Skip to main content

Table 3 CNAO LEM rectum constraints for 12-, 8-, and 4-fraction CIRT converted based on two strategies

From: Conversion and validation of rectal constraints for prostate carcinoma receiving hypofractionated carbon-ion radiotherapy with a local effect model

dDLEM16fx

eDMKM 16fx

aDLEM 12fx

bDLEM 8fx

cDLEM 4fx

fMKM LQ

gLEM LQ

hDiff

MKM LQ

LEM LQ

Diff

MKM LQ

LEM LQ

Diff

D10cc ≤ 54.00

39.99

45.97

49.14

6.90%

36.53

42.59

16.58%

23.94

32.60

36.19%

D5cc ≤ 61.00

49.84

51.70

55.30

6.96%

40.73

47.70

17.12%

26.62

36.28

36.30%

D1cc ≤ 66.00

57.31

55.97

59.69

6.65%

43.97

51.33

16.75%

28.67

38.88

35.59%

  1. aThe LEM rectum constraints for 12-fraction CIRT [Gy (RBE)]
  2. bThe LEM rectum constraints for 8-fraction CIRT [Gy (RBE)]
  3. cThe LEM rectum constraints for 4-fraction CIRT [Gy (RBE)]
  4. dThe CNAO rectum constraints for 16-fraction CIRT of absolute volumes [Gy (RBE)]
  5. eThe MKM constraints which were backward converted from CNAO rectum constraints based on our RBE-conversion model [Gy (RBE)]
  6. fThe LEM rectum constraints converted from CNAO constraints by MKM LQ strategy
  7. gThe LEM rectum constraints converted from LEM LQ strategy
  8. hDifference = (LEM LQ-MKM LQ)/MKM LQ*100%