Skip to main content

Table 8 Comparison of CIs and MUs in five groups

From: Escalation of radiotherapy dose in large locally advanced drug-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors by multi-shell simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated technique: a feasibility study

Groups

CIs

MUs

Con-IMRT

0.92

(0.909–0.938)

534.10

(365.0–772.0)

SIB10-IMRT

0.93

(0.904–0.936)

565.30

(375.0–750.0)

SIB15-IMRT

0.92

(0.899–0.935)

626.60

(426.0–784.0)

SIB20-IMRT

0.92

(0.896–0.932)

670.30

(452.0–838.0)

SIB25-IMRT

0.92

(0.902–0.926)

721.10

(495.0–832.0)

p-values

0.006*

 < 0.001**

  1. Bold represented the optimal values of parameters. It displayed the trend of each parameter more plainly
  2. *The significant difference of Pairwise comparisons for CIs: SIB10-IMRT VS SIB25-IMRT, P = 0.01
  3. **The significant differences of Pairwise comparisons For MUs: Con-IMRT VS SIB25-IMRT, P = 0.013; SIB10-IMRT VS SIB20-IMRT, P = 0.023; SIB10-IMRT VS SIB25-IMRT, P = 0.001