Skip to main content

Table 4 Patient position uncertainty: two formations with 28 scenarios

From: Evaluation of plan quality and robustness of IMPT and helical IMRT for cervical cancer

Axes Endpoints

One creation with 12 scenarios

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

X (mm)

5

āˆ’5

0

0

0

0

5

āˆ’5

0

0

0

0

Y (mm)

0

0

5

āˆ’5

0

0

0

0

5

āˆ’5

0

0

Z (mm)

0

0

0

0

5

āˆ’5

0

0

0

0

5

āˆ’5

CT density

2%

2%

2%

2%

2%

2%

āˆ’2%

āˆ’ā€‰2%

āˆ’ā€‰2%

āˆ’ā€‰2%

āˆ’ā€‰2%

āˆ’ā€‰2%

Diagonal Endpoints

The other creation with 16 scenarios

Ā 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

XY (mm)

2.9

2.9

āˆ’2.9

āˆ’ā€‰2.9

āˆ’ā€‰2.9

2.9

2.9

āˆ’ā€‰2.9

2.9

2.9

āˆ’2.9

āˆ’ā€‰2.9

YZ (mm)

2.9

2.9

2.9

2.9

āˆ’2.9

āˆ’ā€‰2.9

āˆ’ā€‰2.9

āˆ’ā€‰2.9

2.9

2.9

2.9

2.9

XZ (mm)

2.9

āˆ’2.9

2.9

āˆ’2.9

āˆ’ā€‰2.9

āˆ’ā€‰2.9

2.9

2.9

2.9

āˆ’2.9

2.9

āˆ’2.9

CT density (%)

2%

2%

2%

2%

2%

2%

2%

2%

āˆ’2%

āˆ’ā€‰2%

āˆ’ā€‰2%

āˆ’ā€‰2%

Ā 

13

14

15

16

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

XY (mm)

āˆ’2.9

2.9

2.9

āˆ’2.9

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

YZ (mm)

āˆ’2.9

āˆ’2.9

āˆ’2.9

āˆ’ā€‰2.9

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

XZ (mm)

āˆ’2.9

āˆ’2.9

2.9

2.9

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

CT density (%)

āˆ’2%

āˆ’2%

āˆ’2%

āˆ’2%

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 
  1. X right-Left, Y Inferior-Superior, Z posterior-anterior