Skip to main content

Table 2 Baseline characteristics of included studies

From: Charged particle therapy for high-grade gliomas in adults: a systematic review

Studies

Country

Study design

Time range

Surgery

Radiation modality

Chemotherapy

No. of patients

Median Follow-up(mo)

Charged particle technique summary

GRS

SUB

BIO

Tsujii et al. [13]

Japan (TSU)

Prospective

1983–1990

Proton ± Photon

No

13

NG

Fitzek et al. [15]

USA (MGH)

Prospective

1992–1996

9

13

1

Proton + Photon

NG

23

33

NG

Mizoe et al. [27]

Japan (NIRS)

Prospective

1994–2002

8

8

32

Photon + Carbon ion

ACNU

48

23

NG

Mizoe et al. [27]

Japan (TSU)

Prospective

2001–2009

0

15

8

Proton + Photon

TMZ or ACNU

23

Double-scattering proton therapy

Adeberg et al. [14]

Germany (HIT)

Retrospective

2011–2015

13[10]b

Proton + Photon

TMZa

132

15

Proton beam: active raster-scan system

Vora et al. [11]

USA (Multi-institution)

Prospective

2009–2017

34

18

11

Proton alone

TMZa

63

15

NG

Kong et al. [25]

China (SPHIC)

Prospective

2015–2018

17

22

11

Proton + Carbon ion

TMZa

50

14.3

PRT/CIRT: 2–3 beams; Pencil-beam scanning system

Brown et al. [12]

USA (UT MDA)

Prospective

2013–2016

19(20)b

5[17]

2(4)

Proton vs. IMRT

TMZa

67

48.7

IMPT: Multi-or single-field optimization; Passive or active-scatter technique

  1. TSU University of Tsukuba; MGH Massachusetts General Hospital; NIRS National Institute of Radiological Sciences; HIT Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center; SPHIC Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center; UT MDA The University of Texas, MD Anderson Center; GRS Gross total resection, SUB Subtotal resection, BIO Biopsy; IMRT intensity modulated radiation therapy; ACNU Nimustine hydrochloride; TMZ Temozolomide; NG Not given concretely
  2. PRT proton radiotherapy, CIRT carbon ion radiotherapy, IMPT intensity modulated proton therapy
  3. aTMZ guided by Stupp et al.
  4. bSurgery population of IMRT group