Skip to main content

Table 4 Number of nodes, beams, MU, CI, Dmax and HI comparison of AD-S and MLP plans

From: Applying pytorch toolkit to plan optimization for circular cone based robotic radiotherapy

  No. of nodes No. of beams MU CI HI
  AD-S MLP Ratio AD-S MLP Ratio AD-S MLP Ratio AD-S MLP Ratio AD-S MLP Ratio
Brain 52 72 0.72 83 123 0.68 26,759.4 40,348.0 0.66 1.06 1.28 0.83 1.16 1.11 1.05
55 73 0.75 151 179 0.84 23,905.8 28,069.0 0.85 1.09 1.34 0.81 1.25 1.34 0.93
63 80 0.79 119 146 0.82 24,242.7 34,516.5 0.70 1.08 1.39 0.78 1.21 1.29 0.94
59 75 0.79 130 141 0.92 21,111.5 27,985.2 0.75 1.12 1.26 0.89 1.11 1.10 1.01
54 75 0.72 134 151 0.89 14,099.2 18,766.1 0.75 1.15 1.43 0.80 1.19 1.21 0.98
65 98 0.66 160 199 0.80 26,676.5 36,531.6 0.73 1.08 1.30 0.83 1.17 1.18 0.99
0.74 (0.70–0.78) 0.83 (0.76–0.89) 0.74 (0.69–0.79) 0.82 (0.79–0.85) 0.98 (0.95–1.02)
Liver 39 51 0.77 80 100 0.80 37,693.0 46,693.2 0.81 1.10 1.29 0.85 1.19 1.17 1.02
46 65 0.71 118 135 0.87 44,690.9 48,487.5 0.92 1.09 1.35 0.81 1.09 1.09 1.00
25 38 0.66 81 100 0.81 36,108.4 46,468.6 0.78 1.07 1.32 0.81 1.22 1.20 1.02
37 59 0.63 116 143 0.81 61,853.9 76,896.0 0.80 1.07 1.4 0.76 1.11 1.09 1.02
48 62 0.77 114 130 0.88 50,577.6 82,111.8 0.62 1.13 1.38 0.82 1.27 1.31 0.97
39 53 0.74 72 94 0.77 40,155.7 54,089.8 0.74 1.05 1.35 0.78 1.44 1.41 1.02
0.71 (0.66–0.76) 0.82 (0.79–0.86) 0.78 (0.70–0.86) 0.81 (0.78–0.83) 1.01 (0.99–1.02)
All 0.73 (0.70–0.76)
p-value: 2.42 × 10–7
0.82 (0.79–0.86)
p-value: 1.91 × 10–6
0.76 (0.71–0.81)
p-value: 3.25 × 10–4
0.82 (0.80–0.83)
p-value: 4.70 × 10–9
1.00 (0.98–1.02)
p-value: 0.56
  1. The ratio column was the ratio of the AD-S over MLP. The average ratio along with 95% confidential interval (CI) was listed at the bottom of each cases