Skip to main content

Table 4 Reported outcomes of recent cervical stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy boost studies

From: Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy boost for cervical cancer when brachytherapy boost is not feasible

Authors Study type Number of patients Median follow-up (months) Pelvic RT total dose (Gy) Pelvic RT dose per fractionation (Gy) Boost total dose (Gy) Boost dose per fractionation (Gy) Local control Overall survival Progression-free survival Late toxicity
(Grade 3 or worse)
Haas et al. [12] Retrospective 6 14 50.4–61.2 1.8 19.5–20 4–6.5 100% (Overall) 100% (Overall) 100% (Overall) 0% (Overall)
Marnitz et al. [13] Retrospective 11 6 50.4 1.8 30 6 100% (Overall) 100% (Overall) 100% (Overall) 0% (Overall)
Hsieh et al. [14] Retrospective 9 NR 50–50.4 1.8–2 16–27 2–4.5 77.8% (3-year, LRC) 46.9% (3-year) 25.9%
(3-year)
0% (Overall)
Ito et al. [15] Prospective phase I 6 17 45 1.8 21–22.5 7–7.5 100% (Overall) 100% (Overall) 83.3% (Overall) 0% (Overall)
Albuquerque et al. [16] Prospective phase II 15 19 45 1.8 28 7 70.1% (2-year) 53.3% (2-year) 46.7%
(2-year)
26.7%
(2-year)
Dalwadi et al. [17] Retrospective 25 25 45–50.4 1.8 12–30 4–7 95.5% (2-year, LRC) 95.5% (2-year) NR 4.0% (Overall)
Current study Retrospective 25 34.2 44–50.4 1.8–2 20–33 4–5.5 80.9% (3-year) 77.1% (3-year) 58.5%
(3-year)
20.0% (Overall)
  1. RT, radiotherapy; NR, not reported; LRC, locoregional control