Skip to main content

Table 6 Logistic regression of dose escalation status and treatment year adjusting for potential confounders of the NCDB cohort with RT dose exclusions during Period 2 (2010–2012)

From: The use of dose-escalated radiation for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the U.S., 2004–2013

 

NCDB 2010–2012 (N = 6546)

Study sample characteristics

Escalated dose

Standard dose

Escalated vs standard dose

No. (%)

No. (%)

Adjusted OR (95% CI)

P*

Treatment year

  

0.77 (0.69–0.85)

<0.0001

Age

  ≤ 67 yo

367 (54)

3124 (53)

ref

 

  > 67 yo

308 (46)

2747 (47)

0.93 (0.79–1.09)

0.38

Sex

 Male

393 (58)

3308 (56)

ref

 

 Female

282 (42)

2563 (44)

0.94 (0.79–1.11)

0.45

Race

 White

594 (88)

4937 (84)

ref

 

 Non-white

78 (12)

895 (15)

0.76 (0.59–0.98)

0.04

 Missing

3 (<1)

39 (1)

Not included

 

Histology

 Squamous

315 (47)

2658 (45)

ref

 

 Non-Squamous

360 (53)

3213 (55)

0.97 (0.82–1.14)

0.72

Derived AJCC v6 T-stage

 T0-2

425 (63)

3693 (63)

ref

 

 T3

250 (37)

2178 (37)

1.01 (0.85–1.19)

0.95

Charlson/Deyo Score

 0

406 (60)

3510 (60)

ref

0.80

 1

196 (29)

1684 (29)

1.00 (0.83–1.20)

0.83

 2+

73 (11)

677 (11)

0.96 (0.73–1.24)

 

Hospital typea

 Community

520 (77)

4220 (72)

ref

 

 Academic

155 (23)

1651 (28)

0.80 (0.66–0.97)

0.02

Hospital settinga

 Metro

495 (73)

4421 (75)

ref

 

 Non-metro

163 (24)

1285 (22)

1.07 (0.88–1.29)

0.51

 Missing

17 (3)

165 (3)

Not included

 
  1. *Chi-square test. Missing data was excluded from Chi-Square comparison. aHospital characteristics are those of the diagnosing hospital, not treating institution