Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of ROI-based lung DVH metrics, functional map-based DFH metrics and DFH metrics-based Normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) for grade 2 + radiation pneumonitis (RP) among RP-risk non-benefit patients (Group 2)

From: CT ventilation image-guided helical Tomotherapy at sparing functional lungs for locally advanced lung cancer: analysis of dose-function metrics and the impact on pulmonary toxicity

Variable

Planning strategy

Anatomical plan

Func_ plan Top10

Func_ plan Top20

Func_ plan Top30

Func_ plan Top40

Func_ plan Top50

DFH metric-based NTCP model (toxicity probability of the mean)

 NTCPf V10(%)

20.24 ± 14.68

26.21 ± 20.02

26.81 ± 22.08

23.56 ± 17.25

22.40 ± 16.87

21.47 ± 15.15

Ventilation map-based lung DFH metrics (mean values)

 fV5 (%)

44.26 ± 20.54

52.89 ± 24.78

51.77 ± 25.62

49.96 ± 25.14

46.18 ± 23.29

44.84 ± 21.51

 fV10(%)

27.36 ± 13.94

33.21 ± 17.58

33.52 ± 19.05

30.89 ± 15.79

29.77 ± 15.44

29.00 ± 14.46

 fV20 (%)

16.72 ± 10.59

17.44 ± 12.55

17.25 ± 11.90

17.09 ± 11.46

16.53 ± 10.97

16.49 ± 10.66

 fMLD (Gy)

5.59 ± 2.76

6.13 ± 3.05

6.16 ± 3.23

6.00 ± 3.06

5.82 ± 2.93

5.76 ± 2.82

Structure-based lung DVH metrics (mean values)

 V5 (%)

41.14 ± 16.31

48.81 ± 16.53

47.44 ± 17.12

45.74 ± 16.06

43.12 ± 15.94

42.55 ± 16.42

 V10(%)

25.10 ± 9.74

31.38 ± 13.44

31.56 ± 14.09

29.75 ± 11.59

28.15 ± 11.34

27.26 ± 10.29

 V20 (%)

14.48 ± 6.90

15.05 ± 6.83

15.63 ± 8.20

15.15 ± 7.80

14.99 ± 8.49

14.81 ± 7.84

 MLD (Gy)

8.52 ± 3.30

9.41 ± 3.42

9.54 ± 3.86

9.28 ± 3.66

9.18 ± 3.81

9.06 ± 3.66

  1. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01, indicate significantly decreased when compared with anatomical plan; Func_plan Top10/20/30/40/50, means top 10%/20%/30%/40%/50% percentile functional volume were defined as the high-functional lung in planning optimization