Skip to main content

Table 1 Risk of second fatal malignancy with IMRT compared to conventional or 3D-CRT

From: Second primary cancers after radiation for prostate cancer: a review of data from planning studies

Study

Region assessed§

Method of obtaining dose data

Method of risk calculation

Energy

% Risk of second fatal malignancy

     

Conventional/ 3D-CRT

IMRT

Followill 1997 [47]¥

Out of field

Measured in phantom- previously published data

Whole body dose equivalent for neutrons and photons

6MV

0.6%§

1%

18MV

2.5%

4.5%

NCRP risk coefficients

25MV

4.5%

8.4%

Hall 2003 [2]

In field and out of field

Scanned volume: calculated from DVHs (TPS not stated)

LP

6MV

1%

1.75%

LE (with 2 gradients of dose fall off)

Scatter: measured in phantom- previously published

Kry 2005 [40]

Out of field

Measured in phantom- previously published data

Organ specific dose equivalents for photons and neutrons

6MV

NR

2.9%

10MV

NR

2.1%

15MV

NR

3.4%

NRCP risk co-efficients

18MV

1.7%

5.1%

Based on maximum MU to generate “conservative maximum risk estimate”

Schneider 2006 [41]

In field and out of field

Scanned volume: calculated from TPS (Eclipse 7.3.10)

Organ equivalent dose

Risk shown is increased risk relative to 15MV 3D-CRT

LE

6MV

15%(LE) 1%(LP)

Photon scatter and neutrons: measured in phantoms- previously published data

LP

15MV

20% (LE) 2% (LP)

18MV

60% (LE) 30% (LP)

Kry 2007 [50]

Out of field

Measured in phantom- previously published data

Organ specific dose equivalents for photons and neutrons

(Risk ratio relative to 18MV 3D-CRT and 90% CI in parentheses)

EPA risk co-efficients

6MV

with 1.9% (RR:1.4;1.1-1.8)

Based on average MU

10MV

1.5% (RR: 1.1; 0.9-1.3)

15MV

2.2% (RR: 1.6; 1.3-2.0)

18MV

3.6% (RR: 2.7; 2.1-3.2)

Schneider 2007 [49]

In field and out of field

Scanned volume: calculated from TPS (Eclipse 7.3.10)

Organ equivalent dose

Increased risk for 100Gy IMRT relative to 70Gy 15MV 3D-CRT

LNT

6MV

18.4% (LE), 15.0% (LP), 22.3% (LNT)

LE

15MV

25.3% (LE), 17.0% (LP), 14.1% (LNT)

Photon scatter and neutrons: measured in phantoms- previously published data

LP

Stathakis 2007 [45]

Primary and out of field photons

Calculated using Monte Carlo simulations (EGS4/MCSIM) using whole body CT scans

Whole body dose equivalent

6MV

2.40% (LNT)**

3.55% (LNT)

NCRP risk coefficients

1.13%(LP)

2.65%(LP)

0.93%*

2.46%*

Neutron contribution not included-likely to increase risk by 4-10%

LNT

10MV

3.43% (LNT)

4.19%(LNT)

LP

1.72%(LP)

3.19% (LP)

Out-of-field component only

1.54%*

3.02%*

18MV

3.54% (LNT)

4.05% (LNT)

1.73%(LP)

3.07% (LP)

1.56%*

2.90% *

Ruben 2008 [42]

In field and out of field

Scanned volume: calculated from TPS Plato RTS v1.8 and Plato-ITP v2.5)

DVH analysis

18MV (3D-CRT)

1% (2.1%) (LP)

 

Data in parentheses shown for no correction for PCa patients with long term survival (i.e. no reduced weighting)

0.8% (1.5%)(LE)

Rest of body: measured in phantom Neutrons: measured in phantoms- previously published data

LP

6MV (IMRT)

0.8% (1.7%) (LP)

LE

0.6% (1.1%) (LE)

Stathakis 2009 [46]

In field and out of field

Calculated using Monte Carlo simulations (EGS4/MCSIM) using whole body CT scan

Whole body effective dose equivalent.

6MV

2.61%**

3.39%

10MV

2.48%

3.09%

Neutron contribution not included

NRCP risk co-efficients

18MV

2.24%

2.84%

LNT

   

Bednarz 2010 [33]

Out of field

Calculated using Monte Carlo simulations (MCNPX) using computational phantom

BEIR VII co-efficients

18MV (3D-CRT: 4 field box + 6 field boost, anterior-posterior 4 field of box delivered using 6MV, rest of fields 18MV)

Risk of second tumour in:

 

Stomach: 0.03%

 

Colon: 0.3%

 

Oesophagus: 0.07%

 

Thyroid: 3.1X10-4%

 

6MV IMRT

Risk of second tumour in:

Stomach: 0.04%

Colon: 0.4%

Oesophagus: 0.07%

Thyroid: 1.92X10-4%

Patil 2010 [62]

In field

Scanned volume: calculated from TPS (Eclipse 7.3.10)

Organ equivalent dose

6MV

No comparator

Modal estimate per 10000 person years:

LP

Bladder: 0.1

Rectum: 3.42

Small intestine: 7.789

(Whole body: 129.95***)

  1. ¥Patients were treated with pelvic fields for rectal and gynaecological cancers. As prostate cancer patients may also be treated with pelvic RT, this study has been included.
  2. §Figures shown for wedged conventional fields.
  3. *estimations excluding dose to rectum and bladder, i.e. out of field component only.
  4. ** conventional four field box.
  5. ***: mixed population; includes patients treated for prostate cancer (n = 8) and head and neck cancer (n = 10).
  6. LP: linear plateau LE: linear exponential LNT: linear no threshold; DVH: dose volume histogram.
  7. TPS; treatment planning system; BEIR: Biologic Effects of Ionizing Radiations.
  8. NR: not reported. RR: risk ratio. CI: confidence interval.