those of the diagnosing hospital, not treating institution