Skip to main content

Table 4 Number of nodes, beams, MU, CI, Dmax and HI comparison of AD-S and MLP plans

From: Applying pytorch toolkit to plan optimization for circular cone based robotic radiotherapy

 

No. of nodes

No. of beams

MU

CI

HI

 

AD-S

MLP

Ratio

AD-S

MLP

Ratio

AD-S

MLP

Ratio

AD-S

MLP

Ratio

AD-S

MLP

Ratio

Brain

52

72

0.72

83

123

0.68

26,759.4

40,348.0

0.66

1.06

1.28

0.83

1.16

1.11

1.05

55

73

0.75

151

179

0.84

23,905.8

28,069.0

0.85

1.09

1.34

0.81

1.25

1.34

0.93

63

80

0.79

119

146

0.82

24,242.7

34,516.5

0.70

1.08

1.39

0.78

1.21

1.29

0.94

59

75

0.79

130

141

0.92

21,111.5

27,985.2

0.75

1.12

1.26

0.89

1.11

1.10

1.01

54

75

0.72

134

151

0.89

14,099.2

18,766.1

0.75

1.15

1.43

0.80

1.19

1.21

0.98

65

98

0.66

160

199

0.80

26,676.5

36,531.6

0.73

1.08

1.30

0.83

1.17

1.18

0.99

0.74 (0.70–0.78)

0.83 (0.76–0.89)

0.74 (0.69–0.79)

0.82 (0.79–0.85)

0.98 (0.95–1.02)

Liver

39

51

0.77

80

100

0.80

37,693.0

46,693.2

0.81

1.10

1.29

0.85

1.19

1.17

1.02

46

65

0.71

118

135

0.87

44,690.9

48,487.5

0.92

1.09

1.35

0.81

1.09

1.09

1.00

25

38

0.66

81

100

0.81

36,108.4

46,468.6

0.78

1.07

1.32

0.81

1.22

1.20

1.02

37

59

0.63

116

143

0.81

61,853.9

76,896.0

0.80

1.07

1.4

0.76

1.11

1.09

1.02

48

62

0.77

114

130

0.88

50,577.6

82,111.8

0.62

1.13

1.38

0.82

1.27

1.31

0.97

39

53

0.74

72

94

0.77

40,155.7

54,089.8

0.74

1.05

1.35

0.78

1.44

1.41

1.02

0.71 (0.66–0.76)

0.82 (0.79–0.86)

0.78 (0.70–0.86)

0.81 (0.78–0.83)

1.01 (0.99–1.02)

All

0.73 (0.70–0.76)

p-value: 2.42 × 10–7

0.82 (0.79–0.86)

p-value: 1.91 × 10–6

0.76 (0.71–0.81)

p-value: 3.25 × 10–4

0.82 (0.80–0.83)

p-value: 4.70 × 10–9

1.00 (0.98–1.02)

p-value: 0.56

  1. The ratio column was the ratio of the AD-S over MLP. The average ratio along with 95% confidential interval (CI) was listed at the bottom of each cases