Table 4 Quantitative comparison of geometric metrics with state-of-the-art segmentation algorithms
| Â | Present work | Balagopal et al. [14] | Sultana et al. [17] | Tong et al. [16] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Prostate | ||||
DSC | 0.87 ± 0.03 | 0.90 ± 0.02 | 0.90 ± 0.05 | 0.86 ± 0.06 |
HD\(_{\mathrm{avg}}\) | 1.6 ± 0.4 | – | 1.56 ± 0.37 | 1.01 ± 0.65 |
HD\(_{\mathrm{95\%}}\) | 4 ± 1 | – | 5.21 ± 1.2 | 3.51 ± 1.66 |
Bladder | ||||
DSC | 0.96 ± 0.01 | 0.95 ± 0.02 | 0.95 ± 0.02 | 0.96 ± 0.02 |
HD\(_{\mathrm{avg}}\) | 0.95 ± 0.2 | – | 0.95 ± 0.15 | 0.97 ± 0.53 |
HD\(_{\mathrm{95\%}}\) | 2.5 ± 0.5 | – | 4.37 ± 0.56 | 3.17 ± 3.61 |
Rectum | ||||
DSC | 0.89 ± 0.04 | 0.84 ± 0.04 | 0.84 ± 0.04 | 0.86 ± 0.07 |
HD\(_{\mathrm{avg}}\) | 1.4 ± 0.7 | – | 1.78 ± 1.3 | 1.22 ± 1.05 |
HD\(_{\mathrm{95\%}}\) | 5 ± 4 | – | 6.11 ± 1.5 | 4.34 ± 5.30 |