Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of randomized trials of mild hypofractionated radiotherapy

From: Long-term results of a study using individualized planning target volumes for hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy boost for prostate cancer

Study

MDACC (33)

FCCC (34, 35)

RENCI (31, 36, 37)

UK CHHiP (32)

Current study

Dose/fractions (EQD2 α/β = 1.4)

72 Gy/30 (80Gy) vs 75.6 Gy/ 42 (71 Gy)

70.2 Gy/26 (84 Gy) vs 76 Gy/38

62 Gy/20 (82 Gy) vs 80 Gy/40

60 Gy/20 (77.6 Gy); 57 Gy/19 (73.8 Gy) vs 74 Gy/37

42 Gy/21 plus 30 Gy/10 (81 Gy)

Median F/U (yrs)

4.8

5

2.9

4.2

7.2

*PTV margins (mm)

Not reported

Ant/Sup/Inf/RL7 Post 3

10

PTV1 (80%)

Phase 1 - 10

 Ant/Sup/Inf/RL 10

Phase 2

 Post 10

 AP 4

PTV2 (96%)

 SI 3

 Ant/Sup/Inf/RL 10

 RL 3

 Post 5

 

PTV3 (100%)

 

 Ant/Sup/Inf/RL 5

 

 Post 0

 

*LateToxicity (%)

RTOG

NR

RTOG

RTOG

RTOG

≥ Grade 2

GI

11

6

17

3.6 (60 Gy); 1.4 (57 Gy)

21

GU

19

14

14

2.2 (60 Gy); 0 (57 Gy)

3

Grade 3

GI

3

NR

1 patient

none

none

GU

0

NR

none

none

none

Grade 4

GI

none

NR

none

none

none

GU

none

NR

none

none

none

Biochemical control (%)

Phoenix

Phoenix

Phoenix

 

Phoenix

5 yr - 97 vs 94

5 yr - 86 vs 86

5 yr - 85 vs 79

NR

5 yr - 87

ASTRO

   

7 yr – 77

5 yr - 96 vs 92

   

9 yr - 66

  1. MDACC – MD Anderson Cancer Centre; FCCC – Fox Chase Cancer Center; RENCI – Regina Elena National Cancer Institute; UK CHHiP - United Kingdom Conventional or Hypofractionated High-dose Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer.
  2. *Hypofractionated arm only; NR – not reported.