Skip to main content

Table 2 Re-irradiation studies using EBRT

From: Advancements of radiotherapy for recurrent head and neck cancer in modern era

Study

Study design

No. of patients

Previous radiotherapy, Gy

No. of fractions, median

Total re-irradation dose, Gy

surgery

Systemic therapy

Follow up, mo

Efficacy

Severe toxicity

Heron,2008

P

25

median:64.7

5

25–44

/

NA

NA

17.4% CR + PR,48% SD

/

Roh, 2009

R

36

median:70.2

3 to 5

median: 30

/

11.1% chemotherapy

17.3

42.9% CR, 37.1% PR, 8.6%SD

Grade 3 acute toxicity:36.1%

         

1-y OS:53.2%, 2-y OS: 30.9%

 
         

1-y LRS:61%, 2-y LRS: 52.2%

Rwigema,2010

R

85

median:74

1 to 5

median:35

NA

NA

6

34% CR, 34%PR, 20%SD No grade 4–5 toxicities

         

1-y OS: 48.5%; 2-y OS:16.1%, median OS: 11.5 mo

 
         

1-y LC:51.2%; 2-y LC:30.7%

Unger, 2010

R

65

median:67

5

median:30

13.80%

50.8% chemotherapy

16

54% CR, 27% PR Grade 4 toxicity:9%

         

2-y OS:41% median OS: 12 mo

 
         

2-y LRC: 30%

 

Kawaguchi, 2010

R

22

40–65

2 to 5

20–42

/

100% chemotherapy

24

64.3% CR, 7.1% PR, 7.1% SD Grade 3 toxicity: 22.7%

Heron, 2011

R

70

68–70

5

median:40

/

50% cetuximab

21.3(SBRT)

SBRT only: 2-y OS: 21.1%; median OS: 14.8 mo

Grade 3 acute toxicity: 14.3% (SBRT only)

        

24.8(SBRT + cetuximab)

SBRT + cetuximab: 2-y OS: 53.3%; median OS: 24.5 mo

 

Rwigema,2011

R

96

median:68.4

2 to 5

I:15–28; II:30–36

 

40.6% cetuximab

14

2-y LCR:57.8%(40-50 Gy);2-y LCR:31.7%(15-36 Gy)

Grade 3 acute toxicity:5.2%

     

III: 40;IV: 44–50

   

2-y OS: 28.4%;median OS: 15 mo

 

Vargo, 2012

R

150

median:68.4

5

40–50

/

47% cetuximab

/

/

Improved QoL

Lartigau, 2013

P

56

 

6

median:36

/

100% cetuximab

11.4

ORR:69.4%

Grade 3 toxicity:32.1%

         

1-y OS: 47.5.0%;median OS: 11.8 mo, median PFS: 7.1 mo

 

Vargo, 2014

R

28

median:70

5

40–44

/

50% cetuximab

14

1-y LRC: 51%

Grade ≥ 3 acute toxicity:0%

         

1-y OS: 64%

 

Bonomo,2014

R

17

median:66

5

median:30

/

11.8% chemotherapy

7.5

25% CR, 31% PR, 44% SD

Grade 3 toxicity: 6%

       

5.88% cetuximab

Median PFS: 7 mo

Kress,2014

R

85

median:68

5

median:30

29%

45% chemotherapy

17.3

2-y OS:24%

Grade 3 acute toxicity:2.4%

       

25% cetuximab

 

2-y LRC: 28%

 

Vargo,2015

P

50

median:70

5

40–44

/

100% cetuximab

18

1-y OS:40%, median OS: 10 mo

Grade 3 acute toxicity: 6%

         

1-y LCR: 60%;1-y LRC:37%; median PFS: 7 mo

 

Vargo,2017

 

414

≥ 40

5

40 (SBRT)

/

55% cetuximab or chemotherapy(SBRT)

28

2-y OS: 35.4% (IMRT) and 16.3% (SBRT) < 0.001

Grade ≥ 3 acute toxicity:12.2%(SBRT)

    

33

60(IMRT)

 

84% cetuximab or chemotherapy (IMRT)

Median OS: 13.3 mo (IMRT) and 7.8 mo (SBRT) < 0.001.

 

Ansinelli,2018

R

45

NA

5

median:30

NA

NA

8.78

1-y OS: 37.76%; median OS: 9.23

Grade 3 acute toxicity:2.2%

McBride, 2021

P

62

NA

3

27

/

51.6% nivolumab

20.2

Nivolumab: ORR 34.5%; PFS:1.9 mo; 1-y PFS: 32.2%; median OS: 14.2 mo

SBRT: grade 3–5 toxicity 13.3%

         

SBRT + nivolumab: ORR 29.0%; PFS: 2.6 mo;1-y PFS: 16.8%;median OS: 13.9 mo

 

Pellizzon,2022

R

11

median:60

3

median:40

100%

NA

18

2-y OS: 80%; 4-y OS:53.5%

NA

         

2-y DFS: 62.3%; 4-y OS:41.6%

Huang, 2022

R

74

median:70

5

40–50

 

100% cetuximab

9

25.0% CR,41.7%PR Grade 3 acute toxicity:17.6%

         

2-y OS: 22.0%;median OS: 9 mo Grade ≥ 3 late toxicity:20.3%

  1. Abbreviations: OS, Overall Survival; LC, local control; LRC, locoregional control; DFS, disease free survival; PFS, progression free survival; CR, completed regression; PR, partial regression; SD, stable disease; ORR, objective regression rate