Skip to main content

Table 3 Factors associated with progression-free survival: univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models

From: Benefit of chemotherapy based on platinum with definitive radiotherapy in older patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Clinicopathologic parameters

Univariate Analysis

Multivariate Analysis

HR

95% CI

p

HR

95% CI

p

Age (years)

 ≥ 75 vs. 64–75

1.292

1.056–1.581

0.013

1.217

0.955–1.550

0.112

Gender

Male vs. Female

1.158

0.935–1. 435

0.178

   

Weight loss

Yes vs. No

0.960

0.784–1. 175

0.692

   

Chemotherapy

No vs. Yes

1.416

1.157–1. 732

0.001

1.328

1.041–1.694

0.022

RT dose (Gy)

 ≤ 58.8 vs. > 58.8

1.200

1.921–1. 564

0.176

   

Tumor location

Cervical/Upper vs. Middle/Lower

0.867

0.691–1. 088

0.219

   

Tumor length (cm)

 > 5.8 vs. ≤ 5.8

1.377

1.124–1. 687

0.002

1.179

0.950–1.465

0.135

Tumor thickness (cm)

 > 1.2 vs. ≤ 1.2

1.830

1.472–2.276

 < 0.001

1.498

1.184–1.894

0.001

T stage

T4 vs. T2/T3

1.109

0.906–1. 359

0.316

   

N stage

N2/N3 vs. N0/N1

1.589

1.262–2.001

 < 0.001

1.418

1.107–1.817

0.006

TNM stage

Stage III/Stage IV vs. Stage II

1.485

1.161–1.900

0.002

1.286

0.981–1.687

0.069

Year of diagnosis

2007–2017 vs. 2018–2020

1.345

1.033–1.752

0.028

1.293

0.986–1.695

0.063

PNI

 ≤ 41.7 vs. > 41.7

1.682

1.290–2.193

 < 0.001

1.237

0.912–1.677

0.172

NLR

 > 4.44 vs. ≤ 4.44

1.659

1.221–2.255

0.001

1.216

0.839–1.762

0.301

PLR

 > 180 vs. ≤ 180

1.507

1.193–1.902

0.001

1.140

0.849–1.529

0.384

LMR

 ≤ 3.73 vs. > 3.73

1.417

1.157–1.734

0.001

1.161

0.932–1.447

0.184

SII

 > 918 vs. ≤ 918

1.715

1.335–2.203

 < 0.001

1.246

0.890–1.744

0.200

  1. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; RT, radiotherapy; T, tumor; N, node; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis; PNI, prognostic-nutrition index; NLR, neutrophils-lymphocytes ratio; PLR, platelets-lymphocytes ratio; LMR, lymphocytes-monocytes ratio; SII, systemic immune-inflammation index