Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of the PTV dosimetry parameters of the reoptimized treatment plans (Plan_FD and Plan_UIH) and the original clinical treatment plans (Plan_Manual). All of the values are reported as the mean ± standard deviation

From: The dosimetric impact of deep learning-based auto-segmentation of organs at risk on nasopharyngeal and rectal cancer

Site/structure

Dosimetric Indices

Plan

Value

Comparison (paired t test)

Rectal/PTV

V100 (%)

Manual

97.41 ± 1.91

–

FD

96.37 ± 2.98

p = 0.35

UIH

96.49 ± 2.72

p = 0.33

D95 (cGy)

Manual

5088 ± 77

–

FD

5028 ± 66

p = 0.09

UIH

5042 ± 70

p = 0.11

D2 (cGy)

Manual

5349 ± 177

–

FD

5384 ± 167

p = 0.08

UIH

5383 ± 160

p = 0.08

Gamma Pass Rate (3 mm/3%)

FD

97.16 ± 2.43

–

UIH

97.20 ± 2.34

–

Conformity Index (CI)

Manual

0.78 ± 0.23

–

FD

0.78 ± 0.23

p = 0.52

UIH

0.78 ± 0.23

p = 0.48

Homogeneity Index (HI)

Manual

0.10 ± 0.08

–

FD

0.10 ± 0.06

p = 0.64

UIH

0.10 ± 0.06

p = 0.63

NPC/PTV70.4

V100 (%)

Manual

93.39 ± 0.94

–

FD

92.75 ± 2.03

p = 0.39

UIH

92.28 ± 2.00

p = 0.12

D95 (cGy)

Manual

6984 ± 25

–

FD

6978 ± 31

p = 0.66

UIH

6962 ± 32

p = 0.16

D2 (cGy)

Manual

7425 ± 270

–

FD

7445 ± 287

p = 0.17

UIH

7423 ± 276

p = 0.92

Gamma Pass Rate (3 mm/3%)

FD

99.20 ± 1.07

–

UIH

96.35 ± 2.34

–

Conformity Index (CI)

Manual

0.72 ± 0.05

–

FD

0.70 ± 0.04

p = 0.23

UIH

0.70 ± 0.06

p = 0.24

Homogeneity Index (HI)

Manual

0.12 ± 0.05

–

FD

0.12 ± 0.05

p = 0.33

UIH

0.12 ± 0.04

p = 0.58