Figure 10
From: Post-processing sets of tilted CT volumes as a method for metal artifact reduction
Performance compared to other MAR algorithms. The performace of the proposed method was compared to the uncorrected filtered back-projection (FBP), to linear interpolation MAR (LI-MAR,[2]), to bilinear interpolation MAR (BI-MAR,[6, 7]), to normalized MAR (NMAR,[9, 10]), and to frequency split MAR (FSMAR,[11]). Overall, the method performed as well as the established algorithms. FSMAR featured less bias, still in terms of error and noise the proposed method yielded one of the better results.