Skip to main content

Table 1 Cost functions used in robust optimization

From: Evaluation of plan quality and robustness of IMPT and helical IMRT for cervical cancer

Region of interest

Dose Objective

Weight

Robust

CTV

Minimum dose 46.8ā€‰Gy

70

On

Uniform dose 47ā€‰Gy

80

On

Maximum dose 48G y

50

On

External

Dose fall-off: high dose 46.8ā€‰Gy, low dose 20ā€‰Gy, 10-mm distance

10

Ā 

3-mm ring

Max EUD 45ā€‰Gy, Aā€‰=ā€‰150

5

Ā 

10-mm ring

Max EUD 20ā€‰Gy, Aā€‰=ā€‰150

5

Ā 

Bladder

Max Dose 48ā€‰Gy

10

Ā 

Max EUD 30ā€‰Gy, Aā€‰=ā€‰2

5

On

Rectum

Max Dose 48ā€‰Gy

10

On

Max EUD 30ā€‰Gy, Aā€‰=ā€‰2

5

Ā 

Spinal cord

Max Dose 10ā€‰Gy, A

2

Ā 

Bowel

Max Dose 48ā€‰Gy

15

Ā 

Max EUD 30ā€‰Gy, Aā€‰=ā€‰2

5

Ā 

Sigmoid

Max Dose 48ā€‰Gy

15

Ā 

Max DVH 40ā€‰Gy, 20%

10

Ā 

Femoral heads

Max EUD 15ā€‰Gy, Aā€‰=ā€‰2

2

Ā