|
Ma et al. [21] 6–12 field IMRT, MI LN incl.
|
28% ± 2
|
15.1 Gy ± 1.7
|
12% ± 11
|
2.3 Gy ± 1.3
|
–
|
–
|
2% ± 1
|
0.98 Gy ± 0.46
|
|
Nicols et al. [22] 2 field VMAT, MI LN incl.
|
23.3% ± 0.8
|
–
|
37.8% ± 4.9
|
–
|
16.3% ± 0.2
|
–
|
–
|
1.5 Gy ± 0.1
|
|
Zhao et al. [23] 2 field VMAT, MI LN incl.
|
17.7% ± 4.1
|
7.9 Gy ± 2.2
|
–
|
–
|
10.3% ± 5.7
|
6.5 Gy ± 16.6
|
–
|
-
|
|
Lai et al. [24] 2 field VMAT, MI LN excl.
|
23.1% ± 2.3
|
13.5 Gy ± 0.6
|
44.5% ± 6.5
|
5.1 Gy ± 0.7
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
3.1 Gy ± 0.3
|
|
Boman et al. [7] diff VMAT techniques, MI LN partly incl.
|
26–37%
|
14.4–18.6 Gy
|
3.0–2.7%
|
0.7–4.1Gy
|
–
|
–
|
6–40%
|
2–6 Gy
|
|
Balaji et al. [9] hybrid (3DCRT + VMAT), MI LN excl.
|
23–24%
|
12.7–14.3 Gy
|
0.07-11.9%
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
|
Doi et al. [8] hybrid (IMRT + VMAT), MI LN excl.
|
23.7% ± 6.4
|
12.0 Gy ± 2.4
|
5.2% ± 4.0
|
1.3 Gy ± 0.6
|
11.8% ± 3.3
|
6.7 Gy ± 3.8
|
–
|
–
|
|
This study hybrid (IMRT + VMAT), MI LN incl.
|
18.9% ± 3.7
|
10.9 Gy ± 1.5
|
10.2% ± 5.9
|
2.2 Gy ± 0.6
|
9.5% ± 1.9
|
6.5 Gy ± 0.9
|
2.4% ± 3.9
|
1.7 Gy ± 0.6
|
