Skip to main content

Table 3 Survey questionnaire for subjective recognition by school

From: Medical student education through flipped learning and virtual rotations in radiation oncology during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross sectional research

Survey contents

2020

(n = 109)

2019

(n = 21)

2018

(n = 29)

2017

(n = 33)

2016

(n = 56)

Avg

SD

Avg

SD

Avg

SD

Avg

SD

Avg

SD

1. I was aware of the objectives and took part in the practice

4.51

0.60

4.15

0.81

4.17

0.54

3.94

0.80

4.02

0.82

2. The clinical practice was conducted as planned in advance

4.65

0.53

4.24

0.77

4.14

0.79

4.00

0.90

4.16

0.71

3. The content was appropriate at the student level

4.67

0.53

4.14

0.85

4.10

0.86

4.00

0.94

4.07

0.89

4. Clinical practice proceeded without wasting time

4.61

0.62

4.19

0.81

3.93

0.88

3.97

0.81

4.00

1.03

5. There was a chance to encounter patients with various diseases

4.54

0.66

4.14

0.85

3.93

1.00

3.85

0.91

3.73

1.04

6. There was ample opportunity for a checkup or a skill test

4.36

0.82

4.19

0.81

3.62

1.18

3.67

1.02

3.54

1.16

7. The professors were interested in student education

4.70

0.52

4.24

0.83

4.38

0.68

4.18

0.68

4.18

0.79

8. Fellows and residents were interested in student education

4.65

0.55

4.29

0.78

4.24

0.79

4.06

0.70

4.11

0.78

9. I received appropriate feedback on the clinical practice

4.64

0.59

4.25

0.85

4.10

0.77

4.06

0.79

4.02

0.86

10. I was judged on what I practiced rather than on knowledge

4.55

0.76

4.30

0.80

4.03

0.91

4.06

0.79

3.82

0.96

11. The criteria for re-training clinical practice were appropriate

4.55

0.71

4.25

0.85

4.29

0.71

4.06

0.70

12. The overall course was generally satisfactory

4.68

0.52

4.29

0.78

4.21

0.77

4.06

0.75

4.04

0.85

Overall satisfaction average

4.59

4.22

4.10

3.99

3.97