Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of mean quality of life scores (EORTC QLQ-C30) at baseline and after 2 years and mean values of German norm population [28]

From: Health-related quality of life and patient-reported symptoms after postoperative proton beam radiotherapy of cervical and endometrial cancer: 2-year results of the prospective phase II APROVE-trial

Score

Norm population

Baseline

2 years after RT

Mean (± SD)

N

Mean (± SD)

p value

N

Mean (± SD)

p value

EORTC QLQ-C30

Global health status/QoL

67.0 (± 21.8)

24

58.0 (± 20.1)

0.042a

18

69.9 (± 19.3)

0.353

Functional scales (higher scores indicate a better QoL)

 Physical functioning

82.8 (± 21.2)

25

73.9 (± 24.1)

0.041a

17

71.8 (± 26.3)

0.035a

 Role functioning

80.8 (± 27.2)

25

55.3 (± 34.2)

< 0.001b

17

64.7 (± 29.6)

0.035b

 Emotional functioning

73.9 (± 24.7)

25

60.7 (± 30.5)

0.044

17

63.7 (± 27.9)

0.082

 Cognitive functioning

83.9 (± 22.7)

25

80.0 (± 24.0)

0.434

17

71.6 (± 31.2)

0.137

 Social functioning

84.8 (± 25.5)

25

62.0 (± 33.5)

0.003c

17

68.6 (± 29.1)

0.026c

Symptom scales (higher scores indicate more problems)

 Fatigue

31.5 (± 27.2)

25

48.4 (± 26.6)

0.003b

17

35.9 (± 26.0)

0.364

 Nausea and vomiting

6.0 (± 17.2)

25

8.0 (± 18.9)

0.406

17

5.9 (± 11.3)

0.786

 Pain

27.6 (± 30.9)

25

34.0 (± 31.1)

0.286

17

30.4 (± 29.3)

0.955

 Dyspnoea

18.7 (± 27.3)

23

23.2 (± 28.5)

0.292

17

25.5 (± 29.2)

0.372

 Insomnia

27.6 (± 33.1)

25

53.3 (± 35.3)

< 0.007c

17

52.9 (± 39.7)

0.011c

 Appetite loss

10.1 (± 23.3)

25

22.7 (± 30.9)

0.029a

16

12.5 (± 20.0)

0.736

 Constipation

9.6 (± 22.3)

25

37.3 (± 36.9)

< 0.001c

17

29.4 (± 32.1)

0.047c

 Diarrhoe

10.4 (± 22.7)

25

13.3 (± 23.1)

0.270

17

13.7 (± 20.0)

0.258

 Financial difficulties

11.3 (± 25.0)

25

14.7 (± 25.1)

0.259

17

21.6 (± 30.1)

0.096

  1. p values represent the results for an age-matched analysis of our cohort to this norm reference population at baseline and after 2 years
  2. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant
  3. N number of available data, RT radiotherapy, SD standard deviation
  4. aClinically relevant small difference
  5. bClinically relevant medium difference
  6. cClinically relevant large difference