A feasibility study for in vivo treatment verification of IMRT using Monte Carlo dose calculation and deep learning-based modelling of EPID detector response

Table 1 The 3%/3 mm gamma pass rate for the error plans

Plan		Lung 1	Lung 2	Rectum 1	Rectum 2	Esophageal	Thymoma
No error		99.98	100.00	99.65	99.34	99.87	99.77
Dose error	Ea1	98.72	99.54	99.12	99.31	98.53	99.47
	Ea2	85.68	89.36	95.31	96.02	97.29	96.34
	Ea3	73.29	82.35	85.46	82.76	79.34	80.43
	Ea4	60.75	78.91	55.21	71.97	64.89	69.54
	Ea5	80.23	84.42	90.56	79.36	71.75	85.55
Setup error	Eb1	94.47	95.98	98.25	95.78	98.65	94.48
	Eb2	86.22	88.87	94.59	89.36	91.15	80.05
	Eb3	72.62	73.46	87.42	73.88	65.01	66.17
	Eb4	99.78	99.78	99.57	99.02	99.74	99.42
	Eb5	99.58	99.73	99.49	99.27	99.55	99.69
	Eb6	99.33	99.63	99.59	99.06	99.71	99.54
Gantry error	Ec1	97.91	99.50	91.04	98.31	98.52	97.83
	Ec2	93.22	95.26	78.04	97.41	89.26	88.43
MLC error	Ed1	4.07	4.92	5.97	5.20	6.35	6.19
	Ed2	92.13	80.48	92.55	95.57	88.28	94.84
	Ed3	14.23	26.41	22.13	21.97	16.81	13.12
	Ed4	77.44	83.80	87.20	70.80	74.04	75.78
Phantom size change	No error	100.00	99.75	99.21	99.42	100.00	98.97
	Ee1	99.95	98.26	97.34	99.13	99.54	98.64
	Ee2	93.18	94.21	91.64	93.64	94.15	94.31
	Ee3	76.16	80.15	74.97	82.35	71.07	79.29
	Ee4	55.22	50.17	64.32	48.23	40.43	53.97

ISSN: 1748-717X